Software Developer Beats Pirate in Boxing Ring 347
utki writes "The Moscow Times is reporting that the chief software architect at Russian software developer
Cognitive Technologies, Andrei Smirnov, recently won a boxing match organized between himself and a software pirate he caught selling bootlegged software CD's at a Moscow market. At last, a practical and entertaining model for dealing with software piracy (MPAA and RIAA take note), and perhaps a useful way to channel Steve Ballmer's aggression too."
remember kids: (Score:5, Funny)
Re:remember kids: (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:remember kids: (Score:5, Insightful)
No it wouldn't. Continuing the fight was the pirate's idea (no idea who started it). It's poetic justice that the thug who wanted to keep fighting got a beating for it.
Of course, I much prefer living in a country where the cops tell both sides to cool it off, but maybe that's just me.
Re:remember kids: (Score:2)
Re:remember kids: (Score:3, Insightful)
If he had just downloaded something and got caught for that I might have agreed, but not when he is actually selling the stuff to people on the street.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:remember kids: (Score:3, Interesting)
The problem is... (Score:2)
Re:The problem is... (Score:2)
Since there's no way to come up with a fair fight, I'd say that melee weapons should be allowed so long as both participants agree, but no projectile weapons should be allowed on any account, because of the potential injury to a bystander.
If you don't want to fight someone because you think they'll kick your ass, don't agree to fight with them, don't sign the waiver. No pro
Re:The problem is... (Score:3, Insightful)
The problem is that some people are smart enough to use tools. When you use tools in a fight, it becomes a whole different issue. Perticularly when those of us that are patient and have good stratigic skill get involved. Unless for some reason you feel that we should encourage physical size over intelligence, and rash behavior over good planning.
The problem is that some people are intelligent but have no common sense. It's all about moderation, why can't you be both intelligent and physically capable? S
Re:remember kids: (Score:2)
Re:remember kids: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:remember kids: (Score:5, Funny)
A horde of thugs storms into a police building, wearing hoodies, lots of bling, and Mercedes-Benz pendants...
Thug 1: Officer! Of-fic-cer!
Clerk looks up, eyes the gang
Clerk: Yes, what can I do for you?
Thug 1: We need to pop a cap in each other's asses, yo.
Clerk: Ah, yes. I see. Okay, everyone needs to fill out form Gee Emm One Three Dash Twenty-Three and sign this weaver.
Thug 2: I ain't signin' no beaver!
Clerk: No beavers here, son.
Thug 2: I ain't seein' no women here!
Clerk gets annoyed.
Clerk: Son, if you want to fuck with me, you need to fill out form Gee Tee Eff Out Pronto. Now take this pen, sign here, here, here, and here. You guys can then pass through here and go into our backyard. Enjoy your battle and don't try to kill to many people.
The thugs start walking
Clerk: Oh, I forgot to tell you that'll cost you 100 bucks for each of you.
Thugs turn around
Clerk: Sorry, it's an administrative fee.
Thugs turn to themselves, huddle together, then suddenly one of them throws a bundle of money at the clerk.
Clerk: Thanks.
Brought to you by your Libertarian Party.
Re:remember kids: (Score:5, Insightful)
The sorts of people who want to solve their problems by beating the shit out of each other don't care whether it's legal or not -- they're going to do it ANYWAY. And guess what -- we ALREADY pay, as a society, for the injuries sustained in street brawls.
The only difference here, is that by making street fighting legal, we no longer have to pay to INCARCERATE the participants. Obviously this SAVES us money.
Re:remember kids: (Score:2, Funny)
Hey I'll trade you my Che Guevera shirt for some of that shiny tinfoil....
Re:remember kids: (Score:4, Interesting)
I'd be willing to bet that half of the Slashdotters here would have gone off on someone (physically) at least one time dealing with the stuff that they have to put up with. I hear folks whine about their sys admin job and getting the same stupid question 20 times. One anecdote: Try going into someone's house from a 9-1-1 call, finding a guy drowning in his own alchol induced vomit, going to pull him out of it, and having his family members getting in your face yelling at you becuase it took you 10 minues to get there.
