Internet2 Speed Record Broken 344
RevKa writes "InternetNews.com has a report of a new Internet2 land-speed record. The old record was nearly cut in half: the two parties, California Institute of Technology (Caltech) and the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), 'transferred 859 gigabytes of data in less than 17 minutes.'
InternetNews goes on to say, 'This record speed of 6.63Gbps is equivalent to transferring a full-length DVD movie in four seconds.' Various scientific purposes were mentioned 'as well as commercial applications from entertainment to oil and gas exploration.'
The article ended with hardware specs 'S2io's Xframe 10 GbE server adapter, Cisco 7600 Series Routers, Newisys 4300 servers using AMD Opteron processors, Itanium servers and the 64-bit version of Windows Server 2003.'"
wow (Score:5, Funny)
Re:wow (Score:5, Insightful)
It is typical of humans to focus primarily on the ways in which new technology can be utilized for 'fun'. Computer games are a particularily ubiquitous example of this phenomenon. Massively networked computers have the potential to become the greatest compound computational device that mankind has ever had access to. If only the proper effort were expended, multiple paralell processing tasks could quite easily be run on this supernetwork. The combined power of this cluster would thus be beneficial to all.
There is slim hope that this will happen, at least in the foreseeable future, human logic being as flawed as it indeed is.
Re:wow (Score:5, Funny)
Re:wow (Score:4, Interesting)
And you thought computer games were bad. They may save us from extinction.
Re:wow (Score:5, Funny)
"We could take Tribes 2 or Quake, or the like and build entire simulated armies. Instead of actually killing people we could simulate wars and just abide by the results."
Great idea, but only if Diebold gets to orchestrate the simulation...
Re:wow (Score:4, Insightful)
Ah. So, what will this superior form of logic gain us? With a super-efficient system we could solve all sorts of problems and extend our lives and enrich ourselves, allowing us to have longer to enjoy...wait a minute, you're complaining because we'd rather be able to enjoy ourselves, which appears to be the point anyway, than to not enjoy ourselves for a while so that we can later enjoy ourselves as we would have been doing anyway.
Perhaps you could explain your 'unflawed logic' sometime?
Re:wow (Score:5, Insightful)
Giving the average person access to a "compound computational device" would be about the biggest waste of resources in human history.
Re:wow (Score:3, Interesting)
Parallel computing is the forseeable future of computing. If you have sufficient bandwidth across the internet, it only makes sense to share computing resources between people. Just think about how it could help gentoo users :)
Point of life is fun (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:wow (Score:3, Insightful)
Who said research wasn't supposed to be fun?
Re:wow (Score:5, Funny)
Welcome to "Skynet." 8)
Those damn humans (Score:2)
Oh wait nevermind that's what TFA is about.
anyone remember those 3dfx commercials? (Score:3, Informative)
Station wagon full of backup tapes (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Station wagon full of backup tapes (Score:5, Insightful)
Except, that I don't think you can drive from CERN to CalTech, even with a few days to do it ;) So, you might actually be right! But they still have a tremendous way to go to exceed the bandwidth of a supertanker....
Re:Station wagon full of backup tapes (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Station wagon full of backup tapes (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Station wagon full of backup tapes (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Station wagon full of backup tapes (Score:5, Funny)
You can tipically only change this code 5 times before it locks up.
At least that's what the *IAA's would like us to believe :)
Re:Station wagon full of backup tapes (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Station wagon full of backup tapes (Score:2)
Re:Station wagon full of backup tapes - Burn them? (Score:2)
I need more coffee - Lot's more coffee!
Re:Station wagon full of backup tapes (Score:3, Interesting)
"Oh, no more copies of Passion of the Christ on the shelf? Hang on a couple of minutes while I burn one for you..."
Re:Station wagon full of backup tapes (Score:2)
Re:Station wagon full of backup tapes (Score:2)
Re:Station wagon full of backup tapes (Score:2)
Besides, the stationwagon has a far higher total capacity throughput than the server. To get a station wagon's full of data, you'd have to swap the media at the front and back end of the I2 link, too.
Re:Station wagon full of backup tapes (Score:2, Funny)
btw: I think we're forgetting that fold out seat in the back of the station wagon.
Re:Station wagon full of backup tapes (Score:2)
Now lets quell this speak about illegal actions that are typically in the hands of the EVIL mafia and return to our regularly scheduled programs of "backing up" our DVD movies.
Re:Station wagon full of backup tapes (Score:2, Informative)
Hum... Not really "back-up" though. The kind of data which are gonna be produced at CERN in LHC won't be backed up : just too big.
The point of those super fast transfer rates is that probably experiment data will _not_ be stored at CERN at all, just produced and sent straight to storage farmes. Hopefully organisation will be clean enough to avoid more transfere after first storage. The goal beeing : stored where it's gonna be analysed.
