Worker Fired For Running SETI On State-Owned PCs 622
Formica writes "A programmer working for the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services was fired for running SETI software on a state server. As quoted in this article,
department head Tom Hayes says, 'I think that people can be comfortable that security has beamed this man out of our building.' More articles from Google."
Would you want to work for this guy? (Score:5, Insightful)
What an ass Tom Hayes is! Come on now, there is no need for personal attacks, especially because this statement was publicly released in a news interview and they have already fired this guy. I am half tempted to find Tom's email address and tell him just that.
So the issue is: Was there a policy that prohibited use of those systems for that purpose? Granted, since the machines were taxpayer funded, this should have raised some red-flags for Charles Smith (the fired employee), however...... immediate termination rather than a warning seems a bit harsh. Any time you are using publicly funded resources for personal use, there should be extreme caution, and my bias is to never, ever go there in the first place unless there is a prior agreement for reimbursement.
Of course we do not know all the circumstances, but Tom Hayes is still an ass for publicly attempting to humiliate this guy. Tom, whats wrong with you? I suspect you are a former high school football player turned college frat boy who has to put people down to make yourself feel better. Ass!
Re:Would you want to work for this guy? (Score:5, Interesting)
It's going to be amusing if he turns around and sues the state for slander. After all, it's been very publicly broadcast to millions of people that he's short of intelligence.
Re:Would you want to work for this guy? (Score:3, Insightful)
Not only beceause he'll have the aura of a hostile, potentially dangerous employee, but also because his fame will be much greater, after the lawsuit.
If I was him, I'd be low profile for awhile.
Re:Would you want to work for this guy? (Score:5, Insightful)
Of course, one really has to wonder why he wasn't given a warning first. The offense for which he was fired sounds like an excuse to get rid of someone. Age discrimination anyone?
This is a lawsuit waiting to happen. And against The Department of Job and Family Services too. That's going to make the primetime local news reports and leave the department with a lot of egg on their face.
Re:Would you want to work for this guy? (Score:4, Interesting)
This warning, combined with probable violations of Ohio computing policies by a programmer (who sure as hell ought to know better), would make calling the guy a dumbass entirely reasonable.
Re:Would you want to work for this guy? (Score:3, Interesting)
Really, would you think it would be discrimination if he decided to donate some of his employer's PCs to Goodwill and got fired? Or if he decided to help poor families by giving away office furniture? Basically,
Re:Would you want to work for this guy? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Would you want to work for this guy? (Score:5, Insightful)
That has a negative impact on the machine performance, as the requests come regardless of its load. SETI@home uses the computer only when it doesn't work otherwise.
However, using the same server for SETI@home is somehow better, right?
Yes. What is the real damage done here? If we stretch things a bit, we could get a minor potential vulnerability of running a third-party app taking data from a remote machine, but MSIE - even when fully patched - is orders of magnitude worse in this regard. Other possible damage is a minutely higher power consumption of the CPU - worth perhaps couple cents.
Really, would you think it would be discrimination if he decided to donate some of his employer's PCs to Goodwill and got fired?
That would negatively affect the employer's ability to use the PCs - while SETI@home software doesn't use the CPU when other apps need it.
More accurate comparison would be being fired for running a CPU-intensive screensaver.
This smells more like a dumb manageroid hating a specific employee (which would also explain his later remarks), and using the first excuse to get rid of him.
Basically, he was doing something that constitutes theft of service, with somebody else's computer.
If it was theft, where's the stolen goods missing from?
Re:Would you want to work for this guy? (Score:4, Informative)
Other possible damage is a minutely higher power consumption of the CPU - worth perhaps couple cents.
Don't underestimate the power consumption of modern CPUs. Mine (an Athlon64 3400) consumes something like 50W between idle and 100%. Measure made with a vectorial wattmeter before the power supply.
Re:Would you want to work for this guy? (Score:3, Interesting)
The modern CPUs are not that common in office environment, where Word/Excel/Powerpoint are the required applications and Doom 3 is unheard of. (The situation is likely to be different on servers, though.)
