Bram Cohen's Response to Microsoft's Avalanche 443
An anonymous reader writes "Bram Cohen has reduced Microsoft's proposed file-sharing application--codenamed Avalanche--to vaporware, dubbing its paper on the subject as "complete garbage". "I'd like to clarify that Avalanche is vapourware," Cohen said. "It isn't a product which you can use or test with, it's a bunch of proposed algorithms. There isn't even a fleshed-out network protocol. The 'experiments' they've done are simulations.""
Not even close to finished, you say? (Score:4, Funny)
Use the Coral Cache! (Score:5, Funny)
Forget it.
Not bad! (Score:2, Funny)
Another interesting project from the Microsoft team then? Looks like they've made an entire department, dedicated to making ideas about things that they could make, but never intend to do.. Nice going
SDLC (Score:5, Funny)
Hope that helps.
Sincerely,
Microsoft
PS: Note that I used maybe twice.
Torrent? (Score:3, Funny)
Somewhat patronizing? (Score:5, Funny)
"Unfortunately, [the paper] is actually one of the better academic papers on BitTorrent, because it makes some attempt, however feeble, to do an apples to apples comparison," he said.
Then Mr. Cohen patted Microsoft on the head, gave it a cookie, and sent it outside to play.
Re:Not even close to finished, you say? (Score:5, Funny)
LOL (Score:1, Funny)
Slashdot is turning into the Jerry Springer of tech news.
"My P2P architecture is soooo much better than your P2P architecture, bitch!"
"Oh no you didn't!"
So, when will we get to see the topless crack-whore midgets?
A long time ago Alan Turing... (Score:0, Funny)
We don't know yet (Score:4, Funny)
And there it is! (Score:0, Funny)
Illegal file swapping uses asside, one of the advantages that I had expected BitTorrent to provide was increased download speed. I expected that the use of multiple download sources would allow me to saturate my connection rather than be at the mercy of a single FTP server's connection. What I have experience repeatedly, version after version, with BitTorrent has been quite different. I have experienced slow connections, at least much slower than I would expect and in some cases, slower that a single FTP server. Now we see the problem. It is because of the "choking alogrithm".
Now, don't even bother offering your comments on configuration of BitTorrent or the firewall, I know what I am doing and I know that the configurations were fully optimized. The fact is that BitTorrent consistently under performs because of its "choking algorithm".
This choking algorithm may be beneficial in the sense of increasing the total connections that a seed will accept but it robs the system of its performance benefits. So what is the advantage then? Provide slow connections to the largest possible audience or provide better performance? The answer seems to be the former, which is very advantageous to the illegal P2P crowd but doesn't really help the legitimate users. There's little or no benefit in being able to connect to an ISO download when it will take a week to complete the download. It is better than waiting a week for a connection and then downloading the ISO is 15 minutes!
But, Cohen doesn't want to here this stuff. In fact when presented with these ideas, he reacts like a mental patient! It is because of Cohen and his arrogance or mental disorders that MS Avalanche will emerge from its vaporware as a vastly superior system. It will of course also include DRM so it won't help the P2P crowd very much.
Article is all wrong,,, (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Not even close to finished, you say? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Dont Underestimate MS. They'll Integrate Avalan (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Torrent? (Score:2, Funny)
Yeah, We Know It's Going To Be Garbage (Score:3, Funny)
The question is: Will it be pulled from Longhorn?
(Yes, this is a joke, morons.)
Re:Not bad! (Score:3, Funny)
How did this get modded up?
Sweet no more lawsuits (Score:1, Funny)