Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Spam The Internet

Tech Reporter Pursues Spammer 183

girish writes "Technology reporter extrordinaire, Mike Wendland, is at it again tracking down spammers. Wendland conducted the infamous interview with Alan Ralsky, the alleged mega-spammer, a few years ago. That article spawned a lively discussion on Slashdot and eventually resulted in hundreds of pieces of junk postal mail flooding Ralsky's million-dollar home. Now Wendland is using a new tool from a service called Project Honey Pot to track email address harvesters. He posted on his technology blog this morning about catching a company that is holding itself out as a legitimate bulk mailer, but appears in fact to be sending to harvested addresses and conducting on the side some other seemingly seedy businesses. Interesting stuff."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Tech Reporter Pursues Spammer

Comments Filter:
  • spamtraps... (Score:4, Informative)

    by mmThe1 ( 213136 ) on Sunday November 21, 2004 @04:15AM (#10879657) Homepage
    An relevant note here would be to mention Spamikaze [linux.org] system (intro here [linux.org]).

    In a nutshell, it sets up spamtrap e-mail addresses, and any IP that sends mail to that address is automatically added to the blacklist, and further mails from it are rejected at SMTP level. A false positive can be easily removed from the blacklist manually (example, PSBL [surriel.com]).

  • by bigberk ( 547360 ) <bigberk@users.pc9.org> on Sunday November 21, 2004 @04:16AM (#10879668)
    My hosting service tried to filter all the viruses with clamav, but they got so many viruses that it was too much of a CPU load
    This is why renattach exists [pc-tools.net]. You run that baby in kill mode, and you can handle millions of viruses a day without breaking a sweat (load average wise). This filter just drops mail when certain types of attachments (by file extension or file names inside a ZIP attachment) are found. Not as proper protection as a virus scanner, but coupled with spamassassin it will do the job.
  • by Beryllium Sphere(tm) ( 193358 ) on Sunday November 21, 2004 @04:21AM (#10879681) Journal
    >Seems to me that this kind of thing should be fairly straight forward. I mean, sending millions of e-mails can't exactly be done "quietly" can it?

    Sure it can.

    Creepy spammer approaches creepy trojan writer. Creepy trojan writer rents creepy spammer access to 10,000 compromised PC's on DSL and cable. Creepy spammer commands each compromised PC to send three emails per minute from 11PM to 7AM. Creepy spammer has now sent 1.44 million pieces of email without an obvious flood anywhere and without an obvious IP address to block.
  • by gtoomey ( 528943 ) on Sunday November 21, 2004 @04:37AM (#10879716)
    I recently changed to Postfix as my Mail Tranfer Agent.

    The Postfix Spam Controls [postfix.org] have reduced my spam by 95% without using compex spam filters like Spamassassin.

  • by Serious Simon ( 701084 ) on Sunday November 21, 2004 @04:42AM (#10879732)
    During the past months I have been receiving on average 3 to 4 spams per day from the IP range of Media Dreamland. These spams are cleverly constructed so that they are difficult to filter out automatically, and as they use a whole range of IP adresses and varying domain names, these are not likely to wind up on a blacklist.

    I added rules in my .procmailrc file to block all e-mails from the IP range of this company, this has worked very well for me (100%/0% positives/negatives)

    Interestingly, since a few days I was again receiving quite similar spams, and this time they originate from the IP range of a company called Big Time Fiber. It turns out that the spams from Media Dreamland abruptly stopped after 10 november (spammer kicked out?) and after a few weeks the spammer apparently found a new hosting service.

    I put the following lines in my .procmailrc:

    :0 H
    * ^Received:.*\[204\.9\.24[0-7]\.
    {
    LOG = "[!!!! Big Time Fiber] "
    :0
    /dev/null
    }
    and just this morning I found the following entries in my procmail log:

    [!!!! Big Time Fiber] From rolffarris@newssign.net Sun Nov 21 00:16:08 2004
    Subject: Would you like to stop smoking?
    Folder: /dev/null 1550
    [!!!! Big Time Fiber] From benniemilburn@minisaver.net Sun Nov 21 01:55:43 2004
    Subject: Apple 17" iMac G5 Desktop!
    Folder: /dev/null 1705
    [!!!! Big Time Fiber] From rhettsmallwood@bigtopsavings.com Sun Nov 21 03:36:04 2004
    Subject: Mortgage interest rates are at their lowest point ever.
    Folder: /dev/null 1739
    [!!!! Big Time Fiber] From bruce.tillery@e-goodstuff.com Sun Nov 21 05:20:55 2004
    Subject: Women, something to rock your world
    Folder: /dev/null 1565
    [!!!! Big Time Fiber] From donovanragland@e-goodstuff.net Sun Nov 21 07:06:03 2004
    Subject: Test & Keep an IBM Laptop - Product Testers Wanted
    Folder: /dev/null 1623
    [!!!! Big Time Fiber] From gilcolvin@bigfoodsavings.com Sun Nov 21 08:46:04 2004
    Subject: You can be smart! Folder: /dev/null 1563

    As you can see from the type of domain names these spams are probably from one spammer.

    In the past I have received spams using the same trick from Webhostplus, Pharmakon and Aphrodite Marketing, but the spammer (now) operating from Big Time Fiber IP range appears by far the most active.

    See also http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl (fill in "204.9.240.164" in the search box)

  • I read the article. (Score:3, Informative)

    by bs_02_06_02 ( 670476 ) on Sunday November 21, 2004 @04:49AM (#10879748)
    Curious, I punched up the IP address (69.6.66.17) in my web browser, and I get the default IIS page, telling me there is not a default web page... blah-blah-blah.

    So this clown is either stupid and someone really has hacked his box and it's a zombie, or he's playing dead, and has set up the box to appear hacked, and is happily harvesting email addresses anyway. Either way, boxes like these should be shut down. Who leaves an unprotected IIS box exposed to the internet?

    I'm curious if anyone is able to resolve that IP address to a street address. It has to be static. Get someone over to that address, see what's going on with this clown.
  • As far as I can tell, bigtimefiber is media dreamland.
    www.bigtimefiber.com resolves to 69.42.98.5 which resolves to host-98-5.approvednews.com.

    A lookup on approvednews.com shows that it is owned by:

    Media Dreamland Inc
    5546 Camino Al Norte #2-278
    N. Las Vegas, NV 89031
  • by Ge10 ( 803950 ) on Sunday November 21, 2004 @05:18AM (#10879812)
    All the spammers have to do is to filter out the domains of known honey pots. Even with the donation of additional IP's by vounteers, this would be trivially easy to do.
  • by adzoox ( 615327 ) * on Sunday November 21, 2004 @08:52AM (#10880284) Journal
    I have been doing a little tracking down of a Spammer myself from my state.

    A few months back, when the free iPod craze started - a company in my state started sending out emails from:

    Product Test Panel
    Consumer Research Corporation
    Subscriberbase.com

    Saying, "Product Testers Wanted". They would go from hot product to hot product. Sometimes, not even released products - like the Nintendo DS was advertised almost 2 months ago - claiming immediate shipment.

    I found that they were in my state by reading the actual email and seeing a location in my state and then by confirming it with whois information.

    I then sent off an email to the contact. I got an email from a guy named Brian Benehaley. In typical fashion, all of my accusations were denied.

    Turns out, if you Google this guy's name - he has written a well respected piece [respected amongst bulk emailers] about how the Can Spam Act will bring a new renaissance in email marketing.

    I have since written the Better Business Bureau about him, found the record for the company is now in the 1000's of complaints

    I have contacted my state attorney general which is conducting thorough investigation

    I contacted the host ISP - Exodus - they have over 12000 complaints lodged against Subscriberbase.com

    I have written a piece that has gotten into Google searches [blogspot.com] - that receives a few emails and comments each week.

    More info about Product Test Panel [adzoox.com]

    It has been quite fun to research this guy and put various internet tools to my disposal.

    This was a good story to see what techniques Mr. Wendland used.

