Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

In Praise of Constant Connectivity 118

An anonymous reader wrote to mention an opinion piece on CNet discussing the realities of living in constant contact with the world at large. The author argues that the ability to connect actually creates time for us that we wouldn't have otherwise had. From the article: "... rather than obliterate our social lives, always-on connectivity and the increased flexibility it brings will allow us to break free from the office and actually socialise more. Sure, you'll be on call at unusual hours of the day, but think about how much more efficient you'll be -- particularly if your most productive hours aren't between 9am and 5:30pm! And besides, all newfangled technology comes with an 'off' switch should you find yourself needing some down time."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

In Praise of Constant Connectivity

Comments Filter:
  • Hmmm.... (Score:1, Interesting)

    by corychristison ( 951993 ) on Saturday March 04, 2006 @04:39AM (#14848979)
    I'm a freelance web developer.

    I generally do most of my work between the hours of 5:00pm - 5:00am the next morning.

    Without constant connection to the internet, I don't know where I'd be.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 04, 2006 @04:41AM (#14848987)
    No thanks, I'll have the "off" switch and a sterile office, please. I've learned from experience that when something really, absolutley needs *doing*, sitting in a comfortable chair at home, with the Web at my fingertips, is a *massive* distraction.

    That is not to say I am against ubiquitous connectivity - I long for the day mobile Web access is as simple as using a cellphone. With Google, dictionary.org, Wikipedia, various product review sites etc. on hand, making decisions and finding out information while on the move will be incredibly easy - in my *free time*.

    For work though, I don't see "always on" as something as positive.
  • by Bananatree3 ( 872975 ) on Saturday March 04, 2006 @04:49AM (#14849005)

    My always-on connection to the internet has been a major help when I need to get to a website in a bind, and I don't have to wait 3 minutes for a modem to dial in to an ISP, and then wait for some page to slowly load. Also my cell phone has proved invaluable in situations where I would have been stuck otherwise.

    But along with that, the old tale of telemarketers and charity seekers calling at dinner time is still a pain (even if you have caller ID, it still is annoying to have the phone ring at such times unecessarily).

  • by Bazman ( 4849 ) on Saturday March 04, 2006 @04:54AM (#14849016) Journal
    I'm sick of having near misses with innattentive pedestrians and cyclists with headphones on and staring into their mobiles[1]. These people aren't "connected to the world at large", they are disconnected from the real world around them. At some point my bike is going to make a connection with one of them as they step into the real world road without looking.

    Baz

    [1] yeah, I've seen cyclists pedalling and texting at the same time.
  • by Hamster Lover ( 558288 ) * on Saturday March 04, 2006 @05:29AM (#14849096) Journal
    There are both pros and cons to the "constantly connected".

    Pros:

    * I don't have to be in the office to actually "work". I am hardly there anyway as my work is supporting POS in a retail environment.
    * I travel around a lot and am constantly in touch with others.
    * I can schedule doctors, dentists, mortage, and other personal appointments whenever I feel like it.
    * I can see a hit movie in the middle of an afternoon if I want. I saw Spider-Man that way and it was worth the afternoon.
    * I hardly ever take vacation because I can take a Friday and drive to my Mom's , or Banff or wherever and take a long weekend as long as I can stay in touch with my Blackberry. As long as there is GSM service, I can be there (unless I really do take vacation).
    * I determine what the priorities are and what my schedule is to a large degree. Sipping a margarita in the pool at a friend's house in the middle of Summer. *sigh* That was a good Summer.
    * I can watch The View in the morning. OK, that's probably a con as there is nothing else on...

    Cons:

    * I must be on available for calls pretty much 24/7.
    * I sometimes have to break important plans or appointments to solve problems or go to the trouble including having to break those fun three day weekends.
    * I am expected to have instant answers to perplexing problems hundreds or thousands of miles away and solve those problems over the phone.
    * I am many times engaged with work for 12, 14 or 18 hours at a time solving large scale problems or installing new locations.
    * Putting down the margarita, getting out of the pool and driving six hours to a location to figure out what the alarm at a location is refusing to release a data line and having to fix the fuckup and completely rewire it and get back home at four in the morning. :(
    * One of only two people in the company covering the entire country with the answer to a problem. The responsibility gets to you sometimes.
    * When your friends tell you that you have no life other than work.
    * Standing at my best friends wedding as the best man at the front of the church during the service and my Blackberry rings and I insisted that I had to answer it. That's when everyone figured I had a problem.
    * Actually looking forward to the fucking View in the morning. God damn you Starr Jones! I hate that bitch...and that annoying skinny blonde.
  • by crazee_cruzer ( 936514 ) on Saturday March 04, 2006 @05:46AM (#14849127) Homepage
    There's a major differnce between being available online and having a social life. Social interaction has a lot more involved than simply communicating in words. Here's my take on this: http://junkland.n3rds.net/archives/28-Communicatio n-In-A-Connected-World.html [n3rds.net]
  • Re:Boss (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Fred_A ( 10934 ) <fred@NOspam.fredshome.org> on Saturday March 04, 2006 @05:59AM (#14849146) Homepage
    In the work life of a lot of people, being connected 24/7 is now pretty much like being in the office 24/7. Yes, there is an off switch. Using it will just get you scalded because "we couldn't get hold of you like the hundreds of other times the minute we wanted to".

