Download-only Single Becomes UK Number One 192
Stuart Gibson writes "As predicted, the Gnarls Barkely single 'Crazy' has reached the number one spot on the official UK charts, based solely on legal downloads. The CD version of the single will not be released until tomorrow. This is the first single to be eligible for the honour as, until last month, download sales would only be counted if the track was also available to be bought as a physical copy."
Proof (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Proof (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Proof (Score:2)
it's not too great either, but for something that you can just
download it's good. still there's no reason why it should be a #1 single.
and the quality could be a bit better
this will find a nice place for it in my playlist.
Re:Proof (Score:4, Funny)
Or does that only apply to grape jelly?
Re:Proof (Score:2)
If you want an download only single to succeed you have to have a unique name or customers won't find it on Google [google.co.uk].
Re:Proof (Score:5, Informative)
I bet you don't even know who made this song, you probably think it was some guy named "Gnarls Barkely", nevermind that such a person doesn't actually exist. For your information Gnarls is a collaboration between Cee-lo and DangerMouse. I'm not much of a Cee-lo fan, but DangerMouse is the shit. His Grey Album (half White Album, half Black Album) was as close to bittorrent platinum as an album could be, and DangerDoom (another collaboration, this time with MF Doom) was an awesome hip hop album (you probably hate hip hop, but I guess that's your loss).
At any rate: forget the past of these two artists, this song is awesome and I'm really looking forward to their album.
Re:Proof (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Proof (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Proof (Score:1, Funny)
Are you using some new transcription of Chinese in roman letters, -- or is this twilight zone?
Re:Proof (Score:2, Insightful)
Some slashdotters seem to think: popular song == bad; popular song that makes a lot of money on sales == t3h evil/RIAA(or equivalent)/worthless sell-out.
On the other hand, the GP does have a certain point, in that popular music will be popular, regardless on distribution method, regardless of vain lock-in. Or rather, popular music will be dis
Re:Proof (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Proof (Score:2)
Re:Proof (Score:2)
Like it used to be.
Or do I just remember it being good in the past?
I can't really remember any more you RIA GNAA GOATSE gay bi pig.
All of my base are belong to me?
Re:Proof (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Proof (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Proof (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Proof (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Proof (Score:2, Interesting)
Unfortunately, according to the RIAA RADAR, [magnetbox.com] "Crazy" by Gnarls Barkely is published by WEA records (German Warner Bros.) making it an RIAA 'property.' It doesn't matter to me how talented they might be, I will make no purchases as long as they associate themselves with the RIAA.
Re:Proof (Score:2)
Re:Proof (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Proof (Score:2, Insightful)
Sorry, I only know the little bit of Latin I picked up watching gladiator flicks with Cliff and Norm. I'm going to presume you said something wittily devastating, stutter and stamm
Re:Proof (Score:3, Funny)
Ooh, crumbs, DM!
Re:Proof (Score:3, Funny)
I'll get this album for the beats, definitely. It'll be hot.
music is one of those things. the random critiques people make of music they've never heard or music they don't understand never ceases to amaze me. because music is so personal and relative, it seems smart not to judge that which one is not. I suspect that flames will follow your post
Re:Proof (Score:2, Informative)
DangerMouse previous recorded an album with brilliant US hip-hop artist MF-Doom as 'Danger-Doom' which featured cameo's by the Adult Swim crew (including Brak, Zorak, Space Ghost - and best of all the Aqua Teen Hunger Force). He seems to be getting really well known in hip-Hop scenes for his collabrative work; really funny stuff.
Re:Proof (Score:1, Funny)
And proof that there will always be some idiot will make wild assumptions re: other's musical tastes.
And, 3.5 sentances later,
you probably hate hip hop
The people rest, your honor.
Re:Proof (Score:1)
Isn't that the stuff best sent down the toilet? Guess you agree with the poster that the song is no good?
Re:Proof (Score:2)
I could only stand about 30 seconds of it.
I think "grating" would be a good word.
Re:Proof (Score:2)
The underground hip-hop scene is amazing right now.
