Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Mass Microsoft Defections to Apple Possible 722

An anonymous reader writes to mention a MacWorld article covering research by the Forrester group. Their report shows that mass dissatisfaction with Microsoft and its products could lead to defections from the company. From the article: "Over all, only Apple and Tivo saw their brand trust rise in the last two years, according to the report. The final tally saw Bose, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Panasonic and Sony earn the highest marks, while Microsoft, Gateway and LG ranked lowest. The low scores for Microsoft could mean good news for Apple as consumers showed their distrust of the Redmond-based software-giant."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Mass Microsoft Defections to Apple Possible

Comments Filter:
  • Re:No way (Score:2, Informative)

    by thesman ( 655727 ) on Friday April 14, 2006 @01:42PM (#15130915)
    Like they did last August, when they released the Mighty Mouse [apple.com]?
  • Oh please. You have no knowledge of history.

    Microsoft is a convicted monopolist.

    Microsoft was convicted of including a BROWSER in their operating system. Roll that around in your head for a second -- doesn't that seem utterly ridiculous from the vantage point of 2006? Can you imagine an operation system that doesn't include a browser as a fundamental tool? (I personally thought the whole thing was ridiculous at the time).

    Because of Microsoft's illegal coercion tactics toward OEMs in the 90s, superior products weren't allowed to compete, and Microsoft cheated to achieve 95+% market share.

    No doubt Microsoft did some coercion (though it wasn't illegal), but that's not why Microsoft won. Microsoft won because they were COMPATIBLE. Pure and simple. Windows 3.1 killed all the competition at the time because it was the most compatible with DOS. Windows 95 killed everything because it was STILL the most compatible with DOS and Windows 3.1.

    Look at OS/2. IBM, with every computer they sold, included OS/2 as the default operating system and also Windows 3.1. People had to go out of their way to delete OS/2 and use Windows 3.1 instead. And they did it! They deleted something that was clearly superior in every way. You know why? Because OS/2 was INCOMPATIBLE with a hell of a lot of software and drivers.

    People don't want to throw away their whole software investment. No one cares about operating systems -- they care about applications, which is what they use for *work*. All people see of operating systems is that it's a program launcher.

    Microsoft won because they were smart enough to give people an upgrade path, and secondarily they treat the development community very well (Apple was notorious on crapping on developers and treating them like second class citizens who should be honored for being "allowed" to develop for the Mac).

  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 14, 2006 @01:59PM (#15131088)
    Why should I place any more weight in this article, than, say, something out of Redmond touting Microsoft?


    You shouldn't.

    I can't wait for that +5 informative mod.
  • by WinDoze ( 52234 ) on Friday April 14, 2006 @02:15PM (#15131258)
    I just bought a Dell and a MacBook Pro within a week of each other. Both have 100 GB hard drives, 2 GHz core duo CPU's, wireless, 15+" widescreens, etc. The Dell has 2 GB ram. The MacBook Pro has 1 GB, but it does have a camera (iSight) that the Dell does not, so we can consider that a wash I suppose.

    The Dell was $1,400.

    The MacBook Pro was $2,500.

    I use both, but that's a very big price difference.
  • by Braino420 ( 896819 ) on Friday April 14, 2006 @02:23PM (#15131339)
    I love how this happens on every Apple thread.. Someone says they're overpriced and then some Apple owner adamantly denies it.

    Well, here's what I do everytime (I should just bookmark these links)

    Macbook [apple.com] Pro:

    Dell XPS M170 [dell.com]

    Please note: The expensive thing here is the lcd display and the Dell's display is even bigger. Also note: it's a little over 1,500, but I didn't make the %60 clame. You will probably bitch that the Dell has a 60 gig vs Apples 100 gig harddrive, don't worry: you're still wrong; you can upgrade dells for 30 bucks.


    Overpriced? No way, OSX is definately worth $1,000. [/sarcasm]
  • by jthill ( 303417 ) on Friday April 14, 2006 @02:23PM (#15131344)
    including a BROWSER
    Microsoft were convicted of a teensy bit worse [justice.gov] than just that.

    "Informative"?!?? "Flamebait". "Troll".

  • Re:Trying a Mac (Score:3, Informative)

    by Bert64 ( 520050 ) <bert@[ ]shdot.fi ... m ['sla' in gap]> on Friday April 14, 2006 @02:24PM (#15131350) Homepage
    Yes, if you really want to...
    I assume your talking about the menu bar (which can be configured to hide itself anyway).. but what your not considering is that under windows or x11 the menu is inside of the window itself, whereas with osx it's always in the same place at the top of the screen, so appwindow+menubar on osx is equivalent to appwindow (with included menubar) on windows or x11.
  • by kiddailey ( 165202 ) on Friday April 14, 2006 @02:30PM (#15131403) Homepage
    If you got that price, you really didn't compare equal specs.

