Windows Nag Windows to Counter Piracy 548
Vicegrip writes "Microsoft is enhancing its Genuine Advantage program in the US, Australia, UK, Malaysia and NZ to now include persistent nag screens to remind that your version of Windows is not licensed. These nag screens will keep appearing until you license your version of Windows or, presumably, convince Microsoft they've made a mistake."
Best thing ever... (Score:5, Insightful)
And not at the expense of existing paying Windows customers.
I don't think Microsoft is going to be convinced otherwise, and if people are pirating when they would really not use anything else, then hell, they should pay for their Windows license.
It might move those who pirate just for fun into other OS's :-)
Re:Easy to circumvent... (Score:5, Insightful)
You, sir, are brilliant.
Of course, that's assuming that the dialog isn't modal and that it obeys whatever scheme you're using to hide the other Windows and never deliberately pops to the front of all desktops.... But Microsoft would never break functionality to wring more revenue out of....
Eh, never mind. Maybe not.
More interesting: how it's described. (Score:5, Insightful)
From my standpoint, what was more interesting was:
a) This was a high priority item. Yes, this is as important as fixing IE flaws. Surely.
b) How it's listed in the license agreement:
MICROSOFT PRE-RELEASE SOFTWARE LICENSE TERMS
MICROSOFT WINDOWS GENUINE ADVANTAGE VALIDATION TOOL
So they're putting BETA software into high priority updates?
Planet Microsoft (Score:5, Insightful)
Do these guys WANT to drive users to open source?
Ed Almos
Re:Now that's funny! (Score:5, Insightful)
DMCA: Anybody pointing to or discussing a crack .. (Score:2, Insightful)
Welcome to the new world order.
Re:obligatory (Score:4, Insightful)
With some time and testing it would be possible to come up with a diff of both before and after its installation and come up with manual removal process... Sure it can be beaten, but I doubt this method is meant to be impenetrable from the l33t hax0rs of the world, instead they are trying to stop casual piracy and those who unknowingly purchases illegal copies of Windows.
Re:This is priceless! (Score:2, Insightful)
I had to do the same thing with Win ME. It pained me to say that Win 98 was the better alternative, but compared to Morons Edition, it was true.
Comment removed (Score:3, Insightful)
I hope not! (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't think all of the current Windows users are willing to pay for Windows, and if they are forced into doing it, there's a good chance they'll look elsewhere. Those that do decide to pay for Windows will also eventually be tempted by any alternative that has zero cost.
In trying to make all users pay for Windows, Microsoft would be shooting themselves in the foot, and I think they realise that they need illegitimate copying. Not too much, but not too little, either...
What type of nag message windows? (Score:4, Insightful)
Maybe they could have the annoying Search Mutt take up the left hand window and do a little animation while I have to figure out how to turn it off?
Or they could have that bastard Clippy come on screen and tell me something like "It looks like your copy of Microsoft Windows" isn't licensed properly." with a list of solutions on how I can throw more money at MS.
Lastly there is the universal message box that could pop up right in the middle of the screen stealing focus. That's a classic.
Microsoft Windows has so many annoyances to choose from that most users will probably just click OK when the message box pops up. After all, it's worked so well for WinZip.
Re:Planet Microsoft (Score:2, Insightful)
Do these guys WANT to drive users to open source?
Are you trying to make a joke here? The firewall is FAR from "crippled". That was mearly spin put on the article to continue the "Microsoft is evil" jabber.
Frankly speaking, it's going to take far far far less technical knowledge to turn on the outbound firewall than what it will take to download a Linux Distro and put it on CD. That's the long and short of it.
About a week ago there was an article about Linux snobs, these kinds of posts prove the arguement. LINUX ADVOCATES: Please understand that most users will be able to turn out the outbound firewall and probably won't have a problem getting past these "nag" screens. Most windows users who even know what Linux is still don't even know how to choose what distro is best for them let alone the install procedure for even getting to screen one. That is just part of the failings of the OSS community... you think that since you understand Linux everyone else will too. And if you honestly think that these two potential shortcomings in windows is going to convert even one user than you are completely out of your mind!
Why I pirate Windows. (Score:1, Insightful)
However, sometimes I have no choice. I HAVE to use Windows. Why? Because there is some program that I want to use that will ONLY run on Windows. I refuse to shell out $250 CDN to get a copy of XP Pro when I need to run one or two programs. Especially becuase I don't like the product, in the least. If it was a good product no problem.
