FTC Levies Fine Against Big-league Spammers 82
An anonymous reader writes "The FTC said it has closed down a spam operation in California that sent millions of unwanted messages to online users across the country and fined the companies involved about $2.4 million. The settlement doesn't shut down the businesses and, based on the financial records of the defendants, the judgment will be suspended upon payment of $475,000."
CAN not stop SPAM? (Score:5, Insightful)
-- contained false or forged header information;
-- included deceptive subject headings;
-- failed to identify e-mail as advertisements or solicitations;
-- failed to notify consumers they had a right to opt out of receiving more e-mail;
-- failed to provide an opt-out mechanism;
-- failed to include a valid physical postal address.
If this can't get them shut down what can? Sending out spam email that totally destroys your computer into tiny little pieces?
C'mon FTC (Score:4, Insightful)
I wonder if the FTC will turn around and use the fine money to pay the people who were affected by the spam? Nah!
Re:CAN not stop SPAM? (Score:5, Insightful)
Licensing spam is like allowing people to break into your house and steal your stuff provided they leave you a business card and offer you an opportunity to opt out for the future.
Only shuts down the business, not the people (Score:5, Insightful)
No surprise here (Score:1, Insightful)
The FTC is now taking the same approach to spammers as they do telemarketers, in a theoretical sense.
They rather fine these companies just enough to get some money out of them but not shut down their business or cause them to go under. Just another revenue stream for the FTC.
It goes to show they could really care less about these companies sending out spam, they would rather just fine them and make money off of them.
Like I said in the subject, no suprise here. The FTC really has no compassion for what the consumer has to go through, if it's more money for them. they're all for it. If they were to actually shut down the business then they couldn't fine them anymore.
Hardly a condign punishment (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Only shuts down the business, not the people (Score:3, Insightful)
How exactly does that work? I'm sure the IRS would be interested in talking to them about their financial practices. How is that even legal if the company is incorporated? I was under the impression you couldn't just move money back and forth between the business to shelter it from taxes or bankruptcy.
Re:Misleading as hell (Score:4, Insightful)
Treat spammers like drug traffickers (Score:5, Insightful)
The FTC should hook up with the IRS to go after spammers.
Basically, if you're caught spamming the Feds come in and make you account for all of your income over the last year. Any money derived from spamming is forfeited, plus penalties. I'd also like to see the penalties weighted so that if the spammer gives up the identity of who paid him or her to spam, the penalty is reduced if that person is successfully prosecuted as well. This way the number of spammers and the companies which contract them get slapped.
Any legitimate business should be able to account for all its income. If a spammer can't prove his income is clean, it is no different than a drug trafficker having piles of cash around which just magically appeared. Anything which can't be documented as coming from a non-spam source should be considered profits of a criminal enterprise, and should get seized.
Re:Never mind the fine... (Score:4, Insightful)
I can see it now...
Hello. This is Mr. Spammer, a.k.a. Happy Dude. The court has ordered me to call everyone in town and say that I'm sorry for my telemarketing scams. (pause) I'm sorry. If you can find it in your heart to forgive me, please send one dollar to "Sorry Dude," 742 Evergreen Terrace, Springfield. You have the power.
Re:CAN not stop SPAM? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:C'mon FTC (Score:3, Insightful)