Two New TLD's Near Approval 329
Iphtashu Fitz writes "The Associated Press is reporting that ICANN is nearing approval of two new top level domains: .travel and .post. The Universal Postal Union in Bern, Switzerland, wants ".post" for national postal services, local post offices, business partners and stamp collectors around the world. Private companies that provide postal services, such as Federal Express and UPS, also would be eligible. The Travel Partnership Corp., a New York-based trade group, seeks ".travel" for travel agents, airlines, bed and breakfast operators, tourism bureaus and others in the travel industry. ICANN is also considering eight other TLD's including .asia, .eu, and .jobs but they haven't progressed as far as .travel and .post. More information here."
seriously. (Score:2, Insightful)
I think it would be nice to seperate that stuff out.
Right. (Score:5, Insightful)
Like this will be controlled any better?
TLDs are BS (Score:5, Insightful)
What are the points of TLDs? I thought they were to avoid ambiguity, yet they promote it. Remember the whitehouse.com vs. whitehouse.gov thing? How about the current suprnova.org vs. suprnova.com and suprnova.net? The USPS can't figure out if they are a
How many "normal" people know more than the
I go on these rants from time to time, and I feel as though I'm in the vast minority of people that see no purpose of TLDs, but can anyone give one example of their utility? I have found one guy [templetons.com] on the net that agrees with me and the
Now, the only useful thing for TLDs is to separate countries. Why? Because countries have different languages and currencies. I get pissed when I do a google search for something and end up at a brittish site. I have nothing against the brits, but its stupid for me to look at buying a $10 trinket from there. Its not too common, but I've ended up at UK
Why? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:seriously. (Score:1, Insightful)
.TLD's .for .all! (Score:5, Insightful)
Value of non .com/net/org/national TLDs? (Score:5, Insightful)
What is exactly the relative value of these new TLDs, as compared to the most common TLDs? ( .com, .net and .org, coupled with national ones like .nl, .co.uk, .au, etc ) I mean, I think most of us know just how respected any .biz or .info domain is, as most of those domains are used by spammers, scammers and other pond scum. Therefore, if my business' primary adress would be a .biz I'd instantly lose a lot of credibility online, simply because of the TLD. Of course, other TLDs host their fair share of crap as well, but the signal-to-noise-ratio is quite terrible on .biz and .info ...
Re:TLDs are BS (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:seriously. (Score:2, Insightful)
Why don't the Swiss... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:TLDs are BS (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Wow, they did it (Score:5, Insightful)
How many commercial travel operators are going to move away from the well-recognized .com TLD and into a new .travel? That sounds even lamer than .biz, and I've literally never seen one single legit business in that namespace (please don't flood me with counterexamples).
At any rate, you'll see at least as many smartass domain names as legitimate ones in either dumb new TLD. For example:
I for one welcome our new com.post overlords.
What percentage of people... (Score:5, Insightful)
A TLD in English for people who by and large don't speak English (Yeah, go on and tell me about India, Hong Kong, and Singapore... then look at how many others don't) seems pretty friggin' silly.
Except maybe the French, who might think it's short for Etats-Unis, of course.
This is bullpucky. (Score:5, Insightful)
We should abolish all non-national TLDs. Each company could then register under its own national domain, or if local, under the state, county, or city sub-domain. This would deal nicely with the sovereignty issues that crop up all the time - if you're in the
This is all IMO, of course.
why not... (Score:5, Insightful)
For each and every blockbuster movie a website pops up that is called something like foobar-themovie.com, foobar.com, foobar-film.com, etc.
Would be nice to have all the official websites collected under one TLD.
Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:seriously. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:TLDs are BS (Score:3, Insightful)
I agree. I believe that all domains, even those in the US, should end in
Seconded (Score:5, Insightful)
I have no idea what the Belgium post office thinks it can accomplish with the
I concur that geographic names have some use; it would perhaps have been better never to have introduced
At this point whenever I see companies with irregular TLDs, I think of them as second-rate. Often those TLDs are cheaper, and so the companies seem shady or fly-by-night (especially if they're trying to save a measly five bucks on makealotofcashlegally.biz). If you have a name and you can't get
Actually, I myself use a personal
TLDs only exist to make money for registrars (Score:2, Insightful)
We're just creating more "names" to sell. The only people who really benefit are the registrars
Re:seriously. (Score:3, Insightful)
You know, free market and all..
Re:Wow, they did it (Score:4, Insightful)
Honestly, people don't follow the rules for
Specialty TLDs aren't a bad thing (Score:3, Insightful)
This is already the case with several gTLDs, such as
For instance, in order to qualify for a
Unlike
(Actually, maybe such a mad rush didn't happen for
More importantly, specialty TLDs provide an opportunity for eligible individuals and organizations to actually use their own name. An accounting firm by the name of McDonald & McDonald, for instance, might actually get to use mcdonalds.pro
Done right, these new TLDs are part of the solution to the artificial scarcity of the
Re:Yeah (Score:4, Insightful)
You don't do anything about them.
If, say, IBM wants to have a
Just like at the moment IBM's American subsidiaries have to be operated in accordance with American laws and its French and British subsidiaries have to be operated in accordance with French and British laws.
Re:This is bullpucky. (Score:2, Insightful)
Laws can now be applied based on where the site is hosted, base them on domain names and you can have [insert something evil] hosted right in the US, but with
The internet is supposed to be free, if a foriegn state doesn't like what other countries are putting up, they can go fuck themselves.
For the same reason... (Score:3, Insightful)
a) Porn sites would lose customers because some people would "publicly" have to use a clean ISP but would really like to have smut.
b) Porn-incompatible ISPs would lose customers (but oh no not because the competition offers porn, no uh they just had the better offer, that's just coincidental).
And, if nothing else, I suspect these domains would become another "register the
Kjella
Re:seriously. (Score:5, Insightful)
This is getting stupid (Score:2, Insightful)
Even before ICANN started added redundant TLDs the TLD system wasn't right. Why should the US government have
In a perfect world the only TLDs that should exist are the country codes for country specific websites, then
why do we need top level domains at all? (Score:2, Insightful)
Which doesn't really solve the DNS naming issue... (Score:3, Insightful)
Your suggestion is just begging for a service like the linkfarms for google. Register hashes on countless variations of combinations of words to send people to the wrong site. Instead of a few, you now have near endless combinations to worry about. The problem is not the hierarchy, it never was. Sure it's imperfect, but it is marginal.
The real problme is that there are too many companies, organizations, societys, individuals and whatnot that want to have a short domain, and there's only that many to go around. In order for your solution to work, all must really have one unique "entity name", and then you're back to a non-TLD solution. Otherwise, squatters will register "entity name" + other keywords.
Kjella
Re:.mov TLD for movies (Score:2, Insightful)
No, .biz sucks harder (Score:4, Insightful)
I do agree with your observation, though - I too have never seen a legit business in the
Selling thin air (Score:3, Insightful)
But of course, these guys are charging people up the a$$ for merely managing dns servers. Don't fall for the hype. Your domain will NOT BE WORTH ANYTHING unless you have a
Plus, imagine trying to build a business on a non-dot-com domain. Your traffic will just leak to the dot-com version, giving your competitor free advertising.
This is getting really lame. In 1998 when CORE was gonna release all those tlds (which never came about) it was sort of interesting. Now it's just the same old same old.
Trust me folks. DOT COM is where the action's at.
More bad neighborhoods (Score:3, Insightful)