Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

AOL Fined for Making it Hard to Cancel Service 446

andy1307 writes "CNET is carrying an article about a settlement between AOL and New York State that includes AOL paying a $1.25 million fine and agreeing to reform its customer service procedures. The agreement stems from consumers' complaints that AOL customer service representatives would either ignore requests, or make it unduly difficult, to cancel their service, according to a statement from Attorney General Eliot Spitzer. The policy probaby had something to do with rapidly declining customer numbers at AOL as more Americans switch to broadband."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

AOL Fined for Making it Hard to Cancel Service

Comments Filter:
  • by TheOtherAgentM ( 700696 ) on Wednesday August 24, 2005 @08:11PM (#13393751)
    When I used AOL for a dialup ISP during the summers, I never really wanted to cancel. I just said I wanted to cancel, saying the features aren't everything I was looking for in an ISP. Then I waited for the free offer of another three months. It was a great way to get an ISP for the summer.
  • Re:CDs (Score:1, Interesting)

    by jarich ( 733129 ) on Wednesday August 24, 2005 @08:14PM (#13393775) Homepage Journal
    Now, if they could just do something about those CDs...

    If they would put Firefox, OpenOffice, and other nifty open source software in the extra space on those CDs, people would keep them around instead of throwing them in the trash.

    AOL would end up getting tons of great press, it would help their reputation, and they'd get more customers just from the CDs that would be in circulation!

  • Got off today (Score:5, Interesting)

    by NovaX ( 37364 ) on Wednesday August 24, 2005 @08:17PM (#13393785)
    I just got my mother off AOL today. I read about how people would call, be harassed for 30 minutes and then told AOL wouldn't allow them to cancel. However, I read one post where they guy claimed he told them he sold his computer and was moving to Europe, and it took him 3 minutes flat.

    So I told her to say she was going into hospice. She saw it as a game, so she even timed it. It took 1:30 min with the operator, who talked about how sorry she was for her.

    That's how you do it. AOL only lets you go if you have a terminal condition.
  • by John Seminal ( 698722 ) on Wednesday August 24, 2005 @08:21PM (#13393817) Journal
    Another issue I have with AOL is that AOL digs roots very deeply into your computer. I don't know if this is still true since I haven't seen anyone using the service in a while, but it used to do stuff like replace your built-in dial-up networking functionality with its own, and even replacing various parts of the TCP/IP software and system files with its own. Uninstall? Useless.

    I am not an AOL fan, but to be fair to them, I will say that when I cancled my cousins AOL and he got a cable modem, the AOL software was uninstalled without a problem. There was no problem with the cable modem working.

    AOL != Real Media and their deceptive practices.

    It is one thing to lie to people, and another thing to be unresponsive. AOL's problems are not that they lie so much as they drag their feet. It is a customer service problem, not a software problem.

    Now if they could only get something better than 5k/sec on their dial-up, I don't think people would be running away like crazy. And with AOL charging $20+ a month, and Verizon just announced they are offering DSL for $15 a month, it does not take a genius to figure out what the better deal is.

    Even back when AOL was the biggest ISP, many people I knew picked companies like Juno because they charged half as much and ran just as quick.

    I never could figure out why AOL became such a large company. They charged more than anyone else. They were not the best or the fastest. All they did was package in an IM. But anyone can download Yahoo IM or something else. Did AOL become so huge because they were the only company that handed out free CD's at every computer store?

  • Finally (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Floydius ( 811220 ) on Wednesday August 24, 2005 @08:28PM (#13393862) Homepage
    I work at a credit union (the largest in the world), and we get people calling in *all the time* complaining about AOL/TW ignoring or being hostile about cancellation. I'll admit, i'm not going to assume much about the intelligence of AOL users, but still, if everyone is having the same problem, there's got to be something to it. It is absolutely the #1 problem company for cancellations, even above magazine subscriptions and people calling who tried to cancel their internet pornography.
  • Hmm (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Trip Ericson ( 864747 ) on Wednesday August 24, 2005 @08:32PM (#13393890) Homepage
    I'm seeing many calls for him to run for President as he's truly a public servant. I can't agree more, but I doubt he would ever make it. The corporate interests would use their endless supply of money to find a way to discredit him, no matter how wrongly, and keep him out. It's pathetic, it's disgusting, it's the way politics works.

