Consumers vs. IP Owners: The Future of Copyright 415
conJunk writes "The BBC has a thoughtful article about new challenges in copyright. The problem: The rights to the audio recordings of the Beatles first album will expire in 2013. While consumers stand to benefit from competing releases of the materials, the copyright owners are of course terrified. And the artists? This one doesn't even seem to affect them."
They think no one will like the Beatles (Score:4, Funny)
Just wait. The Bottled Head of Paul McCartney's gonna be pissed!
Don't even need the US congress! (Score:4, Funny)
You don't even need the US congress! I got an email just today:
Legitimate points (Score:5, Funny)
Please think of the children.
Yestarday (Score:4, Funny)
Now* it looks as though they're here to stay
Oh, I belive in royalty pay
*thanks to Evil Mega Corp (c) lobbying agency
Re:Duration (Score:2, Funny)
It doesn't matter (Score:3, Funny)
Who submitted this? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Copyrights won't expire in the U.S. (Score:3, Funny)
Wow, that makes me feel really, really old! I just barely remember getting a then-current Beatles album as a present as a small child -- Magical Mystery Tour, I think it was. Now, we have Slashdotters who don't even know that the Beatles were British.
That generation gap is a devil bitch, eh?
Re:The Corruption of Copyright Law (Score:2, Funny)
In today's world the copyright should be 14+14 days and heading towards 14+14 hours.
Re:Creation in the digital age (Score:3, Funny)
get real, the ease of copying creative works means that copyright is MORE important now than before.
I guess you dont work in a job where you create anything digital or easily copied, because your plan makes you a homeless tramp...