Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Communications United States The Internet

FCC: Broadband Usage Has Tripled Since 2001 154

Brainsur writes "According to Newsfactor more and more Americans are migrating to high-speed Internet service, with the number of broadband subscribers tripling in recent years, according to a comprehensive report from the Federal Communications Commission. The U.S. is making progress in delivering broadband access underserved areas, the report states. The report also says that the number of users of broadband services (speeds exceeding 200 kbps in both directions) soared to 28 million in December 2003 from 9.6 million in 2001."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

FCC: Broadband Usage Has Tripled Since 2001

Comments Filter:
  • Unsurprising. (Score:2, Informative)

    by rincebrain ( 776480 ) on Sunday September 12, 2004 @01:29PM (#10228342) Homepage
    As people become more accustomed to using computers, they become less patient.

    As people become less patient, they become less likely to want to wait for the loading of such bandwidth intensive sites as, oh, say, Slashdot.

    As people become less patient, they become more willing to pay for broadband, and be able to browse at speeds that will amaze them.

    Also, file sizes have increased, and so gamers are increasing their pipes to compensate. For those of us, myself included, who have not seen the World of Warcraft beta...that's two gigabytes, downloaded over your internet connection.

    Finally, I must point out...BitTorrent really became popular in 2003, as is evidenced by WoW using it as a distribution method.

    Small wonder, then, that broadband is increasingly becoming a necessity.
  • by YasserTowelhead ( 570584 ) on Sunday September 12, 2004 @01:33PM (#10228353) Homepage

    Listen, you smashed body of a wretched animal. I suspect it wasn't meant as a compliment.

    Furthermore, your grandstanding assertion that this is "one of the best [you]'ve ever had the honor of receiving" indicates to anyone with the barest grasp of Collaborative Discussion Theory that you've never uttered a word of substance. To anyone. I submit to you that any well-worded assertion predicated upon original and rational thought will raise howls of protest from the Mothers Against Drunk Driving (rehash of the failed and immoral "temperance movement" (i.e., the recurring meme that encourages the insulting and unbiblical (cf. Genesis 1:29 [ebible.org]: "God said, 'Behold, I have given you every herb yielding seed, which is on the surface of all the earth, and every tree, which bears fruit yielding seed. It will be your food. To every animal of the earth, and to every bird of the sky, and to everything that creeps on the earth, in which there is life, I have given every green herb for food;' and it was so.") suppression of the consumption of plants given to us by God for our sustenance and pleasure)), Million Mom March (attempt to subvert the respect for motherhood by associating the delusional wailings of those who cannot mentally separate a tool from its wielder with an unconstitutional effort to destroy our inalienable, individual ("A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves ... and include all men capable of bearing arms." --Richard Henry Lee, Senator, First Congress, Additional Letters from the Federal Farmer (1788)) right to defend ourselves against both foreign invaders and corrupt tyrants and usurpers (note that Diane Feinstein has a concealed carry permit but she doesn't want the hoi polloi, the proles, WE THE PEOPLE OF THESE UNITED STATES to be on an equal footing with her; why's she afraid of the well-regulated militia if she truly preserves and protects the Constitution?)), military-industrial-pharmaceutical-complex worshipping toadies.

    We're a generation of men raised by women. I'm wondering if another woman is really the answer we need.

    Note the blatant censorship by Skull & Bones, Bush & Kerry, Kang & Kodos, yin & yang, there is no hope, your vote is a joke, the republic is dead, of "Chapter 5: The Right to Bear Arms [state.gov]" (compare Chapter 4 [state.gov] and Chapter 6 [state.gov])!

    I weep for the future if you think a random blast of vulgarity is a "raving troll". Patriots question the "Patriot" act and Ashcroft says they aid terrorists, Maddox opens his mouth and censorship [xmission.com] is attempted. We live in the age of feelies and soma and a lack of Quality (Pirsig) and you are amused by self-referential parody of the hopelessness of the age? You appendage of Cthulhu. Go back to your lair; we are not ready for you yet!

    Your inner thoughts as you posted your ill-advised diatribe:

    ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
    ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
    ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
    ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
    ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
    ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
    ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
  • Re:DSL vs. Cable (Score:2, Informative)

    by angrykeyboarder ( 791722 ) <mr.scott.beamer@gmail . c om> on Sunday September 12, 2004 @01:51PM (#10228419) Homepage Journal
    From my POV, it's who offers the best overall deal. I've had broadband in two metropolitan areas (Atlanta and Phoenix) and in both places Cable offered a faster connection (4 MB/s download vs 1.5 MB/s download for DSL) for approximately the same price.

    Advantage:cable

    Also having cable broadband allows one to completely free themselves of a landlines phone. Get a cell phone with unlimited local calling along with your cable internet and who needs a landline phone?
  • Exceeding 200k? (Score:3, Informative)

    by nurb432 ( 527695 ) on Sunday September 12, 2004 @01:54PM (#10228437) Homepage Journal
    Hmm my out going is capped at 128k like everyone else on my system..

    That is, if i dont use it, once i do, my downstream is pretty much cut off at the knees..

  • Re:200 kbps uplink? (Score:2, Informative)

    by QuickSilver_999 ( 166186 ) on Sunday September 12, 2004 @01:55PM (#10228442)
    Actually it didn't change the statistics at all. Since this was an FCC report about US statistics, Canadian ISPs wouldn't be reported. It's just that the reporter is obviously a self centered US citizen, since he uses the generic term "American" to mean ONLY the USA. :)

    Course, I usually fall into that category too. When will you darn Canucks learn that you aren't American just because you occupy more of the continent than we do? :)

  • Re:Both directions? (Score:3, Informative)

    by The Analog Kid ( 565327 ) on Sunday September 12, 2004 @01:56PM (#10228443)
    You know since you have 1.5 down your less than 15,000ft from the CO, you can call up and get a free upgrade to 384k up. Verizon also now offers 3.0/768k for $40 if you have the Freedom package and $44 if you don't. You have to be 11,000ft max for that though. Make sure to call billing though since only they do the upgrades.
  • by Laebshade ( 643478 ) <laebshade@gmail.com> on Sunday September 12, 2004 @01:57PM (#10228447)
    Helps in increasing this. We're sort of a meta-ISP. We do cable modem infrastructure rollouts and provide phone technical support for small MSOs (multiple service providers, i.e. cable companies). Check us out at ibbsonline.com [ibbsonline.com]. And, wouldn't you know it, it was founded at the end of 2001.

    P.S. I hope our servers can handle a /.ing.
  • by 3seas ( 184403 ) on Sunday September 12, 2004 @03:45PM (#10229011) Homepage Journal
    .... the rate is probably not what they claim, but less than that, especially since I recently saw a story on slashdot saying doubled....

    Broadband was/is subsidized by dialup subscribers.

    Dialup legal position is one of insuring better competition.... some FCC thing about telephone line equal opportunity..... anti-monopoly.

    But cable is not that way legally and can be and is used in a monopolistic manner. If I want a cable modem here there is only no choice but comcast.

    I'm sure the report is a marketing effort making things sound better than they are in order to attract the "jump on the (broad) band wagon"... keep up with the jones...

    It works against your consumer freedom of choice.

If all else fails, lower your standards.

Working...