Desktop Replacements and the 11 Pound Pencil 252
Marco Ramius writes "Tom's Hardware Guide has an article up entitled 'Unwieldy Laptops or Portable Desktops?' in which the author lugs an Alienware Area-51m desktop replacement to a 32 hour LAN to assess what advantages and disadvantages desktop replacements have over desktops themselves." They also have a related article entitled The Case of the 11 Pound Pencil where an office adopts a desktop replacement solution to unsatisfactory ends. Both interesting looks at appropriate uses for hefty hardware.
Re:Well... (Score:5, Informative)
I'm not sure if the parent post was just unfunny or ignorant, but it's definitely -1 overrated.
Re:Shared devices (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Machine was in motion for 32 hours straight - h (Score:2, Informative)
If there was, it wouldn't go to someone playing 32 hours straight. It would go to that Korean man who died after playing for 50 hours. [BBC News [bbc.co.uk]]
Re:portable ENIAC (Score:2, Informative)
1) A large desktop replacement laptop was chosen when a thin and light laptop or PDA would have been a better choice.
2) The PDF files required duplex printing when the office had only single-sided printers.
3) Users weren't adequately trained on how to manage the data files. The original PDF files should have been READ-only, and the users trained on where to save the files they created.
4) No database tool was used. This forced each electronic form to be filled in anew each time instead of pulling up client data that had already been entered before.
The gist of the article is not that laptops aren't useful, but that jumping onto a technology bandwagon without first gathering requirements from the actual users and designing a solution to best meet the user's needs leads to half-assed solutions.
The poor users were essentially forced into using large laptops to do the job they could have done just as well with a notebook and pencil. The article maintains a good solution is possible, but in this case was not achieved.
Re:Shared devices (Score:2, Informative)
perfect for iMac (Score:5, Informative)
iMacs are wonderful for desktop use and relatively portable when it comes down to it... ie: you can move them around by yourself... all the connections are easy to get to, they have built in wireless so no need to rewire or extend the network to a new space.. if you have a wall port for ethernet no problem... built in speakers and headphone jacks for privacy... the new ones have the built in iSight for video conference and all have a built in mic for audio conference. New ones have bluetooth built in for use with wireless input and for synching up your pda with entourage or ical....
Bonjour is a god send for IT... just buy a printer that uses zeroconf and you'll never have label another ip address on it again just 'add printer' and pick bonjour , voila.. the printer shows up and will work without special drivers, though you may want to download them for extra features for special people...
So many nice things to say about the combo of OS X and iMac for office use.
Re:Shared devices (Score:3, Informative)
Because, as those of us who have to work for a living know: a TON of important software uses it for the dongle!
Re:Well... (Score:3, Informative)
Both the Americans and the Russians used pencils in orbital flights in the early days of the space race. However, they both realized that it was kind of a bad idea to be using something that shedded little bits of graphite or lead into a zero-G, high-oxygen, stuffed-with-electronics environment. So a company, Fischer maybe, not the US government, spent about a million US dollars developing the "space pen" which was then sold to both the Russians and NASA.
Re:Shared devices (Score:2, Informative)
Other than that, the zd8000 is nice. While I've got a whupass desktop (athlon64 3800+/sli nvidia 6800gtx/2gb ram/720gb hdd/yadayadayada), I have never once had the desire to pick it up and lug it anywhere. LAN party or not, that box is staying there for a LONG time.
With the laptop, on the other hand, it's much easier. My buddy and I go down to the local Starbucks and wile away hours playing UT2004 or similar.
I'd never recommend the laptop to anyone who had to carry it around for business though, the thing weighs in at about 11-13 lbs., once you include the power brick, obligatory second battery (1 hour battery life on their 'HIGH CAPACITY' battery if you're doing anything worth a crap). It's quite a pain.
But, for sheer performance, you can't beat it. It plays UT2004 in very high resolutions and gets 90fps. Doom 3 and Quake 4 play on it remarkably well. If you're a gamer and like to game on the go, it's great to have. I don't really mind lugging it around because I don't go too far with it -- and I don't carry it all the time.
Anyways.
Re:Shared devices (Score:3, Informative)
-nB
Re:Bean Counters and Laptop Specs (Score:3, Informative)
Graphics cards have a finite amount of resources in them, such as memory, and they decided to spend the resources on more color depth per pixel instead of more pixels. 1024x768 is more resolution than 800x600. 800x600x24 is better than 800x600x8, but as a programmer, or writer, or diagram-drawer, or web-reader, I need more pixels a lot more than I need more colors. For looking at satellite imagery in the late 80s, it would have been nice to have more than 256 grey-scale (not that you could really see more than about 64 greys on the CRTs we had, but it would have given us more bits for overlays or false-color or let us avoid having the screen flash palettes as you switched between windows.)