I have pirated, am pirating, and will continue to pirate (thanks to BootCamp, man is that handy). Until Microsoft produces a product I feel is worth $250 CDN. Windows is simply not worth what it sells for.
Re:obligatory (Score:3, Insightful)
I disagree. They see the sales of white box computers not matching the Windows Boxes sold and assume everyone is stealing from them. Never mind that people might be installing Linux/Win98/2000/BSD or whatever onto these computers. Look for them to lobby Congress about outlawing unlicensed computers next.
Enjoy,
Read about forfeiture law!! (Score:2, Insightful)
The idea dates back to admiralty law in England. Basically if you violated law with your boat they would put your
This seems quaint, antiquated and entirely absurd right?
IT IS STILL LAW IN THE US.
I think we can all collectively saw, wtf?!
Excuse me...I'm going to go put my neighbors Porsche on trial
May I take a moment to remind these users that... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:It is good that this happens (Score:2, Insightful)
It's all good. (Score:5, Insightful)
Seriously, it's nothing but good for everybody.
1. Microsoft gets to protect the copyright on its products. Protecting copyright is good for everyone. Proprietary, GPL, Open Source, it all boils down to Intelectual Property Law, and if there were no circumvention of it, people would be forced to make more appropriate choices. You're pretty pissed when companies violate the GPL, right? You should be equally pissed when someone violates the Windows EULA. Look at it this way: for every pirated copy of Windows, there is one less Linux User. If they can't afford Windows, welcome to the Free World.
2. If you can't run a bootleg copy of Windows, maybe you will try something else/better
== feh ==
Re:Next move... (Score:5, Insightful)
Now, if they offered a scaled down version that contained only the most necessary of drivers and a simple user interface to access drives and programs (think 32-bit safe mode) that I could then build it up from there, I would jump on it in a heartbeat.
Re:Next move... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Next move... (Score:2, Insightful)
Alas, the majority of PC users have no clue, can't install anything and don't care for "Lusix" or "Apple POS" I know it's not what people here on
Re:Next move... (Score:4, Insightful)
Several years ago, I had hoped that Linux would be a possible upgrade path from 2000 by the time Longhorn (now Vista) gets here. But it won't be, and it looks like we'll end up paying for that upgrade, even if there *still* isn't a compelling reason to upgrade...
Comment removed (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:obligatory (Score:5, Insightful)
Your theory might hold some weight if there wasn't a huge market for counterfeit hardware, and other consumer goods. In such a case both the customer and the actual product maker end up losing because the customer doesn't have the product they thought they were buying and the actual producer's name gets tarnished if there are problems.
No, your mistaken. You would be right if we were talking about Asia. But this genuine check is targeted at the US, EU, UK, and AU were it is much harder to sell conterfeit goods (Yes I know it happens, but not on a broad scale).
This program is for the 60% of shipments White box PCs accounted for last year (See IDG/Gartner reports). Five of which I bought and installed Windows on none. See this article for more information http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/04/05/14252
Your talking points read like a Microsoft Marketing campaign.
Enjoy,
Re:obligatory (Score:2, Insightful)
And no I'm not (unfortunately) joking. A mate sells computers and got hassled by MS because if it is an OEM license that stays on the MACHINE and not the USER and when you buy a new PC you need a new license to run windows!
If you really want I can grab some of the literature for a laugh!
Re:Next move... (Score:3, Insightful)
Whats wrong with runas.exe or shift->right click->run as.. on an executable in explorer?
You *should* be able to install software as a normal user if you install it into your home directory and the software does not touch the registry or kernel.
You *CAN*. This is not a fault of microsoft, this is a fault of app developers that chose to write to %SYSTEMROOT%, to the Local Machine registry keys, or other areas that are locked down from User write priviledges.
And to you I say "Use Linux!! Gentoo would pe perfect for you!"
I have yet to find a linux distribution or any alternative operating system (besides BeOS and Mac OS X) that didn't run Gnome or KDE, had a functional desktop, and could run nicely under 256mb of ram. X and Firefox alone use ~100mb of ram on my machine AND i don't get an accelerated desktop. Looks like Windows has the desktop market in the bag with Apple looking for a piece. Linux is still the red-headed stepchild that has to eat in the basement. Not bashing, just laying the facts on the table.
Linux is okay for small-to-mid server environments and making headway into the enterprise market. Desktop, it is not.