SGI Files Chapter 11 Bankruptcy 316
audi100quattro writes "The WSJ has a story about SGI filing for bankruptcy, but the SGI Investor's Relation page doesn't say anything." Nothing else really known at this point, but this is not unexpected.
Sad (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm sad to see them go. Not surprised, but still a bit sad.
Erwin will need a new home...
To be perfectly honest... (Score:5, Insightful)
Unexpected (Score:5, Insightful)
Old age is the most unexpected [accelerating.org] of things that can happen to a man. -- Trotsky
Re:Does this suprise anyone? (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't think they stopped doing what they were doing - they just never came up with a strategy to handle the new reality.
Re:Does this suprise anyone? (Score:5, Insightful)
Big hardware companies need to seriously change their outlook - if it can be done with a PC, it will eventually be done with a PC cheaply, the question is not what the "box" does, it's who's the best at providing the service.
Re:To be perfectly honest... (Score:1, Insightful)
Some would think this is precisely what Belluzzo had in mind all along--to kill SGI. As a former HP employee, I wouldn't trust Belluzzo to wash my car.
Was anyone surprised Ricky ended up at Microsoft?
They needed to repeat the success of the Indy. (Score:1, Insightful)
For many, the Indy proved to be a gateway system. Developers or graphics artists would purchase an Indy, become quite happy with it, and then go on to purchase higher-end SGI hardware when the need arose.
The Opteron provided an opportunity for them to repeat that feat. They could have released a low-cost, high-quality workstation based around that CPU. Had they beaten Sun, HP, and others, they could have had a large chunk of the market. They could have even used the distinctive blue/teal case of the Indy to appeal to former users.
In addition to that, they could have tweaked a system such as FreeBSD to run very well on their new Opteron-based system. Unfortuantely, IRIX development has lagged recently, and is just not up to par with other UNIX systems of today. FreeBSD, however, with SGI-specific modifications could have proved to be a real winner.
Re:Does this suprise anyone? (Score:3, Insightful)
So, in a way, gross mismanagement over a period of about a decade. The amazing thing is that it took so long to finally go bankrupt. Pity, as I remember my Indigo2 SolidImpact (with the CrystalEyes stereo adapter) rather fondly. On the other hand, I don't remember my days securing Irix nearly as fondly. Another contender who actually believed their PR, and lost sight of their market.
SGI is now a good bargain (Score:5, Insightful)
What do you get (of any value) when you snap up SGI?
-XFS/XVM/CXFS - one of the best storage environments out there in production
-OpenGL/VAN
-DMF/TMF
-GRIO
-Numerous other subsystems to IRIX/Linux
Their hardware hasn't kept pace as well. However, there's still a lot to like about the architecture (HyperTransport looks so much like SGI-Craylink). They're about the only ones who managed to make something useful of Itanium (another straw on the camel's back). Perhaps someone could do something with it, provided they supply the needed R&D money.
To the memory of SGI (Score:2, Insightful)
I am sorry for SGI breaking down. But I hope that Apple can learn from their mistakes. It's too late for Sun I guess.
I shall remember you, SGI, and I will think of you every time I play with my future girlfriend.
Oh No! (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Press Release (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:They needed to repeat the success of the Indy. (Score:3, Insightful)
There are few things that spot opportunities as well as companies competing for space. The lack of offerings indicates the lack of a consumer market - it indicates that those who want non x-86 Unix-like desktops (and I would love to see a Niagara, MIPS, XCPU, Cell or ARM-based desktop computer - I love diversity) are very few.
Modern x86 PCs, as dull as they are, are quite capable Unix workstations and, in many respects, are well beyond any desktop system SGI ever made.
Re:The death of SGI (Score:3, Insightful)