Slashdot Index Code Update 386
One of the most common questions I get is simply "What does the '2 More' mean in the left side menu?" To me it's obvious: it means there are 2 more stories on say, apple.slashdot.org than you have seen on slashdot.org. This is because Slashdot probably already had 15 stories today, and this particular story is only of interest to users who explicitly chose to view Apple stories.
Those little 'N More' snippets clutter up the left hand menu, and confuse people. Our power users know that they can suck all the sectional content into the main page, but very few users actually bother with that kind of customization. And just as important, we have a lot of content that is simply lost because most of you never knew it was there in the first place.
What you'll see now is the interleaving of sectional content with main page content. These articles are displayed in a very abbreviated format, amidst the other stories. This is content we've been posting on Slashdot for years, but most users never knew. I'm pleased with the design of the whole thing. I think it looks really nice and doesn't clutter up the page.
Of course some users will always disagree with me, and for them there are now a plethora of user configurable options. Essentially, each section has a range of options ranging from "All" (Meaning, every story is displayed in full text) to "None" (Meaning I really really really never want to see anything about Apple really no seriously I'm not kidding!)
These options are available on the left hand menu by simply clicking the 'Sections' menu entry. A fancy little window will open with various tools for you do play with allowing you to choose what content on Slashdot you want to read... and perhaps more importantly, to disable the content you don't. The default view of Slashdot has slightly changed today, but you can set your preferences back to make the site look like it did before too.
We are keen on making sure that this works for as many browser platforms as we can. We've tested it on the platforms used by around 96% of you. (that is to say, Internet Explorer, Safari, Firefox, under Windows, Mac, and Linux) and it works on those platforms. However if your platform doesn't work, you can still change the settings from the user preference page (click the word 'Preferences' on the left hand menu if you are logged in. If your browser doesn't support javascript, clicking the 'Sections' menu item on the left hand menu should take you there.).
We fully expect there to be some bugs with this, so please feel free to contact us... preferably by submitting a bug report to our sourceforge project tracker. We hope to have any major kinks worked out of the system in the next few days, so just hang in there.
All in all I am very pleased with this. This solves a number of long standing problems on Slashdot: That is to say sectional content getting "Lost" in the shuffle, the left hand menu being confusing, and the user preferences to twiddle these settings being buried so deep in the UI that nobody would bother changing them.
Best of all, if any of this bugs you, it takes just seconds to disable this stuff. In fact, it would probably take less time to fix it then to post a comment complaining... not that that will stop some of you ;)
update many people have commented on the design of the abbreviated story. Many make great points about how they visually could be interpreted as being "Footnotes" or "Related" somehow to the content above them. Just a reminder, the site is all nicely CSSified now... modifiy the CSS send it our way. If someone creates a design that works better, we'll use it! We're not married to what we have. Personally I wanted the grey curve on the bottom right side, but we thought we'd need an extra DIV to get it right, so this was the compromise.
updated again the reason we don't update the index 'on the fly' is because it is possible for you to get content that we don't actually have yet. We don't have a full ajax engine yet- so if you made an abbreviated article be a full text article, we'd have missing fields. When we have a real dynamic engine for loading the content, doing it on the fly will be trivial. Today I think it would just look crappy.
AHA! (Score:5, Funny)
How about a "Dupes Only" Option (Score:5, Funny)
I only want to see the dupes. Really no seriously I'm not kidding!
Re:How about a "Dupes Only" Option (Score:3, Funny)
Me too. I figure, if it's been duplicated it must be a story worthy of my attention. It's all the non-dups that must be worthless because only one reviewer posted it.
Re:How about a "Dupes Only" Option (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:AHA! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:AHA! (Score:2, Troll)
This will make Slashdot worse (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:This will make Slashdot worse (Score:3, Interesting)
The problem with Slashdot is that the signal to noise ratio of comments has been getting worse and worse.
Well, who is submitting the noise and the signals? The best part about slashdot that I like is the 'slashdot effect' which punishes websites for publishing something of interest to the trolls. I don't think that is going to change. Besides, Slashdot's engine needs some upgrading soon so that stories are submitted faster and news arrives at a higher frequency, eventually the trolls will distribute the
Re:This will make Slashdot worse (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:This will make Slashdot worse (Score:4, Insightful)
Very nice - but has some rough edges currently (Score:5, Insightful)
There needs to be a bit more work to get the rough edges that I see out:
Re:Very nice - but has some rough edges currently (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Very nice - but has some rough edges currently (Score:2)
Re:Very nice - but has some rough edges currently (Score:2)
Re:Very nice - but has some rough edges currently (Score:5, Funny)
Watch yourself there....