    If he's not willing to play ball, he would never be elected.

    But perhaps making him Attorney General of the US under a different President? That's a possibility, and I would like to see that happen. Then he could continue bringing cases like these on a national scale.

    But I suppose all we can do for now is hope.
  • Re:Got off today (Score:3, Interesting)

    by nolife ( 233813 ) on Wednesday August 24, 2005 @08:36PM (#13393914) Homepage Journal
    Better keep checking the credit card statements for the next few months to make sure it really is cancelled. I am not just being paranoid either as they kept charging me for several months after I cancelled. Of course this was 12 years ago but according to the lawsuit, they still operate under the same shady business practices, or at least did until this lawsuit came up.
  • Tesla Coil Re:CDs (Score:5, Interesting)

    by turtleAJ ( 910000 ) on Wednesday August 24, 2005 @08:36PM (#13393916)
    I was once on a physics discussion board, and they where using the AOL CDs as capacitors... They would solder a small cable to one of the sides (top side, obviously), then stack them 50/100/250 high. I don't remember numbers, but some guys said it worked excellent. I think one of the guys was using a five-pack of these AOL CDs to fire up a Tesla Coil... I don't recall it's use... but I've always found very amusing a "Tesla Coil anti-pissing-dog application" ::: You hook-up your Tesla Coil to a metallic trash can (has to be of the above-ground type)... then, when your most-hated man's-best-friend comes along and takes his typicall piss, you fire up the coil... You can imagine what would happen when 375,000 volts shoot straight up the dog's winnie. I haven't done this, and I suggest against it... but for some idiotic reason, I crack my self up laughing every time I think about it. -AJ [There... my 1st /. post =) Now if I can nail down how they make the italics and bold letters... and those nifty hyperlinked text phrases...]
  • by io333 ( 574963 ) on Wednesday August 24, 2005 @08:41PM (#13393950)
    Twelve years I fell for one of those "free for 30 days" offers, and canceled within a week as I was already on the 'net and didn't see anything special about AOL. Somehow, probably because I didn't have a credit card at the time, they managed to keep sucking money out of my bank account every month for the next three months, no matter how much I complained to the bank, and to AOL. I never was reimbursed, and the only way I managed to make them stop was just to close my bank account.
  • by Nurseman ( 161297 ) <nurseman@NoSpAM.gmail.com> on Wednesday August 24, 2005 @08:50PM (#13394010) Homepage Journal
    I once signed up for AOL all inclusive phone service. I got dial up Internet, and local and long distance for one price. After regaining my sanity, I canceled it. About six months later, they began billing me again. I called customer service, and had the charge reversed. This went on for 4 months, bill me, credit me, until I called the FCC and reported them for "slamming" (switching my service without my permission) and fraud (for billing for a service they were not providing).

    About 2 weeks after my complaint, I got a very frantic, angry phone call from someone who said he was a lawyer representing AOL and I had caused them much grief with my "false" complaints. Bottom line, I never got another bill from them, and got two follow-up letters from the FCC asking me if AOL resolved my complaints. Sometimes the FCC works !

  • by billmustdie ( 862610 ) on Wednesday August 24, 2005 @09:05PM (#13394094)
    Oh man, did I have a problem..... I was on concast... moved (but had a spankin' new computer with 3 Mos free AOL) so I signed up to hold me over 'till I had everything set up for broadband again... So things got set up.. canceled AOL... Hundreds of dollars later, they claim they never got my money (LOL) and want up to date payment (1 yr or so) and I NEVER canceled (according to them)... I remember AOL from the'80s, I never thought they would try to screw me out of $100s and F with my credit... but they did. GOD I HATE THEM NOW. I have family who internet==AOL, some are comming around.. but...
  • by Fortran IV ( 737299 ) on Wednesday August 24, 2005 @09:08PM (#13394108) Journal
    The policy probaby [sic] had something to do with rapidly declining customer numbers at AOL as more Americans switch to broadband.