I worked a while within the ALICE experiment off-line software sectio
Re:Station wagon full of backup tapes (Score:2)
However, we're still left with the problems of what to do with that station wagon full of DVDs and how to handle the late fees at Blockbuster.
Re:Station wagon full of backup tapes (Score:2)
Re:Station wagon full of backup tapes (Score:2)
This sounds great! (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:This sounds great! (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:This sounds great! (Score:3, Interesting)
With a transfer rate of 60 MB/sec, the Ultrium 460 is the ideal choice for enterprise-class data protection needs. linky [hp.com]
So, real numbers are max 1.2GB/s or 12Gb/s for the L700, not bad, but not that much faster than this transfer. And with the tapes you still have to transport them to the destination to make the comparison fair.
Re:This sounds great! (Score:2)
-
Re:This sounds great! (Score:5, Insightful)
Remember that this is an experiment, and getting speeds like these into widespread availability is pretty far in the future. By the time such speeds are available, the computing power to take advantage of them probably will be too. If they don't start the research now, we'll have very powerful computers that come to a screeching halt everytime they have to retrieve data from the 'net.
Re:This sounds great! (Score:2)
The average home NEVER needs to transport a ton of goods. Shall we not build trucks and ships that can?
DVD speed (Score:5, Funny)
Yeah, that's the message we want to convey to the MPAA. Everyone knows the Internet2 is all about pirating DVDs.
Re:DVD speed (Score:2, Funny)
I want one!
Re:DVD speed (Score:4, Funny)
-
Re:DVD speed (Score:2, Funny)
Re:DVD speed (Score:5, Funny)
Someone give Jack Valenti a call! His exit interview [engadget.com] was linked off here [slashdot.org] just a few days ago, and he said:
If everything stayed just as it is right now, we could probably survive it, because even with broadband it takes at least an hour to bring down a movie. But I visited the labs at Caltech, and they're running an experiment called FAST where they can bring down a DVD-quality movie in 5 seconds. The director told me it could be operative in the market in 18 months. Well, my face blanched.
I wanna know what his face does when he finds out we can now do it in under 5 seconds
Anyway, don't let him quit before someone tells him!
-- james
Re:DVD speed (Score:2)
Re:DVD speed (Score:5, Funny)
Sheesh. Whatever happened to the last benchmark unit? Libraries of Congresses? All you kids and your new fangled metric system... DVD units. Back in my day, we were sued by BOOK publishers! Not some crazy eight track industry. Those were some REAL copyrights.
*prattles*
Re:DVD speed (Score:2)
Yeah, that's the message we want to convey to the MPAA. Everyone knows the Internet2 is all about pirating DVDs.
You're pitching it wrong. What we tell the MPAA is, "See, with Internet2, you can sell a whole movie every 5 seconds."
Re:DVD speed (Score:2)
Hey, I should trademark that...
Right now I can't afford both DSL and Cable TV. Which do you think I picked?
Anything that puts another option out there is good. Now I know that we won't be seeing these speeds to our homes, it just gives me hope. My monitor has excellent resolution and I'm all for streaming television. I'm already sitting here all day - streaming audio gets old.
If the MPAA was smart, which they usually aren't, they would support this with their minds on movie
Look on the bright side :) (Score:2)
not bad... (Score:5, Informative)
Current Records
IPv6 Category
Single Stream Class: 46,156 terabit-meters per second by a team consisting of members from the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) and CERN across 10,949 kilometers of network.
Multiple Stream Class: 46,156 terabit-meters per second by a team consisting of members from the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) and CERN across 10,949 kilometers of network.
IPv4 Category
Single Stream Class: 69,073 terabit-meters per second by a team consisting of members from the SUNET, the organization for the national higher research and education network (NREN) of Sweden, and Sprint across 16,343 kilometers of network.
Multiple Stream Class: 104,528 terabit-meters per second by a team consisting of members from the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) and CERN by sending 859 gigabytes of data across 15,766 kilometers of network in 1037 seconds (just over 17 minutes), for an average rate of 6.63 gigabits per second.
Re:not bad... (Score:3)
In tomorrow's news ... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:In tomorrow's news ... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:In tomorrow's news ... (Score:2)
"It has long been established that most blank media is used for piracy. The legislatures have wisely acted to provide compensation to our rights holders for all blank media sold."
"However, we have been remiss in not realizing that, like blank media, network bandwidth is also mostly used for piracy. Accordingly, we are today introducing a bill to compensate our rights holders for the piracy that
Re:In tomorrow's news ... (Score:2, Informative)
"A tax of $0.01/MB will be levied on all network transmissions except those originating directly from our licensed content distributors."
Of course, if the country has any sort of constitution guaranteeing freedom of speech, copyright law will allow any copyright owner to join the royalty pool. This is already the case with sound recordings and blank Music CD-R media.
