IE7 Separated from Windows Explorer 434
An anonymous reader writes "Security experts warned Microsoft 10 years ago that putting IE as a component of Windows Explorer was a bad idea, looks like Microsoft finally decided to listen to the advice. According to a short write up in Business Week, Microsoft has decided that when IE7 comes out with Vista it will no longer be a component of Windows Explorer and will be able to replace IE6 even on XP machines."
Welcome news (Score:5, Interesting)
Lied to the EU? (Score:5, Interesting)
Interesting seeing as Microsoft are now suddenly able to seperate the two (in reference to Windows XP, not Windows Vista).
On XP (Score:3, Interesting)
Okay, but... (Score:5, Interesting)
I imagine a lot of users are quite used to typing webaddress.com into Windows Explorer, now. I suppose that should respond by launching the user's default browser with the command line argument webaddress.com, but is that what it will do, or will WinExplore still function as a browser?
Re:Lied to the EU? (Score:4, Interesting)
Great! Now to get Konqueror! (Score:5, Interesting)
meh (Score:4, Interesting)
Good news (Score:5, Interesting)
Today, with people having more horsepower in their computer then they know what to do with, same goes for hard drive space, having a tightly integrated web browser / file browser doesn't make sense, and it has been a source of Microsoft's security problems.
Yes, you will still be able to type a web address in the file explorer in Vista and have a web page display . While explorer and internet explorer are no longer integrated, Vista will transparently switch between the applications and maintain the same window view.
I am sure that I.E. components will still be launched at system startup, to give Microsoft and edge over 3rd party browsers for quick browser launching, but by removing the integration with the file explorer, this will definitely be a welcomed change that should offer better security in the long run, which Microsoft desperitely needs.
So this explains the delay? (Score:5, Interesting)
I doubt though that something so integrated into windows explorer can be seperated and reprogrammed into a seperate application within the extra 2 months.
Its alot of work not to mention may break many applications. For example cdroms that use autoplay sometimes display html and javascript in the windows explorer menu in a seperate pane. I suppose you could reprogram windows explorer to just call an IE7.dll to display it.
But Microsoft was found guilty of merging IE into a million libraries so third party apps would not function without IE and infact required it. Even a command prompt program that uses strings requires IE as a result.
Thank god I am not on the windows development team.
FTP Evidence (Score:4, Interesting)
What about windowsupdates (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Okay, but... (Score:2, Interesting)
No it isn't. Most of the problem is that ActiveX and other MS native components on a webpage aren't supported in other browsers, and for good reason.
Windows Update for example always calls IE and uses ActiveX. Changing the default browser is going to break WU.
Re:Finally! (Score:1, Interesting)
Do you think that anyone back during the conception of that feature thought that a decade down the road companies were going to distribute executables on music cds that install rootkits a la DRM? Outside of that whole fiasco there's no possibly reason why autoplay is not a feature. Nearly everyone knows that programs launch when they insert their cds and most the time this feature saves them the time of loading it. Anyone who really needs to do anything besides run whatever the default program is should know to hold down shift anyway. It's not like the cd-rom is a vulnerable part of the computer where unapproved information is readily inserted, it's a piece of hardware a foot away from my leg - I know if anything malicious is going to be placed in there.
Glad to hear it (Score:4, Interesting)
Clever, eh?
Re:Replace IE6 on XP machines? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:What about windowsupdates (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Great! Now to get Konqueror! (Score:1, Interesting)
Actually pulling up taskmanager.exe by way of Ctrl-Alt-Delete will allow you to start a command shell.
Re:Lied to the US DOJ? (Score:2, Interesting)
It'd be similar to saying that Safari can't be removed from OS X because a number of applications and system utilities rely on Webkit. Of course you can get rid of Safari without getting rid of the libraries - just drag the userland app to the trash.
Personally, I think that saying that there was no way to get rid of IE, the application, without breaking Windows was not true at all. People still don't seem to make that distinction.
Re:Glad to hear it (Score:1, Interesting)
Re: java and architecture neutrality. (Score:3, Interesting)
The problem is that some OSes and implementations don't draw anything at all. So, on Windows and Linux, you get a pixel, on Mac OSX, and Sun, you get nothing. (I mean, it's a 0 width, 0 height rectangle, that means draw nothing, right?)
The frustrating thing is the first Lab went out, and I designed it on a Linux machine, and I turn it in, and the TA for the course, who was grading them, was grading them on a Sun machine. So the response comes back "Your program doesn't draw anything" Aw... thanks Java.
I've actually written a POSIX compliant web-server that supported CGI/1.1, and enough HTTP/1.1 to be at least useful, and it was far more compatible at the source level than Java was at the binary level.