2006 Webby Award Winners Announced 116
Wired is reporting that the winners for the 2006 Webby Awards have been announced and the usual suspects have dominated the scene. From the article: "With a record 65 award categories, this year's Webby honorees ranged from well-known sites like the (Washington Post, a popular vote winner for best newspaper site, to more obscure newcomers, like Remember Segregation, named best home page. As in years past, the honoree list included several winners of multiple awards, along with perennial favorites that have won Webbys previously."
Summary Incomplete (Score:5, Funny)
Come on!
Re:Summary Incomplete (Score:4, Funny)
Yeah, I couldn't figure out how they managed to miss that. After all, Slashdot introduced the site to a whole new audience!
Re:Summary Incomplete (Score:2)
I think you're thinking of Goatse.
Re:Summary Incomplete (Score:1)
Fucked Company and Something Awful had much to do with the desensitizing of viewers. On FC I can't remember many threads when the first reply was "don't click! goatse!" because, well, it was.
It still amazes me how many people I can freak out with that image.
Re:Summary Incomplete (Score:2)
Re:Summary Incomplete (Score:1)
Re:Summary Incomplete (Score:1)
Re:we-huh? (Score:2)
Re:we-huh? (Score:2)
Google Earth named best visual design (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Google Earth named best visual design (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Google Earth named best visual design (Score:4, Funny)
Geoff
Re:Google Earth named best visual design (Score:1)
Re:Google Earth named best visual design (Score:1)
That's the same line people hear Tom Cruise mutter sometime in February/March of every year.
Take it you weren't nominated?
Re:Google Earth named best visual design (Score:1)
The design of that page is pretty breathtaking!
Webbies? How about the Flashies? (Score:5, Insightful)
Flash *IS* cross-browser. (Score:1, Funny)
You don't see me whining that gmail doesn't work in lynx. Grow up. The plugin takes what, 1 second to install?
Oh, I know I know, "But I don't want it".
If you don't want to install technology to allow you to view web pages, you should not be posting on an article about awards to many webpages. You should fully expect
I'm 32. (Score:2, Insightful)
Flash is just glitz. Yes, anyone who puts information that you are searching for into a flash needs to be shot. But there's more to life than textual information. We have gone way past the days of Lynx and Gopher, which I remember fondly.
You, sir, resist progress. Here's a bad car metaphor (seems to be a slashdot thing): You want a corvette, but you are unwil
You browse WITH IMAGES TURNED OFF?! (Score:1)
However, you are in no position to complain about new web technology when you disable OLD web technology that is 15+ years old (images).
I think the fact that you disable images completely proves the gist of what I was said. You cripple your machine intentionally, then complain when other people use features you have disabled.
You are greatly raising smug levels. This is bad for the environment.
A.D.D. (Score:1)
Re:A.D.D. (Score:1)
Re:Flash *IS* cross-browser. (Score:5, Insightful)
But everybody still hates it.
Flash is like Chicken Pox. You know you have to get it eventually, and you're sort of grateful that you did. But the expierience is often very ichy and nauseating.
Re:I agree to an extent. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:I agree to an extent. (Score:1)
And: Your whole argument is a strawman. Flash is usually glitz, not content. Chrome on your bumpers. Unless you have a habit of bookmarking individual page elements rather than a page, your comment is completely non-applicable.
Furthermore, I already said earlier that anyone who puts valuable c
Re:I agree to an extent. (Score:2)
And: Your whole argument is a strawman. Flash is usually glitz, not content.
How's it a strawman when I see content inside Flash all the time? I don't really have any problems with Flash for some limited applications (e.g. web games), but any defense of Flash should begin by acknowledging that 80% of the time,
I think "misused" is taking it a bit too far. (Score:1)
The screenreader stuff can work with NO additional markup. It depends on the type of text box you use in Flash. Obviously I'm a bit rusty or I'd specify precisely what that type is. Also, although JAWS ignores it, OBJECT tags can have ALT attributes. And I still have yet to meet any of these blind friends people keep claiming to have :) But we brought a blind guy into work to test some of our flash stuff. It was i
I've only tried 2 of those so far... (Score:1)
NPGMusicClub clearly worked in HTML, I could mouseover the image placeholders as they loaded, clearly indicating HTML image links, not flash. There were flash elements. Not installing flash would certainly ugly it up. This i
You say tomato, I say toma--hmm... this joke doesn (Score:1)
Anyway...
