Slashdot Firefox Extension 293
christopherfinke writes "I've been working on Slashdotter Firefox extension for Slashdot users, and version 1.2 has been approved by the Mozilla admins. Features include the ability to auto-add cache links after story links (from any of Coral Cache, Google Cache, or Mirrordot), a quick-reply feature that adds a 'Reply' option to the right-click menu when you select text in a comment, the option of styling all of Slashdot's pages like a chosen Slashdot section, links in the comment sections that allow you to toggle open/closed all of a comments replies, and more. All of Slashdotter's features are optional, and the extension is compatible with Firefox, the Mozilla Suite, Seamonkey, and Flock."
Re:Awesome (Score:5, Informative)
It's really quite nice (Score:5, Informative)
I find some of the additions of the extension to be things that really should have be built into
One negative aspect of the extension, however, is that it seems to me that, depending on the feature set you have enabled,
All of you should check this out for sure!
Re:trolly troll troll (Score:5, Informative)
LEARN TO READ! HTH HAND.
Re:trolly troll troll (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Features (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Aw nuts (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Firewall this... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:awesome (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Opera? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Reply to text option (Score:5, Informative)
any chance we could customise the reply to selected text option?
You can. It's in the Extension options.Re:Missing one... (Score:5, Informative)
From Camino FAQ [caminobrowser.org]
Q. Does Camino support Firefox extensions?
A. No, and it never will. Firefox extensions rely on XUL (a user interface toolkit made by the Mozilla Foundation) to interact with the user and draw their interface. Camino uses Cocoa (an interface toolkit made by Apple) and does not support XUL.
Also from the interview [gigaom.com] with Camino Project lead Mike Pinkerton
We recognize this is a problem for our users, but extensions only exist because of the cross-platform UI layer upon which Firefox is built. It's that same cross-platform UI layer that makes Firefox feel "wrong" on Mac OS X. Camino's use of Cocoa for the user interface makes it fit in with the rest of the platform, but prohibits us from using extensions. We feel this is a trade-off worth making. That said, we are investigating ways to allow non-user-interface extensions to register and work correctly.
Re:Mmm OK... where's preferences page? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:What about IE? (Score:3, Informative)
If you want to change the options for Slashdotter without the dialog, call up the page about:config. Slashdotter's options all start with extensions.slashdotter. The boolean ones are pretty straight-forward, and the stylesheet one is the subdomain of the section that you want to style Slashdot as (e.g. apple, it, games, etc.) or blank to disable it.
Greasemonkey Script can make it pretty... (Score:3, Informative)
Thank God... (Score:5, Informative)
I have some ideas about what is broken on Slashdot. Some of them would require actual site modifications to fix, other could be fixed with a browser extention.
If you want more bugs, how about:
- When I'm in the post writing screen, there is no text of the story or link to it, so I have to open Slashdot in another tab and go to the story to read it.
- The comments index is very, very broken. The "threshholds" concept's three drop-down menus (-1:5), (Threaded/Nested/Flat/No comments), (Oldest 1st/Newest 1st/Highest 1st/Oldest 1st Ignore threads/Newest 1st Ignore threads), and the "Comments spill at 50" concept interact in bizzare ways such that I don't even know what it's *trying* to do.
- I *hate* the fact that comments below your viewing threshhold are listed at the bottom of the thread level instead of between the posts that it was replying to and got a reply from. So you sometimes see people seemingly reply to themselves, or flaming others, but they are actually replying to something below your viewing threshhold. I've seen arguments start this way, because someone thinks a flame was directed at them instead of to the AC that replied to them earlier. Please. for the love of god, put in an indicator if there is a post below the threshhold that a post is replying to.
- I would like to be able to view the whole comments section as a threaded, subject-only(that is, no expanded posts) view, and open up individual posts which will open up in a nested, all-open veiw. Perhaps allow right-clicks on post titles should allow you to open up the comment and its follow-ups with any pre-specified threshhold options?
- Instead of three drop-down menus in the comment index, how about a list of rules which we can rearrange the order of to make settings? Might require AJAX.
- Slashdot's user prefs allow me to "bias" the moderation towards funny, or informative, or other moderation types, but it is a PITA to change it for each story. Some stories I want to read in "funny" mode, others I want to read in "Informative" mode. I should be able to change the bias to one of several presets like on an Winamp equalizer on a per-story basis.
Re:*Gasp* (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Mmm OK... where's preferences page? (Score:3, Informative)
Or you can go to "tools->Extensions" and then double-click on the slashdotter plugin. It brings up a nice dialog box to configure slashdotter.
Re:Opera? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Yay!.. Taco did you see that? (Score:4, Informative)
I'd give them a look before I demanded the slashcode [slashcode.com] writers add features you want (or write the code yourself and submit it to slashcode), unlike other news sites [digg.com] this is an OSS project.
Re:Tinfoil hats on! (Score:2, Informative)
There is no barrier to entry in becoming a reviewer. You are only expected to install the extension, use it for a bit to make sure it does what it claims and doesn't break, and approve. (Disapprove, of course, if it doesn't work.)
There is no code review involved. The reviewers are not even really expected understand code. Being approved on there doesn't really signify a sign of quality. Heck, if you want to you can end up reviewing your own.
Re:Features (Score:5, Informative)
On the other hand, he really should use <blockquote> instead of <p> because it is a quote, which was what I was going to point out until I saw your post. ; )
Personally, what I use for quotes (manually, until I install the extension) is <blockquote><i>%s</i></blockquote>.
(I just hope he notices and reads this post, since I replied to a reply instead of replying to his post directly.)
Re:On Writing (and a suggestion for the extension) (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Opera? (Score:4, Informative)
If you hover over the comment Link (#15013415) it will pull the moderation results for this post with xmlHttp, and display the result table in a DIV tag, beside the current post.
The bookmark name is "slash mod"
The URL is:
(AFAIK this should all be in one single line.)
Once this is added to the bookmarks you can use it in the following way.
It's good (Score:2, Informative)
Re:The times they.... (Score:3, Informative)
This issue isn't complicated to solve. When you leave your comments Threaded, slashcode displays some random crap comments for no other reason. Try this: set your comments to "Nested" and "Oldest First", and set your threshold to "+3". It's slashdot nirvana.
For whatever reason, Nested does what you'd think it should do. Top level posts are all the way on the left of the screen; direct replies are underneath. Setting your threshold to +3 has the following benifit: Before the karma counter ran on the Bill and Ted system, it was a simple number between whatever and 50 (I don't remember if it went below zero, but I think it did). If your karma was 25 or more, you got a karma bonus to your posts, i.e. posts you made were at +2 starting, rather than +1. Unfortunately, this is still in effect, and almost everyone has enough karma to post at +2, or at least enough people that there's lots of noise in with the signal. So, by narrowing your comment display to +3, you only see comments that *someone* has modded up.
So, that's "only comments that have been modded up" coupled with "a proper nesting system" and "not random crap". And if you want to see the rest of the comments, just click the "X replies beneath your current threshold" link to display them. Try it; you'll never go back.
~Will
Re:Opera? (Score:2, Informative)
Not that it seems to work for me, Greasemonkey or otherwise. Did
Example header:
Tagging is by users (Score:3, Informative)
Users add the tags, not the editors.