Novell Suggests Linux Program Replacements 358
An anonymous reader writes "As a result of over 14,000 votes since the beginning of January, Adobe Photoshop, Autocad, Dreamweaver, iTunes, and Macromedia Flash are currently the top 5 'most wanted' Windows/MacOS-only applications in Novell's online survey. From comments made by the survey participants, Novell has also listed suggested substitutes for each of the five. What do readers think of these suggestions?"
Re:Why? (Score:4, Interesting)
PhotoShop 7 reportedly works with WINE (Score:4, Interesting)
Er...this isn't Novell (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Dreamweaver and flash ... (Score:3, Interesting)
Finally, someone who "gets it." Especially since most work IS maintenance work, and its a lot easier to write a perl script and make file to regenerate 100 pages than to load each one and change it.
Audio in SVG? (Score:4, Interesting)
If SVG ever becomes standard, we'll be able to do all the animation we want.
But does a solution involving SVG allow for synchronized audio? For instance, if I wanted to use SVG instead of SWF to make an animated series such as Homestar Runner or Weebl and Bob, would that work?
Re:My opinion: (Score:5, Interesting)
Actually this is a bit of a myth in my experience. I send stuff to printers from Gimp fairly often and CMYK isn't an issue; they just convert it as part of their process.
What IS a killer is spot-colour usage. I have no decent method of working with Pantone or other specialised spot colours, nor is there a good system for handling product shots where a particular colour HAS to be represented correctly, such as a Coke can.
People forget that CMYK can represent less than half the contents of a Pantone swash; it is not the be-all and end-all of colour handling.
TWW
Re:AutoCAD (Score:2, Interesting)
That's good, because you'll be writing a lot of big ones. Most folks have never even been able to get close to this kind of software, because it's just too damn expensive. Too bad, because 99.99999% of the world has absolutely no way to create and share design documents. It's an exclusive club, populated by overtaxed addicts. It's a hard habit to break: if you need CAD, you need to pay the man.
And pay and pay and pay. Autodesk is notorious for breaking backward compatibility with their own products. And because designers and engineers must share their documents, once the upgrade train starts rolling, everyone in the whole connected web is compelled to upgrade also. And every upgrade comes at great expense, causes a lot of disruption, slows people down, and virtually never provides functionality that results in any real productivity increase.
An open CAD format and at least one good free reference implementation of a CAD package that used it would change the world. How many people with good ideas don't even bother trying to get them off the ground because they just don't have the tools? How cool would it be to be able to mix and match design elements the way web page authors patch together pieces of html? Mix this house with that pool, but swap out the bathroom design and add a garage. Do it yourself at home and then ask an architect to help you finesse the result to meet local building code and permitting requirements. Never mind fat rich Americans, think what might be done in the developing world. It's hard to be an engineer if you have no tools.
As with most software, the real value proposition for our economy is not the software market itself, but the markets served by that software. CAD, just like other applications, should be commoditized. I preemptively call bullshit on anyone who claims CAD is special, and can't be developed or in a F/OSS environment. It would thrive.
Death to Autodesk.
Video-editing (Score:2, Interesting)
My showstoppers (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:My opinion: (Score:2, Interesting)
But, to get to my point, I've been exploring lots of Open Source Alternatives like Inkskape, GIMP, Songbird, etc. And for the most part I've been pretty impressed.
The programs I like so far are:
GIMPshop (I can't stand The GIMP's standard interface, though even with GIMPshop I miss PSPs ease of use and intuitive interface)
InkScape - Intuitive Vector Editing. I adore it. I more than adore it. I highly recommend it.
Firefox - Seriously, I will never use IE again (except, of course, to download FireFox
OpenOffice.Org - Version 2 is everything that Version 1 was not (functional, stable, etc). And being free of that damn paperclip (or dog..I think it's a dog now) is only points on its side.
Those are just my opinions though.
A quick question: does anyone know what the best OS media player there is? I do have a lovely music collection I'd like to keep.
--Jimmy
amaroK vs iTunes (Score:2, Interesting)
What does iTunes have to offer that amaroK doesn't match?
I'm assuming the online music store would be the biggest one, but what else?
Re:the most desired are ones I never use (Score:2, Interesting)
At Sicirec [sicirec.org], we've used Outlook (Express) with LDAP in the past. Outlook didn't even support LDAP autocompletion. So, basically, all the users went on to add all contacts to their local address books. The kind of synchronisation problems this caused were pretty annoying. But, even when the users ignored autocompletion, performing an LDAP search still required struggling through three to four dialogs.
Admittedly, Mozilla (and now, since 1.5, Tunderbird) has its inperfections too; why can't you globally set the default sort order for IMAP folders (bug 86845 [mozilla.org])? For the rest, Mozilla has served us great, though. Now, if Thunderbird's integration with server-side spam filtering would get a little more configurable, I would be even happier.
Re:Dreamweaver and flash ... (Score:2, Interesting)
The best analogy I can come up with is a device with piano-like keys that clips onto the neck of a guitar, and frets and strums the strings in response to your key presses.
* I consider anything with <font> tags in it to be bad HTML.
Re:My opinion: (Score:2, Interesting)
As an estimator for the second largest printer in the world, I can tell you that CMYK isn't an issue and we will convert it for you, but we will charge you the desktop time for it. After all, conventional printing is done in CMYK, not RGB, so the conversion is a requirement. Most customers don't send in RGB files for this reason.
To be honest, I would like to see OpenOffice be able to output PDFs in CMYK rather than RGB. Any modern printing facility prefers finished PDFs over Quark as they need no manipulation. I could then convince some customers to generate their page layout in OpenOffice.
Also as an aside, contrary to popular belief, most large printing facilities do not accept word, excel, or other Microsoft files for printing. If they were stuck on using these formats, they could use OpenOffice to output those documents to PDFs and then print facilities would accept them.
Ok, ok, I'll admit that every time I get to tell a customer "I'm sorry, Microsoft Office file formats are not supported by our facility", I do kind of grin a little ;)
Re:Dreamweaver and flash ... (Score:3, Interesting)
Statistical & Mathematics SW (Score:2, Interesting)