Of course, I think Rodney King got off too easy.
Re:remember kids: (Score:4, Insightful)
O: What do you mean I can't smoke this joint on the street?
P: It's illegal.
O: Well, what do you think about that law?
P: I'm just doing my job.
O: What do you mean I'm trespassing?!?!
P: You're staging a sit-in in the presidents office.
O: So??? Don't you think we should be allowed to do that?
P: Hey man, I'm just doing my job.
O: Are you seriously telling me I'm not allowed to drive 120mph in a 35 zone?
P:
Maybe if you'd stop breaking the law, you wouldn't end up "on the other side of the argument"? Just a thought...
FYI, whether it's cops, soldiers, firefighters, or EMT's, none of them are likely to express their personal or political beleifs to you while in uniform. The reason for it simple and should be obvious; the organizations involved don't want that one individuals opinion to be blown out of proportion and made to reflect badly on the entire organizaton. What would be the media response if a handful of cops or soldiers went around telling anyone who would listen that "all ragheads should die" or that "there's nothing wrong with snorting the occasional line"?
All the left wing organizations could learn a thing or two from that. The main problem with their image is that, while the majority may be quite moderate, the extreme views of a few individuals get all the media time, and reflect badly on everyone associated with them.
OT: Sig (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:OT: Sig (Score:4, Funny)
Re:remember kids: (Score:5, Funny)
Re:remember kids: (Score:2, Informative)
Except in the realm of sexual frustration.
Re:remember kids: (Score:2, Funny)
Re:remember kids: (Score:2)
Re:remember kids: (Score:2)
In the words of a great man, "Make love, not war."
We all just need more love, that is the answer. =)
Re:remember kids: (Score:5, Funny)
The females I try to talk to when doing my laundary at the local coin-op apparently never got that memo.
Re:remember kids: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:remember kids: (Score:3, Insightful)
There's nothing wrong with two guys having a 'good clean fight.' We should see more of it. The US has gotten to the point where if you're angry at somebody then it's assumed there's something wrong with you.
A good sporting match (boxing, basketball, whatever) is a great way to get some aggression out.
Re:remember kids: (Score:5, Interesting)
My daughter was constantly beign harassed by this girl at school that was patting her down and stealing her money, cellphone,etc...
I told her that next time to grab her hair and pull down as hard as she can and put her knee in her face as hard as she can without saying a word.
It worked. she did it, the brat went down hard with a broken nose and when the school tried to expel my daughter I was all over the Principal poised with a letter from my lawyer with documentation of the number of times we reported this to him and he did nothing and asked... " How do you want to handle this?" he backed down and let things go.
My daughter has the right to defend her self, and I tell her this daily. She has been "mugged" 5 times in the hallway by this girl and finally had enough. The school refused to deal with it and now the "tough kids" keep away from her because they now know she will fight back hard and without warning. And this is the good school in my area.
Being known as the "crazy" kid in school to the hoodlums is a good thing. I had to put a kid's head through the locker in Junior high to get them to leave me the hell alone. Parents need to be ready to fully back their children when they defend themselves.
Re:remember kids: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:remember kids: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:remember kids: (Score:5, Insightful)
Fighting a bully has two very important results:
1) Staving off the bully. Not always permanantly, but at least 'for a while.'
2) Building self-respect and confidence in the child defending his/herself.
(2) is must more long-lasting than (1), and therefore much more imporant IMHO. While you may stop the bully from fighting you by calling the police, you've now likely unleashed *years* of being called a 'tattle' and 'baby' by not only the bullies, but others who will view your actions as weak or 'weird.' Thus making a bad situation worse. Can you call the cops for children making fun of you? No. You can't always rely on others, but you *can* rely on yourself.