    Oh, crap. AOL has always been difficult to escape. Years ago they told my company that their service--which could be ordered over the phone--had to be canceled in writing. After we sent them a letter canceling the service, they continued billing the credit card account for several months.
  • by Elminst ( 53259 ) on Wednesday August 24, 2005 @09:31PM (#13394242) Homepage
    OMFG yes.
    I worked at a fairly sizable local ISP (40000 dialup customers at the time) when 5.0 came out.
    We served a lot of rural areas- upstate NY; adirondacks. So a lot of people would dial into our service so they could run AOL over the top.

    Installing 5.0 completely hosed EVERY other dialup connection on the computer. And a good portion of the time, it would hose LAN connections too!!!

    Christ, I will never forget how the phones were lit up for the next 3 weeks.

    There was supposed to be a class action lawsuit over that version, but i never heard what happened to it.
  • by droopycom ( 470921 ) on Wednesday August 24, 2005 @09:42PM (#13394324)
    When I first moved to the US, while I was still evaluating the different broadband options, I started with a free AOL CD just to be able to connect.

    I got broadband a few weeks later, and forgot to cancel rigth away. When I finally called to cancel, they asked why I cancelled. So I told them the truth:
    - "It was just a temporary solution until I got cable installed"
    - "So you never really intented to keep AOL"
    - "Well... no..."
    - "So tou're just abusing the offer"
    - "What ????"
    - "This is intended for people who really wants to try AOL."

    I was flabbergasted. And I didn't even complain when then charged one month service because I cancelled 2 days late - even though I hadnt logged in AOL for a month or so before...

    Thats just rude...

  • I found it easy too! (Score:3, Interesting)

    by conJunk ( 779958 ) on Wednesday August 24, 2005 @10:08PM (#13394467)
    When I was 14, I would sign up for the "free 250 hours!" trial deals with a "checking account" I got from one of those nifty cc/bank account generaters from a local BBS. It worked great until AOL stopped accepting bad info (probably around 1995 or 1996).

    And I never had the hassle of canceling the service!
  • DirecTV Next? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by TheHulk ( 80855 ) on Wednesday August 24, 2005 @10:16PM (#13394510)
    I had the exact same experience when trying to cancel my DirecTV service. Months of phone calls couldn't stop the constant barrage of monthly bills. I would call and give them an earfull, and they would say they must have screwed up and not cancelled the service. I would get a credit, and then the next months bill would come again. It took 5 months to finally close the account.

    Seems like someone did the numbers and figured out what percentage of customers would adamently call to point out the mistake and keep on their case, what percentage would only notice after a few months, and what percentage would do nothing at all. Then if you weigh that against the scenario where they would canel your service on your first request, they probably saw a substantial amount of money that can be made off "screwing" up cancellations. Kinda like that commercial where the guy finds out they can save $1 million dollars by putting one less olive in every jar they sell. Over time the scam makes a ton of money.

    Glad to see someone got called on it.
  • by Sir Homer ( 549339 ) on Wednesday August 24, 2005 @10:25PM (#13394571)
    If you cancel AOL they actually "deactivate" your account, and if you ever try to log in with any of the screen names anytime in the future, they bill your credit card which they have on file! I was billed six months after I canceled AOL because my sister accidently signed on. I had to dispute the charge with my credit card company, which didn't work, but I did manage to put a ban on AOL ever billing my credit card ever again for any purpose.
  • My AOL story. (Score:2, Interesting)

    by uberjoe ( 726765 ) on Wednesday August 24, 2005 @10:31PM (#13394617)
    I got 6 months of free aol when I bought my dell. I requested msn but they gave me aol. After a few months I grew tired of the intrusiveness of their software. So I called to cancel. They wanted to know why, as if my request as a customer was not enough. I said that I did not like to have their custom brower open to dial up. I did not like being unable to use windows' built in dialer, or when I booted to linux I could not use kppp( I couldn't connect at all). The CSR says 'oh no, you don't need to have the brower open all the time, just when you want to be connected.' Like I would want it open when I'm off line. Again I repeated that I wanted it cancelled. So she says 'Ok I'll tell you what, I WONT cancel your account, give you an additional 6 months free how about that?' After demanding again that my account be cancelled, they finally relented but only after trying to sell me broadband.