Personally, I am pondering trying to underclock some of our newer machines by 10%, in order to reduce the long-term impact of electromigration and heat-related failures (not sure it's worth the bother, though - did anybody actually performed any re
Re:Would you want to work for this guy? (Score:5, Insightful)
I'll address this. I'm a senior security engineer for a major corporation. We, too, have a policy against running any unapproved software on workstations owned by the company.
There are many, many reasons for this beyond just "negative impact." For instance:
What if a security vulnerability was discovered in Seti@Home (or any other unauthorized software) and it resulted in a compromise of (in this case) private citizens' data?
Who is liable if the software causes an outage on the workstation or the network?
Who is liable if the software causes a breach of security or corrupts the integrity of the data being handled by the state?
You see, in the case of corporate (or government) resources there is more at stake than just whether the software has a measurable impact on the performance of the machine. If the state wanted to run Seti@home on the machines, it would do the approriate dilligance to do so- including a risk evaluation and mitigation plans (like upgrades / patching / &etc) to do so. By running any unauthorized software, especially network software, without the knowledge of the owning party you are putting their property (and in this case the public's property) at an unneccessary risk.
I'm sure this is stated in their computer use policy, as it is in ours. Firing the employee was probably the correct action.
-pm
Re:Would you want to work for this guy? (Score:3, Insightful)
Who was the damaged party here? Is it theft when it is wasted otherwise? What's the difference between running Seti screensaver and any other one? Would you complain about a morphing image or dancing Bezier curve? Just because someone else (in this case Project SETI) profits, is it suddenly a theft?
Pull your head out of your ass, realize the extent of your fucking idiocy, then go fuck yourself with a chainsaw and die.
Using
Not PC (Score:3, Interesting)
The guy installed an unapproved program onto to a production server without approval and bypassing change control. What happens if his little stunt had brought the server down or worse yet the network down and had cost people in Ohio tax dollars? What if the program had allowed a breach that let confidential information out?
The retort that "It was just the SETI client" isn't the issue. Smith's complete violation
Re:Would you want to work for this guy? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Manifeste your outrage to Ohio D.J.F.S (Score:3, Insightful)
These are points that I believe and that I have expressed in my email:
1-Publicly insulting someone without any reason was unacceptable.
2-Tom Hayes is a public servant and it makes is act much more critical because he receive is pay from taxpayers.
3-Charles E. Smith is 63 and I think that
Overreaction (Score:5, Insightful)
If installing SETI@Home is all he did wrong, I wouldn't have fired him either. I would most certainly have disciplined him and reviewed his permissions/other boxes he's touched. However, I would not have fired him for just that. He made a mistake; point it out to him, admonish him for it, and move on. If he did it again, then I'd send him packing.
Treat those who work for you with respect, especially when you're disciplining them, and yes - even when you're firing them. They're people, goddamn it - treat them like you'd like to be treated.
WRONG (Score:5, Interesting)
The organization that hired the meathead running the IT organization should be forced to pay out a multimillion dollar damage judgement. Unfortunately, this will come out ot the pockets of the taxpayers, not stockholders, but shit happens.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Would you want to work for this guy? (Score:3, Informative)
That where defamation law [megalaw.com] comes in....
Screwed out of retirement (Score:3, Insightful)
Disclaimer IAADP
Re:Would you want to work for this guy? (Score:3, Insightful)
"When will people get over the illusion that because the current younger generatio
Re:Would you want to work for this guy? (Score:5, Interesting)
While I have never seen a problem personally I enforce my company policy that it be kept off servers. Desktops/proto machines fine, just not production environment servers. We actually use it to increase load on pre-production servers though
-nB
Re:Would you want to work for this guy? (Score:3, Insightful)
On some level, every networked computer is a server. Just because the article says it's a server, it may not be a server like you think of a server. It could very well just be the person's personal desktop box. Remember, the article was probably written by journalists, not IT people.
(Of course, it's also possible that he installed it on every computer in the building, even servers he shouldn't have access to ... you just don't know, so it's hard to make judgements.)
