The Horror Of British Telecom 651
MBCook writes "'Someone, raised amidst the elegant lattice of custom and tradition that serves as the foundation of English society, came up with a very elegant, very British, solution to broadband policy here.
And it absolutely, positively sucks.' So starts an article by Mark Hachman over at ExtremeTech chronicling his odyssey to get broadband in his new flat."
Seconded (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Been there, done that (Score:3, Informative)
BT used to own a company called Cellnet, that later became o2. o2 is owned by mmo2, which does not belong to BT.
mmo2 are not another name or brand of BT. mmo2 operate several mobile and communication networks of their own (the new police network, manx telecom, o2, etc)
TFA Books I-IX (Score:3, Informative)
Should have checked his facts... (Score:5, Informative)
Wrong, wrong, wrong.
Check your freakin' facts before you go slagging off the rather elegant BT system.
The bit that is the same is the DSL connection between your house and the exchange, and the virtual circuit over BT's ATM network to the ISP.
It is then up to the ISP in question as to how they link you (the customer) to the Internet.
You can pay a pittance and get a shitty connection with a dynamic IP address, through a transparent web proxy and have your web surfing go down every few weeks (or whenever it gets really busy).
Or you can pay a few pounds more and get a static IP address (or even a range) and no transparent proxy, and loads of back-end bandwidth so that you get a very reliable service.
Although I am not surprised that a foreigner wouldn't know this because very few Brits are aware of these facts either.
Re:Public sector companies usually suck... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Poor article (Score:3, Informative)
BT terrible? It's an outrage!!
Just try NTL, then you'd know what terrible service really feels like...
Re:What's taking so long? (Score:5, Informative)
Beh, it's not just the Britland that's suffering this problem. In Poland, we have Telekomunikacja Polska SA (tp SA), although the name obviously must have came from "communism" rather than "communication". Abysmal service, and no competition -- a cable operator would have to provide his own backbone as tp sa obviously isn't going to cooperate.
Just a few tidbits:
Our business crawled to a halt during that time -- but, there is nothing we can do about this. Sue them for lost profits? Hah. All we can possibly get is getting back the bill for 30 days, and it would take a 5-10 years long lawsuit that would cost plenty.
And, the guy who does the real work for them said it's a matter of flipping a switch (as the cabling already existed), but he was not allowed to do it without clearance from the bureaucracy.
This post is pretty grim, indeed. But, as the brighter side, the rumors say there are people who live in Somalia and Sierra Leone...
Re:I know the horror (Score:2, Informative)
by "you'll need a microfilter plugged in to each phone line or extension that you want to use with broadband."
they really mean "With the broadband service you must have a microfilter for EACH device which you want to connect to the line on which broadband is enabled."
Good luck!
Re:Let's review... (Score:5, Informative)
BT's not all bad.
Re:Let's review... (Score:3, Informative)
Step 1: Go to providers web site, order broadband and modem.
Step 2: Recieve and install modem
But that's because everything went well for me (exchange was only recently activated for broadband, and phone line was only installed 15 years ago). I think the problem he's pointing out is when it goes wrong, it usually goes horribly horribly wrong.
I haven't really had massive problems with BT myself - but at the end of last year I had a problem with my broadband connection dying in the evening so I phoned BT (who provide my phone line). They ran line checks at their end and found nothing wrong, even though the connection was down at the time, so told me to contact Eclipse (who provide my broadband).
So I contacted Eclipse and they ran line checks, which also returned fine, and they could see no reason for the line being down! They told me they would contact BT and about three days later they sent an engineer round who managed to fix the problem.
He hasn't even started yet! (Score:2, Informative)
Finally, he gets a connection. It connects at something completely stupid like 30k over a 2MB line. Fault process gets raised with the ISP, passed to BT, passed to ISP, passed to user for (really stupid) checks over their system. Passed back to BT, closed, opened, closed, re-filed, and finally, one day, it starts working. No explanation will ever be forthcoming. In reality, you don't want to ask.
Then comes the fun of trying to work out what the daft ISP has blocked port wise, and which bloody stupid MTU they are using (sticking to the standard for ethernet would be *WAY* too easy.