Re:Proof (Score:2)
Also the rules state that it can only get in the official charts if it's released afterwards on CD, so it's not technically download only.
Re:Proof (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Proof (Score:3, Insightful)
Just because you (and a lot of others) haven't heard of them doesn't mean they're bad. This is not Suga Babes II.
You'd think the
(For the record, I think Gnarles Barkley is just OK so far... I prefer some of Danger Mouse's other work).
Re:Proof (Score:2)
Re:Proof (Score:2)
Have you even listened to it, or are you just making a snap judgement?
Oh, wait... this is Slashdot, where people don't even "RTFA" most of the time.
My world is desintegrating (Score:2)
Could this mean the RIAA and such have been wrong all those years?
I know everybody in the world has said they were, but they were so sure of themselves; even trying to ban it.
Now I don't know what to believe anymore!
Where's the Torrent File? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Where's the Torrent File? (Score:1, Informative)
Actually, no. (Score:1, Redundant)
They aren't. Nobody paid for the download; its simply available on their website. In fact, if you go there it autoloads and plays, so you get counted toward the total.
I call that cheating. And its driving me crazy. Driving me craaaazy.
Hmm...needs more cowbell.
__
Elephant Essays [elephantessays.com] - Custom created research papers and essays.
Re:Actually, no. (Score:2)
Yes.
so you get counted toward the total.
No. Only purchases are counted.
Apple pwnt teh downloads (Score:2, Insightful)
That's a 'b'
Billion.
Nine zeroes.
Big number. More than a lot. Like, really big number.
Just before iTunes launched everyone said "who's going to pay for something you can get for free?"
Then Apple sold one billion songs.
That's a 'b'
pwnt
Next.
Re:Apple pwnt teh downloads (Score:2)
Re:Apple pwnt teh downloads (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Apple pwnt teh downloads (Score:1)
[...]
Just before iTunes launched everyone said "who's going to pay for something you can get for free?" Then Apple sold one billion songs.
That's a 'b'
pwnt
Next.
It took them what
It had slight help from the BBC (Score:5, Informative)
who used in in one of their BBC radio 1 channel branding idents (which was very cool) where they animated real objects in various real life scenes (street lights , cars , scaffolding, people) to the soundtrack like a VU meter
very cool effect and it worked perfectly with the track, i remember when it first aired people asked me "have you seen that bbc advert" and "i love this track", played often its not suprising the tune did well, this is just like any other adverts that have cool tunes, if its a good tune people will buy/seek it, good music conquers all
AJ
Re:It had slight help from the BBC (Score:1)
go figure, I didn't know what either one was, and now I know both are the same
This song was used for a radio station advert (Score:1, Informative)
Re:This song was used for a radio station advert (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:This song was used for a radio station advert (Score:2)
Yeah, you get crap pop music, and... crap pop music. Plus whatever song they want to plug that week (completely breaking the BBC's charter).
Not all internet hype (Score:5, Informative)
Readers must note that download-only tracks are not eligible for the UK chart, the rule is that the physical version must be released within one week of the download version. So, it's just a way to get an extra week in the top ten.
And, this song's success isn't solely down to internet hype or hoopla over downloads... it was used on an eye-catching BBC Radio 1 advert that received heavy play on the BBC's channels. Sadly I can't find a link to it, but UK readers will surely know which one I mean. Here's a link [youtube.com] to a different Radio 1 ad that uses the same technique.
Re:Not all internet hype (Score:1)
Perhaps it's also down to the fact that it's really rather a good song? my friend, an avid giles peterson/zane lowe fan sent me this song (oops! who said that?) a while back and i thought it was great. if i paid even the slightest bit of attention to the singles chart then i'd probably own a copy (in digital format) right now.
video here (quicktime) (Score:1, Informative)
here you go
Zane Lowe Gnarls Barkley advert/ident [nyud.net]
very cool, if only more adverts where like this, but then it wouldnt be on the BBC
Re:Not all internet hype (Score:1, Troll)
Wow, that is special. I don't think i've ever had the radio catch my eye.
