FBI Warns: Many Tsunami Relief Pleas Are Fake 353
lgrinberg writes "Even in the face of terrible disasters such as the Tsunami that hit South East Asia and Africa in late December, many are finding ways to take advantage of it and make money off of it. An example is fake websites that claim to be non-profit charitable organizations that help out the victims when they really take all the money for themselves. Other instances are emails or websites written by people who claim to be survivors of the disaster and are asking for help. The FBI warns that many of these are fake and recommends people to help via known non-profit organizations."
How can they sleep at night...? (Score:5, Informative)
Amazingly, the site is still up. The owner, "Damion", offers the following weak apology:
The worst thing I heard of... (Score:5, Informative)
Wikipedia (Score:5, Informative)
This is a news story [sky.com] about somebody changing e-mail headers to pretend to be the British government confirming friends of the recipients to be dead. Very sick. Luckily, the police acted in this case.
Giving intelligently (Score:5, Informative)
Even legitimate charities are sometimes a bit sloppy with how they spend the contributions they get. Many non-profits spend a considerable portion of their donations on fund-raising (read: telemarketers) and compensation of management. One of my favorite non-profits is the American Institute of Philanthropy [charitywatch.org] which is a watch-dog organization that releases reports that "rate" the charities on various criteria. Given the fact that there are so very many organizations that are set up to aid the tsunami victims, I encourage my fellow slashdotians to give their money to an organization that gets an A rating in the guide.
GMD
What does it take to not be an asshole? (Score:5, Informative)
Now, 150,000 dead, and we still have assholes trying to make a buck off it. What does it take for these people to learn morals? Is the extra cash worth that much when there's now several thousand orphans? Do we need, what, a nuclear holocaust to get assholes to knock it off?
Reliable Orgs. (Score:5, Informative)
Not karma hoaring, mods can skip this if they wish, here is a list of reliable places where you can donate [google.com].
Re:Giving intelligently (Score:5, Informative)
I got one (Score:5, Informative)
Tsunami Scam [accettura.com]
Sounds like a nigerian letter, but with Tsunami mixed in there.
Re:The worst thing I heard of... (Score:5, Informative)
Salvation Army (Score:4, Informative)
They have feet on the ground everywhere in the world, and they don't squander your money. It actually makes it to victims of disaster and poverty.
UH DUH! (Score:5, Informative)
Better yet, if your technically inclined, get your ham license and donate sometime to ARES by training in events and field day. Then when disaster strikes in your area, you'll be ready. I used to think it was ridiculous, but after a bad ice/snowstorm took out people's electric and 2-3 inches of rain falling right after that cause flooding in and around Columubus we'd never be needed but in just 14 days we had 2 activations of ARES to staff the red cross shelters with communciators. I know it won't help the Tsunami victims, but then when something like this hits your town, you can not only donate your money but also your time.
Re:Salvation Army (Score:1, Informative)
The "Sally Ann", as it's called here, is just a big cult. They have their own churches ("Citadels" they call them) and enforce religion on their workers.
Re:The worst thing I heard of... (Score:3, Informative)
The thing that did happen was that when newspapers and tabloids published names and photos of missing that relatives sent them; then some of those were robbed.
Re:Big nonprofits have big "administrative costs" (Score:3, Informative)
For organizations like the Red Cross and Salvation Army, the amount going to overhead is very small.
Re:Giving intelligently (Score:2, Informative)
Nevertheless, despite the risk of money being diverted, money is the best contribution. It can be sent around the world quickly, and aid organizations can buy appropriate supplies from the best locations. You might want to donate cans of baked beans and blankets, but it costs a lot of money and time to get such material to the other side of the world and baked beans and blankets might not be appropriate.
Paramount (Score:2, Informative)
beware spammers too (Score:4, Informative)
" The boy about 2 years, from Khoa Lak is missing his parents. :
Nobody knows what country he comes from. If
anybody knows him please contact
us by phone 076-249400-4 ext. 1336, 1339 or e- mail
info@phuket-inter-hospital.co.th
image001.jpg"
Trouble is, it contained a spammers zombie (I didn't realise when I got it) and it depends on suckers trying to be helpful and recirculating it to people they know to infect them. That's how it got to me but 'cos I use Linux I was immune and I didnt circulate it anyway.
What I did do was waste the cops and the Norwegian embassy's time. I recognised the kid in the picture from a TV news report that named his parent nationality name and location. I spent an hour on the phone to the TV station the police and the Norwegian consulate telling them that I knew who the kid was and I could help.
Turns out they knew anyway so did I do right or wrong? did the spammer do wrong? suppose I had been the only one to indentify this lost 2 years to the parent but I had infected loads of people in the process?
Spammers - what slime-bags.
Be careful who you donate to (Score:3, Informative)
T.O. police arrest man posing as Red Cross worker [www.ctv.ca]
There's no reason you should to give your money to strangers. If you can't/don't want to donate money over the internet, go to your local Redcross office. Every major city has one.
Re:What does it take to not be an asshole? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Giving intelligently (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Just so you know (Score:4, Informative)
It's fair to mention that the LOAC (Laws of Armed Combat) make such facilities fair game if they are being used to perform military action. That said, I haven't seen too many terrorists being shy about targeting hospitals regardless of use, or using them (and mosques, and schools) as fighting positions. When I served in the Afghanistan theatre, we even made troops leave their long-arms (and all ordinance heavier than side-arms) outside our hospital. Now our "hospital" was a tent, we were miles from anything, and there were no media types around to see it, but we still did it. It wouldn't have stopped the terrorists from rocketing our position, but we at least tried to play by the rules.
In the subject of the Red Cross, the LOAC explicitly prohibits perfidy, or treacherous actions, including misuse of the Red Cross or Red Crescent. The laws of warfare can probably stand alone without the support of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.