Anyway, I don't see how "it works in javascript" is a good response. We weren't talking about javascript. My answer was accurate, but I guess one can never be too precise (accuracy vs precision) these days. I should have named every technology used. Or perhaps, you are making an argument against javascript too? My god, are abacuses and sextants and slide rules somehow involved too? :)
If you're arguing against javascript, you've really lost me now (not that you shou
Re:I agree to an extent. (Score:2)
However, that does not make it a bad technology, just a misused t
Re:Flash *IS* cross-browser. (Score:2)
I often access Gmail via elinks under linux, and have used it with Lynx - it sucks mightily, and most of the cool features, like chat, don't work - but it'll open and run :)
Not necessarily (Score:2)
Uh... What? (Score:1)
I think not.
Either I am missing your point (quite likely), or your posting was by far the most pitiful of the lot.
Re:Uh... What? (Score:2)
Why? (Score:1)
I would say, if I had to buy another machine this year, it would be nice to have an architecture that the operating systems of 2009 would run on.
Not that this has anything to do with the parent conversation (that I can ascertain).
Re:Why? (Score:2)
flash library
Ummm mm Mm mmmmm. ..... (Score:1)
Re:Flash *IS* cross-browser. (Score:2)
Sigh. Your post is so stupid it almost physically hurts me to think about it.
I can think of about 15 web browsers, which two would you be talking about?
I think you're missing the GP's point. The "Remember Segregation" page shows a shit brown page of nothing when Flash is turned off. The problem isn't tasteful us
Re:Flash *IS* cross-browser. (Score:2)
And Windows has penetrated over 90% of the x86 userbase. But I'd much rather use Linux, thanks.
of both browsers.
There are more than two, as others have said.
You don't see me whining that gmail doesn't work in lynx.
Yes it does, but with fewer features. One of the primary complaints of Flash, and particularly entirely Flash websites like these, is that they don't degrade gracefully at all -- Gmail works in lynx, Flash doesn't.
Grow up. The plugin takes what, 1 sec
Re:Flash *IS* cross-browser. (Score:1)
Oh, but images can have alt tags, right?
So can OBJECT tags.
You have to shut down one browser to launch the other? You have to set up separate user accounts to mit
You, sir, are a non-functional web user. (Score:1)
Security? Please. Don't let the flash app get me! I lost my life's work due to flash! Flash killed my parents!
PERSONAL WEB SITE (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:PERSONAL WEB SITE (Score:2)
Re:PERSONAL WEB SITE (Score:4, Funny)
Re:PERSONAL WEB SITE (Score:2, Informative)
For Firefox 1.5
->Tools
->Options
->Content
->Advanced (next to the "Enable JavaScript" checkbox)
->Uncheck "Move or resize existing windows"
In older versions, you have to open the configuration file and disable from there.
Re:PERSONAL WEB SITE (Score:3, Informative)
In the menu, click on "Edit" and go to "Preferences". When the prefereces dialog opens select the "Content" tab. Text to the checkbox and label "Enable JavaScript" click on the "Advanced" button. Uncheck "Move or resize existing windows".
Personally, I leave them all unchecked.
Re:PERSONAL WEB SITE (Score:1)
Always remember segregation (Score:2, Insightful)
Are the webbies still around? (Score:5, Informative)
I mean, I could see some industry group giving out awards, like the Academy awards, or even a bunch of trade journalists, like the Golden Globes, but the webbies are just some guys who said, "How can we make a buck off this Internet thingy? I know! We can get paid to throw a huge party and hand out some made-up awards!"
