The Softening of a Software Man 617
theodp writes to tell us that New York Magazine has an interesting editorial stating that no one is afraid of Microsoft anymore. The article argues that Microsoft has noticeably been adrift in the wake of Gates' philanthropy, which some cynics suspect is a Rockefeller-like attempt to 'fumigate his fortune' as he makes a play for the history books. From the article: "Like the robber barons, Bill Gates has moved from trying to take over the world to trying to save it."
can you blame him? (Score:4, Informative)
Well, it does take a lot of effort and energy to be competing with Bono. [time.com]
Re:Yeesh.. (Score:4, Informative)
He plans to eventually give it all away, leaving something for his childern.
Thats a bit more than ~2%.
Re: identity politics and "divide and conquer" (Score:4, Informative)
A political scientist named Fresia has a book online that talks about this. It's called _TOWARD AN AMERICAN REVOLUTION_.
Also, one Richard Bissell, an early CIA honcho who helped start the Ford Foundation with CIA and plutocrat money, said the tactic for destroying leftism was to not debate the leftists about their ideas, but instead to divert their energies to activities and interests that would be less harmful (to the rich and megacorporations, one presumes). The primary diversion created by the Ford Foundation and other nonprofits was Identity Politics/Pluralism/Multiculturalism.
Divide and Conquer, same as it ever was....
I can't say what drives him today... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Check the facts (Score:5, Informative)
Thats the whole point of a foundation. you DO NOT give as much as your investments return. You have to account for things like inflation, which is not steady over time and which is actually at a low point right now.
You can say what you want about the Gates foundation but the fact of the matter is that is has done real work - and it is well-managed. It isn't just a billionaire throwing money at the latest fad, it is a self-sustaining foundation aimed at an important problem for our time. Bravo.
-everphilski-
Re:Adrift? Try sinking. (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Check the facts (Score:4, Informative)
Obviously your new job isn't in accounting. (Score:1, Informative)
One of her pet peeves (and mine by virtue of being married to her) are idiots that don't understand the tax system, that think "the rich" have magical hiding spots for money and that "the poor" (generally whoever is talking because everyone thinks they don't mkae enough money.
Interesting fact I bet you don't know: Actual "poor people" get OODLES of cash back that's unavailable to people in anything from the middle class (roughly $37,000 or more) a year and up.
Oh, and "rich people" are in a higher tax bracket. They pay more in taxes and these "tax cuts for the wealthy" that people like to talk about, without really knowing what they are and having no intention of finding out (seriously... if you heard "geez, there's a way to get more money on your taxes" wouldn't you TRY TO FIGURE OUT WHAT THAT IS, instead of just saying "oh, it's for them there richy type folk!"), are basically things like tax credits for buying hybrid cars (because only the rich want cleaner air) and tax benefits for first time home owners (another low to mid class benefit that helps the so-called poor because they're more likely than "the rich" to qualify for ridiculously low interest loans from organizations interested in providing first homes.)
You're probably one of the idiots that gets the income tax refund at the end of the year and thinks you've just "beat" the government and don't realize that most of that refund comes from your earned income credit, which "the rich" pay for in the extra tax money.
You see, the couple thousand dollar refunds "the poor" get in March and April don't come from God, and they don't come from the few thousand in withholdings (usually not enough, and certainly not enough for people on most forms of assistance) that get taken in by most of you people, they come from "the rich." And your "pure charity" (ie, those taxes where you actually pay a smaller percentage of your income than those who make more than you... sorry, your 42% of poverty level income quote is pure BS) goes for things like the police, the firefighters, the EMS, subsidizing health care so people without insurance who want to go deadbeat on hospital bills don't bankrupt such services... your charity is just you paying for YOUR share.
And the funny thing is, it's those rich people paying more in taxes that are less likely to go deadbeat on their hospital bills, are more likely to have better security features and insurance on their cars and homes (thus, less need for the police when something happens)
Oh screw it... you're one of "those" and you'll never understand taxes but don't worry, MY tax money will go towards keeping state tuition so much cheaper than private school so that you can have one of your children become an accountant and THEY can try to explain it to you.
Pot, meet the kettle. (Score:2, Informative)
That line is just classic Gates, the computer time may have been worth $40,000 but Gates never paid for it. Gates and Allen did not even have authorization to be using the university machines in question, something Gates himself would probably liken to "theft".
Actually, the jist of the story is that Gates did his development on machines owned by the U.S. Government and that's what got him kicked out of Harvard for misuse of federal funds. I assume that efforts of Bill Sr. are what kept him out of jail, why Harvard allows him to say he "dropped out," and why Harvard doesn't talk about the real circumstances of his leaving. (Well, I'm sure the reason they don't talk about it now starts with $ and ends in $.)
Bill started Microsoft based upon theft, and theft has been it's primary business since then. Pardon me if I don't trust his motives in doing charity work.
I'm sure Capone did some nice charity work, too.
Re:Um... (Score:3, Informative)
Thanks, I totally agree with your statement. Many of the new generation are not aware of what happened during those days. As an owner of a Laser 128 [apple2clones.com] (which I loved to death) I followed with interest Apple's destruction of the many available Apple clones [apple2clones.com] which were out there. Even after that, I purchased an Apple //gs [fortunecity.com], just to watch Steve Jobs destroy that platform too, as he pitted his own engineers against each other in a ridiculous internal power struggle which eventually killed the //gs. Many of my friends ask me why I won't buy anything from Apple anymore. Well, those are a few reasons why. They have a history of screwing over their customers.
Anyone who thinks Steve Jobs is a nice guy, or is looking out for your welfare is seriously misinformed.
Re:Yeesh.. (Score:2, Informative)
While what Gates is doing is definatly notable, it just seems more of a PR move with the whole point as to establishing his legecy. Why not create a foundation and name it after something a bit less pretensious.
Re:gates following in Rockefeller's footsteps (Score:2, Informative)
I'm not sure which Rockefeller you are talking about, if it is Sr. then I'm not so sure about that statement. Rockefeller's charities were mainly in the medical field simply because no one can really say that you are manipulating people or influancing things if you are just curing illenesses. Eventually the Rockefeller Foundation has grown to probably do just about everything, but its inital aims were spread amongst many charities, many of which focued on a specific problem (i.e. eliminating hookworm in the south)...While the rich of that time did get their money in ill gotten ways, a few of them (Rockefeller and Carnegie) had idelogical issues with having that much money, so they attempted to better the world...and for the things that they founded, I would say that it has been bettered in many ways...
Re:It worked for Rockefeller and MacArthur (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Original Parent isn't far off (Score:2, Informative)