After all that, 3 months down the line they start capping your download limits, and charging you for more on a per byte level (slight exaggeration).
And yet, after all that, we thank them and pray to them because they are the gods, and we have no where else to go.
Re:What's taking so long? (Score:5, Informative)
> Most of these problems would likely not of occured if they hadn't privatised BT .
I agree _in part_ with you. I've witnessed first hand the result of the deregulation of another telco market (the French one, with France Télécom as the Ugly Monopolist From Hell), and here's what happened :
On the other hand, before deregulation you would only get 1024 kbps at cut-throat prices. Now, most providers go up to 8 Mbps, and a few will even provide 20 Mbps ADSL2 with free national long-distance phone calls and TV service. So, I will stop short of saying "there shouldn't have been any deregulation", it was clearly good since it spawned a lot of interesting offers. But the way it has been done is quite stupid, especially the fact that you no longer get a free hotline in touch with the actual people doing the work. The market was stagnant, right. But the way it is now is more like "anarchy in the .FR"... I can see why they did it this way (avoid confusing the users with multiple points of contact) but the end result is that many problems take longer (in some cases *much* longer) to be solved. The most knowledgeable people still have a separate DSL traffic hauling contract with FT and an Internet service contract with a third-party provider that still does it (there aren't many that do anymore) for reliability (yo
Re:Should have checked his facts... (Score:2, Informative)
AAISP http://aa.nu/ [aa.nu] offer a very fine ADSL service wherein you can get an IP address range if any size (provided you can justify it to RIPE of course) regardless of the service package ordered.
They offer static IP addresses as standard. If I understand correctly they don't even do dynamic IP addresses on ADSL.
AAISP provide the highest data rate your line that can be achieved on your line (currently 2Mbps with more coming this year), at no extra cost.
They also have no transparent web proxy, guaranteed, cannot be changed - it is an intrinsic part of their service that they just carry IP packets between you and the rest of the Internet.
With AAISP there is absolutely no filtering whatsoever. With AAISP you are considered to be part of the Internet, rather than a "client" or "user" of the Internet.
There are no mysterious or unstated bandwidth caps. Each service package has a clearly stated data allowance, which is more than any reasonable user might need. More data can be transferred at extra cost. Demand during the night time and at weekends is so low that data transferred during those times is not metered.
(Please no babbling about wanting uncapped services at no extra cost -- it is simply not economic to have people saturating a 2 megabit pipe 24/7 for £20 per month. So-called "uncapped" services will always be subject to increased service charges, unstated limits, highly variable performance, ... or a pack of lies.)
I have no connection with AAISP other than as a satisfied customer! They just happen to offer a service which I find to be most agreeable.
Re:The UK is broken... patches welcome (Score:2, Informative)
BT? Dont talk to me about BT! (Score:4, Informative)
Then I had to move. Unfortunately I still had a few months to go on my one year contract. But when I called BT to set up ADSL in my new flat, they were happy to waive the remaining months I owed them. Very nice of them I thought, yet when I tried to order the new ADSL installation they told me I couldn't pay for it with my credit card because only one installation was allowed per credit card. They wouldn't let me pay by any other method (not cheque, cash nor gold doubloons). I only had the one credit card at the time, so I offered to pay up the remaining months on the old installation to free up my credit card. But they wouldn't let me do that either. Several weeks of calling and being called back went by with no progress and I was eventualy given email addresses to complain to, which were just ignored.
I eventualy just went with another ISP, who were more expensive but helpful. So I am no fan of BT. And dont get me started on the time they routed my phone calls to another (unattended) number, then spent two weeks calling me to arrange an engineers visit!
Dealing with big companies (Score:4, Informative)
When it's too important to call, write a letter and have it sent with the option where they sign to receive the letter. Again, you have a date, time and name.
When the inevitable time comes that they claim money from you, reply with a letter enumerating all your notes. You'll never hear from them again.
