Inside DARPA's Robot Race 135
Belfegor writes "The PBS series Nova has a great feature on their website, regarding the coverage of the DARPA-sponsored 'Robot Race' in which driverless vehicles 'competed' in a 130-mile race across the Mojave Desert. The full show is available on the website, and besides that they have plenty more information about the robotics behind the challenge, and also some pretty cool out-takes from the show."
Seen it (Score:5, Informative)
torrent (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Great show but... (Score:3, Informative)
Tell PBS Thanks! (Score:4, Informative)
Let PBS know [pbs.org] what you thought about the format, show, or anything else.
-Ian
Sebastien Thrun's book (Score:3, Informative)
Seminar about Stanley (Score:1, Informative)
Mostly paid employees and purchased parts (Score:3, Informative)
The big breakthrough was Stanford's texture vision system. I was very impressed with that. Computer vision in unstructured environments has a terrible track record, yet they made it work. Everything else was basically integration of off the shelf gear.
One accomplishment not oftened mentioned is that, by year two, many of the components that weren't available in year one were available off the shelf. In year one, getting an integrated GPS/INS/compass/odometer system was very tough. Applanix had one that cost $70K, took up a 4U rack, and required air conditioning. (CMU used it.) By year two, you could get something comparable from any of three vendors for about $20-$30K, ruggedized and able to run on 12VDC. All the successful teams had one, usually from Trimble or Novatel. Once you have one of those, just staying on course is straightforward. Then it's all about obstacle avoidance.
Re:Mostly paid employees and purchased parts (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Fascinating program (Score:5, Informative)
One paper that's of interest might be here: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.edu/user/thrun/p
And that paper is mentioned in the readme of the BFL (Bayesian Filtering Library) found here:
http://people.mech.kuleuven.be/~kgadeyne/software
Lastly, at one point all of us competitors were required to give our design documents to DARPA, and they put them up on their webpage here:
http://www.darpa.mil/grandchallenge05/techpapers.
BTW, I wasn't on Stanford's team, but I was on another finalist team.
Re:Sensors (Score:3, Informative)
Re:I'm a geek, so I watched this twice last night. (Score:2, Informative)
Why did they make it easier? My personal theory is the act of congress that calls for 2/3 of the armed forces to be autonomous vehicles by 2008 (or something of the sort; I'm probably wrong about the date).
By making people win (not to denigrate their achievement... debugging an autonomous vehicle is no mean feat!), DARPA has robbed the rest of the teams of a fair shot.
TerraHawk, in particular, was designed for a much mure brutal course. It was not the fastest vehicle, but in the terrain that we expected, it wouldn't need to be. (actually, the 5 m/s speed cap was in software... we limited it for safety reasons, as well as the trash can we murdered at the Site visit when we tried to raise the speed a bit
We had problems because, In an effort to deal with that kind of course, we were replacing components right up until the end. (and we did our first test of the new vehicle the day before we went up to Fontana. The old vehicle was well tested, but it had issues with the pneumatics, and we were willing to risk failure in order to get a better chance of success.)
Now that I'm partially off topic, I might as well go the rest of the way.
I am most probably the only person in the world who has worked on no less than THREE teams (PVRW, Team Tormenta, and Terra Engineering). But, I also noticed that is was the big money teams that got through the NQE and on to the main race. Interestingly enough, after the race, when DARPA refused to announce the winner immediately, conspiracy theorists were arguing (with reason) that DARPA was trying to find some technicality to let the Red team win; 8 hours later, they realized that there was no such technicality, and their favored team lost.
Now, before that's marked as flaimbait, keep in mind that this is coming from someone who hasd been involved with this for 2 years, and who noticed the beaurocracy involved.
As a final illustration of this beaurocracy, at the gate to the team garages, ther was a seperate entrance fro people. For about 25 feet on the public side of the gate, there was a portable barrier set up so separate the footpath and the path for vehicles. On the other side, however, there was absolutely nothing. Now the guard was rather strict about the "humans on the human path, and 'bots on the 'bot path" rule, een when someone was coming out the the team area to go to something right next to the gate.
Comaring this to the creativity shown by the teams, you really had to wonder: who was really more organized?