Re:Would you want to work for this guy? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Would you want to work for this guy? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Would you want to work for this guy? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Would you want to work for this guy? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Would you want to work for this guy? (Score:5, Informative)
His Phone # [ohio.gov]
His bio [ohio.gov]
His feedback form [ohio.gov]
Re:Would you want to work for this guy? (Score:5, Funny)
Doesn't the photo of this Tom Hayes look almost exactly like Bill Lumberg from Office Space??
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0170550/
http://jfs.ohio.gov/director.stm
you're not a sysadmin, are you... (Score:3, Insightful)
It's pretty clear you've never worked in a corporate IT department. So the issue is: Was there a policy that prohibited use of those systems for that purpose?
Any employer worth his or her salt has an item in the employee handbook that prohibits employees from installing stuff on systems without permission.
Furthermore, and I have to point this out to users ALL the time- the computer they use is not theirs. It belongs to the company, as does the telephone, the power that PC uses, and its internet connec
Re:you're not a sysadmin, are you... (Score:5, Insightful)
Not if the employee handbook says that's the consequence.
That's just ridiculous. I've seen "employee handbooks" before and they're not the final word on anything. A book means nothing, it's all about what the people in charge are saying.
Not if Smith was doing other things deserving of termination. Not if his actions endangered adherence to security protocols, placed sensitive data at risk of disclosure, or caused a department to loose certification.
Sure, but we have no evidence of that whatsover. That only exists in your imagination to justify the harsh treatment of this guy. Please stick to the facts and not what you imagine to be the case.
And yes, I _am_ a sysadmin. He shouldn't have been running the program, but based on what we know firing him and making assholish statements about him in print is going way to far.
Re:you're not a sysadmin, are you... (Score:3, Insightful)
He doesn't have to actually violate confidentiality, just making it possible through negligent behavior is enough to have him fired.
That's what happened here.
Re:you're not a sysadmin, are you... (Score:3, Informative)
The standard of behavior for businesses that handle confidential records is much much less tolerant of misatkes, because the stakes are so much higher. If you worked in an agency like this, you'd understand he stepped way over the line. It's just different, and you have to deal with it to really understand how serious it is.
Re:you're not a sysadmin, are you... (Score:3, Funny)
Maybe I'm crazy, but I don't take into consideration anything unless I actually have a reason to believe in it. Imagined justifications for the firing are just that, imagined. Unless you know either of these guys it's unfair to assume there were any straws on anyones backs.
I'll tell you this though, it does sound awfully bizzare this whole thing even g
Re:you're not a sysadmin, are you... (Score:5, Funny)
Bet you're a popular guy around the office
Re:Maybe, but... (Score:3, Insightful)
And there's a difference between a sysadmin who "gets it" and one that's a "fucking ass". If your sysadmin cannot gain the respect of the rest of your employees - to the point where they ignore him and he must constantly harangue them - then it's time to get a new sysadmin. There are plenty out there, and not all are total dicks.
Re:Would you want to work for this guy? (Score:5, Insightful)
Comment was way out of line (Score:5, Informative)
"I understand his desire to search for intelligent life in outer space, because obviously he doesn't find it in the mirror in the morning," Hayes said.
However justified the firing of the employee, there was no reason to make such a denigrating comment about that employee. Smith should file a complaint and Hayes should publicly apologize. I hope that if Hayes ever makes a mistake he is treated a whole lot better than he chose to treat this man. I sent an email to them asking how this manager can behave in such an awful and slanderous manner. If you feel so inclined you can go here and do the same [ohio.gov].
Clash.... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Clash.... (Score:2)
call him (Score:5, Informative)
T: 614/466-6282
Re:call him (Score:5, Informative)
Ohio Department of Job and Family Services
30 East Broad Street, 32nd Floor
Columbus, OH 43215-3414
T: 614/466-6282
F: 614/466-2815
E-mail: hayest@odjfs.state.oh.us
Re:call him (Score:3, Informative)
For the address, I guess that's him:
T J Hayes
369 Bradley Rd
Bay Village, OH 44140-1174
(440) 871-8022
Re:call him (Score:3, Informative)
Re:call him (Score:2, Funny)
Re:call him (Score:5, Funny)
Wasting Time (Score:5, Funny)
maybe he was... (Score:3, Funny)
As a taxpayer... (Score:3, Insightful)
Wasting cycles looking for ET = wasting tax dollars.