Suggested feature (Score:5, Interesting)
Here's one suggestion for an improvement: How about automatically "promoting" abbreviated stories to full stories if a certain number of comments are posted on it. In other words if, say 200 comments are posted on one of these abbreviated stories, it becomes one of the main page stories and it's full summary is displayed.
The reason behind this is that if a "sectional" story is particularly popular, it probably deserves the same treatment as the major stories. I am more likely to take interest in a story if a large number of comments have been posted to it. Assuming that a good default is chosen for number of comments before an article is upgraded, this shouldn't affect your 15 stories a day rule much. Of course, registered users should be allowed to select their own minimum comment count.
In effect this would probably be a type of crude article moderation. The sectional stories are moderated up by way of user comments.
Of course, if you have more ambitious changes to story selection in mind, this wouldn't be of much relevance.
Re:Suggested feature (Score:4, Interesting)
Of course that would slow down it turning up on the main page as people would have to first post and then be moderated.
Although I still generally just read the RSS and go from that as to which stories I want to read but it's nice to see people are still trying to improve
Re:Very nice - but has some rough edges currently (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Very nice - but has some rough edges currently (Score:5, Insightful)
Why not put them together in a separate section at the top or bottom of the page and organize them better?
Re:Very nice - but has some rough edges currently (Score:3, Interesting)
I think the fastest solution to the "looks like a part of the previous article" is to just use a grey bar with all square corners. The rounded bottom curve looks like it matches with the rounded upper curve on the previous article.
I like the "In other news..." idea someone else posted though. If there are 4 or 5 articles
Re:Very nice - but has some rough edges currently (Score:2)
The best solution would be to have a separate sidebar or something that listed all the "lesser" stoies, and not trying to do it inline. However, if Slashdot is really attached to doing it inline, you could only show stories from the same topic were under each story, so that a
Re:Very nice - but has some rough edges currently (Score:5, Insightful)
Personally, I love the interleaving lesser stories with the main page.
1.75 thumbs up (reserving the
-nB
Good idea. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Very nice - but has some rough edges currently (Score:2)
Major props to anyone who can figure out a good way to show that they are different stories without adding another line.
My idea is to have a transparent gif...er...png vertially centered on the right side of the section thingys. It should say "In other news" or "In unrelated news."
I like it... (Score:2)
Re:I like it... (Score:2)
Re:I like it... (Score:2)
Awesome feature (Score:5, Insightful)
I've always felt that having to browse separate sections of Slashdot was a little painful, and a way to know if new articles were posted in certain sections of interest would be neat.
This is a really cool feature and a much needed one. Props, folks!
Re:Awesome feature (Score:2)
Why not make them green like the rest of the headlines? As a bonus they could even expand when clicked to look just like a normal front page article.
Another satisfied customer chimes in... (Score:2)
Of course, Slashdot login was still broken in Safari 1.0 last I checked, but unlike most people, I'm not in love with any individual browser; I've got Safari, IdiotExploder, Netscape, and Opera all running. I'm content.
I like it - it's a step forward (Score:2)
I'm terribly disappointed (Score:5, Funny)
Form, function, blah blah blah (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Form, function, blah blah blah (Score:2)
Honestly, having red and grey blocks in the middle of story lists where said blocks are supposed to be for headers, really makes my eyes a bit confused and unable to simply scan down the page. When I saw this last night, I actually didn't want to read through the stories be
Re:Form, function, blah blah blah (Score:3, Insightful)
Otherwise, nice feature. I'm not 'fanboi'-level acceptance yet, but I imagine it'll grow on me over the next few days.
Re:Form, function, blah blah blah (Score:5, Informative)
The case can be made that the 2 pixel green border at the top of the abbreviated article seperates it at least somewhat from the content above it.
Of course all of this is irrelevant since we hope to redesign the whole schebang soon too...
Re:Form, function, blah blah blah (Score:3, Interesting)
What's the problem with that...?
J.
Re:Form, function, blah blah blah (Score:2)
I would increase the margin on the stories here... blank space on one of the sides would help me separate that content from the one above it. Another option is to make these section stories -- and all the main page stories, for that matter -- look like a Dr. Mario pill, and have background colors for the stories. That would be ideal, because then I would know for sure where your content started and stop
Re:Form, function, blah blah blah (Score:5, Insightful)
You can try to explain to people that the two pixel green bar means it's separate, but if everyone who looks at it immediatly thinks that that they are footnotes to the previous story, your UI is bad.
