Next Generation Spam Zombies Will Use Data Mining 133
branewashd writes "The Globe and Mail is covering some new research on the future of spam. The paper 'Spam Zombies from Outer Space', from researchers at the University of Calgary, will be presented on Sunday at the European Institute for Computer Anti-Virus Research conference. According to the paper, the next generation of spam zombies will employ 'sophisticated data mining of their victims saved email'. When a computer is turned into a spam zombie, it will first be mined of its address book, mail client configuration, and mail archives. Then the spam program will use Natural Language Processing techniques to send spam messages to the victim's contacts that look a lot like messages that the user has previously sent. The researchers predict that this will be extremely hard to detect, but they do offer a few suggestions for combating it."
The three forces driving spam (Score:5, Insightful)
Same reply for all these threads.. (Score:5, Insightful)
2. This is the fault of the legal system. Spyware is ALREADY illegal. Congress has talked about making it 'illegaler.' Someone needs to jump forth and realize the moneymaking potential that it is to sue the pants off the incessant spammers.
Again.. 99.9% of spyware problems can be fixed by just running in limited user mode. Ubuntu has the right idea..
What piques me about the article... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Some will be lucky (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:What piques me about the article... (Score:3, Insightful)
Look at it this way. If Linux was the dominant platform, the issue would still exist. Let's assume for a second that Linux is 100% secure. The user will still see something online that says "Click here for free screensavers!" and guess what, they'll click there for free screensavers. The typical, uneducated user, would run as root all the time and install every piece of trash software they could.
This is a Windows problem because of the users, not because of Windows.
That was not (intended to be) insightful (Score:3, Insightful)
Even though I wrote it myself, I am somewhat scared about the moderation. A couple of hour ago it was 3-Funny. It was intended to be funny. Now it is 4-Insightful.
I will not assume that a lot of slashdot users will support the idea of solving problems by removing the part of the population that causes the problem. Most will be aware that a) even idiots usually have positive sides, b) an idiot in one area may be a genius in another, c) trying to fix something complex like society with a hammer will most likely not result in the society you wanted and d) that it is ethically impossible to avoid misjudgment and injustice about who is worthy existing or not. I'm a native German and due to our history we are very aware what kind of disaster one can create if you allow yourself to consider something like this an acceptable solution, so I'm basically trained to be oversensitive about this issue. But "Insightful" is still scary.