    When I match the specs/features, I get $2,075 for the Dell and $2,399 for the Apple or a difference of $324. That's hardly 66%.

    Here are the specs/features I used for each:

    Apple
    • 2.0 Intel Core Duo
    • 1GB DDR2 RAM
    • 100GBx5400RM HD
    • SuperDrive (DVD±RW/CD-RW)
    • AirPort Extreme Card & Bluetooth
    • ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 with 128MB GDDR3 memory*
    • Remote Control*
    • OS X & Install Disk*

    ----------
    $2,399

    Dell
    • 2.0 Intel Core Duo
    • 1GB DDR2 RAM
    • 100GBx5400RM HD
    • 8X CD/DVD Burner
    • Dell Wireless & Bluetooth
    • 256MB ATI MOBILITY(TM) RADEON® X1400 HyperMemory*
    • Remote Control*
    • XP Pro & Install CD* **

    ----------
    $2,075

    These really aren't even exact matches, but they're very similar and moreso than the prices you quoted.

    * The Mac includes a backlit keyboard, remote control, OS X install disk, CD/DVD RW, Bluetooth, and ATI video standard while the Dell does not, which is why, aside from the backlit keyboard they're added to the Dell. Although the remote on the Dell won't work with XP Pro supposedly.

    ** Despite the limited web hosting ability of XP Pro, OS X more closely resembles WindowsXP Professional over the Media Center version. Macs always include an OS X install disk while most (if not all) PC vendors charge extra for the Windows disks.
  • by Dominic_Mazzoni ( 125164 ) on Friday April 14, 2006 @02:34PM (#15131439) Homepage
    You forgot to upgrade the Dell to 667 MHz RAM to match the Mac and give it the high-end graphics card, not Intel integrated video. Then give the Mac two 512-MB DIMMS instead of a single 1 GB (still for a total of 1 GB), and the total is that the Dell is $2100 and the Mac is $2400.

    Other differences: the Dell still doesn't have a built-in hi-res webcam, an IR remote control, optical digital audio, integrated Bluetooth, a tilt sensor to automatically park the hard drive when you drop it, or a backlit keyboard.
  • by diamondsw ( 685967 ) on Friday April 14, 2006 @03:05PM (#15131735)
    I call bullshit on you. From today's Dell store:

    Inspiron E1505
    Intel® Core(TM) Duo processor T2500 (2MB Cache/2GHz/667MHz FSB)
    1GB Shared Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 533MHz, 2 Dimm
    15.4 inch Wide Screen XGA Display
    100GB 5400rpm SATA Hard Drive
    8X CD/DVD Burner (DVD+/-RW) with double-layer DVD+R write capability
    256MB ATI MOBILITY(TM) RADEON® X1400 HyperMemory
    85 WHr 9-cell Lithium Ion Primary Battery
    Remote Control for Windows XP Media Center Edition
    Standard Features: IEEE 1394, 4-USB 2.0 4-pin, 5-in-1 Combo Card through ExpressCard, 15-pin VGA connector, S-Video connector, Integrated 10/100 Ethernet, Integrated v.92 56K modem
    HxWxD: 1.44" x 14" x 10.45"
    Weight: 6.18lbs
    Total: $2180 (after a "special offer" $200 discount)

    MacBook Pro
    2.0GHz Intel Core Duo with 2MB shared L2 Cache, 667MHz frontside bus
    1GB (single SO-DIMM) 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM
    15.4-inch TFT display with 1440x900 resolution
    100GB 5400rpm Serial ATA hard drive
    Slot-load SuperDrive (DVD±RW/CD-RW) [Apple doesn't state this explicitly, but it's 4x and not dual layer]
    ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 with 256MB GDDR3 memory
    Standard Features: iSight, wireless networking (802.11b/g), Bluetooth 2.0+EDR, ExpressCard/34 slot, dual-link DVI video out, Gigabit Ethernet, USB 2.0, FireWire 400, and optical digital and analog audio in/out.
    HxWxD: 1.0 x 14.1 x 9.6
    Weight: 5.6lbs
    Total: $2500

    Dell advantages:
    S-Video
    More USB 2.0 ports
    Better DVD burner
    Modem

    MacBook advantages:
    Higher resolution screen
    Better GPU
    Lighter and smaller
    Single DIMM preinstalled
    DVI
    iSight
    Gigabit Ethernet

    So, a whole $300 difference (on special), and you be the judge of those differences.
  • by metamatic ( 202216 ) on Friday April 14, 2006 @03:51PM (#15132162) Homepage Journal
    I went to the Inspiron E1505 page. I started with the 80GB one, i.e. same size hard drive as the MacBook Pro. I upgraded the processor to 1.83GHz core duo, to match the MacBook Pro. I upgraded the OS to XP Pro with a real reinstall CD, to match the full version of OS X with dev tools that you get on CD with the Mac.

