Switching to Windows, Not as Easy as You Think 803
rchapman writes "Mad Penguin writer Simon Gerber has published an amusing review of Windows XP as seen from a Linux users point of view. He really makes you feel like you are trying to use Windows for the first time after exclusively using Linux. The article covers everything from the hideous installer and its lack of partitioning/formatting capabilities to the utter wasteland that is the Windows desktop, devoid of useful applications and everything in between. A fun read."
Old News / Rip off (Score:1, Informative)
No partitioning? (Score:1, Informative)
Reminds me of another article (Score:4, Informative)
RTFA (Score:5, Informative)
Re:RTFA (Score:4, Informative)
For most users, a partition is something that's between them and the guy in the next cubicle. They don't want to know what a computer partition is, they don't care, and they don't even want to see it - not even "Do you want the computer to partition for you?"
Forcing such a thing on them is annoying at best, and for some especially inexperienced computer users, it can actually be scary. One of the things I had to get used to on the job was two of my users (out of 35) who would call me at the slightest hiccup because they simply didn't want to deal with anything at all out of the ordinary. That's my job, they'd say.
Re:Reminds me of another article (Score:1, Informative)
Disclaimer: Kudos to NewsForge(http://os.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=
I'll go out on a limb and say 'most likely'
Re:So much innaccuracy... (Score:3, Informative)
Someone has already mentioned the fact that you CAN partition and format drives in the installer, so thats wrong for a start.
The summary is inaccurate. From the article:
And what is Microsoft supposed to do about applications? If it bundled Microsoft Office in with Windows, the anti-competition people would be on their backs the day it hit the shelves.
No one would complain if Microsoft bundled non-Microsoft applications. For example, back in the mid 90s, if Microsoft had cut a deal with Netscape, offering to bundle Netscape Communicator with Windows and paying Netscape $5 per copy, Netscape would have jumped at it, and no one could accuse Microsoft of trying to leverage their OS monopoly to acquire a web browser monopoly
mirrordot mirror (Score:2, Informative)
Probably less biased & more useful info (Score:4, Informative)
Making Windows Usable for Old Linux Farts [weitz.de]
Still shows that making Windows workable is rather hard task.
Re:XP is a bit older (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Denial: Not just a river in Egypt (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Flawed. (Score:3, Informative)
Microcenter, and Fry's both sell Linux pre-installs. I believe some of the local CompUSA are doing it on the custom built boxes they sell.
This reminds me of the joke.. (Score:1, Informative)
There was a joke going around in the mid-1990's that was about what you would have to do to a Cray supercomputer to convert it into an IBM PC. It involved taking most of the extra terminals and putting them in an infinite loop and disabling extra CPU's, etc. It was really quite funny(to a geek anyway). Problem is, as it is always, I had the only copy I've seen in ages stored on a hard drive that went bad the day before I was scheduled to back it up so I have no recollection of the exact text. It was the 90's..backup wasn't cheap for anything over 100mb and I had GB's to do..floppies were not the answer..heh. Anyway, I don't suppose anyone knows where the text to that is? I've searched with no luck.
Re:Um, partition is still good (Score:3, Informative)
It's also a good idea to put /var on it's own if you're running a webserver, just in case your logs somehow get enormous, it's a fail-safe way to ensure that a growing logfile doesn't cause the main filesystem to run out of space. Yes, I know there are better ways of doing this, but it's a nice backup plan to make absolutely sure.
Finally, I usually leave one primary partition and about 10-20 GB free just in case I want to install a new OS. Who knows when I'll want another free partition hanging around and don't feel like scrounging for another drive?
Bottom line is it's not particularly hard to create partitions, and there are times where it could be advantageous to have things separated, so there's no reason why not to do it.
Re:Wow. (Score:2, Informative)
My university did just that and made it a group policy, so all machines on the IATS network have all of the apps sorted according to usage: office, graphics, mathematics, statistics, drafting, etc. It sure made it a lot easier. And since the machines are all centrally-controlled, new apps are put into the right folder once on the server(s) and then all of the machines are updated.
Re:Denial: Not just a river in Egypt (Score:2, Informative)
The problem begins when you generalize the evidence of your own eyes onto the entire population of Windows PCs. In this particular case, it'd be nice to know what stop error caused the blue screen. Was it a device driver? an intermittently working fan causing random mobo failures? (something Linux is just as susceptible to) A genuine Windows install or an ISO grabbed from piratebay? Without knowing these, 2 crashes *on computers you do not own* are just anecdotes.
In my experience, the bulk of deployed/OEM-installed XP PCs (modulo virus/spyware infections) do work well, even after 3-4 years. Yes, computers fail and cause the OS to fail and _sometimes_ it is the OS' fault. But esp on 2000 and above, most of the time it's the hardware's or a device driver's fault. And randomly posting 'OMG Windoz is teh cr4sh' on messageboards doesn't make me want to believe "the evidence of your eyes", it just marks you out as an excellent instance of the not-very-complimentary Slashdot stereotype.
Re:Denial: Not just a river in Egypt (Score:3, Informative)
Cookie to whoever comes up with a list of ECC supporting S939 motherboards.
Re:Um, partition is still good (Score:3, Informative)
Anyway, what partitions is it that you have growing out of control? I separate
If you're avoiding good partitioning practices because partitions are "too hard" or "inconvenient", look into LVM/EVMS (even if you just make one huge volume that can grow onto another disk later). If, rather, you're avoiding it because you're convinced that every other sysadmin out there is stupid and has been wasting their time for no reason over teh last few decades, well, I can't help you out there.
Re:Um, partition is still good (Score:2, Informative)
Then don't. You don't *have* to have a swap partition. I have one because it (presumably) gives better performance, since the filesystem layer isn't involved in every swap to/from disk. At least you have a choice.
What if you need more swap? Then you have to create a swap file on an existing partition and manage two separate swap files in the future. Ugh.
Or, if your swap is at the end of your main filesystem, you can shrink your main filesystem and make a new, larger, swap partition (depending on the availability of resizing tools for your filesystem, of course).
I'm not sure what's so difficult about "managing two swparate swap files", anyway. You create an empty swap file of the desired size (owned by root, with mode 0600, of course), format it with mkswap, add an entry for it to /etc/fstab, run swapon -a (or reboot), and never think about it again. What's to manage?