Re:As a taxpayer... (Score:3, Insightful)
Maybe he even felt happy and empowered by contributing to what he saw as a worthwhile cause, and the state got an extra hour's worth of wor
Re:As a taxpayer... (Score:5, Informative)
However, let me add my voice to the general sounds of outrage over the fireing of an elderly worker, in this case a programmer. If he was indeed a programmer, and I was very productive at writing code when I was his age but I've faded some in the 8 years of seniority I have on this gentleman, then he was obviously of above average intelligence, and to have the head of the dept make public statements in the manner in which he apparently made them is both very childish and immature on the part of the dept head, and IMO an actionable occurance that the state of Ohio may well have to pay for in the long run.
Talented people, generally speaking are, even if they are perceived as being a bit abrasive, are often well worth keeping around. They are doing it with me yet at 70 on a part time and emergency basis, more than willing to put up with a sometimes cantankerous old man for the simple reason that when things go to hell in a handbasket, or a lightning strike, having me available reduces the downtime more than enough to pay for the fringies I'm still getting, like health insurance etc.
Thats not saying that what he did was right. He should have asked for permission and abided by any ruleing TPTB made.
However, if I were in Toms shoes (and I'm glad I'm not ATM, I don't own any asbestos or nomex underwear) I think my 'punishment' would have been to issue a directive that a) seti be cleaned off the machines by the person who installed it, and b) the person who installed it would have lost the keys to the executive pisser for a week. Further action would have depended entirely on the results of that one. Obviously there may be more to the story that we aren't being told. But thats how I see it, and believe it or not, my employees, when I was full time, all respected me and my occasionally short temper, and do to this day.
They took that in stride in exchange for the times when I went into teacher mode trying to lessen the daily load on me by passing on the knowledge collected in 55+ years of chasing electrons for a living. I have tried to condense what to many looks like black magic, into the physical laws that govern how it does, or does not work. I've managed to succeed fairly well from observing the results. What more can a teacher do, but pass on what he knows?
Cheers, Gene
Re:As a taxpayer... (Score:5, Interesting)
And then there's the small amount of bandwidth used ...
Running programs like Seti and RC5 is *not* free. Cheap, maybe, but not completely free.
SETI@Home: The next big threat (Score:5, Insightful)
My mother works for the County Gov't, and I've seen some of the spyware infested cesspools that they call computers, and they fire this guy for doing what? Wasting clock cycles?
Re:SETI@Home: The next big threat (Score:5, Insightful)
Why not? (Score:2, Interesting)
After all, they are public servers --- they should be serving the public at every moment.
Re:Why not? (Score:2, Informative)
Yes, those are machines whi
Re:Why not? (Score:3, Funny)
Unauthorized software is unauthorized software (Score:5, Insightful)
Remember: Those servers, routers, switches, and workstations aren't yours, they belong to your employer. You're paid to do what your employer wants to them, and not do what said employer doesn't want. Nothing more, nothing less.
If you're stupid (yes, STUPID) enough to flaunt the rules because you think they don't apply to you, you deserve what you get.
Re:Unauthorized software is unauthorized software (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Unauthorized software is unauthorized software (Score:2)
Re:Unauthorized software is unauthorized software (Score:2)
Isn't a warning sufficient? It isn't as if SETI software damages things.
I just think the entire situation was mismanaged, that said, there isn't enough information to go on.
Re:Unauthorized software is unauthorized software (Score:2)
Second, on such a short article, there is a lot of missing information which a lot of presumptions are being based upon. Mr. Smith was not in the right for using state computers to do his research - that much is agreed upon. However, that does *not* give the state the right to make libelous comments against Mr. Smith's intelligence.
That is just plain wrong.
Was Mr. Smith a repeat offender? Was he given warning? Was there some beef that Mr. Hayes had with Mr. Smith before the firing that M
quite wrong (Score:5, Insightful)
There is the kind that introduces viruses, the kind that is used for trading porn, the kind used for trading Windows source code, the kind for sharing MP3's with a million of your closest friends, and the kind that people use for running a side business.