    It certainly won't improve your work life, it just will make you more of a serf.

    The only cases in favour that I can find would be artists waiting for employment and possibly self employed people who can at least more or less set their own rules.

    In our private lives, being in touch 24/7 currently means that for a lot of people, no plans are made any more. Everything is now decided on the spur of the moment. Planning a dinner or a night out with friends is no longer possible. They will wait until the latest minute to see if there isn't anything more exciting going on elsewhere (of course they'll attempt to drag you along). Let's hope the dog enjoys whatever meal it was you cooked for the occasion.

    Here too, not answering the phone (or turning it off) is immediately suspicious ("are you filtering me?"). And can lead to problematic relationship issues with friends.

    Disclaimer: Those are my experiences in Europe, in your location YMMV.

    Disclaimer 2: My cell phone is now off most of the time.

  • by JRGhaddar ( 448765 ) on Saturday March 04, 2006 @06:48AM (#14849222)
    I think "Always On" can be positive, but in retrospect to the position on call. For support, data entry and sales I think that is a great idea. For development...not so good. For example:

    Sales Person A wants to work for a couple hours so they log into the corporate servers at home and answer a few emails. The duration of their login, and what "work" is done is documented to prevent abuse etc, and they are credited with the work (hours, commission etc.). Say they want to go to an early movie...they can check out at anytime, and when one person checks out a text message is sent to all offline employees notifying them of a slot available for work. Only X amount of slots are allotted at any given time.

    Now of course I just thought of that off the top of my head, but I think there is legitimate promise to a system like that.

    Maybe an open source project would be a great place to test a system like that?
     
  • Missing... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by DarkZero ( 516460 ) on Saturday March 04, 2006 @07:08AM (#14849244)
    I think one thing that this story is missing is the way that connectivity can really improve your social life. As a young guy still working a fairly lame non-cubicle job, connectivity makes my social life much easier. With a cellphone that not only makes basic calls with plenty of minutes, but also text messaging and mobile AIM, I can contact virtually all of my friends at any time and schedule any kind of get-together I want.

    It used to be that if you wanted to get all of your friends together, you'd have to call all of them, and if they didn't answer their phone, you either leave a message on their machine at home or just have to call them back. Now, I just type in the message "Sushi tonight?" and send it to the eight people that have cellphones with text messaging, and then load up mobile AIM for the one or two that don't. In five minutes, I'd easily convinced all of my friends to go to the same restaurant as soon as they got out of work.

    I also don't come home to any tedious questions or demands. I already know from text messages during the day that someone was too busy to feed the dogs, so I just walk in and do it. I already know that my sister had a bad day at work and I can read every detail of it while I'm eating lunch at work, rather than listening to a furious rant as soon as I've switched from "work mood" to "relaxed mood" when I walk in the door at home.

    Connectivity makes life a lot easier in this regard. If I could do my work like this, it would even better.
  • Totally serious... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Hamster Lover ( 558288 ) * on Saturday March 04, 2006 @07:08AM (#14849247) Journal
    and that's one of the dangers of "constant connectivity" is that it's amazingly hard to turn off. The ceremony hadn't started yet, but I felt compelled to answer the phone. Problem is if I don't answer the phone, the person at the other end panics and does something stupid in an attempt to fix the problem and ends up making things much, much worse. It's just easier to take the call and solve the problem. Needless to say, it was taken away from me. :)
  • by Heembo ( 916647 ) on Saturday March 04, 2006 @07:40AM (#14849297) Journal
    I've learned from experience that when something really, absolutley needs *doing*, sitting in a comfortable chair at home, with the Web at my fingertips, is a *massive* distraction.

    (darth-vader-like-voice)That just shows you lack of discipline.(/darth-vader-like-voice) I'm a telecommuter working from the highly productive comfort of my home in Hawaii while making over 6 figs consulting for the likes of big banks and big geek companies. You CAN work from home, but you must show constant, daily output and be verbose on communitation with those who review your deliverables. Oh yea, and do rock star-like work. I think needing to go into an office is archaic if you have this thing called work ethic.
  • My always on . . . (Score:1, Interesting)

    by rbannon ( 512814 ) <ron.bannon@gmai l . com> on Saturday March 04, 2006 @08:07AM (#14849348) Homepage
    Internet connection cost me $50/month, and my cellular service cost me $60/month. Bottom line, being always on is like having a ball-and-chain on 24/7 and I'm being forced to pay for it.