    What part of cancel don't those people seem to understand? I still years later get calls from them asking for me to come back. I'm thinking of changing my name.

  • Verizon Wireless (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Detritus ( 11846 ) on Wednesday August 24, 2005 @10:46PM (#13394734) Homepage
    I went through a similar odyssey when I tried to terminate my Verizon Wireless cell phone account. Their web page has all sorts of automated ways to sign up for service or to modify your service. The one thing conspicuously absent is the option to terminate service. I had to call customer service and deal with a "customer retention specialist" who did everything possible to to try to talk me out of terminating my account. He was very manipulative and it really pissed me off.
  • Oy, the torture! (Score:3, Interesting)

    by pjt48108 ( 321212 ) <<moc.liamg> <ta> <rolyat.j.luap.rm>> on Wednesday August 24, 2005 @11:19PM (#13394950)
    I finally sacked up and cancelled my AOL account several months ago, after about ten years. It almost seemed to take ten years to finalize the cancellation with that call. Everytime I thought the deed was done, the woman with the vaguely foreign accent would present me with one more consolation prize to keep me on. And, every time she gave me the "Well, I can do such and such for you" spiel, I repeated the mantra: "Actually, I just want to cancel my service."

    I found it helped to have the mantra ready beforehand, so it would roll off the tongue with ease. It paid off because I had to say it so many times, if I'd had to think about it, I might have just given in, if only to end the torture.

    I was lucky, I think. My AOL account was cancelled, and they stopped billing me. But one thing is for sure--the lengths they went to convince me to reconsider a decision I had already considered at length made me very unlikely to ever, EVER return to AOL. In fact, mark that down as an impossibility.
  • by SeaFox ( 739806 ) on Thursday August 25, 2005 @12:49AM (#13395387)
    I called them and after waiting on hold in the retention queue for about 10 minutes got someone.

    They asked me why I wanted to cancel and I said their web browser was bloated and slow, and I preferred Firefox. They said I could minimize the AOL app and run IE if I wanted (I pointed out this didn't change the fact I was running a bloated CPU hogging program on my machine) then I said I also couldn't use my own mail program (this is before they allowed the IMAP access, so I couldn't send outgoing mail from my other email accounts since there was no outgoing SMTP server).

    "So you want to use Outlook Express for your email?"

    "No, actually I use Mozilla Thunderbird."

    "What?"

    "Mozilla Thunderbird," I said more slowly.

    "Okay" the rep said "I have no idea what you're talking about." [little giggle]

    "Perhaps we should skip this little interview then?" I answered coldly.

    Bing. Got it cancelled immediately.

    Now removing AOL, that was the hard part. I wanted to do it immediately, because they have that great EULA clause that if you sign on to AOL anytime after you cancel (which isn't hard when AOL makes itself the default everything in Windows), you're consenting to the reactivation of your service.

    I had both versions 7 and 9 installed (for some reason the v9 "updater" just installed a second copy). My hard drive must have cranked away for over 45 minutes while the uninstaller ran. But it was still in the registry somewhere. For months after that, besides the IE 6 "provided by AOL" I would see my old screenname pop up in the most unlikely places when doing filling out web forms or on AOL/Netscape pages.
  • by HD Webdev ( 247266 ) on Thursday August 25, 2005 @12:51AM (#13395391) Homepage Journal
    Yes, I remember the fateful day that AOL first got USENET accesss...Spring, 1994. The first problem was their USENET server duplicating every post several times.

    It was a rather dark day, but then again, we had a lot of fun in alt.aol-sucks and other groups telling AOLers (like those you mentioned, not the mature people) that we knew where they lived.

