Gentoo 2005.0 Released 425
mintshows writes "According to Gentoo Planet, the first gentoo release of the year, 2005.0, is out. You can download the 2005.0 ISOs from the torrents at http://torrents.gentoo.org/ . Of course, current Gentoo users can just emerge to the latest and greatest as always."
Re:Gentoo liveCD? (Score:3, Informative)
Gentoo is already on a livecd, which you boot from. Then you chroot into your hard drive for the install. Is that sort of what you meant?
Re:compile on! (Score:5, Informative)
I'm a computer science student, and love learning all I can about computers, so maybe some of those are not advantages for you. However, if you're into experimentation and the latest and greatest, gentoo is a great way to play with it all.
Re:compile on! (Score:3, Informative)
But to answer your question, I've had a fully compiled system started from stage one, and didn't have any hard drive problems. Also didn't notice any visible performance difference, but the customizability has kept me with Gentoo for a long time now.
For those of you who want ease of install (Score:4, Informative)
Vidalinux [vidalinux.com]
Apparently it's Gentoo, with a nice graphical installer that is no longer cruel and unusual punishment...although the install of Gentoo teaches you quite a bit.
Yes, you get the benefits of portage.
Just wait a little for a new version based on 2005
Oh, and I just (Score:4, Informative)
Releases only mean something for people wanting to install gentoo, although it is no proplem to install from an older medium, you'll still get an uptodate system in the end.
However, what is great about new releases is that they mean new and uptodate binary packages, so if you just want to install gentoo quickly and still have an uptodate system, here is your chance.
Btw., wasn't this release supposed to feature at least a preview of the upcoming installer? Any word on that?
Re:Gentoo liveCD = Catalyst (Score:3, Informative)
The software is called Catalyst. More info here [gentoo.org].
Re:KDE 3.4 (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Gentoo users need to do more (Score:5, Informative)
just sub 2004.3 for 2005.0.
Re:compile on! (Score:5, Informative)
Re:That's what I like about Gentoo... (Score:5, Informative)
Actually, it's far from a nightmare on the desktop. I got sick of a few other distros mostly because of their philosophy of reinstalling every new minor release.
On Gentoo, you don't even upgrade from release to release, you just install stuff when you can be bothered and one day you find yourself on 2005.0 accidentally. Since I did my last world upgrade a day after KDE 3.4 came out, I'm probably pretty up to date by chance.
Well, I guess there is a slight difference between the releases, though. The later profiles will specify more modern default packages than the earlier ones. That doesn't have too much effect once your system is already installed, however.
Re:KDE 3.4 (Score:2, Informative)
then to top it off, it has taken a clue from the *box's and the like and made using workspaces more than just an eye-candy toy, making it easy to scroll through workspaces, or to set keys to do so. It doesn't steal key configs as gnome does (F1?). and last but not least it's FAST.
Anders
Calm down (Score:5, Informative)
Also the important messages scrolling by has been a problem for ages and still hasn't been addressed, which is a shame.
And I also agree that gentoo's handling of web things like apache, php, wordpress, etc. is far from ideal. (webapp-config, how I hate you).
But there is one thing that really makes a lot of your critizism mute, you are running an unstable system and complain about breakage and constant updates. Come on, that's just silly.
And contrary to what you seem to think, there is no situation that requires you to run an unstable system, especially if this system is a server. If you think you need some unstable apps, fine, gentoo gives you the tools to just install those unstable apps and leave everything else stable, if you refuse to use these tools, don't complain, it is entirely your fault.
add this to /etc/portage/package.keywords (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Gnome 2.10? (Score:5, Informative)
So if you want it, unmask it (should be 2 minutes or work) and install it, but let the people that want to have a stable system have their stable system.
Broken system? (Score:3, Informative)
I wonder if this new release is why autoconf became broken and why I can't compile anything,
Re:compile on! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:New but better? (Score:3, Informative)
Anyway, Ubuntu has up to date packages, uses a nice interface to apt, and has really excellent hardware detection. It's as brainless to install as Windows and just about as easy to use. I like it much.
Re:compile on! (Score:5, Informative)
has all the learning/tweaking/compiling been worth the extra power/costumizability in the end
I'm an avid Gentoo user, and I've got to say, if you're only considering Gentoo for the speed/power, you might as well put some stickers on your case, because you'll probably notice a bigger speed improvement like that. Gentoo is really useful for the following reason:
Re:fragmented fs (Score:4, Informative)
And people wonder why Gentoo users are stereotyped? All three of those statements aren't always true.
1.) So, where's your Gnome 2.10 then? Before anybody mentions ~x86, that's no different from unstable on Debian or just installing the package yourself on any other distro.
2.) There are sometimes configuration issues with Gentoo; they are mentioned elsewhere in this discussion. For instance, etc-update absolutely sucks and the Gentoo devs refuse to replace it with better solutions that have already been offered.
3.) Gentoo's packaging system sometimes creates versioning conflicts. I've personally had to fix a broken system twice. Check the Gentoo forums for all the other issues users sometimes have.
I'm not bashing people who use Gentoo. I'm just saying, it's not some perfect distro that does everything great. And compilation is so overrated and provides no benefits. I wiped my three year old Gentoo install once I discovered Ubuntu, so that's just me.
Split ebuilds (Score:1, Informative)
Re:fragmented fs (Score:3, Informative)
You might want to look into XFS, particularly xfs_fsr ("filesystem reorganizer for XFS" from the xfsdump package in most distros). Works on mounted filesystems.
Higher CPU and mem usage than other fs, though. YMMV.
