Cory Doctorow's 'I, Robot' Posted 126
maxentius writes "A bunch of new stuff has been posted to The Infinite Matrix , reports editor Eileen Gunn, including a new 15,000- word short story from Cory Doctorow entitled 'I, Robot.' Other new additions include material from Howard Waldrop and Patrick O'Leary."
I'm writing Cory Doctorow's Biography (Score:1, Insightful)
Must be easy to get attention for your short stories when you give them names that were formerly used for best selling novels and blockbuster movies.
The title (Score:5, Insightful)
About this story, Cory says, "Last spring, in the wake of Ray Bradbury pitching a tantrum over Michael Moore appropriating the title of 'Fahrenheit 451' to make Fahrenheit 9/11, I conceived of a plan to write a series of stories with the same titles as famous sf shorts, which would pick apart the toalitarian [sic] assumptions underpinning some of sf's classic narratives."
Yes, the title is on purpose. Of course if people did that, there would be no discussions here, would there?
Re:The title (Score:2, Insightful)
Oh god, not again (Score:3, Insightful)
This man's writing is so amazingly stilted even reading the first paragraph makes me cringe in horror. For the love of my life, I can't understand the Slashdot infatuation with him. Everything I've ever seen by him has been awful even by pulp SF standards.
Re:Catchy Title... (Score:3, Insightful)
But I guess leaving important details out allows the
Re:Reply to sig (Score:3, Insightful)
If meant tons of former heterosexuals. Does that mean your willing to give up your protected status??
Re:Neat Idea - shame about the writing (Score:2, Insightful)
So he reading of his script sounds just like his writing of said scripts then?
Reading through his works on Boing seem to be the same -- his quick postings always seem to be soapbox statements, generally referring to himself in the third person. Its fucking annoying.
I bought one of his books off of Amazon last year when they were blowing it out very cheap and honestly, I couldn't get past the first 30 pages. It read like a high school assignment. He will get better, but the very first thing he needs to do is to hire a great editor -- and not someone that just rubber stamps and spell checks the document before it hits the press (albiet, the anonymous coward writting this post would have been most greatful if this were to have seen if this were the case, capeesh?)
BTW -- I love Boing and I check it before I actually check into
Re:The title (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Neat Idea - shame about the writing (Score:3, Insightful)
The saddest part is just how angry this guy always comes across. I really hope it's just an act, otherwise he'll probably have a heart attack by the time he's 40.
You could be right. I don't know anything about this particular guy, nor have I bothered to read any of his stuff yet (I'm strapped for time as it is, despite posting here to slashdot). I was speaking more generally, from my own experience (my writing is improving with practice, and while it isn't where I'd like it to to be, it's a lot better than when I first started) and from my observations of others (I've read early drafts and writings by some of my favorite authors, and compared them to their later stuff, and the early stuff is rough by comparison).
As for the anger thing
Proud tradition (Score:2, Insightful)
And of course Asimov's title was, in turn,
a riff on Robert Graves' I, Claudius. [amazon.com]
But that case is quite different from both Doctorow's i, robot and Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11, inasmuch as Asimov's I, Robot is a quite brilliant work of art in its own right.