Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

A Look at Windows Server Outselling Linux 450

THG writes "CoolTechZone.com has an interesting look at Linux's position in the market now that Microsoft has sold more Windows Server software than Linux. From the article: "The most important reason that Windows based servers are doing so well could be that programmers find it extremely easy to work on .Net and other related technologies (seamless integration). Plus, you have hassle free and rapid support from Microsoft, which is a comforting feature for corporate customers. When Windows Live comes in, we will see further integration between the server and online technical support areas, thereby making the troubleshooting process easier for in-house administrators and reducing overhead costs for the company."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

A Look at Windows Server Outselling Linux

Comments Filter:
  • Hmm... (Score:5, Funny)

    by 75th Trombone ( 581309 ) on Saturday November 26, 2005 @10:38PM (#14121579) Homepage Journal
    CoolTechZone.com has an interesting look at Linux's position in the market now that Microsoft has sold more Windows Server software than Linux.

    Okay now wait, I'm confused. Are Microsoft's sales of Windows Server higher than Microsoft's sales of Linux? Or are Microsoft's sales of Windows Server higher than Linux's sales of Linux? Or are Microsoft's sales of Windows Server higher than Linux's sales of Windows Server?

    Because, y'know, without clarification, I might think someone didn't know what someone was saying.

    (At least we can feel safe knowing that once we figure that out, any stats involving both "sales" and "Linux" will be perfectly clear and accurate and meaningful.)

  • by eyebits ( 649032 ) on Saturday November 26, 2005 @10:50PM (#14121655)
    This story is like putting a cat in a kennel of dogs. I can imagine the editors sitting there thinking, "Mmm. We could use some good fun..we're bored. Let's throw this cat in the kennel and get our kicks out of watching the dogs go nuts." Thanks guys.
  • Re:Hmm... (Score:3, Funny)

    by slavemowgli ( 585321 ) on Saturday November 26, 2005 @11:07PM (#14121744) Homepage

    Are Microsoft's sales of Windows Server higher than Microsoft's sales of Linux?

    That's the way I'd read it - and it's probably true, too (which is certainly a new twist as far as FUD is concerned).

  • by Glonoinha ( 587375 ) on Saturday November 26, 2005 @11:27PM (#14121839) Journal
    the rest is servers bought without OS Guess what is being installed on those?
    Windows 2000 Pirate Edition?
  • by eyebits ( 649032 ) on Saturday November 26, 2005 @11:27PM (#14121843)

    Rebooting to fix problems is actually a feature! See, there is this highly secret and very technologically advanced code in Windows that on a reboot diagnoses the problem and automatically fixes it! What other OS can claim that? It's self-healing!

    ~wink~

  • by aywwts4 ( 610966 ) on Saturday November 26, 2005 @11:39PM (#14121906)
    Ciggarettes outselling Air!

    And In other news...

    Tanning Booths outselling Sunlight!

    Its a mad mad world.
  • by Create an Account ( 841457 ) on Saturday November 26, 2005 @11:40PM (#14121911)

    Bill? Is that you?
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 26, 2005 @11:56PM (#14121987)
    They charge you for "NO operating system?" Brilliant! They should branch off into not farming too...
  • by sillybilly ( 668960 ) on Saturday November 26, 2005 @11:58PM (#14122001)
    Duh. Linux can be had for free, without a sale. You could even say linux had zero sales and you could still be missing the point, because some people might find it very useful and might be using it very happily, for free. This is not the front to attack linux from.

    If you wanted to have a point to what you say, you could say about linux that people who made it were too lazy to make it good because they weren't paid, and I could believe that with good data backing it up, but it must be hard to prove that point, or we'd see it all over the place. You could also say that linux was submarined and made defective on purpose, that there was significant effort invested by the competition to bring it down, or to bring down its creators, and I would even believe that with even less data, but I'd get very pissed. "Ideally" (according to some people,) people who get paid lots of money to program should come up with better software than those that only make a comfortable sustenance at it, and are mostly fueled by compassion and the love of their art, and the recognition of their peers. Money can only buy you so much recognition in a linux coding community, but if you're the creator of some cool kernel feature, or device driver, or super optimized smp code section that everyone admires to read, now you're talking.