    All we had to do was mention the city (by looking at the post headers) and threaten to give out their address and phone number. It scared the crap out of those 'I'm calling AOL because you're violating the AOL Terms Of Service!' types. We'd often get panicked 'IM SRY PLEZE DONT' post/email replies.

    And, back to the 'AOL Fine' subject, even back then AOL was making it extremely difficult to stop the billing. Many people were getting screwed because direct withdrawals & CC charges would not stop.

    It took 11 years until something was finally done about it. Even back then, it often took a lot to cancel charges and we'd post information similar to what's below (from the FAQ) in reply to people who couldn't get AOL to cancel their accounts:

    http://anti-aol.org/faqs/aas/faq1.html [anti-aol.org]

    " America Online
    8619 Westwood Center Drive
    Vienna, VA 22182-2285
    Send a certified letter with a return receipt. This will protect you in the event that AOL decides to continue billing you, as you'll have proof of when you canceled and proof that your letter was received by AOL.

    E-mail: AOL used to offer the "cancel online" function at Keyword: Cancel, but supposedly hasn't for some time now. And even when they did offer this service, it didn't always work. The moral: don't count on e-mail to close an account.

    Get TOSsed: Be enough of a jerk on AOL and they'll cancel you!
  • by Creepy Crawler ( 680178 ) on Thursday August 25, 2005 @01:43AM (#13395565)
    Why didnt you pay the 35$ to file a small-claims suit against them? Slap them with a 1000$ "fee"...

    A kilobuck isnt enough to warrant a lawyer, and they'll prolly settle just for no bad press.
  • Re:How to cancel AOL (Score:3, Interesting)

    by BackInIraq ( 862952 ) on Thursday August 25, 2005 @03:14AM (#13395782)
    I've told people for the last 8+ years that the only way to cancel AOL is to call your credit card company and report the card lost.

    Don't know about AOL specifically, but in general companies can still rack up a bill for you, then just report you for nonpayment. I wouldn't count on this working.

    I found the most effective way to cancel AOL, as well as MSN or Xbox Live or any other service where the phone jockeys are paid to try to convince you not to go, is the following line:

    You: "I am done talking to you. I am going to remain on the line, silently, until you tell me my account is cancelled."

    Their usual response: "You really should reconsider, you could blah blah blah (or something like that)..."

    You: ".... (crickets chirping) ...."

    Them: "Um...okay. You're account will be cancelled as of the end of this billing period (or whatever)."

    Works like a charm. Especially if we're talking about 1-800 numbers (which pretty much all customer service numbers are), and they're footing the bill for you to silently wait for them to not be stupid.
  • Why AOL got big (Score:2, Interesting)

    by mildgift ( 855983 ) on Thursday August 25, 2005 @03:31AM (#13395812)
    They got big because their software took care of a number of problems. First, their much hated DLLs got the people online, when the standard networking on Windows (and Mac) machines were not easy to configure (or to use to tunnel IP). Networking was focused on the LAN, and auto-configuring workgroup LANs. Remember that it took til around 1998 until the two big OSs had really functional "network installation wizards" for ISPs. Also, both MS and Apple had their own online services circa 1996-1998, and had little incentive to help their future competition operate well on their operating systems.

    (Even today, many companies have alternative network dialers for their customers. It's still that tough to get online, and there's still value in making it easy. The future will belong to the company that introduces no-configuration networking boxes that combine the router, managed firewall, and modem.)

    The other thing AOL did correctly was put chat rooms and instant messaging into the core of their service. Other online services focused on message boards and treated chats as a secondary service. AOL went whole-hog for scheduled chats with famous people.

    The facts are simple. People want to chat with each other in real time. The majority of regular people don't feel confident about their writing. The vast majority are intimidated by message boards frequented by college grads who write well. AOL, by having lousy message boards (they are garbage) and being a lousy place for bookish people, helped create an environment that was perceived as less hostile to their target market of average people.

    Also, unlike the current internet, the high cost of AOL actually improved the quality of the users, at least in the chats. I think that was a happy accident for them. The Usenet and internet were great until the mid 90s, then it all went to hell. The exorbitant $25 per month fee and "silence the obnoxious" anti-free-speech policies of AOL served to keep the service a little more civil than the open services on the internet.