Go ahead and spring for whatever extra code you need to make it look intuitive.
hope to redesign the whole schebang soon (Score:2)
Re:Form, function, blah blah blah (Score:2)
Personally, I really like the new feature. It's a great addition to the site, and I look forward to seeing the new redesign. Is it being done partially to address the complaints some people have about the site not conforming to
Re:Form, function, blah blah blah (Score:5, Insightful)
Just change the curve to a half circle. Then you'd get something like a little bubble for each brief article.
Seems like it would be easy, and I think the curve on top would help dissociate it with the story above it.
I spent quite a while this morning before this article came up wondering what relevence any of the brief articles had to the rest of the articles. It seems I'm not the only one.
Re:Form, function, blah blah blah (Score:3)
A better solution would be to put a curve on both the top and bottom, but then I have to ditch the green line. I like the green line. The design thoughts here was that the green line was a 'top' and the grey curve was a 'bottom' thus creating a unified visual element blah blah blah.
Submit modified CSS my way. We're open to all ideas.
Re:Form, function, blah blah blah (Score:5, Interesting)
How about this [cox.net] ?
Re:Form, function, blah blah blah (Score:3)
Re:Form, function, blah blah blah (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Form, function, blah blah blah (Score:2)
Re:Form, function, blah blah blah (Score:2)
Ian
page filled earlier, more older stuff! (Score:4, Interesting)
Huh? Problem? Wow. (Score:2, Insightful)
Because they are unable to follow the "Yesterday's News" links? Unable to see the "Sections" links? Us the "Search" function? Thes must also be the people that have never been to a web portal or blog before. I would have never guessed it was a "problem".
Re:Huh? Problem? Wow. (Score:2)
The cost is a minimal amount of visual clutter, or a small one-time effort to turn it off. Probably not a bad trade.
Nice bevels (Score:2)
Re:Nice bevels (Score:2)
Lynx compatible? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Lynx compatible? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Lynx compatible? (Score:2)
I like it! (Score:2)
Very nice (Score:2)
Looks Good (Score:2)
Interesting and helpful (Score:2)
Imagine that, a Slashdotter that doesn't read something the first time.
I can't stop my complaint gene (Score:4, Funny)
I have a complaint, why do you say that it probably takes less time to fix it than it does to make this post?
Is my typing not fast enough for you?
Neat, but no thanks. (Score:2)
I guess I fall under the "poweruser" category. I've had the slashboxes that I want over on the right for years now, and I'll admit that having the mini stories between full stories looks a little cluttered to me (but I've already turned it off, so no big deal).
I did notice, though, that after changing that setting, my top-most slashbox got moved all the way to the bottom. Is there an easy way to get it back to the top without clicking that "up" widget about 15 times? (I haven't done any searching for i
Bless the editors (Score:2, Interesting)
Wow! There's so much content that doesn't make the main page. And thank goodness, as I sure wouldn't care to see it. I had no idea that the editors were doing such a good job.
We Fear Change!! (Score:2, Offtopic)
What are you doing??!?! Don't you know that /. users fear change! Next thing you know, /. will update the hideous green color scheme that we have all come to know and love!.
http://religiousfreaks.com/ [religiousfreaks.com]Bug (Score:2)
The little sub-headings frequently count the comments wrong, saying things like "15 of 1 comment".
More discussion (Score:2, Interesting)
n more (Score:3, Insightful)
About this...
One of the most common questions I get is simply "What does the '2 More' mean in the left side menu?" To me it's obvious: it means there are 2 more stories on say, apple.slashdot.org than you have seen on slashdot.org.
I imagine that much *is* obvious, but what isn't obvious is how that number is determined. If there are "5 more" stories on Apple, and I click on Apple, why do I see more than 5 stores? How is the number "5" factoring in at all? At first I figured it might have been cookied to only show unread stories within a certain timeframe, but that quickly proved to be false. So, the usefulness of the link is apparent, but the descriptor is byzantine.
A bug? (Score:2)
The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
Games: Officer's Group Calls for Ban On 25 To Life
Like it (Score:4, Insightful)
The verbosity of a story on the main page should be a function of its activity, moderation, and timeliness. In other words, stories appear as a single line, then gradually get more page space as people reply, and less as they fade away, until finally you have a bunch of one-liners at the end. Sort of like the way threaded postings work with but with 'newest first'.