    I gave Dell the benefit of the doubt for the LCD quality, and left it with the cheapest. I added a DVD burner and Bluetooth, like the Mac has, and a 128MB Radeon to approximately match the Mac's video. I left the Dell with the cheapest battery, even though it has less capacity than the Mac's.

    The resulting price is $1891, vs $1999 for the Mac. That's including an "instant $200 discount" from Dell. So when you actually configure them similarly, the Mac is about 6% more expensive than the Dell.

    And I strongly suspect that you really need to go for the better LCD on the Dell, in which case the price premium for the Mac drops to just $8. And that's for a machine that's thinner and weighs less.
  • by GPez ( 168764 ) on Friday April 14, 2006 @04:04PM (#15132253)
    Did you even bother looking up any of the "coupons" that Dell offers all of the time?

    From http://www.allonlinecoupons.com/st/dell/ [allonlinecoupons.com]

    SAVE $750 on Select Inspiron(TM) notebooks $1999 or more (before tax, restocking fees, shipping & handling)! Not available on XPS notebooks or Spotlight Savings offers. This offer is not combinable with other dollars off, percentage off or mail-in rebate offers. Only one coupon may be applied per cart at checkout. Coupon code expires after first 4000 uses, or when the limited time offer expires, whichever is earlier. Offers subject to change. View details in My Cart. Enter coupon code at checkout to receive this offer in Dell home
    Enter Dell Computer Coupon Code: 1CS4WZBB5$LVSS

    They are also offering a $100 rebate and free shipping.

    I just ordered nearly the same laptop as you speced out from Dell on Monday. Total cost after tax, discounts and rebates: $1202.77. I have the invoice to prove it. Yes I know the Dells are overpriced to begin with so to say you're "saving" money is not quite correct.

    Since when does Apple give you a deal like that?
  • by Ryvar ( 122400 ) on Friday April 14, 2006 @04:39PM (#15132506) Homepage
    Read my post [slashdot.org].

    The Dell is sitting on my desk right now. Arrived 5 days after I placed the order with free shipping. The charge on my credit card is $1067.
  • Re:Trying a Mac (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 14, 2006 @04:43PM (#15132533)
    Or I can get a new Acer or similar PC system with all the bells and whistles, running a Dual-Core 64-bit AMD processor at 3.2 GHz, a Gig of memory, a 300 GB HD, for about $700 at my local Impress Computer store.

    From the link you provided, that system only has a single-core CPU:

    "CPU CPU Type Athlon 64 Installed Qty 1 Max Supported Qty 1 CPU Speed 3500+ L2 Cache Per CPU 512KB CPU Socket Type Socket 939"

    AFAIK there is no such thing as a 3.2GHz dual-core AMD CPU. There might be an FX model Athlon coming out (or just came out) that might reach that speed, but unless you overclock your CPU you won't get that high.. not to mention that the FX chip would probably $1000. Maybe you are referring to AMD's speed rating, so maybe a 3200+ ?? Even then, if you were to get the lowest price dual-core AMD chip, it is still going to be almost $300 just for the CPU [newegg.com]. Intel Duo chips are cheaper, but in my opinion Intel is a piece of shit. I'm an AMD fan I guess.

    P.S. - Even though I am an AMD fan, and not really into Macs, I would buy a Mac over a piece of shit Acer anyday, even if it costs more.
  • by rapett0 ( 92674 ) <liquidgod AT hotmail DOT com> on Friday April 14, 2006 @04:49PM (#15132573) Homepage Journal
    I just got an E1505 a few days ago, because they had a 750 dollar off special if your system was 2000 or more. So yes, he could easily have gotten it for 1400. Mine only has 1 GB or ram and the 1.87GHz cpu, but it was 1200.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 14, 2006 @07:31PM (#15133387)
    Uh. DVD playback??? Its easy.

    In gentoo:
    USE="xine" emerge totem (or any other xine player)

    in FC/RH:
    rpm -i [path to livna RPM]
    yum install totem-xine

    Suse:
    Go to YAST, install xine.

    Now that wasn't that hard was it?

  • by Generalisimo Zang ( 805701 ) on Friday April 14, 2006 @09:26PM (#15133793)
    Five million subscribers play World of Warcraft... and it runs just fine on OSX.

Love may laugh at locksmiths, but he has a profound respect for money bags. -- Sidney Paternoster, "The Folly of the Wise"

Working...