    These are market forces in action.

    Also, for all the disses against AOL software, it does outdo the web in some respects. For one, it has a better caching mechanism, so pages are downloaded only once. This improves overall responsiveness. The bookmarking is a little less confusing, because the authors use better titles. The "few features, big buttons" interface is easy to learn, even when they violate every GUI rule known to interface-dom.

    I am not a big AOL user, though I did use it for work, and also played with it for a year or so just to see why it was so popular. It was okay. It's its own thing. Before you get the wrong impression of me, I've been online since the mid 80s, and have written networking software, so, please... I'm not a fool, but just a user trying to look at this dispassionately.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 25, 2005 @06:00AM (#13396079)
    I had a dial up contract with Tiscalli and tried canceling when I got broadband. When I rang up, they insisted that the only way they could cancel was if I told them the order reference that came with the paperwork when I took out the service. Since this was several years ago I did not have the paperwork, but no matter what information I could give them, they could not tell me that order reference, and so I could not cancel. I did talk to my bank about blocking payment, which they were happy to do, but warned me that Tiscalli could then give me a bad credit for non-payment of bills. I finally resolved it by pretending I was just ringing up to get the order reference 'for my accountant to complete my tax returns'. They gave me the order reference straight away. Possibly someone more cynical than me would claim that they were deliberately putting artificial barriers in the way of customers canceling their service, but I could not possibly comment.
  • Loses business (Score:2, Interesting)

    by massysett ( 910130 ) on Thursday August 25, 2005 @09:40AM (#13396848) Homepage
    I don't know when these companies will ever learn that making cancellation difficult merely costs them business. People might have a myriad of reasons for cancelling AOL and, believe it or not, hating AOL is only one of those reasons. Perhaps they are moving out of the country, getting DSL, or don't need Internet access anymore. If AOL made it easier for these people to cancel (e.g. ONLINE) then at least these former customers would recommend AOL to someone else.

    Instead, they force people to wait on hold and then argue with some dumb rep. After that, NO ONE would recommend AOL to anyone.

    I had a similar experience with Vonage. Their service deteriorated; I wanted to cancel. Maybe I would have recommended that other people try Vonage. But after they forced me to wait on hold to cancel, I tell everyone I know to stay the hell away from Vonage.

    Netflix, on the other hand, makes cancellation easy. Do it anytime, on the Internet. Maybe one day I'll just get tired of watching movies. "Netflix is great," I would tell my friends. "I saw so many movies that I just got tired of movies. But I wholeheartedly recommend them." Their easy cancellation policy is one reason I signed up for Netflix.

    One tip: get a credit card from MBNA. They have disposable credit card numbers. If you want to cancel a recurring service, just kill off the credit card number.

  • by nocomment ( 239368 ) on Thursday August 25, 2005 @10:57AM (#13397441) Homepage Journal
    I can't give names because I don't remember them. That's what I was told by my manager (in Ogden). He was an Asian guy if that helps you any. We were told not to tell the customers on the phone that though. Perhaps your vantage point was different but if they spent all that effort BEFORE hell broke loose then why did hell break loose?

    The reason I quit was not because I didn't want to help, it was because I wanted to work in technology, this wasn't a "ok we're going to transfer calls from the cancel/save to you for awhile" which did happen on occasion for other queues, that was to be my new permanent posistion.

    As for MY vantage point I was tired of getting yelled at. In those days you answered the phone to get screamed at. Customers were LUCKY to have an hour of hold time on the phone. I can't tell you how many times we answered the phones to people snoring because they fell asleep. We'd try and try and try to wake them up (typically it was futile) and that happened several times a day. I can see you are loyal to them but I wasn't. It was a means to an end. Get the college credit for taking AOL's training course work in the support field for a bit and jet. As soon as they said my new posistion was going to be cancel/save, I was gone. There were lots of other crappy non-tech jobs in Ogden.
  • by Cinematique ( 167333 ) on Thursday August 25, 2005 @01:31PM (#13399036)
    Back in 2000, I was using AOL on top of Earthlink dial-up... it was pretty nice... $10 for as many hours as I wanted...

    then I received a bill for like $200.00, IIRC.

