Napster Legal Battle Reaches from Beyond the Grave 131
neelm writes "The EFF is reporting that EMI and Universal Music Group may have been caught lying to the Department of Justice in the 2001 antitrust investigation involving MusicNet, and pressplay. The 2001 investigation found no evidence of illegal efforts to monopolize digital music distribution, but new evidence presented by Hummer Winblad and Bertelsman ("original napster" investors) in their on-going defense from the RIAA suggests otherwise. The judge ruled that the documents to be turned over were not protected by attorney-client privilege because '[the court] finds reasonable cause to believe that the attorney's services were utilized in furtherance of the ongoing unlawful scheme.'"
Excellent (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:The RIAA might be lying? (Score:3, Insightful)
Yeah, but now we got PROOF.
Slap these companies up side the head, HARD!!! (Score:5, Insightful)
These companies should have something severe as a punishment, like serious jailtime for the offenders and big fines for the corporation.
Although the current justice dept will probably just put them in the proverbial "time-out" then give them a cookie.
Make an example out of a couple of them.
The government should have the will to reject a corporation's charter for shit like this.
No Big Deal (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Excellent-Coming out of the closet. (Score:5, Insightful)
You see, in America, anal rape in prison is considered funny and part of the punishment for whatever crime commited. I'm not entirely sure why anal rape is considered an acceptable part of prison and consensual anal sex is considered illegal (which is rather ironic - get convicted of having consensual anal sex, get sent to a prison where it's expected that you'll get anally raped).
But, it's just another part of America's messed up culture on sex - sex is OK as a punishment, but must be bad if it's consensual. See, 'cause enjoying things is bad, according to some interpretations of the Bible.
The real issue is copyrights (Score:4, Insightful)
In fact copyeight compromizes are the worst thing we could to. It's like the US conolists compromising with the Brits, it's like the slave states compromising with the free states. People who thought it was workable simply were in denial of the real world and real world forces that were in play.
Re:Slap these companies up side the head, HARD!!! (Score:3, Insightful)
Companies today believe they can act with impunity and they need to be shown otherwise.
Re:No Big Deal (Score:2, Insightful)
It's called a settlement. Something the cartels do all the time. "Without admitting any wrongdoing". And then we, the customers, tell them, "Very well then. Carry on." And continue to buy their crap.
Do you really think politicians are going to allow major donors to face serious punishment?
Only if they themselves thought that they might get caught in the scheme. Then they would throw them (the "donors") to the wolves. Which will make the politician look like a hero to their constituents. They'll destroy one cartel to help another.
Re:Been Caught Lyin' (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Been Caught Lyin' (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Excellent (Score:2, Insightful)
Not a chance in fucking hell. Send the sick fucks to a Federal Pen.
Re:No Problem (Score:2, Insightful)
(sigh)
How about (Score:3, Insightful)
b) People make fun of what they fear. Personally being analy violated is a rather fearsome prospect to me, but if it were brought up I'd probably joke about it. There are many similar jokes based on a similarly macabre sense of humour.