Jan Schaumann Talks About NetBSD on the Desktop 29
An anonymous reader writes "Continuing his series of interviews, Emmanuel Dreyfus asks NetBSD's Jan Schaumann about his experience with NetBSD on the desktop. From the article: 'Jan Schaumann has been an important contributor to the NetBSD project for several years. He spent a lot of time working on the NetBSD package system, known as pkgsrc, and he currently uses NetBSD as his desktop system. We will try to learn from his experience during this interview.'"
Brilliant (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Brilliant (Score:4, Insightful)
I have been hearing this for a long time. Basically to sum it up: I don't understand this issue about "desktop readiness". What matters is that the applications you need are available and that drivers exist for your hardware.
Data Centric (Score:4, Insightful)
In short, "personal computing" is getting to be like driving: most people can use most cars more or less the same, with different performance and convenience, on standardized roads, to get where we're going - mostly to get to other people. Applications are like cars, desktops are like dashboards, OS'es are like transmissions, networks are like fuel types, and our data is like the open road. MIME and desktop integrations are making that data the center of user activity. So the question is decreasingly whether "the" app you need is available under an OS on given HW. Rather, whether an app more or less automatically is available to work with your data, on whatever OS/HW is available and connected to the Internet. Since most of that data is for working with other people, convergence of voice and other data will make a lot of idiosyncratic SW, and unique skills using it, go the way of the Model T.
Re:Brilliant (Score:1)
-Lasse
Re:Brilliant (Score:2)
Re:Brilliant (Score:1)
I haven't dual booted in five years or more.
Re: (Score:1)
FWIW (Score:5, Interesting)
Granted, I'm more of a pure software developer (I don't game, and I don't use my machine for "media" too much), but I can't recall a time when I got "stuck" because I didn't have some piece of software available. I believe both KDE and GNOME are available (I used AfterStep), so there shouldn't be too much confusion switching a Windows user over.
Re:FWIW (Score:2)
I ran NetBSD on a Mac SE/30 for a while, as it was the most advanced free *nix for the system at the time. But it was never my primary system. Nowadays my main contact with it is at SDF (freeshell.org). They run on Alphas, which (combined with the sysadmin's hatred of Linux) I think has something to do with their choice of NetBSD.
Re:FWIW (Score:2)
NetBSD is on my desktop (Score:3, Funny)
But yes, compared to VMS on the same hardware, NetBSD is WONDERFUL!
Maybe good for sysadmins and tweakers (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Maybe good for sysadmins and tweakers (Score:1)
Re:Maybe good for sysadmins and tweakers (Score:3, Insightful)
in all fairness he did mention that you can install stable binary packages, which you can -- they release builds every quarter. his argument basically is that if you like control over your systems you should use netbsd, if you don't then use a `modern' linux distro, which i guess is also ok, but not for me.
i come from a Slackware background, and i believe my views on simplicity and/or ease of use are slightly different. i like the fact that NetBSD is a simple barebobones system [the overhead he was talkin
Re:Maybe good for sysadmins and tweakers (Score:2)
That's why I like FreeBSD. In fact, it's pretty much only chance that I'm running FreeBSD instead of NetBSD. I too used to be a Slackware person, and if I had to go back to Linux, it would be Slackware with pkgsrc.
Would use it if... (Score:1)
I'd use NetBSD on my desktop if the NVidia X server would run on it. Does anyone play Unreal Tournament on BSD?
Re:Would use it if... (Score:2)
"Primitive" and "simple" are not the same. (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Would use it if... (Score:3, Informative)