    Turns out that my account was somehow switched from BYOA $10/unlimited/month to $10/5hrs/month + $6 for every hour over the initial 5. Mind you, I set up screen names for the rest of my family... 50-hour months were not out of the ordinary...

    At any rate, I called AOL, explained that I had been a member for a good year or two, and that the change was obviously a mistake since we had used roughly the same amount of time each month... "why would I make a change to pay more?"

    Since I said an unauthorized change was made to my account, I was almost automatically transferred to AOL's fraud dept.

    The person I spoke to from the fraud department emphatically denied that anyone but me could have possibly made the changes and was very blunt - I would be paying the whole charge. Oh, and it had already been billed to my credit card... "have a nice day."

    I immediately asked to talk to her supervisor but got the same spiel.

    Pissed... I called my credit card company. The rep I reached was awesome... she treated it as though my credit card was physically stolen. In effect, she prevented AOL (or anyone else, for that matter) from charging against my account. Then, she marked the account to prevent AOL from making a charge in the event that the $200 bill had already gone onto my "pending charges."

    Ready to play ball, I called AOL back...

    I ended up talking with a supervisor who was generously willing to cut my bill in half and offered an apology for the whole mess. Mock-worried... I whined that cutting my bill in half was pointless because I had already been charged.

    Miraculously, the guy was able to issue a credit to my account for about a hundred dollars... despite the fact that it had been closed for about an hour at that point. Oh, and I hadn't been charged for the $200 yet. w00t.

    When everything was said and done, I wound up actually getting the "refund" and was never charged for the erroneous $200 AOL bill.

    I'm not sure what was worth more to me... the extra cash... or the sweet satisfaction of knowing I screwed them for trying to screw me.
  • by gstoddart ( 321705 ) on Thursday August 25, 2005 @01:33PM (#13399053) Homepage
    That reminds me of some code I saw the other day:


    try {
        do_something(); ...
    }
    catch (MyProgrammingIsBadException e){
            throw new Exception(e.getMessage());
    }

    I'm surprised that's even legal.

    There are several reasons why you may legitimately do that.

    You may be able to recover from the error and avoid re-throwing.

    Sometimes, you're calling a lower-level library which throws classes of exception not accepted/understood by classes expecting your punlished interface. (ie. you're not declared to throw a MyProgrammingIsBadException, but might still receive them.)

    It's actually not as outrageous as you'd think.

    Cheers
  • Re:HA! (Score:3, Interesting)

    by rainman_bc ( 735332 ) on Thursday August 25, 2005 @07:28PM (#13402583)
    Actually, my better half has a cool credit card. Any balance under $10 they write off... So every month she'd get a day of free parking somewhere.

    Sounds stupid, but it's $120/yr... Not too shabby for just having a credit card...
  • by phocion ( 671999 ) on Friday August 26, 2005 @01:54AM (#13404737) Homepage
    Well, I'm sorry I didn't fall in the 65% for whoever I talked to the other day. OK, I'm not really sorry but I'm working on that tact thing. I'd used AOL since probably 1994. Was it the greatest ISP. No, but it worked. Now that I've got broadband (and wifi and...) I decided that it was finally time to lay my AOL account to rest for good. It had been resting for a few months unused anyway. It wasn't all that hard IMHO. I got the hard sell on how valuable their security features are and replied how I already have separate and better sources for all their protection services. I was offered a "new" rate of 5 bucks less than the current one. No thanks. I was told how I can keep my screen name and AOL email even after I cancel using their now free web email. Great, I'd been wondering where I'd find enough spam to get me through the day. Seriously, I'll be watching my account closely to see if AOL is truly canceled, but so far it wasn't as bad as trying to cancel out of those CDs by mail services! Columbia House! BMG! Ahhhhhh!

E = MC ** 2 +- 3db

Working...