I had my bully in grade-school. Every year he would pick a fight with me, or tease me, or whatever. Every year my mother told me to go "punch him in the nose" and I would. He'd lay off for a year or so, and I'd do it again. Every time I fought back I felt better about myself. Not because I liked fighting (far from it), but like a "man" I defended my right to exist without help from others. Sure I got hurt. But that only lasted short amount of time. The confidence I recieved, however, has lasted much longer. To this day I'm not afraid to fight back either verbally or physically, though I prefer verbally. I wasn't taught to be violent, but to have self respect and not let others walk all over me.
I welcome a counter argument, but I'm unlikely to be swayed. I've heard many people say "I wish I'd fought back" on some matter, and I've *never* heard anybody say "wow, I should have just run for help rather than arguing back."
Re:remember kids: (Score:3, Interesting)
I certainly didn't give them any money, but I mentioned "Fuck off" and turned around and slowly walked away. Most Russians don't have contact lenses, which I was later told gave me an extra 30-45 seconds. They probably thought I was Superman.
My friend wanted to beat the hell out of them, a
Re:remember kids: (Score:2)
Hear hear!
Rather than a counter argument, I want to say that you are 100% correct IMO.
There is no other person or establishment that you can depend on to defend your right to exist better than you can do for yourself. Period. Calling the cops or filing lawsuits can even make matters worse, because it can piss off the person/people that are
Re:remember kids: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:remember kids: (Score:3, Insightful)
Throughout school, I was tiny, and so bul
Re:remember kids: (Score:3, Insightful)
Obviously you mis-judged my point a bit (or are attacking a straw-man). But that may have been my fault as I never mentioned that this isn't a "blanket condition." Obviously one should only fight back when it's a valid option. Two kids on a playground - sure. A guy with a gun vs. me? No, sorry.
Other than that we 'mostly' agree I think. What pisses me off is the "tell you kid to never fight" crowd. You fought and you lost. But you *fought*. There's a big differen
Re:remember kids: (Score:3, Interesting)
Exactly. As a child, I never understood the bullies. I would be nice to them, and they'd pound me into the ground again. Then, the instant I started to fight back (around 8th grade), I started gaining respect from them, and actually became friends with some of them.
The biggest difference between doormats and losing fighters is: the aggressor knows exactly what to expect from a doormat:
Re:remember kids: (Score:3, Funny)
For example, doing homeworks for somebody stronger, who will be your rent-a-fist.
Re:remember kids: (Score:3, Insightful)
During High School, I was in the sum total of 2 fights. Both were with people I dealt with on a regular basis. I'm rather skinny, and as the resident "computer geek", people figured I was on the weak side. I'm also 6'10" (not too big a secret), and have a 720 pound leg press (you can't tell by looking).
The first issue I had was with a wrestler in choir class (don't ask). He kept hounding me, harassing me verbally, and after a
Re:remember kids: (Score:4, Interesting)
Bullying isn't always a case of the victim walking away with some bruises and maybe a bloody nose, sometimes the damage is much more serious. While I agree with slackartist that your best bet is generally to try and avoid the situation or resolve it non-violently, sometimes things just don't work out that way.
Re:remember kids: (Score:2)
Re:remember kids: (Score:2)
Huh?! I always thought a good samaritan law was one that protected you if you are trying to assist someone. In other words, I give the himelich to someone choking, and am somewhat responsible about how I do it, I cannot be sued for cracking one of your ribs. Believe it or not, people have been sued for the side effects of saving someone's life before.
As I know it, there is no responsiblity for me to help anyone.
Re:remember kids: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:remember kids: (Score:2)
I'll remeber this when folks argue that they can seperate TV from reality
Re:remember kids: (Score:2)
Oddly enough, I have a link to just such an example bookmarked: http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=121564&cid =10232368 [slashdot.org]
It's from the "Home Defense, Geek Style" thread. I bookmarked it because I remembered reading about that exact case in the news.