Done right, the code would be simpler.
Or maybe not. As I said, I like the new feature/design.
Re:Like it (Score:5, Insightful)
Say a story gets posted, and then it gets 100 comments, say that is the threshold for making it appear in full text mode. At this point it might be the 5th story down. Do I push the article to the top of the page (hearing 50 readers post DUPE as they cry in their soup!) or expand it and let it continue to slide down off the page... knowing that some users will miss it because they only read until they get to where they left off?
Really good idea. I'd like to figure out a way to use it somehow.
Re:Like it (Score:2)
Re:Like it (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm probably in the minority in this second suggestion, but how about allowing the one-liner articles to be expanded using
Re:Like it (Score:2)
Re:Like it (Score:3, Interesting)
Hmmm, I don't know. I was only thinking about how verbose the story references were.
Personally I'd prefer not to have stories sort by popularity, but only by time as it is done now. That might be a per-user preferences selection. I can see that kind of sorting being a real problem, as one story could explode and dominate the attention of users and mo
Some thoughts (Score:3)
My first thought would be to have a "virtual" section for the most popular stories. All that section would do is beg/borrow/steal articles from other sections and reformat them to the way desired and in the order desired. That takes care of avoiding the dupe-detector but at the same time retaining
Small aesthetic issue (Score:4, Insightful)
Browser Stats! (Score:3, Insightful)
(Yes, I realise people here are stuck to browse with what's at work, but it's still a extra blip of information)
BTW, Kudos on the
Re:Browser Stats! (Score:3)
Given that, it would be interesting to see browser stats based on time, and possibly Time Zone. This of course won't be the most accurate thing in the world (people work different hours, proxy servers in various locations etc etc)..but it would be nifty to see for lets say the Eastern Standard time zone between 7AM and 6PM 95% of the browsers are brand X...During the rest of the day for that sourc
I love the idea (Score:2)
This is really ugly. It distracts me while I'm trying to read. I think it belongs more one a side pane somewhere. Look at kuro5hin.org for a good example of this (minus the ads)
good concept, can you tweak the implementation? (Score:2)
I like it... (Score:2)
I like that the "niche" stories stand out more - I find it a bit distracting, but I'd rather see them than not notice them.
Ick (Score:2)
Possible next step...? (Score:5, Interesting)
Design Issue (Score:3, Insightful)
Good idea, though. Thanks!
-Dom
Very good, but... (Score:3, Insightful)
Excellent idea. Nice to see content instead of having to hunt for it and this will force submitters to get creative with their headlines!
I have only one complaint and that's having the stub stories "grafted" onto the bottom of full stories. While I like the curve and it makes for an interesting visual package, I think the stub stories should be in their own individual little capsules, color-coded to the sections they belong in. This will make it easier to see them for one and also indicate that they are not "attached" in any way to the full story above them.
implication of layout (Score:2)
Disclosure Triangles (Score:2, Interesting)
How about some disclosure triangles next to to the stubs so I could check out the description without having to open up a new tab?
Re:Disclosure Triangles (Score:3)
maybe someday tho...
we have plans to use something similiar to this in articles to show other related articles... in that space, where we would probably be talking about only 3-4 maximum articles, this concept works really well.
That is what AJAX is for (Score:5, Insightful)
The best of both worlds: small initial page size, dynamic content.
Main problem (Score:2)
In The Works A Long Time, I'm Sure... (Score:2)
Add history to the bottom please (Score:2)
your "Older Articles" link under old stories has been horribly broken for years... the older articles link should pick up where the old stories secion leaves off. Instead, it seems to be random, and repeats a lot of stories.
OK I'll admit that this is a minor issue.
Not the only change, it seems (Score:3, Insightful)
Missing Sections (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Missing Sections (Score:5, Informative)
Visited? (Score:2)
Digg Dotted (Score:3, Interesting)
Wow. Digg really has you guys shook up. That's great. That's what competition's all about. This is the exact kind of action Microsoft, the recording industry and the Baby Bells would be forced to make if there were really competition in their worlds.
kudos!
MjM
Un-relating the other stories (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Un-relating the other stories (Score:3, Interesting)
RSS vs. front page (Score:3, Informative)
So, whatever changes you make, I think you should definitely keep in mind that at least some people (probably a lot) rely on the RSS feed as the main means of getting slashdot information.
Thanks for the great site, and especially the recent efforts towards improvements!