Sorry for the rant, but these guys epitomize everything that was wrong with the
+1 Insightful ... no, make that Informative (Score:2)
"International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences"? My ass. Pray, just what sciences do these esteemed luminaries represent?
Hey, America! New York needs rescuing here. Nebraska? Wisconsin? Arkansas? West Virginia? Surely there's some other state with a town
Re:+1 Insightful ... no, make that Informative (Score:2)
Re:+1 Insightful ... no, make that Informative (Score:2)
Not that I have any problem with drugs. Just shallow people.
International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences (Score:1)
"Membership in The Academy is currently by invitation only and is limited to those individuals who have catalyzed great achievements on the Internet, demonstrated extraordinary talent in a traditional medium, or who possess in-depth knowledge of new media and comprehensive familiarity with a broad range of sites within a category."
So there's
Re:Are the webbies still around? (Score:2)
Re:Are the webbies still around? (Score:2)
$245 to enter too (Score:4, Informative)
There's a good description here [sfist.com].
Breakout of the Year? (Score:5, Funny)
What's the equivalent of the Razzies [razzies.com] for websites?
Re:Breakout of the Year? (Score:1)
They would have links to odd and badly composed websites... Used to be my required reading when I went to the college library to surf the web.
Re:Breakout of the Year? (Score:1)
I used to check out LOSERS dot ORG [losers.org] as well, but that site is more a condemnation of people than of web site design.
Re:Breakout of the Year? (Score:1)
Re:Breakout of the Year? (Score:1)
Acceptance Speech... (Score:1)
I would like to thank
Seriously though, nice to see NPR getting some props.
Snopes.com is weird? (Score:2)
Did anyone notice this? (Score:5, Informative)
WEBBY AWARD WINNER
AGENCY/CREDITED ORGANIZATION
The Huffington Post HuffingtonPost.com
http://www./ [www.] huffingtonpost.com
2. http:/// [http] ariannaonline.huffingtonpost.com/
3. http://www.webbyawards.com/about/index.php [webbyawards.com]:
The Academy is an intellectually diverse organization that includes members such as musicians Beck and David Bowie, Internet inventor Vint Cerf, political columnist Arianna Huffington...
It looks like 500 members of the Academy is a huge pool to pick the ~50 (?) winners from...
These awards don't carry any weight... (Score:1)
Re:These awards don't carry any weight... (Score:2)
Use Stumble Upon for real site diversity (Score:2)
Did I win? (Score:3)
Chase was nominated (Score:5, Funny)
I also forwarded the email to my associates, Panikovsky and Balaganov, I thought they would enjoy the services of such a nice company.
At least (Score:1)
MySpace.com won (Score:2)
Was that a low blow?
Why, yes. Yes it was.
Exhaustive Search (Score:2, Informative)
"After an exhaustive search of about 38 web sites we have chosen the top 37 in a variety of categories. Although we realize there are about 14 billion web sites we did not visit, we feel pretty good about our choices."
The Onion as a news site? (Score:3, Interesting)
Like a Democrat on voting day... (Score:2, Funny)
healthline.com (Score:1, Informative)
Wonderbra? Big surprise (Score:2)
webby awards ruled by too much flash (Score:2)
By the number of flash winners it's clear that the webby's are still out of touch with reality.
No porn on the web (Score:1)
Very stange considering that porn is largely responible for the growth of the web.
Webby Schmebby...they missed some great sites (Score:1)
Weak weak weak
There's something wrong here... (Score:1)
My favourite home page (Score:1)
Re:Remember Segetation? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Remember Segetation? (Score:2)
Re:Remember Segetation? (Score:2)
And assuming you don't mind heavy Flash usage, it is a nice site.
Re:Remember Segetation? (Score:2)
First of all it uses the silhouette of Martin Luther King, Jr. as a thermometer bar to load the page. When your activist is fully black, your page is loaded. Not horribly disrespectful, but getting into strange territory.
And secondly, after the immediate shock of being presented with "are you white or colored" we're brought to the same page. So while the point of the site (and arguably this country) is "there is no separate but equal
Re:Remember Segetation? (Score:1)