Re:remember kids: (Score:2)
In this case the crime is not witnessing the crime, but failing to intervene to prevent the crime. That doesn't necessarily mean facing down the bully, but notifying authorities who could physically intervene.
Violence is generally not the answer (Score:2, Interesting)
Your daughter does indeed have a right to defend herself, as we all do. But telling her to take an action that is far more severe and dangerous than the bullying is a dubious reaction at best. I understand your desire to have her fight back and make her boundries known to her aggressor, but using THAT type is force is NOT justifiable.
The larger concern here is she could have killed the girl if that nose had broken wrong. And we must al
Re:Violence is generally not the answer (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't know if a fight is more severe and dangerous than bullying. A fight hurts, but even the loser usually gets over it pretty quick, at least at the grade school level. Bullying, however, causes severe emotional stress over a prolonged period.
That one fight might have prevented far more damage than it caused.
Re:Violence is generally not the answer (Score:5, Insightful)
If somebody has beaten and bloodied you in order to steal your money or possessions and attempts to do so again, then beating and bloodying them when attacked (not as a retributive move) could not possibly be seen as excessive force.
If they choose to escalate further from there, and somebody were to say, put a bullet in their head in self-defense, then it is entirely justified too. The police are there to protect and serve, but they can't watch your back every minute. Self-defense from violent criminals is a constitutionally-guaranteed right (this is coming from a fairly liberal Democrat too, though I am admittedly pro-Second Amendment, within a reasonable context).
Re:remember kids: (Score:3, Insightful)
As you say, while it's not ok to go around looking for a figth, that doesn't mean you have to accept *anything*. It's allowed defending yourself.
Many kids don't really know that they're allowed and indeed encouraged to break "rules" when the situation warrants it. They think the rules apply all the time.
I once had to try to calm down a 13 year old girl that had, on purpose, thrown a chair trough a window to get out in a fire. (the windows of the room she was in,
Re:remember kids: (Score:3, Insightful)
If the school won't handle the problem, then what are you supposed to do? Out in the real world, if someone attacks you, you have a legal right to defend yourself
Re:remember kids: (Score:2)
I'm jealous (Score:2)
Pay attention Fox Channel.... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Pay attention Fox Channel.... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Pay attention Fox Channel.... (Score:2)
Nay nay! I suggest FOX hosts it, and it be named "The Ring of Death". The pirates who choose, can defend themselves against the *AA's gladiators. And who needs Wapner, we'll get Gonzales himself.
And, we can throw single-mothers and little old ladies who don't own computers to the Lions.
It'll be awesome. Just like the old Roman Colliseum. And, we'll play it live with the
Finally! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Finally! (Score:5, Funny)
Software pirate - Probably very pale and skinny due to skipping meals and time outside in order hack or organize pirated playlists. Resulting low vitamin intake can affect durability. Small target. Hyped up on caffeine. +5 to defense, +7 to speed, -10 to HP, -4 to strength. Levels up 20% faster due to time spent playing Fight Night on modded Xbox.
Software designer - Tends to be larger due to snacking on the job. Caffeine adds no bonus (addicted). Large mass can offer several advantages. -4 to defense, -10 to speed, +10 to HP, +6 to strength. Can invoke Putrid Socks of Nonwashing.
Re:Finally! (Score:2)
Re:Finally! (Score:2)
Re:Finally! (Score:2)
House of the dead, etc... (Score:2)
I'd **love** to kick Uwe Boll's ass for ruining so many good video games.
What's next? (Score:5, Funny)
Come to think of it, after seeing "Dance Monkey Boy," I see that his kung fu is quite strong. I doubt though that he could defend against my Iron Developer Technique!
I wouldnt... (Score:2)
Say whatever bad shit you want about Microsoft, Ballmer etc, but I wouldn't say it to this guys face. Hes like 6'5 and built like a linebacker. Plus this guy looks mean... I think he would still look mean petting a kitten or kissing a baby. He would hand you your ass without breaking a sweat.
