Chinese Company Produces $150 Linux PC 325
srinravi writes to mention an Ars Technica article about another ambitious 'inexpensive computer' project. A Chinese manufacturer, YellowSheepRiver, is aiming to make available a $150 Linux PC built with inexpensive hardware components. From the article: "Urging potential customers to 'Say no to Wintel,' YellowSheepRiver is devoted to using its own Linux distribution and hardware designed and manufactured by Chinese companies. YellowSheepRiver hopes to close the "digital divide" by making computer technology available to the Chinese public at an affordable price. The Municator, which comes with 256MB of RAM, uses a unique 64-bit CPU with an instruction set based on a subset of the MIPS architecture. Designed by a Chinese company called BLX, the the cheap chip is clocked at 400 or 600MHZ and supposedly provides performance comparable to that of an Intel P3."
Danger for GNU/linux (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:1 problem (Score:5, Insightful)
thin client? (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:1 problem (Score:5, Insightful)
You don't have to. You just have to convince them it's a better bang for the buck. Not everyone drives a Mercedes - and it's not because they think their Kias are better cars.
Re:Such a (sucky) deal! (Score:5, Insightful)
Let's say that right now the cheapest PC you could get were $3000 (akin to the Dell $300 box), and a really good one cost $30,000 (think your $3K gaming box). Making a crappy machine for $1500 means that there are a whole bunch of folks would couldn't possibly afford a new computer who now can.
Remember, these things aren't targeted at the US market, and aren't targeted at people who can afford current prices.
Re:Why put a drive in there? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre (Score:3, Insightful)
Red Office (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:1 problem (Score:3, Insightful)
I used it for word processing, spreadsheets, charts, databases, basic programming and even games!
Our need for something faster is somewhat artificial. People don't need to have the latest and the greatest unless they want floating transparent rotating windows or to play duke nukem forever.
Our perception of utility and function has been distorted by our voracious consumerism.
By our logic and reasoning, if we were ever visited by a more advanced civilization, all of our technology would become obsolete instantly. The fact that it worked right up to that moment is completely irrelevant.
-----------
I sometimes drive my 17 year old car for fun and it works great. It is looked down upon by society, but it does the same basic tasks that the newer cars on the street can.
The sheep of things to come (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre (Score:3, Insightful)
People who already have a TV?
Is this really so bad? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre (Score:5, Insightful)
They see no need to be tied to the X86 ISA.
It makes a lot of sense in that it helps China become more independent of the West and possible make the west more dependant on China.
You want to sell systems to the Chinese government? Someday it may have to have a Chinese CPU in it.
Re:Its a bunch of crap (Score:1, Insightful)
Stupid reply. The whole point of the cheap entry computer is because of low incomes. I could just pay 20k more than 15k and get a BMW instead of a Hundai, but maybe I don't have that extra 20k.
I can't believe someone serious asserts something based on "you could just pay 133% more..."
Interesting Uses (Score:3, Insightful)
I challenge anyone here to actually go out and purchase the equivalent, new (not refurbished/used,) components and put it together into such a small footprint as this thing, with the ability to power it by lithium-ion battery, for under $150 USD.
The most appealing spec to me is the size. This thing is t-i-n-y. With that in mind, here are a couple uses I have thought of for them:
1. Car PC (media player, engine performance monitor, GPS navigation.) You can roll your own Car PC's these days, but for $150?
2. Home automation controller (have a touchscreen monitor mounted into a recessed area in a wall, with this thing inside a small space, which would also be recessed into the wall, under the monitor.)
Driver Support (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Its a bunch of crap (Score:3, Insightful)
Assuming that this processor is no slower than a 600mhz Pentium III, the machine can easily run a normal set of productivity applications and access the internet. It'll be slow, but not too bad.
As other posters have stated, $150 in rural China is like half a year's pay. Paying more than twice as much for better performance isn't nessisarily the plan. It'd be like if I had gotten a BMW C series instead of my Hyundai Accent - possible, but not nessisarily economically responsible.
I disagree (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Now running Rinux (Score:1, Insightful)
Will Windows run on this "unique 64-bit CPU" made by this Chinese company? Does anyone know something about that?
Re:How much is how much? (Score:3, Insightful)
Ummm...from your own pdf:
Per capita != "household income." And, from your same source (in the same paragraph!):
So, for a urban family of three, their total household income would be $3139 ($327*3.2*3)...so a $150 computer would be ~5% of their total annual household income...
The median US household income is $43318 [google.com]. 5% of that figure is $2165--basically the price at which computers went mainstream in this country.
Re:Driver Support (Score:1, Insightful)
If there is hardware that doesn't have OSS drivers, they either won't go in, get reverse-engineered or china are making them and will take the tech.
Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre (Score:3, Insightful)
That is fine for exports. China makes lots of stuff for export that it wouldn't sell in China. The difference is anything sold in China with an Intel or AMD CPU and Windows involves money leaving China. If it exported then it is a net gain.
I'm sick and tired of this argument (Score:3, Insightful)
I do sidework where we have to worry about these kinds of things. After we find a good deal on parts we ask ourselves "Can this company supply us enough units if this product takes off?", "Is this company going to be around in 3 years?", "Are they going to be able to supply this exact product for the next 3 years?", and so forth. Long term supply of uniform parts is a HUGE deal to companies. If you interchange your parts haphazardly you will run into issues. Issues that cost money. Any money you saved by doing so will be lost in support costs.
Building a PC for your grandma and building a PC for 10,000 customers are two different ballparks. Every screwup, every tiny cost, every little bit is multiplied 10,000 times. But I suspect many on here don't understand that.
Re:I disagree (Score:3, Insightful)
Back to your original point, Seiko, Casio, and Timex all had crappy watches when they brought their first products to market. Had companies like Rolex created a new low-end brand to compete with the low end market, Seiko would have probably not grown to the size that it is today. Such business strategies are discussed in Dr. Christiensen's new book, "The Innovator's Solution". It's the same reason Intel created a separate company/brand to focus on the Celeron product to compete with AMD & Cyrix. At the time, AMD & Cyrix were eating up Intel at the low end and Intel took no notice because it actually made their high end products produce greater margins. The instant Intel started competing at the low end, they basically forced brands like Cyrix into non-existence (bought out by AMD).
Re:BLX allegedly stole MIPS architecture (Score:2, Insightful)
Absolutely! They're putting stuff on the market that otherwise be locked down by the "owner". If China sets one good standard on the planet, it would be their present attitude towards IP law. Let's hope it spreads to other parts of the world. Then we can say China actually promoted freedom. Unfortunately, the WTO will have something to say about this. And it won't be good since China will bend over to appease them.