All telcos suck (Score:5, Informative)
I lived in the US for several years, and was in a GTE (which became Verizon whilst I was there) area. They sucked every bit as hard as this guy's complaint against BT, and that was just for voice (I used RoadRunner cable for broadband). Specifically:
- two weeks after I moved in, they disconnected me without warning because they unilateraly decided my apartment was 'abandoned' (yes, that was the word they used).
- I got disconnected *again* when a new neighbour moved in because they thought my line belonged to my neighbour.
- more billing errors than I care to mention
- abysmal line quality; in the middle of a metropolitan area, when I was on dialup it was impossible to get much better than 33k dialup connections. Yes, they DO have line faults in the US. They just don't actually fix them.
Then there was MCI. They had a whole new level of suckage. I wasn't even a customer of theirs, and one of their charges showed up on my bill. "Third Party Call" it was called - a $10 call from Florida to New Jersey (and I lived in Texas). MCI never did properly refund the money and I had to PAY Verizon for 'third party call blocking'. I had to PAY them to fix a horrible security hole whereby you can charge money to a different phone line! Apparently you can set up a 3rd party call by calling the operator and having the charge sent to another phone line. I suspect you do have to provide some details so the operator knows you're not just picking a line at random, what I suspect is the operator mis-keyed the number to charge to.
I also got charges put on my phone line from another random long distance company with no explanation. I could never get them to remove that charge, fortunately it was trivially small.
Re:I Once Wanted to Live in England... (Score:1, Informative)
If you think free healthcare is expensive then I despair.
You think the UK press is sensationalistic? I couldn't stop myself laughing when I saw Fox "news"
No TV licence man can enter without a warrant unless you are fool enough to invite them.
Please, do some research first.
Re:Poor sod! (Score:3, Informative)
Comment removed (Score:3, Informative)
Article Was Fine Says Fellow Brit (Score:3, Informative)
Take a step back and look at your response, bit extreme perhaps?
Frankly your response does damage to how people here on slashdot will generally perceive us, so thanks for that.
Re:Learn some f***ing geography (Score:1, Informative)
No, it's NOT "Holland" or whatever you English people/Brits call it.
FYI: The Netherlands consists of 12 provinces, only 2 of which have "Holland" in them.
Same as in Ireland (Score:2, Informative)
In my case it took me about 3 months to get the local thieves (Eircom) to free up my line from the broadband service that they claimed I had ordered from them (no, never did, why would I order the same package at 3x cost?).
They only moved their asses when finally after about 2 months I decided to contact the Communications Regulator.
Nowadays when your ISP encounters this situation they send you a nice form where you can specify which ISP you want and which one you no longer want... I guess that even with this process it takes about 2 months anyway.
The Psychology of Attracting BT Engineers (Score:5, Informative)
>Technically not true. They have early-shift and late-shift engineers, and the former can work pretty early in the morning. But you have to find your way through the incredible, Byzantine, almost unreal tangle of red tape
When you arrange the engineer's visit, insist that the operator puts "CUSTOMER WILL SUPPLY BACON SANDWICH" on the call details.
I have used this trick twice now. First call of the morning (08:30) every time. One of the guys actually drove a 30 mile round trip back to HQ to pick up a spare part and come back to me, after being fed a bacon sandwich and promised more.
Seriously, you have to be aware than BT engineers get allocated a whole heap of calls for the day, then they get to choose which ones to do in which order. The ones they leave until later will probably get postponed as they run late.
Therefore you need to make your call the attractive one which the engineer picks first.
All BT engineers like bacon sandwiches. There are NO vegitarian BT engineers. You need calories and protein to climb telephone poles.
Next, the most important question when the engineer arrives is "Tea or coffee, milk and sugar?". Once you have your engineer, you want to keep him on your side. Your anger with the bureacracy of BT means nothing to him, if you get feisty he can just pretend he doesn't have the part and will have to come back tomorrow (ie. you get marked as troublesome and always get picked last each day).
Re:BT (Score:2, Informative)
Oh, yeah? Well, check this out, then:
Re:Almost (Score:3, Informative)
I laughed while I was reading the article, because nearly the exact scenario happened with us (here in the U.S.) as we were trying to transfer the provision of DSL service from AOL to Qwest. Because each one decided to point the finger at the other, it took several weeks of phone calls, several promises on their part, my increasiug ire, and finally, someone who decided that it might be a good idea to actually do their job and get things take care of. The whole experience was quite nasty, but unfortunately, not all that surprising.