Re:What's next? (Score:2)
Ballmer? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Yar Matey (Score:3, Insightful)
Nerd Rage at it's finest - what exactly was the positive side of this for either of them?
Only thing I can think of is a cheap publicity stunt....
Re:Yar Matey (Score:2)
Southwest Airlines famously settled a trademark infringement suit with an arm-wrestling match [airandspacemagazine.com] between CEO's.
(Warning: link not really unsafe for work but does feature a loud Howard Dean-ish scream, so beware if you're not on headphones.)
missed opportunity (Score:2)
Seems unbelievable (Score:2)
Nice story though, and thats all that counts.
I can see it now... (Score:4, Funny)
Smirnov: You will lose.
Software Dev's friend: Whatever he hits, he destroys.
Smirnov: I must break you.
Smirnov: If he dies, he dies.
Re:I can see it now... (Score:2)
Ballmer entering to f****** kill someone (Score:3, Funny)
Oh no, no chairs allowed in here, sir!
Hope this won't become standard... (Score:2, Interesting)
Is [insert software company here] hiring Boxing champions just in case someone decides to pirate their software
Bet a lot of 'open software' writers are happy that pirating GPL software isn't a serious option...
Roel
Re:Hope this won't become standard... (Score:2)
The FSM is not pleased (Score:5, Funny)
RAmen
read your eulas (Score:5, Funny)
Ballmerized (Score:3, Insightful)
Chair throwing is more of a pro-wrestling thing than a boxing thing last I checked...
Result would've been completely different... (Score:2)
Really, how do we know it didn't happen that way? TFA states, "Manager of the company's software department, Andrei Smirnov, offered to fight the dealer in a fitness center. He defeated the computer pirate 24-16 in three rounds, lasting three minutes each."
16 points being tied down, though - that's one tough "boxing" opponent!
Sports Section Headlines (Score:5, Funny)
In other news, "Don King promotes new Dice.com job search section aimed at boxing elite"
Re:Sports Section Headlines (Score:2)
I'm guessing that if he was employeed by the RIAA biting ears would be mandatory.
I like my odds... (Score:5, Funny)
*ducks*
was he sure? (Score:2)
Was he sure it was the real pirate, and not a copy? Did he check his license file? :)
Pro wrestling would work better for Ballmer (Score:2)
'Cause then he could go for the chair!
Another SR Joke (Score:2, Funny)
If that happened in the states (Score:2)
In An Ideal World... (Score:2)
Rocky IV? (Score:2)
"a way to channel Steve Ballmer's aggression too." (Score:2)
"It's the BOXERS! BOXERS! BOXERS!"
DIBS ON DARL!! (Score:2)
That was a cool story, but (Score:3, Funny)
Now THAT would be cool ...
Re:That was a cool story, but (Score:3, Funny)
Personally... (Score:2)
Peasants: Burn Hilary Rosen, burn!
Hilary: Rarrrrgh! RAAArrrghhh!
That takes me back to WWF days (Score:3, Funny)
I'm Russian and here are three observations (Score:3, Insightful)
2. Piracy is a more complex problem than you Americans think. Many do not have money to buy licensed software. It's often simply not an option, period. This is why software piracy is so prevalent and accepted here.
3. If you want a personal perspective on video piracy, have a look at my review [vad1.com]. When I did buy licensed DVDs, they were of lower quality than pirated ones more often than not.
I'm not advocating anything, just trying to state the state of the facts.
Re:Oh, lordy (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Oh, lordy (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Now the time has come for the real FIGHT CLUB (Score:2)
Re:When did we drink the Kool-Aid? (Score:3, Insightful)
A long time ago; it's even more firmly embedded in popular usage than 'hacker'.
This battle has been fought and lost, and slashdot rants aren't going to fix that. That's what makes it not just a propaganda machine, but a good propaganda machine.