And then there is the kind that people use to contribute to a not-for-profit scientific effort at a public university for no financial gain, software that only uses idle cycles and is known not to interfere with anybody's applications.
Unauthorized use of sofware of those different kinds demands different kinds of responses. The use of the latter kind of software use warrants at most a warning.
Re:Unauthorized software is unauthorized software (Score:5, Funny)
The real question is, how bad is the thing this guy did? Does it rise to the level of termination? How much taxpayer money did he waste? How much risk to security did he cause? Were there other mitigating circumstances, such as already being told not to do this once before, or did he have several other questionable items on file?
I've run a few calculations of my own to determine how much taxpayer money he wasted, and I arrived at 35 cents/year electricity-wise. According to a careful analysis and security risk assessment, the mean cost per year of additional security problems due to SETI is roughly 3 cents/year (it would be much lower, but my complex analysis takes into account that this was a production server for the government of an entire state, and we all know that government production servers run calculations that are of great value and importance...this particular production server was most likely figuring out how to balance Ohio's budget heavily on the surplus side so that the state could afford to treat little old ladies compassionately when they cannot afford health care instead of leaving them to die in the street; or perhaps it was about to finish a calcuation that would allow Ohio to do away with gang violence and ensure that would-be gangsters grow up and get good jobs in marketing). This brings us to a grand total of 38 cents/year.
Now we must also consider the intangibles. First, it is important that government organizations are ruled with an iron fist. Working for the state is not like having a normal job...at most workplaces, bosses are expected to treat their employees with great care and respect. But as we all know, in government organizations, it is far more important to ensure that the governmental workers are terrified at every moment they'll lose their jobs for any reason at all; otherwise, the system quickly degenerates into utter chaos. We must keep government workers in this constant state of fear in order to guarantee that they scurry around and look busy even when they have little to do. This is necessary because if they do not look busy at the foot soldier level, people may begin to realize that politicians have directed an undue amount of funds from the state and federal legislatures to the enterprise-in-question unnecessarily, and these extra millions of dollars are actually of little direct benefit to the people. Rather, it gives the government a place to put money for the current year's budget until the politicians find a way to redirect it to other important state affairs, such as assuaging special interest groups and paying lobbyists in order to get reelected. This is important because if our exalted leaders, who have the best interests of the people at heart and who shoulder an enormous responsibility to them while meeting the highest standard of ethics, cannot secure reelection, the government could fall to corruption and waste.
There's another intangible here as well. We must ensure that, in order to keep turnover low in the more significant positions, we allow managers in governmental organizations to indulge in behaviors that suit their personalities so they will feel a high level of job satisfaction. In this case, Mr. Hayes' personality is obviously one of vindictiveness and unfairness. In order to keep him satisfied at his job, we should support his right to paint this employee as a man who believes in space aliens and was willing to sacrifice the safety and security of the resources of the state of Ohio and waste hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars to pursue his absurd search for little green men. We must, just for this moment, overlook the fact that this is serious research going on at several esteemed institutions around the country, many of which are public institutions supported by public funds. We should also probably forget about the scientific summits, attended by the likes of Carl Sagan and Isaac Asimov, that addressed such projects as SETI. In this case, it is much better for everyone involved to focus on the fact
Re:Unauthorized software is unauthorized software (Score:4, Interesting)
Plus, from the way the boss held himself out in public, it sounds like he was gunning for this guy for a while or he's just generally of a dickish nature.
Stupid, stupid. (Score:5, Insightful)
It's stupid to fire someone for running this on company/institutional computers (whatever happened to warnings?), but it's also stupid to just decide to run it on the assumption that your boss isn't stupid.
Re:Stupid, stupid. (Score:3, Interesting)
The warning is when your employee handbook says not to do something.
Conspiracy (Score:5, Funny)
He should be fired. He should be arrested! (Score:2, Insightful)
Running SETI costs tax payers money if the form of the electric bill and ware and tear on the equipment. I am running on my personal system GRID.org to fight cancer and my electric bill went up $20 a month for just 3 computers. This shit adds up, fast!