    Google, Whois, MY BLOG, The BBB online, My attorney general all helped me ...
  • How I stay spam free (Score:5, Informative)

    by Examancer2 ( 606336 ) <<slashdotnew> <at> <examancer.com>> on Sunday November 21, 2004 @09:08AM (#10880325) Homepage

    This is how I keep spam from ruining my email while also catching spammers in the act:

    I have a domain (examancer.com) and a cheap hosting company that allows unlimited email accounts. Every time I give out an email address I make up one that will remind me why I gave it out (like slashdot@examancer.com, nytimes@examancer.com, someotherservice@examancer.com, etc...). I don't actually have to set up each account because I have all undeliverable mail sent right to my main account. If I start receiving spam, I just look at which address its sent to and I know right away which company sold my address or which online forum my email was harvested from. If the spam gets too bad, I actually go and create a real mailbox for that address and route it to a black hole... viola, no more spam.

  • Re:Education? (Score:3, Informative)

    by hugesmile ( 587771 ) on Sunday November 21, 2004 @09:53AM (#10880431)
    There are some SPAM's that will continually entice people, regardless of the amount of education. And unfortunately, I think that there are reputable companies that are unwittingly behind them.

    Spammer sends out millions of emails touting an unbelievably low "m or tga ge | r ate". Are you interested in a 30 year, no points fixed 1% interest rate? If you're shopping for a loan, then absolutely.

    Suckers check it out. "Want information? Someone will be contacting you shortly. Just give us a little information.. name, phone number." The average person on the street - even SPAM haters - will think "This is probably too good to be true, but I'll check it out with a critical eye... I probably won't finance through this scum, but I better know what the going rate is, so I don't get screwed by my local bank...", and they submit their personal information

    Now spammers have a huge list of people shopping for a mortgage. This list is transferred to a semi-legit shell company, who sells it to a completely legit Fortune 500-sized major banking institution. The major banking institution has no idea that these names are collected via SPAM. Under inquiry, the semi-legit company can claim that they "purchase lists of people shopping for mortgages and aggregate them".

    Customer gets a call from some Fortune 500 size bank coincidentally asking if they are shopping for a loan, which they are. The Fortune 500 Bank has no clue that there was an offer of 1% 30 year loan, and the sucker has no idea how the major bank got their name. No one's pissed except the 99,999,999 people that were annoyed by the email. And the system continues.

    You'll never rid yourself of that problem with education, unless we educate the major companies to consider their sources when buying lists! And even then, since the lists tend to work for the big companies, the problem won't go away anytime soon!

  • Re:Education? (Score:3, Informative)

    by fdiskne1 ( 219834 ) on Sunday November 21, 2004 @11:09AM (#10880677)
    I was giving someone help with their email, saw a spam in their mailbox and commented that if they sent it to me, I'd adjust the filters so it doesn't get through in the future. This was most definitely from a spammer. They said, "No, I ordered something from them. I expect their email." When I told them the reasons they should never, ever buy anything from spam, they said, "But that's where I get the best deals." I re-iterated the reasons against it, but they didn't care. As long as they got a good deal, that's all that mattered to them. I suppose they won't learn until they get taken on one of their "good deals".
  • by Inoshiro ( 71693 ) on Sunday November 21, 2004 @01:47PM (#10881491) Homepage
    /^\s*Content-(Disposition|Type).*name\s*=\s*"?(.+\ .(ad[ep]|asd|ba[st]|c[ho]m|cmd|cpl|crt|dbx|dll
    |e xe|hlp|hta|in[fs]|isp|lnk|js|jse|lnk|ocx|md[etw]|m s[cipt]|nws|ocx|ops|pcd|pi|pif|prf|reg|scf
    |scr|s ct|sh[bms]|swf|uue|vb|vb[esx]|vxd|wab|ws[cfh]))"?\ s*$/ REJECT Files attached to emails
    that contain or end in "$3" are prohibited on this server as they may contain viruses. The fil
    e named "$2" was rejected.
    This covers more executable types and is a bit more permissive in the matches to the content line.
  • by gregmac ( 629064 ) on Sunday November 21, 2004 @02:19PM (#10881624) Homepage
    I used to do what you do but I had to abandon that idea. That defensive tactic won't get rid of those who setup the spam server to autogenerate millions of addresses to your domain.

    I use a subdomain, but otherwise do the same thing. It works well, because the sub-domain doesn't get directory harvest attacks, only the main domain (and I only have a couple valid addresses there). Certainly doesn't keep me spam free, but helps to filter out a lot of it.

Understanding is always the understanding of a smaller problem in relation to a bigger problem. -- P.D. Ouspensky

Working...