  • by hughbar ( 579555 ) on Saturday March 04, 2006 @08:25AM (#14849368) Homepage
    Like many older people, I have a pay-as-you-go cellphone for emergencies and genuine need. I am able to make an appointment and keep it, without 7/8 intermediate cellphone conversations. And, as the original post said, I'm not interested in being 'available' at all times or babbling every inconsequential thought as I 'think' it. I enjoy staring out of the bus window and it's cheaper too. Some people get quite angry when I won't give them my cell number and I tell them that I don't use it. I've also noticed that the internet is much more central to my life since broadband, I going to have to chase it back down to a reasonable level too.
  • Off switch? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by CCFreak2K ( 930973 ) on Saturday March 04, 2006 @09:25AM (#14849510) Homepage Journal
    If there's anything electronic in my room made after 2000, it doesn't have an off switch, merely a power cable and a "soft" power button.
  • by Kalvos ( 137750 ) <bathory@maltedmedia.com> on Saturday March 04, 2006 @09:45AM (#14849566) Homepage

    amelith: The ones who are likely to welcome this are people who already work freelance in jobs such as writing and journalism, like the author of the article maybe? They already have to do time management and have a large amount of control over their working hours. Nobody is likely to ring them at 3AM to complain about a typo in their last article for example.

    Spoken like a non-freelancer? You're mostly right. I've been a freelance writer (as well as composer, engraver, consultant, programmer, and photographer) for the past 30-plus years. As a freelancer on the US east coast, I work "in" a dozen times zones, from Prague to Portland, and until I set clear rules, that phone would ring at any hour of the day or night.

    I've been computer-connected 24/7 since 2001, but now the phone and Skype are answered only automatically and a message must be left, even if I am here. I suggest callers always send an email to confirm their call and their question, because my clients know that their calls will be returned only when I can focus adequately on their question. Usually that is promptly, sometimes it isn't ... but the delay helps them both realize what is actually important and clarify the problem for themselves (and consequently for me). Their deadline is my deadline, but their panic is not my panic. The work always gets done, in time and well.

    As you say, always-on is a great advantage for those who can manage their time and insist they not be taken advantage of. Managing it also helps clarity of thought and family life. But I had to develop the ability to say no to unacceptable work, even if it means a light diet for a while.

    Dennis

    My latest project [maltedmedia.com]

  • Re:the "off" switch (Score:2, Interesting)

    by iTristan ( 893792 ) on Saturday March 04, 2006 @10:56AM (#14849795)
    Because I'm likely to fall into the "always on" trap like everyone else, I've automated my "off switch".

    The same technology that connects me (email, chat, office VoIP phone) can all be preprogrammed to turn off, or go to voicemail at pre-determined times. Now, I don't even notice that my outside working world has stopped being able to directly infringe on my downtime because the technology is now taking care of that and I just slow down and stop for the day.

    My office email stops checking after a certain time, office phone goes straight to voicemail at set times and on weekends. There's an "emergency" contact contingency available that of course, is clear that it's for emergency use only.

    And best of all, is that it's automated, because if it wasn't, I wouldn't be strict enough myself.
  • by Omestes ( 471991 ) <{moc.liamg} {ta} {setsemo}> on Saturday March 04, 2006 @04:14PM (#14850822) Homepage Journal
    I think 90% of social structures (resturants, churches, movies, pubs, libraries, etc...) need faraday cages, or some other form of signal blocking. I'm so sick of idiots yelling at their phones in public, or dropping out of real conversation just to look at their little gadgets. It is outright rude.

    If your talking to someone HERE, and NOW, then you talk to them. No matter how many times your little gizmo yells at you. Its polite, it is something from an older age called manners. People used to have them, but technology has done its best to kill them.

    And, to be more OT, why is constant connectivity a good thing? I knew I had misanthropic tendancies, but I guess they are worse than I thought, since I really find no need to be in constant contact with people, news, slashdot, my friends, parents, neighbors, government, EVERYONE. I like the quiet time, even at work. I like quiet, uninterupted, conversations with friends, reading a good book far from a telephone or gidget. I like getting lost on little trails in the woods. Appearently I am a minority. What is so good about constantly being interupted?

    Listen to a random sample of average cell conversations, or chat logs, or even analyze the topics of your own conversations. How much of the communication is pure noise? I've noticed that cellphones bring out the urge to spill all of our minutia to uncaring others. People sit around talking about shopping, their classes, how they need to buy more shoes, that they went to the dentist, the current state of their bowels. But rarely anything meaningful. They just want others to live their lives vicariously.

    Also, contrary to the article, it is damaging our social structure, and making us more and more clanish. When I was going to a community college back in the mid-late 90's, after classes people would go outside, light a cigarette, and talk to their classmates, now people immediatly open their phones and talk to people they already know, never needing to confront strangers. One would think that this lack of novelty would lead to a more closed minded society, where we never need to confront opinions other than the ones we are familior with already.

    Wow, that turned into a rant. Sorry. Needless to say, I don't own a cell-phone, turn off AIM periodically (much to the shock of my friends), and only check my email (private) once a day. I sometimes keep the ringer off on my phone (mostly weekends, or holidays), with the answering machine volume off, and check the messages once a day. I get more done, and I think my mental health is better (no tech caused ADD).

"Protozoa are small, and bacteria are small, but viruses are smaller than the both put together."

Working...