Re:He should be fired. He should be arrested! (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:He should be fired. He should be arrested! (Score:3, Interesting)
I don't really see it. One Google result [techreport.com] showed the difference in power consumption between an idle and loaded 3.4GHz P4 to be about 80W. I pay about $0.09 for a KWh of electricity. That works out to about $5.62 extra per month per computer - assuming that the CPU would otherwise be completely idle for the entire month. This is for a particularly power-hungry CPU, and most would be
Re:He should be fired. He should be arrested! (Score:3, Insightful)
Ok ... now multiply that by 3. Awfully close to $20, wouldn't you say?
Also note that some places may pay more for electricity than you do. Here in Austin, TX, the first 500 kW/month is relatively cheap, then the next 1000 kW/month is about twice as much, and the rest is even more. My average price per kWh works out to about $0.10, but using more power costs me more like $0.12 per kWh. (Also, the electric company shows a nice profit, which
Well (Score:3, Insightful)
Been there done that. (Score:4, Interesting)
Meanwhile (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Meanwhile (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Meanwhile (Score:3, Insightful)
Specifically they have hired a programer who installed and operated SetiAtHome on their servers, and have subsequently fired him specifically for that offense. While there are a number of people who think that the act of firing him was unjustified, and others (apparently including the state in question) think it was justified, it's easily clear that for this offense it is not
THE HORROR! (Score:2, Troll)
Seriously- does SETI@home have such a huge impact on computer performance that it causes losses in productivity?
Probably not- it just uses CPU cycles that are going to be wasted anyways. And as for bandwidth consumption, I think uploading/downloading a work unit isn't going to be significantly more of a load than doing a littl
Re:THE HORROR! (Score:3, Insightful)
It turned out that when the seti screen server kicked in it starved out IIS. Maybe there are settings to say "run in nice mode" and so forth, but I was less than amused at the time.
Personal hardware, fine - knock yourself out. Server hardwar
Beh (Score:5, Interesting)
On one hand what this guy did is clearly wrong - even according to SETI rules - you're warned not to run this shit on computer on which you're not allowed to do so.
SETI uses up a lot of CPU cycles and makes outgoing network connections on its own (well he could have set it up in different ways, I guess) so it's dumb to have it run on a government SERVER without getting explicit permission.
On the other hand - this sort of shit shouldn't get someone fired* - maybe some embarasing talking to followed by an office-wide memo reminding everyone that "in light of recent transgressions, PLEASE BE ADVISED not to do this kind of shit"
*The stories that I've seen do not indicate whether there's been any prior incidents. Perhaps in this workplace, the "don't install shit on the server" policy is so ingrained into the office culture that someone can't be unaware of the severity of the consequences, in which case the firing is in order.
But actually I hink the comments by Tom Hayes are truthful (but unprofessional). Someone who values his SETI workunit count to such an extent as to fuck around at work, isn't brilliant.
What about... (Score:2, Insightful)
hayes (Score:3, Interesting)
Looks like he's done anyways. For shame!
fixed linky (Score:4, Interesting)
Hayes was stepping down Oct 1. Why he's still there, I don't know. (Or is Slashdot posting weeks-old news again? No, couldn't be!)
Firing (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't necessarily agree with the firing, but if the rules state explicitly that you can't do it, then don't.
Emailed him (Score:3, Funny)
Here's the message:
Good morning/afternoon/evening Mr. Hayes!
You have just appeared on Slashdot as the asshole of the day today (09 October 2004), the largest geek news website. Expect many many more e-mails and possibly telephone calls and faxes from other geeks like me!
Use of such software on production line equiptment isn't a good idea in the first place. SETI does not cause damage, but may slow things down. Warning, pay cut, write up, whatnot might have been a more suitable punishment, but fireing the dude and saying:
"I understand his desire to search for intelligent life in outer space, because obviously he doesn't find it in the mirror in the morning," Hayes said. "I think that people can be comfortable that security has beamed this man out of our building."
is just uncalled for. And because of your actions, this is now on slashdot and you have basically been deemed asshole of the day.
