RIM Rejects More Patent Infringement Allegations 127
SilentOne writes "Waterloo based Research In Motion is facing new allegations of patent violation. Visto Corp. of Redwood Shores, Calif., said Monday that it had won an infringement case against Seven Networks, also of California, and is now targeting RIM for infringing four patents, including three involved in the Seven action. "Our case against RIM is based on similar technology, law and patents as the case we have just won," Visto said in a statement. "
More lawsuits... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:More lawsuits... (Score:4, Insightful)
Rather than produce the best product at the lowest cost, you buy the legislation to give you a competitive advantage. Rather than create something new, you file some patents and claim other people's work as your own.
It's difficult to find a solution; the interwoven laws and old-buddy networks are so deeply entrenched that it'll take some major overhaul to set things straight. I really hope that the pseudocapitalists who strap on our shackles notice the chains hanging from their own ankles, as well.
The solution, the general strike. (Score:1)
Feeling? (Score:2)
Advice for RIM: Help abolish Software Idea Patents (Score:4, Interesting)
It would be great to see RIM financially support initiatives like NoSoftwarePatents.org [slashdot.org] and SWPat.ffii.org [ffii.org], whose aims are to stop the legalized extortion [nosoftwarepatents.com] by the Patent Leeches and Patent Mafia [nosoftwarepatents.com].
Dont trust them (Score:2)
Re:Advice for RIM: Help abolish Software Idea Pate (Score:2)
"...computers are ubiquitous -- and as a result, so is software authorship...Thus, a patent on a drug creates potential liability for those companies in the pharmaceutical business, while a software patent creates potential liability for any company with its own website or
Re:More lawsuits... (Score:1)
Hit the nail on the head, you did.
It's a competetive market out there, yes, I understand that.
But get innovative (ie:stop trying to rest on your laurels), or get left behind. This has nothing to do with consumer's rights, nothing to do with justice, this only came after the recent trial. Why, if this is really an issue, did it wait until now?
Smacks of oppurtinism to me, not legitimate in my book.
Re:More lawsuits... (Score:2)
But there is more litigation ALSO becuase there is more theft. Using your logic, its not OK for a small company to fight back against a bigger company, just becuase that bigger company put out a product first.
Thats not fair, and that ruins innovation too.
Small companies with patents have little recourse in the marketplace outside of lawsuits if a big player starts using their tech. It takes big money to compete with deep pocketed companies, and its just no
Yea, software patents are bad. (Score:4, Informative)
The link supplied is to this PDF about patents [researchoninnovation.org]. It's worth your time to read about this research.
WTF?! (Score:5, Insightful)
Since when do patents do ANYTHING to protect consumers from anything?
Re:WTF?! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:WTF?! (Score:2)
This is key. Innovation will simply come from countries that don't have as restrictive laws, who will then be able to capitalize on their inventions. There are many brilliant people in the world; the patent system of the United States is going to be their scientific and innovative downfall.
Re:WTF?! (Score:2)
Patents save children (Score:2)
Re:WTF?! (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:WTF?! (Score:2)
And they have never functioned to help out small artists, not that I would care anyway since copyrights cost me easily 10x the dollar cost of what they're paid, along with substantial freedoms.
Re:WTF?! (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't know about that. They were set up with the intent of funding content creation. Copyright laws may still do that -- abused and stretched as they may be -- but software patents are actively harming the ability of engineers to function in the United States.
(And engineers who want to make a product that can be sold in the United States, which is damn near everyone.)
Re:WTF?! (Score:1)
"To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries." It's been a while since I read Jefferson's works, but I do believe he echoed these ideas. Wikipedia's nice article on the sub
Re:WTF?! (Score:2)
The problem with patents is that one entity controls access to the source. Whereas copyright controls
Re:WTF?! (Score:2)
Re:WTF?! (Score:1)
This is what many knew would happen (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:This is what many knew would happen (Score:4, Insightful)
In any case, it certainly didn't work. The moral of the story (for companies like Visto) is not "it costs a lot of money to sue RIM" it's "suing RIM gets you $612 million."
Re:This is what many knew would happen (Score:2)
Doesn't that make them an easier target for future lawsuits?
Re:This is what many knew would happen (Score:2)
Only because the judge told them to do so.
Re:This is what many knew would happen (Score:1)
Using Patents (Score:1, Redundant)
Re:Using Patents (Score:1)
Re:Using Patents (Score:1)
http://www.visto.com/partners/wireless.html [visto.com]
Well, I knowing first hand.. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. (Score:5, Funny)
Well, I sure hope you all don't lose your RIM jobs.
Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. (Score:2)
Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. (Score:2)
http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=176138&ci
Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. (Score:2)
Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. (Score:2)
Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. (Score:3, Informative)
Thank God you're not the guy in charge of insuring shareholder value for RIM - you know - the people that own the company - yeah, they bought it, with their own evil money. Wanna see how far an $80 stock price can fall when you remove the source of the majority of its revenue? Wanna see if it makes any difference to a Canadian company if a US court rules against 'em? Think the Canucks are gonna send the mounties to the border, or enforce the US
It does make a difference (Score:2)
Not that I think this is right, mind you, but we did elect the "let's bridge the imaginary gap between Canada and the US that 9-11 caused" conservatives, and minority government or not there will be nothing but red tape to protect RIM at this point.
Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. (Score:2)
RIMM had Income of $361.2 Million on sales of $1.9 Billion in the last 12 months.
Of that $361.2 Million, they paid out $612 Million in the last litigation, plus how much in future licensing fees? Now another hyena is sniffing.
Yeah, I just bet the shareholders are happy to be going in that direction!
Really hard to figure out why you'll never run a major corporation.
Somehow I have the same feeling about you.
Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. (Score:1, Troll)
Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. (Score:4, Interesting)
It would just be a smaller world economy. US debt is well on the way to making this situation anyway. Ever wonder why the Canadian economy gaining against the US? The US has a larger growing season, Canada has a population of California, but Canada is gaining.
Look to
The Chinese are gaining ground as well, not to mention the Japaneese and European countries. The US is in sad sad shape compared to what it should be, and you've only your government to blame.
Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. (Score:2)
My point was, a population 10 times the size, with all the advantages geographically that the US has should be doing way better then Canada.
Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. (Score:3)
Since the US closed the border, now we do. Now we have the jobs, now we have the markup, now we can sell frozen steak to the EU and make all the profit.
The US are not our friends. They are nothing but a weight around our neck, and when incidents like thi
Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. (Score:2)
The flip side is, in the past, Canada would get a lot of manufacturing jobs because the dollar was cheaper. Over the years wages between Canada and the US have achieved some sort of parity. A Candian welder get's paid more Canadian dollars then his US counterpart, but the per US dollar amount is fairly close.
Now the dollar is rising and the Canadian wages are suddenly more then the US workers. Guess what happens to those jobs. Alberta is doing great. Ontario (the manufacturin
Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. (Score:2, Interesting)
No.
While I am not familiar with the price differences taken over the entire spectrum of products (and too lazy to investigate), you are wrong, at least about specific products, and my guess would be that you are wrong in general, as well--at least when comparing US prices to prices where I
Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. (Score:2)
As of April 6 2005 of the 159 orders placed for A380 Airbus aicraft, only 30 were for US airlines. This is about proportional to the the US's economic weight in the world, about 20% of the global economy. So I guess we don't need you and that Airbus would have gone ahead as a project even if there was no US.
Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. (Score:2)
Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. (Score:2)
What other group had done more to scare the h*ll of out of the ordinary citizen than Lawyers? and usually in a personal way rather than in a general "we hate the US/UK/EU/UN/Bagels way"
Terrorism, while being a real threat, is statistically, not nearly as dangerous as a drunken moron in a SUV, How many of us spend our time worrying about that?
I doubt I would want to be an innovator in a field controlled by
Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. (Score:1)
Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. (Score:2)
Better yet, open source the software, open up the blackberry to community developers, sell the hardware as an empty shell if necessary, flood the market with the devices and still provide subscription services but let the community provide the software.
Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. (Score:2)
Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. (Score:2)
Only if they lose. This isn't softball, and they've already shown that they've got the stones for hardball at RIM.
Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. (Score:2)
Re:Well, I knowing first hand.. (Score:2)
I'm sure the employees of Handspring know exactly what you feel.
http://www.pdastreet.com/articles/2002/9/2002-9-1
terrorists! (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:terrorists! (Score:5, Insightful)
Listen. Understand. That Terminator is out there. It can't be reasoned with, it can't be bargained with
That's kinda how I look at these patent-wielding law firms. As long as you have the money to pay prote^H^H^H^H^Hlicense fees they absolutely will not stop. Ever.