Re:Not all internet hype (Score:2)
Re:Not all internet hype (Score:2)
Really? Where did you hear this from?
I'm CTO at a download store in the UK and we report sales to the chart people, which contribute to the UK singles charts. The only requirement I know of for our reporting is that the track has an ISRC number. As far as I'm aware that's it -
Re:Not all internet hype (Score:2)
We report sales of all items (individual tracks, albums, singles, and EPs) for which we have an ISRC or UPC/EAN code to the charting folks. This all goes into a single report - the charting people match up the codes with products and work out the charts from there. They enforce the rules for which charts certain material is eligible for - not us.
The charting folks aren't at all pissed with us
Tricky Web Page (Score:5, Funny)
I call that tricky. And its driving me crazy. Driving me craaaazy. Driving me craaaazy.
Hmm...needs more cowbell.
__
Elephant Essays [elephantessays.com] - Custom-created research papers and essays.
Re:Tricky Web Page (Score:2)
Basically, they tried to bring up-to-date the chart to include whichever format you buy a single in.
I personally think it's sketchy that the single must be physically released the next week: this seems more a ploy to keep retail shops on-side with the chart compilers. It shouldn't matter who it is released to or when, only the total number of purchases after that week.
Re:Tricky Web Page (Score:2)
Re:Tricky Web Page (Score:2)
while() wget http://www.gnarlsbarkley.com/auzio/crazy.mp3 [gnarlsbarkley.com] >
Woooo we're number one
RTFA (Score:4, Informative)
Download SALES. Not downloads. Visiting the website a trillion times wouldn't change the ranking on the charts.
Re:RTFA (Score:2)
On Slashdot, that sounds like a challenge!
Re:Tricky Web Page (Score:2)
(And it was slightly less annoying back then, than it is now when you look at someone's Myspace profile and get an earful of crap)
Meanwhile (Score:2, Offtopic)
Doesn't sound that good to me. (Score:1)
#1 music is pretty much always crap though...
Re:Doesn't sound that good to me. (Score:1, Informative)
It's become big in the UK because it's been played on the radio here since Mid 2005. Also the BBC Radio 1 Ads helped spread it too.
Usually I'd agree that the British Charts can be ignored (being a Brit myself) as being full of rubbish, but I seem to like this track since it's more my Genre of Music.
website vs myspace (Score:3, Interesting)
Also interesting that when I search iTunes for gnarls barkely I get no returns (?)
Song's not bad.
Re:website vs myspace (Score:2)
Re:website vs myspace (Score:2)
Shouldn't this be crossposted to 'Apple about to lose market share'?
I glanced at the iTunes home page and didn't see: Switch to UK store. It may be there but you've now lost the people who:
Are still a little confused by this interweb.
Will google 15 minutes for 'javascript bug safari 1.3.2' and null for Englands latest pop sensation
Re:website vs myspace (Score:2)
And then I'd go back to not caring, I guess, since the US store had Trans-Siberian Orchestra's album "Beethoven's Last Night" when I looked for it this afternoon.
who? (Score:1, Funny)
Re:who? (Score:2)
Apple the new Record Label? (Score:5, Interesting)
"...Here's the dream world for the EMI Group, Sony/BMG, etc.: there are two prices for songs on iTunes, say, $2.49 and $0.99. All the new releases come out at $2.49. Some classic rock (Sweet Home Alabama) is at $2.49. Unwanted, old, crap, like, say, Brandy (You're A Fine Girl) -- the crap we only know because it was pushed on us in the 70s by paid-off disk jockeys -- would be deliberately priced at $0.99 to send a clear message that $0.99 = crap.
And now when a musician gets uppity, all the recording industry has to do is threaten to release their next single straight into the $0.99 category, which will kill it dead no matter how good it is. And suddenly the music industry has a lot more leverage over their artists in negotiations: the kind of leverage they are used to having. Their favorite kind of leverage. The "we won't promote your music if you don't let us put rootkits on your CDs" kind of leverage.
