Mac Mini and iPod Hi-Fi Over-Hyped? 317
RX8 writes "Analyst Michael Greeson takes a look at Apple's new products, the Mac Mini (Intel based) and iPod Hi-Fi and explains why they were over-hyped and how that can damage Apple. Michael explains that when you are 'an industry innovator - when your products fall short of being truly original, your own success becomes your worst enemy.'" Update: 03/04 00:07 GMT by Z : As many posters have pointed out, the article here has little to do with the synopsis. This article is mostly about the design for the mac mini and its remote, which is a fairly interesting topic. Mea culpa, folks.
Wait just a minute (Score:2, Insightful)
How is this overhyped? (Score:5, Insightful)
When they pull out the stops, it isn't in an event of this level.
Overpriced leather case aside, the stuff they rolled out was worth holding a minor event over...That's what this was, a minor event.
*=yeah, it wasn't the Cafeteria, but it was held in a location they already own, it's cheap floorspace to hold an announcement.
Re:Amateur Hour (Score:3, Insightful)
Ignoring the article completely... (Score:4, Insightful)
Overhyped? More like hardly hyped at all.
Re:They screwed the pooch on the hi-fi (Score:4, Insightful)
Most of your complaints can be traced back to the iPod itself. When it was first announced most people around here laughed it off as being nothing new and overpriced. Don't underestimate Apple's excellent product design and marketing expertise.
What hype? (Score:4, Insightful)
And they could have hyped this. Look, they announced the switch to Intel last year and said they'd have Intel Macs in June this year. It's March, and already they have a mid-range desktop, high-end notebook, and two low-end desktop machines out.
"a dedicated TV output"? (Score:4, Insightful)
Where? I see a Firewire and a DVI port, no composite, S-Video, 75ohm coax, or component video you'd expect for the term "dedicated TV output". Indeed, from the specifications:
So Apple makes a scan converter, which could probably be used with any of their machines. It still doesn't make the DVI port a "dedicated TV output".
Re:Amateur Hour (Score:4, Insightful)
The new masthead (Score:2, Insightful)
Slashdot
News for nerds. Summaries that bear no resemblance to the articles they summarize.
YMMV. HTH. HAND.
--
Sig null
Re:"a dedicated TV output"? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:New revision (Score:3, Insightful)
Not quite as ho-hum as you make out (Score:3, Insightful)
Have you listened to any of them?
I sepnt some time in an Apple store comparing them (not even to buy, just curious) and frankly all of them soundly really weak. Yet people buy them.
If the Apple unit produces much better sound then the extra cost may well be worth it for the same people that are buying these things already (I must admit I am not quite sure who they are, though I suppose they'd be nice for a sewing room or shop or something).
and the Intel Mac mini is simply a retool of the same offering on a faster chip.
Sort of true but it also offers improved graphics support for video (even with the dreaded integrated Intel video chip), and standard bluetooth/wireless. These are really important features so that third party makers of things like bluetooth or IP remotes know that there will be a substantial market for such if enough minis are sold.
these 2 products are more evolutionary than REVolutionary, and hardly deserves the fanfare of a separate launch party hosted by Jobs himself
I agree they are more evolutionary, though in the case of the mini it jumps from a device that is not really usable as an HTPC for a number of reasons to a device that is actually well suited to the task - that is something more of a jump than a basic evolutionary step. It's like going from cro-magnon to wall street stock broker, I was pretty happy as I thought it would take more models to really add HTPC support.
And it was not a party but a press briefing! He came on stage, announced the two items, and took off. Actually the mini alone probably deserved a little more fanfare than that but they wanted to keep it low key I iamgine until other products that tie into it (like HD video on ITMS) are released.
Re:Amateur Hour (Score:5, Insightful)
I've written articles for a few sites in the past, not as anything professional, but come across the same problem. Enough of the feedback in site comments or email comes from people who betray their lack of comprehension by their comments. I'll write about how to install an apache module for example, and specifically state three steps to be taken in order to get everything working; the responses indicate people have jumped in and tried only step three, done all steps in a random order, or in some cases completely misread the point of the article. "Hi B, I'm writing about your article on how to get eaccelerator working, and I'm getting errors decompressing the archive according to Step 2"... so I reply "Hello user, I have never written an eaccelerator article, step 2 is how to decompress the archive for installing mod_gzip". Any & every permutation comes back at me. It's possibly a reflection of bad writing skills, but honestly I don't think my writing is THAT poor.
So it goes on, and I blame half-hearted attempts in school to introduce speed reading, where anybody can be taught in minutes to skim over two paragraphs and get words like "hype" "apple" "mac mini" and "intel" then make up their own story in-mind, without getting any real context or meaning from what's read.
Re:What are these "Channels" (Score:3, Insightful)
So if you're looking for CNN, you look for CNN, not a number that happens to be associated with CNN.
Kind of like my post last week about Vista still using letters to designate drives. Its necessary to have a simple designation, but these sesignations are meaningless to the end user. Where do you find the G drive, or what's on channel 48?
Re:What are these "Channels" (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Remote Controls (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:They screwed the pooch on the hi-fi (Score:3, Insightful)
My first thought upon seeing the picture of it was, "where are the tweeters?"
Frequency response: 53Hz to 16kHz ± 3 dB
(From Apple's "Tech Specs")
16kHz? Absymal. It's not Hi-Fi - I've seen ghetto blasters with better specs. For what Apple's charging, you could buy a Chinese-made tube amp from eBay and still have enough money left over to buy a pair of speakers with better specs.
Comment removed (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Amateur Hour (Score:4, Insightful)
How many people do you know who bought a Mac mini for cutting edge gaming?
Would you whine about your new Dodge Neon not doing very well in the NASCAR standings?