Thanks to the astute posters above... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:"Iso's" (Score:1, Informative)
Quick making excuses and learn to fucking spell.
Thank you.
Re:Darn it! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Proposal for etc-update solution (Score:5, Informative)
Re:question, (Score:4, Informative)
As for the ram, ideally you want 256 as a minimum or you're going to be swapping a lot to disk. 512MB is plenty. I know on my laptop at least going from 256 to 768 [two slots, it came with a 256MB board] MB of ram was a nice boost for building stuff.
On my laptop I sit at 3.2GB used and I have tons of other tools installed [Gnome, tetex, debugging tools, gaim, openoffice, etc...].
But even a full desktop build with Gnome or KDE wouldn't top 4GB of space and in that you're getting a lot of free tools.
Tom
Re:question, (Score:4, Informative)
I'm running gentoo on an old 233 pentium MMX laptop with 80Mb RAM and a 6Gg hard disk (of which 1.5 gb is stil an old windows partition) - it's my home server including my main mail server (built in UPS, only draws about 10 watts, small and quite quiet etc.) and it's running fine.
I rarely run up X on it, I admit, but I've got X installed (so if need be I can run up apps to display on my main machine) and it's happily running qmail (qpsmtpd,spamassassin, clamav,pyzor, razor,dcc etc.), ssh and other "home server" apps, and it doesn't need much room:
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
I could probably trim this further, but it's fine for me. I have a weekly cron job to "emerge --sync" and "emerge -Dupv world", and I'm thinking of adding "emerge -Du --fetch-only world".
Updates compile a little slowly at times, but then I don't have much installed to update, and I could always add a cron job to do the updates too.
Re:compile on! (Score:4, Informative)
The end result is just slightly less stable than debian "stable", but considerably more than "testing" or "unstable". It is only possible because my packages are built against the libraries I've got, not the ones the package maintainer has got. Waiting for compiles is a pain, but it's what makes it all work.
Re:compile on! (Score:1, Informative)
I feel somewhat obliged to point out that with Gentoo you don't need to know what those special cases are since you just set the USE flags for your system and then let it take care of everything. An example: When I used Debian I tried to get lirc working with xine and no matter how I tried to configure it I couldn't get it to work until I finally discovered that the Debian package was compiled with lirc support disabled - despite the fact that if you download lirc and compile it yourself it's enabled by default (I looked at that and couldn't believe that any package maintainer would compile a package with such default settings off). Now I have lirc set as a USE flag and never need to know whether it's set as default or not since everything just works.
Re:fragmented fs (Score:4, Informative)
Then you'll be pleased to discover 'dispatch-conf' It keeps all your CONFIG_PROTECT files in RCS revision control and automatically merges in changes which do not result in conflicts (not by default, auto-merge must be enabled, but it works flawlessly). You'll only be prompted when there are changes to config files in updates that directly conflict with changes that you've made yourself.
Re:compile on! (Score:1, Informative)
Furthermore, OOo has a binary distribution, and KDE is in the process of changing to split ebuilds (so you only have to compile those programs that have actually changed).
Warning to AMD64 Users - Don't download yet! (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Gentoo and upgrades (Score:3, Informative)
No. The message that your configuration isn't valid anymore isn't a death-knell. Change the symlink of
With a system that old, I'd do an emerge -e world too, to recompile the whole system with your new compiler.
Re:fragmented fs (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Will it actually compile this time? (Score:3, Informative)
Support a company that cares about Linux: NVidia.
Having said that... many people with ATI cards have Linux running properly (with 3D support). I've heard they've been improving their driver steadily.
The "Installer" Isn't Just For Installing Gentoo (Score:2, Informative)
Re:just about through with gentoo (Score:3, Informative)
If I were a noob I'd probably be trying to run fedora, but I'm not even going to get involved there. If I can't get white box linux to work on a mailserver box at work, then I'm going to put gentoo there, too. It had SuSE enterprise 8 which actually required an update to 8.1 or 8.01 or something in order to support a megaraid card in a gateway server. I tried doing it with debian, but debian didn't want to read its driver floppies.
I'm pretty well disgusted with every distribution other than gentoo. It features the best part of BSD, namely ports, in a linux-friendly form. Some of the package maintainers are definitely crack smokers, but in general the system works very well. In particular portage itself needs help, especially so that it can recover from problems. If even the cached information is somehow corrupted, even though portage can tell it's corrupted, it won't rebuild it properly. In general some of the most important parts of gentoo, like portage in fact, are poorly documented. Don't even look at the documentation for the installer LiveCD creation tool, it's maybe five percent of what it should be, and even most gentoo developers reportedly don't understand it. Otherwise I've been as pleased with gentoo as possible.
Re:compile on! (Score:4, Informative)
Honestly, the gentoo base installation goes very quick. I suggest starting from a stage3 install, as you can actually be using the system while you upgrade it. Install the portage tree from the CD and don't upgrade it until after you install binary packages from the packages CD. Then emerge --sync to update portage, emerge -u portage to update portage, then emerge -uD world to update the entire system. I think the single thing that takes the longest is probably either building gcc, or X.org. Everything else is relatively short.
Re:That's what I like about Gentoo... (Score:2, Informative)
Everything is up-to-date, and re-installs are rarely - if ever - necessary. Fedora Core users must wait for FC4 for KDE 3.4 and Gnome 2.10; Gentoo users just have to wait for the rsync update.
If (like me) you're runnning a personal computer (i.e. not a production server) and want the latest and greatest as soon as they come out, Gentoo is worth it.
Chandler
Um, not insightful: Wrong. (Score:4, Informative)
New profiles mean more than just installers.