And Apple? Apple wants the signaling to come from what they promote on the front page of the iTunes Music Store. In the battle between Apple and the recording industry over who gets to manipulate what songs you buy, Apple (like movie theaters) is going to be in favor of fixed prices, while the recording industry is going to want variable prices."
Re:Apple the new Record Label? (Score:1)
Re:Apple the new Record Label? (Score:2)
I've been waiting thirty years for this revelation (Score:2)
Worst year for April Fools. (Score:2, Funny)
What's up with the tags? (Score:2)
Is the public taking revenge at Taco et al for having us tortured with PinkDot yesterday?
Re:What's up with the tags? (Score:2)
What people like != what they buy (Score:3, Interesting)
Vik
Didn't that chart also have 'Crazy Frog' as #1? (Score:1)
downloads obey physical laws! (Score:2, Funny)
why dont they count download-only songs? (Score:2)
Pity... (Score:4, Interesting)
As always I tried Googling it first to see if it was iTunes - which it was; I got a handly link to the iTunes store, which opens iTunes. I was then politely told that this track is only available in the iTunes store in the UK.
If the labels are ever going to take this Internet thing seriously they're going to have to readjust their way of thinking. They can't rely on their old system of having area-based licenses - it just doesn't make any real sense in the era of digital content.
Re:Pity... (Score:2)
For example, most of the online mp3 shops that cater for DJs will usually ship mp3 versions either at the same time or before it comes out on vinyl/cd. If somebody releases a track in Chicago, I can have it playing at a club night in London - the same day!
And considering that many labels are selling them through 10 or more sites at a time, and all of them are DRM free I ho
Re:And this is on Slashdot why? (Score:1)
Re:And this is on Slashdot why? (Score:2)
You could always host your own slashdot.co.uk if you wanted to but.. *OOPS* a domain squatter is already there. QUIT yer bitchin.
Re:And this is on Slashdot why? (Score:5, Insightful)
It may interest you to know there's a pretty substantial non-American Slashdot membership.
Re:And this is on Slashdot why? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:And this is on Slashdot why? (Score:1)
You come to
Re:And this is on Slashdot why? (Score:2)
Re:And this is on Slashdot why? (Score:2)
"My friend is Canadian and he loves having things wedged sideways up his ass, you insensitive clod!"
Re:And this is on Slashdot why? (Score:1, Insightful)
The guy figured that "number one song" isn't really news for nerds and such (I would tend to agree, though not enough to warrent a post - been here long enough to know it's not my opinion that matters).
It might interest you to know that we know very well there are other people and the world doesn't revolve around you any more than it does us.
You might want to look in the mirr
Re:And this is on Slashdot why? (Score:2)
Well, here's the first song (in the UK) to make it to the top of the charts based solely on legal downloads.
Don't you think that this provides some sort of proof of what so many people here have been saying? That it *is* possible to make a viab
Re:And this is on Slashdot why? (Score:5, Insightful)
legal downloads of music/film/tv is the way in which music will be sold in the future. the thought of having to go all the way to a shop where there's only an x% chance of finding the album/song you're looking for will seem laughable in a decade's time... at least, it will be should the music industry not drad its feet as it always does... so perhaps we'll still be exactly here.
the biggest impedement to the music industry is the music industry.
Re:And this is on Slashdot why? (Score:1)
It's likely that legal downloads will make up a significant proportion of purchases of film/music products in the future, but the stores themselves won't necessarily die.
Re:And this is on Slashdot why? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Whoever posted this didn't RTFA. (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Whoever posted this didn't RTFA. (Score:2)
Re:Who? (Score:3, Informative)
It's him, under another pseudonym.
Re:Karma Dispenser Post (Score:2)
viva la difference (Score:2, Interesting)
All you just said is "I feel old and close minded, and/or this isn't my prefered genre of music." Guess what, I like my classic rock as much as anyone, and you're more likely to catch me with a Floyd album than the latest 50 pence track, but this is obviously a catchy pop tune (hear it once or twice and I defy you not to be humming it the rest of the day.)
Idiot... or did I just get properly trolled?