Google Propping Up Typosquatting Biz? 279
An anonymous reader writes "Google is making oodles of cash placing ads on a vast sea of otherwise vacant Web sites that do little more than capitalize on misspelled domain name names, according to a story in today's Washington Post. From the story: 'Google Inc., which runs the largest ad network on the Internet, is making millions of dollars a year by filling otherwise unused Web sites with ads. In many instances, these ad-filled pages appear when users mistype an Internet address, such as BistBuy.com. This new form of advertising is turning into a booming business that some say is cluttering the Internet and could be violating trademark rules.'"
Dodgy Business (Score:5, Interesting)
I imagine very few businesses can legitimately claim that the ads on bistbuy.com would confuse anyone looking for bestbuy.com.
Possible motivation (Score:3, Interesting)
Not saying it's the right thing to do, just an idea.
This is like real estate (Score:4, Interesting)
It's a logical progression of this thought that allows corporations to force people off their legal sites because they have the same name. You don't like EToy suing etoy? Deal with the "typosquatters."
Now you know... (Score:3, Interesting)
However in this case, Google is pretty obviously doing *evil* by the very definition of the word, and that definitely speaks bad of it.
Google specifically has tools and offers for filling vacant domains with ads... WHO would use that except domains of generic words and typosquatters? No excuses this time, Google.
Maybe a software solution? (Score:5, Interesting)
Trademark confusion (Score:3, Interesting)
Perspectives (Score:3, Interesting)
Google [google.com] made 2.253 billion USD in one quarter. While the article was vague how many millions it really is, "millions" instead of "tens of millions" or "hundreds of millions" still seems like a drop in the bucket. It goes on to imply that it's quite a bit by quoting Eric Schmidt, CEO of Google:
Google won't disclose how much revenue it is earning from ads on these types of sites, but chief executive Eric Schmidt said in an interview last week, "It's a lot of money."
Did he mean that Google makes a lot of money from ads in general or from ads on typo sites? I can't tell because the article doesn't give me the source of that quote. However, I find it doubtful that Schmidt would be so explicit about Google making money off of typos, even if they did.
In any case, the issue is not as clean-cut as the article implies. Whose responsibility is it to police trademark infringements? Hasn't it always been the holder of the trademark? Google making money off of it does suggest some kind of responsbility on their part as well though. However, Google does provide an avenue for these people to complain and have the affliates delisted from their ad program.
Two points: (Score:3, Interesting)
#2: Thanks to you posting on /. to inform everyone about this, some troll will have registered the site to go to goatse.
Breaking news (Score:1, Interesting)
Nothing wrong with "typosquatters" (Score:4, Interesting)
I have to believe typosquatting has got less profitable since browsers started trying to complete what you type.
Re:In other news... (Score:1, Interesting)
Googe-parked domains [google.com]