Stanford's Stanley wins DARPA Grand Challenge 239
tonyquan writes "DARPA has just announced that Stanford's "Stanley" autonomous ground vehicle has won the Grand Challenge, a $2 million contest for driverless vehicles over a 132 mile course in California's Mohave Desert. Stanley's winning time over the course was 6 hours, 53 minutes and 58 seconds, for an average speed of 19.1 mph. Second was Carnegie Mellon's Sandstorm (7:04:50), third went to another CMU vehicle "H1ghlander" (7:14:00) and fourth to the Gray Team's KAT-5 (7:30:16) More info from DARPA."
so wait.. (Score:5, Interesting)
-molo
Good news (Score:4, Interesting)
Patriotism... sigh (Score:2, Interesting)
19.1? (Score:1, Interesting)
I mean, I can understand the fastest solar-powered vehicle going just over 100..... but what is the reason for these driverless vehicles? I understand that they navigate these things by themselves, but is there any other reason? Is the track pretty much nothing but ridiculous curves or something?
Re:so wait.. (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Good news (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:19.1? (Score:2, Interesting)
If there is a Grand Challenge in 2006, it will probably look more like a race, now that everyone knows it is possible.
Re:so wait.. (Score:5, Interesting)
There are some people who say that this year's course is far easier than last year's. I don't know myself -- I'm not involved with any of the teams and I don't have detailed knowledge of the courses. But there has been some commentary by those involved to this effect, as well as from bystanders. One huge difference is that the most difficult part of the course (Beer Bottle Pass, a narrow road with a steep drop off on one side) was at the end of the course this year, while the equivalent part was near the start last year. Stanford's leader is quoted as saying something to the effect that if they'd inverted last year's course then a lot of cars would've gone much further, even if none of them finished. The complete lack of media attention last year may have been one reason why DARPA swapped the course around -- it's rather anti-climactic to write about a race where the best racer hardly even got off the finish line and leads to the kind of stories DARPA really doesn't want to see (waste of taxpayer money, will never work, etc.).
In any case, given that less than 25% of the vehicles finished, I'd hardly say that it was a trivial thing to do. It's still amazing. Congrats to those who did, and to all of those who participated for that matter -- it's quite an accomplishment, even if there's a long way to go still before this is really usable in a real world environment.
Re:Good news (Score:2, Interesting)
I would certainly let a computer drive me around in a car -- whenever I fly somewhere I'm already trusting my life to a computer.
Modern commercial passanger airplanes come with fly-by-wire flight control system. That means that the onboard computers essentially decide whether or not to adjust the flight surfaces according to the pilot's wishes -- if the computer system gets fuxored, there's no way to fly the plane manually. Doesn't seem to be that big a problem.
Re:How few remain (Score:3, Interesting)
Gray Team? (Score:4, Interesting)
They don't seem to have a webpage for the team...
Re:Patriotism... sigh (Score:1, Interesting)
Well, probably, but it sure made it a lot easier that they were given plenty of VW's to work with, along with VW engineer's to boot. While other folks had to design exterior actuators for throttle / brake / steering along with feedback sensors and the like, Stanford could simply tie into the built in vehicle computer and harness the drive-by-wire features. And unlike others who had vehicle computers on board, they didn't have to reverse engineer the vehicle computer. Now again, those guys were smart and they still had a ton of things to tackle (like the rest of us), but they got half of the equation handed to them. And don't think that VW just donated a single vehicle. Like Red Team (AM General and GM in their case) they were sporting multiple vehicles. In fact they had another robot identical to Stanley (except for smaller computers on board) that they just used for spare parts. Must be nice.
I give props (oh yes I said it) to grey team. They probably dumped money into their vehicle, but I am willing to bet it is a small fraction compared to CMU and Stanford.
As with anything, knowledge is behind everything, but money sure makes it easier.
Re:Stanford + Volkswagen (Score:2, Interesting)
Sensors (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Good news (Score:5, Interesting)
It's funny how our laws are written. I know a guy who built a Lamborghini Countach kit car out of some steel tubing, a pre-made fiberglass body, and an engine that isn't even close to passing federal emission laws. He had no problems getting it inspected, registered, and getting a license plate for it. Custom choppers are the same: It's easy to weld some tubing together and slap on wheels, an engine, and a transmission and you're out on the streets in no time!
I want to import a new Toyota Hilux diesel pickup because a compact diesel pickup truck isn't available in the USA. Unfortunately I'm not allowed to do this because it hasn't been tested against US crash standards and the engine isn't EPA certified (despite being less polluting than just about any diesel engine currently offered in the USA).
Team Grey is the Real Winner (Score:5, Interesting)
Relatively speaking, a small indy group, even if their time was a tad slower than CMU or Stanford, essentially put those three teams to shame when you compare the resources they had available to them.
The real story here is who is behind the Grey team's car. It must be a far superior design than either CMU or Stanford's considering the limited resources and experience they had in addressing the challenge.
Re:cmu won all three (Score:2, Interesting)
I also know that there's some bad blood between Illah Nourbakhsh and Howie Choset. Illah's a great guy and Howie is a real asshole. Anyone who's taken robotics classes at CMU knows what I'm talking about.