    For the other side, there was a story on PBS about two gun-inventors, from about the 1960's, one in the US, the other in the USSR. I forget the actual gun names. They both invented roughly equivalent guns, that were robust, could be dragged through mud and still work, and the US version even saw action in Vietnam, where soldiers preferred it to the more sophisticated guns that just broke down at the slightest touch of dirt. So basically, the US inventor got very rich, while his Soviet counterpart got a medal. This is the most important difference, according to the Soviet guy, as he commented on it years later. Sooner or later that aspect catches up with people too, especially if they are like an ex soviet, currently living barely at the edge of sustenance level. Hey, after the collapse of USSR, there were PBS reports showing a guy with a family to support, whose job was to guard the nuclear warheads, saying he hasn't been paid for six months by his government, because it was so bankrupt it couldn't even send a spaceship up to the MIR space station, and an astronaut was stuck up there for like a year, until the US Space Shuttle made a trip to pick him up. So yes, soviet gun inventors care a lot about not getting paid, especially when they are hungry. Basically, if you want the freecoding linux programming community to care more about getting paid, you should find a way to starve them, but as soon as they make enough to have food, and shelter (but not soap, clothing, combs, etc, such things are unimportant to happiness, unless you want to get laid) off they go again, out of your control.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 27, 2005 @01:24AM (#14122329)

    Well I'll see your call of BS and raise you a little research:

    Microsoft Versus Psychic Friends Network [joke-archives.com]

    For those unwilling to read the article, and you really should read it, here's how it breaks down:

    1. Both Microsoft and the Psychic Friends Network provided an equivalent level of technical assistance. (0==0)
    2. Psychic Friends Network was cheaper.
    3. Psychic Friends Network had better customer service. Faster, and much more courteous.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 27, 2005 @01:41AM (#14122386)
    Is it too much to ask that the Editors edit? (Rhetorical question)

    CoolTechZone.com has an interesting look at Linux's position in the market now that Microsoft has sold more Windows Server software than Linux

    That sentence has two interpretations both of which are wrong:

    * Microsoft has sold more Windows Server software than Linux has sold Windows Server software.
    * Microsoft has sold more Windows Server software than Microsoft has sold Linux.

  • by Lazy Jones ( 8403 ) on Sunday November 27, 2005 @02:37AM (#14122547) Homepage Journal
    Ha ha ha.

    And what kind of bullshit do we have to read here on Slashdot these days? "now that Microsoft has sold more Windows Server software than Linux." - do you mean Microsoft is selling Linux now? Or is Linux some dude selling Windows Server software?

    I really recommend to put fewer, but worthwhile articles on Slashdot - we won't read it more often if you fill the front page up with such crap.

    Thank you.

  • by Futurepower(R) ( 558542 ) on Sunday November 27, 2005 @05:24AM (#14122987) Homepage
    Excellent, clear analysis.

    You said, "I used to work at Microsoft's PSS. I can tell you their support is nothing to write home about. They aren't someone you call because you need expert advice."

    That reminded me of a comparison [karmak.org] of Microsoft technical support with Psychic Friends Network. Neither know the answer, but Psychic Friends Network is more friendly and less expensive.
  • by patiodragon ( 920102 ) on Sunday November 27, 2005 @08:53AM (#14123395) Homepage
    "Plus, you have hassle free and rapid support from Microsoft..."

    OMG, this made me blow coffee through my nose.
  • by perdelucena ( 455667 ) on Sunday November 27, 2005 @09:55AM (#14123503) Homepage
    Now it's official Linux is dying

2.4 statute miles of surgical tubing at Yale U. = 1 I.V.League

Working...