Re:Learn some f***ing geography (Score:2, Informative)
Please, for my own information, point out where he called the UK England. I can find no reference in the article to the UK at all, only the company UKOnline.
For that matter, despite your protest and that of others, I can find no single instance where he used the terms "Britain" or "England" inappropriately. In fact he seems quite careful about refering to his place of residence as England and BT's service as British, never English.
I may have missed some instance or other, however.
He infers in his opening statement that England is British, which, as it happens, it is. It's not like he's living in Wales and calling it "England."
KFG
Re:What's taking so long? (Score:1, Informative)
Re:yeah, at least he could a mobile that worked (Score:4, Informative)
Bullshit. I've texed plenty of people on Verizon, Cingular, and Sprint with my T-Mobile phone. Try it before you spout crap.
". phones are bound to a particular area code. If you move, you either need a new number, or people pay long distance rates to get to your phone."
Guess what? Long-distance is actually *cheaper* in the US than calling a mobile is in Europe.
"you pay to receive calls, on your mobile. So family minutes are cut in half if they are used intra-family."
Yes, you do. But the person calling doesn't. Look at the rates for calling a mobile in Europe - then tell me that we get a raw deal here. Even by multiplying the rates in the US by two (to account for the fact that both parties pay), I still pay less per minute than in Europe.
"When you buy a phone, you pay an "activation fee" for some idiot in the shop to turn it on and press a few buttons."
Generally waived if you buy your phone at the right place.
"Different network providers have different handsets. You cant juggle SIM cards around or choose the phone you want."
You certainly can. Some phones are SIM-locked, but I can use any GSM-1900 compatible phone with T-Mobile. I've had 13 different handsets in the last two years (4 grayscale Sidekicks, 4 color sidekicks, 2 Sidekick 2s, 2 Treo 180s, a HTC Wallaby Pocket PC Phone, and a basic Nokia).
"you pay to receive text messages!"
I don't pay to send or recieve text messages. Nor do I pay by the kilobyte for GPRS like you do in Europe. I get flat-rate ulimited data & SMS for $15 a month.
"you pay to receive calls, on your mobile. So family minutes are cut in half if they are used intra-family"
Not so. I don't pay to calls to any other phone on my network (T-Mobile USA). I can call my family *all I want* and not use any of my minutes.
"prepay is very expensive, minutes expire unless you phone is topped up, not available everywhere"
Prepay runs on the same networks as non-prepay. Cards are availabile at gas stations, supermarkets, and many other locations. Prices average to about $0.15 per minute, cheaper than prepaid in Europe. Expiration varies, but T-Mobile, for example, gives you 365 days.
"you need to work out which providers have approximate coverage in the places you live, work and travel."
Namely, most of them. Verizon, Cingular, T-Mobile, Sprint, and Nextel all have major population centers and larger towns covered. Anything with more than 10,000 people will have coverage, as will interstate highways. Some providers are better, some are worse.
T-Mobile is generally considered the weakest provider, coverage-wise, in the US. I have no problems using their service 99% of the time.
"you then need to decide between prepay or x-minute contracts"
This is different from Europe how?.
Your comment shows that you are misinformed about the US wireless industry.
For $85 per month, my family gets:
- 3 phones
- 500 pooled minutes
- Free nighttime calling, weekend calling, and calling to other T-Mobile subscribers
- Unlimited GPRS on two of the phones
- Unlimited SMS on my phone
- No long-distance to any number in the US
- No roaming anywhere in the US
If you don't want GPRS, you can do even better:
For $40:
- 600 "peak" minutes
- Unlimited off-peak (night) and weekend minutes
- Unlimited calling to other subscribers on the same network
- No roaming or long-distance charges in the US
Run the numbers. Compare the rates. You'll see that they are much lower in the US.
The "cheapness" of wireless in Europe is a myth.