Re:terrorists! (Score:2)
This is the danger of paying an extortionist... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:This is the danger of paying an extortionist... (Score:2, Informative)
http://www.visto.com/partners/wireless.html [visto.com]
So uh maybe RIM is just getting its just rewards for all the sueing it did.
Those who can, do. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Those who can, do. (Score:2)
Re:Those who can, do. (Score:1)
Re:Those who can, do. (Score:2)
Those who can, do. Those who can't... (Score:5, Insightful)
What a wonderful world we'll live in when it becomes so financially risky to try anything new, out of fear of some obscure patent-camping leech stealing the investment and work it took to make that new thing.
We need patent reform: use your patent, or lose your patent.
patents? (Score:1)
So I can sue anyone I see walking to work or going for an afternoon stroll. You are allowed to drive or catch the bus, but not walk.
So its happened in Germany too :S
If Da Vinci Patented his ideas, we would all be screwed.
Re:patents? (Score:1)
Re:patents? (Score:2)
I hope it's not too late to patent running.
We need a linux based RIM alternative SOON!!! (Score:4, Insightful)
HOWEVER! This has actually produced a fertile field for alternative devices. With WindowsMobile getting more secure and more devices being wireless / wifi capable, the blackberry is no longer the only choice for corporate america (nor should it be). Microsoft is trying to play catchup by pushing Windows Mobile as real alternative to Blackberry. There is no comparison. Microsoft simply doesn't offer an end to end service like RIM. BUT if we got a VERY stable and VERY secure linux alternative (handheld and server?) it could save companies hundreds of thousands. But the service must be able to sync with Exchange / Domino and other corporate mail clients.
Coming from a company with over half a million dollar budget for mobile devices and working closely with management, I saw many in Senior management that are very AFRAID to stay with RIM. They are looking for other alternatives just in case something ELSE happens to RIM and there IS no way out the next time. They are just now looking to not "put all their eggs (for mobile email) in one basket".
Bottom line? Windows is now in the market with crappy devices (any 240 x 240 screen, Palm 700). Palm is in the market with a good device (treo 650 with 320 x 320 screen). But there is room to grow in this market.
As soon as a developer gets one of these wifi/cell-enabled devices to run a solid linux distro and get some good encryption on it, mark my words, SOME in corporate America will eat it up, especially with the cost savings. RIM proved this in a way. Blackberries are wonderful email devices. They faltered (till recently) as phone devices. They are NOT PDAs. Corporate America doesn't necessarily need all their employees to have PDA's, but many if not most need email and a viewable calendar 24/7.
Botom line: RIM made lots of money from an email device and now that corporate America is afraid of RIM someone else can cash in if they beat Microsoft to the punch..
sharks (Score:3, Insightful)
You can't hide from a business method patent. (Score:2)
These trashbags will shut down anyone. If you are making money, they will take it. If you are not they will shut you down so someone else can take it. If what people familiar with the case say is true, NTP never had a patent on a non obvious invention, they had a patent on obvious business metho
Shoot the lawyers (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Shoot the lawyers (Score:2)
On second thought, lets keep the telephone handset sanitizers. They may come in handy some day.
The saddest part... (Score:1, Informative)
Just read that NTP has a large stake in Visto. This just keeps getting better.
I hope to see NTP and Visto get driven into the ground, and RIM come out on top.
Re:The saddest part... (Score:3, Informative)
three in the Seven? (Score:1, Troll)
and this..... (Score:1)
Forget the Sirius Cybernetics marketing division (Score:2)
Or perhaps the fools in government that legitimized them in the first place. Both at once?
Re:Forget the Sirius Cybernetics marketing divisio (Score:1)
Re:Forget the Sirius Cybernetics marketing divisio (Score:1)
Please, my fellow revolutionaries- PATIENCE!
I promise you: give these fools enough rope and they will hang themselves. Give 'em a few more years and most of our work will be done for us.
Once you pay the Danegeld... (Score:2)
shake em down! (Score:2)
Moral of the story..When the bully comes after you the FIRST time, defend yourself to the end. Use a baseball bat if nessessary.
"Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't" - Thomas Jefferson
The problem is not software patents, its the court (Score:1)
RIM (Score:1)
Re:Coincidence? (Score:2)
And to think how close I was to getting myself modded Redundant. Gotta love big displays.
Re:Coincidence? (Score:5, Interesting)
NTP owns a stake in Visto, Bloomberg News reported.
I can't place it, but something just doesn't seem right...why does the idea of NTP using RIM's money to go after RIM again come to mind?