Your personal info is in the comment tree of the article such as address, this e-mail address, fax, etc.
Here is the link: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/10/09/17402
Good luck!
A post above said Hayes is retiring anyway, but... (Score:5, Informative)
I am writing regarding the despicable conduct of one of your appointees, namely, Tom Hayes of the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services. He recently fired an employee, a computer programmer named Charles Smith, for running a program called SETI@Home on the department machines. The program uses spare computer time (when the computer isn't being used, like when a screensaver is running, for example) to do mathematical analysis on data received via radio telescopes by the SETI Program.
The SETI@Home project is well-respected in the scientific and technology communities, and there was no need for Mr. Hayes to fire the programmer for installing the program on department computers. However, the issue goes much deeper than that.
Mr. Hayes demonstrates not only a lack of knowledge on the subject, but also an unwillingness to learn about things he doesn't already know about. A very small amount of poking about on the Internet would have revealed a wealth of information on the SETI@Home project, including its endorsement by a variety of educational organizations and industries.
http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/
Instead, Hayes indicates his assumption of intellectual superiority with such witty repartee as this quote from the Cleveland Plain Dealer:
"I understand his desire to search for intelligent life in outer space, because obviously he doesn't find it in the mirror in the morning," Hayes said. "I think that people can be comfortable that security has beamed this man out of our building."
Hayes's complete lack of tact when dealing with the media over what is actually an unjust firing demonstrates that he is incapable of performing his duties in a way that reflects positively on the State of Ohio, and I hope you will take appropriate action in this situation.
Re:A post above said Hayes is retiring anyway, but (Score:3, Informative)
http://governor.ohio.gov/contactinfopage.asp [ohio.gov]
Re:A post above said Hayes is retiring anyway, but (Score:4, Insightful)
Regardless of how respected the SETI@Home project may be, those servers were purchased for a reason and running SETI@Home was not it. We find that the employee was vioating policy and his termination was appropriate.
Dear Governor Taft,
I am a taxpayer in your state and, therefore, partially responsible for the funding of this computer. I would rather this computer be used to its fullest potential, and I feel that whenever it sits unused, it is wasting tax-bought resources.
It is common knowledge that computers typically become obsolete before they actually stop working. Therefore, getting as much use out of them as possible before they become obsolete is important. It is the same principle as using any product to its fullest potential before its life cycle is ended. I would assume that, for example, your state cars are not retired while they are still in good shape.
SETI@Home, and other distributed applications, are a good method of using computers when they would otherwise sit unused. The applications are designed to benefit the public (ie, taxpayers), and is therefore a method where the taxpayer dollars are directly beneficial to the taxpayer. In my opinion, running such applications on tax-bought machines should be required.
Misuse? (Score:5, Insightful)
Firing this guy is severe and unwarranted. A simple warning should have been enough.
Since he's a state employee, I hope his union [ocsea.org] takes up the case and files a grievance.
pinkslip from outer space (Score:4, Funny)
TheGuy: "Well, I was fired for using company equipment to find space aliens."
Interviewer: "Space aliens?"
TheGuy: "Yip!"
Interviewer: "Um, okay, nice meeting you, we'll call you, don't call us."
Should have... (Score:4, Funny)
Happens too often (Score:5, Informative)
We do everything we can to tell poeple NOT to do this, and they KNOW they are doing something wrong.
I feel bad for the guy, but only as bad as I feel for people that choose to live in Florida and then bitch about hurricanes.
He'll get his job back if he files a Grievance. (Score:5, Insightful)
If this firing were challenged in my state, especially considering the derogatory and defamatory comments issued by this employees boss, a grievance committee would almost certainly give his job back.
I suspect this employee was given no warnings about the conduct for which he was fired. In addition, he probably wasn't violating any direct orders or specific policies. Sure, he was in violation of general policies regarding personal use of computers. But when his boss publically accused him of being crazy, he almost certainly overrode any minor policy violations by the employee.
In my state, the comments made by his boss would have violated any number of state regulations and policies regarding correct termination procedures. And considering that this employee could sue for defamation, I wouldn't be surprised to see his boss actually fired over this.
