Microsoft/Yahoo Merger to Take on Google? 183
Mz6 writes "One faction within Microsoft is promoting a bold strategy in the company's battle with Google:
Join forces with Yahoo. That would be a major departure for Microsoft, the software maker that is legendary for toiling on its own until it captures a new market. However, people familiar with the situation say that Microsoft has considered the idea of acquiring a stake in Yahoo, and that the two companies have discussed possible options over the course of the past year. Currently, talks of an equity stake in Yahoo don't appear to be active, given that Microsoft is focusing on a reorganization that it hopes will re-energize its effort to compete with Google. Two wild cards remain: Steve Ballmer, who has historically shunned large acquisitions, and Yahoo co-founder Jerry Yang, whose support would be key to bringing the necessary Yahoo shareholders on board for a deal. Mr. Yang and others in Yahoo would be hard-pressed to sell to Microsoft, people close to the company say. However, people familiar with Microsoft say its top management remains open to a deal with Yahoo as pressure grows to perform better against Google. The increasing pressure on Microsoft -- not just from Google, but also from its own shareholders, as well as from advertisers that want an alternative to Google -- could help to justify the acquisition or some kind of business collaboration, these people say."
Well... (Score:4, Insightful)
Microsoft/Yahoo Merger (Score:1, Insightful)
Yahoo will loose.. (Score:3, Insightful)
One of my favorite qoutes (Score:5, Insightful)
"The lamb may lay down with the lion, but the lamb won't get much sleep at nights".
Considering MSs history of screwing its partners, Yahoo would be insane to 'partner' with MS.
What planet is the summary from? (Score:5, Insightful)
That would be a major departure for Microsoft, the software maker that is legendary for toiling on its own until it captures a new market.
Huh? This is just plain not true.
--MarkusQ
Antitrust concerns? (Score:3, Insightful)
Then there's the problem that MS has traditionally managed to fsck up most companies they've partnered with, so why would Yahoo willingly get themselves into that situation?
Re:Google = Dead Engine Walking (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:It's a Trick!!! (Score:2, Insightful)
Google isn't just a search engine. Ever heard of Google local? Google maps? GMail? Google Desktop Search? Ad$en$e?
And microsoft also offers most of these things (Google search -> MSN; GMail -> hotmail; GDS -> MSN Desktop Search; Google maps -> Virtual Earth/Terraserver; and Microsoft's working on a advertizing program ala adsense IIRC...
Even if google doesn't make OS'es or office suites, they both compete against each other in a LOT of [overlapping] fields. And google does fund some of Microsoft products' competitors (like Firefox - competiong against IE).
There's FAR more to it than just a "search engine". And as far as search engines go, google may have been king for a while, but I'm thinking this may change soon. Their results have been very much downhill lately (IMHO). Every time I search for something, half of what it finds is links to expired ebay auctions, onlines stores that sells the product (newegg/amazon/bhphoto/...) and often has none of what I'm looking for, tons of pages of linkfarms and other crap (like a bunch of crappy unrelated blogs). Come to think of it, I just may try MSN today... (Not that I like MS, MSN, passport or all that crap, but I want good search results, and google is starting to deceive and seemingly isn't doing anything about it - other than perhaps cry "but MS will use their own search engine by default for their own software!" - oh wait. That isn't helping their results... If their results are good, people will come - no need to resort to crying like that. Google, get working on fixing your results already.
Re:Isn't Yahoo! associated with Google ? (Score:5, Insightful)
Google has become arrogant (Score:2, Insightful)
They have become more arrogant, bought their own lobbyists and, started growing by just buying a lot of smaller companies.
I think a little healthy competition will do good to Google, just like it will do good to Microsoft (remember: IE7 exist largely because of Firefox).
wall street reply (Score:2, Insightful)
GOOG - no change
Toiling on it's own!? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:What planet is the summary from? (Score:2, Insightful)
Why is it always "Big Company vs. Big Company"? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Huh? (Score:2, Insightful)
If this is true. . . (Score:3, Insightful)
Prior to this, they used to leverage their OS monopoly, and bundle "free" tools that would enbrace and extend standards in order to capture marketshare in new markets.
Since they're not going to be able to do that any time in the near future (ie. Vista is delayed, and even when it does ship, it's not going to be widely adopted with any speed, due to hardware requirements, different operating paradigm, and evil DRM), they have to take a different approach.
I find that very interesting. I wonder if it's true - and is this a voluntary change in tactics, or a necessary change due to reduced monopoly power?
Re:It's a Trick!!! (Score:3, Insightful)
Hmmmm (Score:2, Insightful)