One might ask why he would want his job back? Certainly he wouldn't want to work for this jerk again. Because state governments are large, and he could immediately apply for a transfer to another agency. One where he would no longer have to work for the ignorant fool that is Tom Hayes.
Your sig is strangely on-topic (Score:5, Funny)
Not in Columbus, Ohio. The village idiot is heading the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services.
SETI@home Security Vulnerability (Score:3, Informative)
Was it SETI specific? (Score:3, Insightful)
Maybe the man was a border-line screw-up and this was the last straw. Or maybe he was too close to retirement, lost the political infighting, hit on the manager's wife, who knows.
It does seem, however, that the manager's ignorant attitude towards the SETI project had a strong influence on his firing decision. To be expected from a PHB.
Misappropriation of company resources = no job (Score:3, Insightful)
But every employer I've worked for has made it very clear that using their resources for non job-related business is a no-no.
I suspect Buddy had already pissed off el jefe. After doing that, running SETI on el jefe's computer was just plain stupid. Buddy needed to be fired for stupidity.
Here is what he ran it on. (Score:5, Informative)
>
> http://www.newsnet5.com/news/3793629/detail.html
Actually, he wasn't a programmer. He was a database application specialist
(Oracle). And it wasn't just a server. It was a 4 processor LPAR running on
an IBM p690, with 6GB of RAM assigned. I've known about the SETI project,
but who would have guessed that they made an AIX version?
And contrary to his claim about the system not being used on the weekend, he
was discovered precisely because some of the other developers were
complaining about the reduced performance on the system.
_______________________________________________
colug1 mailing list colug1@colug.net
http://www.colug.net/mailman/li
Hayes already gone... (Score:3, Interesting)
http://www.governor.ohio.gov/releases/080404hayes
But the artile listed above was printed 10/9. So this guy's dismissal had to have happened on or before 10/1. I suppose if this thing blows up, this quote "...what I am most looking forward to now is spending more time with my family" may not be as easy-going as he hopes.
Make your opinion known (Score:3, Insightful)
To Ohio DJFS:s sf?/base/news/1097228025306530.xml) for one, I am more than a little shocked that a Department Head in the State of Ohio would slander an employee in such a manner. If the quote "I understand his desire to search for intelligent life in outer space, because obviously he doesn't find it in the mirror in the morning" is correct, it is my fondest wish that Mr. Hayes be publicly reprimanded by Governor Taft and removed from his position. Even assuming that Mr. Smith's termination was somehow justified (and unless there is a long history of similar offences, I suspect that it is not) there can be no justification for such remarks to be made, and most CERTAINLY not in public.
Shame on you Mr. Hayes for the discredit you bring to yourself, the employees of DJFS and the office of the governor. Shame.
If there is a more direct way for me to contact Mr. Hayes, I would be glad to use it, but I'm unable to locate it on your web site. With regards to the recent termination of Charles Smith, as publicized in several news articles (http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.
Office of the Governor:
Governor Taft,
I am sure you are already aware - or soon will be - of the shameful actions of Tom Hayes, the director of ODJFS with regards to the termination of Charles Smith, a computer programmer on the DJFS staff as chronicled in several news articles (http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.s sf?/base/news/1097228025306530.xml), for one. Whether or not Mr. Smith's dismissal is justified (and on the surface it certainly does not appear to be so) the remark attributed to Mr. Hayes following Smith's termination leaves me shocked and aghast. If Mr. Hayes was correctly quoted "I understand his desire to search for intelligent life in outer space, because obviously he doesn't find it in the mirror in the morning" is correct, it is my fondest wish that Mr. Hayes be publicly reprimanded by your office and removed from his position. There can be no justification for such remarks to be made, and most CERTAINLY not in public.
I believe - and certainly hope - that you will hear from the technical and scientific communities, both loudly and publicly, about Mr. Hayes' appalling action. I see no possible way for someone so callous, unthinking and uncaring as Mr. Hayes to serve successfully as the director of an agency like DJFS.
And no, I am not related to Mr. Smith of Ohio...