Waaaah! (Score:2)
It wasn't my fault I jacked 231232432 movies off P2P! The evil bastards INDUCEd me!!!
Oh-oh. (Score:2, Interesting)
Explaining it like that is likely to draw the wrong sort of attention - How long until Jack Valenti and his crew of RIAA/MPAA thugs descend on this new menace to their livelihoods?
Incidentally, for some reason gmail has decided to give me 12 invites - they will go to the first 12 logged in posters telling a funny joke involving ESR or RMS, bonus points for use of ASCII.
joke, best I could do on the spur of the moment.. (Score:5, Funny)
RMS Says "Huh.. that's GNU'S to me."
Re:Oh-oh. (Score:2)
Okay, not a joke per se but kind of funny/sad -- RMS objected to the use of 'win' as a prefix to function names in the windows-specific source files in emacs. Seems the connotations of 'win' are too positive to be used in a function name that will only be called on an MS OS.
I forget whether they were changed, as that was the thing that made me give up on emacs
Re:Oh-oh. (Score:2)
Re:Oh-oh. (Score:2, Interesting)
I think gmail must have just hit some kind of critical density; I finally got my invite last week, and since then I've been seeing them offered just about everywhere.
That's exponential growth for you, though... I've invited three people in myself already, and I imagine they've got invites of their own by now. I dou
Re:Oh-oh. (Score:2)
About a month ago I got five invites to give out, about two weeks ago another six.
Re:Oh-oh. (Score:2)
Q: Why couldn't the ESR scientist ever get a date?
A: Because he was such a Bohr! (explanation) [gsu.edu]
Oh, you didn't mean Electron Spin Resonance? Sorry.
Evil plan (Score:2, Funny)
2, ???
3, Profit!
Re:Evil plan (Score:2)
HAHAHA! (Score:2)
Haha. Silly Mark Cuban. Pirates will always prevail in the face of adversity (and high-density media).
Windows.. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Windows.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Because Microsoft has a marketing budget and Caltech/CERN don't give a rats ass what software it runs when it's the network infrastructure they're showing off..
Re:Windows.. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Windows.. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Windows.. (Score:2)
Debian GNU/Linux [internet2.edu] and
NetBSD [slashdot.org].
I guess it primarily depends on what the participating partners are comfortable with.
they needed data (Score:3, Insightful)
They needed data. They started with DVDs they owned, but a few dozen only added up to about 1/8 of what they wanted. Renting was too expensive and they were worn out from ripping the first 12. The solution was obvious ...
The connected the Winblows 2003 server and used it to collect data. Within minutes, it was rooted and it's reputation for good network connectivity spread quickly. In a day or two, th
Distance is as impressive as speed (Score:5, Insightful)
Cheers,
Erick
Interesting point... (Score:5, Interesting)
Internet2 is fast -- Abilene, a U.S. cross-country backbone network, blasts data at 10Gbps. But transoceanic networking is another story. There are hardware and software issues to overcome, Gray said.
For example, one limiting factor is that the fastest available interface for PCs is the PCIX64 Bus Isolation Extender, which can only handle 7.5Gbps.
So... Let me get this straight... The problem these guys have is that they are using PC to connect to, and send data on, Internet2?
I remember a time when "serious" CS researchers would not touch a PC with a ten-feet pole. Times have changed, indeed.
Re:Interesting point... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Interesting point... (Score:2)
Just because you're using an operating system that is a close relative in terms of technology used doesn't make the computers the same category.
UNIX was an operating system originally developed for minicomputers. This doesn't mean that my IA32 *BSD machine is a minicomputer -- it _is_ a PC.
Although, that said, I've never used a Next Cube, but I understand they were marketed for single user desktop us
Re:Interesting point... (Score:2)
Which was my point. I think Tim Berners-Lee was a serious (not computer) scientist and he was using a Next Cube to develop a way of easily retrieving information from his and others' mainframes.
And the OS I use isn't a close relative, it's the latest version of that same OS that was used on the Next.
Re:Interesting point... (Score:3, Insightful)
Because advancement is market driven and PCs are where the money is. That's probably the fastest price / performance bus they can get. Research institutions aren't made of money (unfortunately).
Re:Interesting point... (Score:2)
but Research is...
Re:Interesting point... (Score:2)
100 Mbps (Score:2, Informative)
Err - cancel that (Score:5, Funny)
Achieving equivalent Disk I/O (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Achieving equivalent Disk I/O (Score:2)
How fast can /dev/null absorb the incoming data? And what happens when it overflows?
Re:Achieving equivalent Disk I/O (Score:2, Interesting)
I suspect that a 16 disk RAID 0 array of high speed disks could keep up with this. However, I think you'd need a pretty specialised computer system to keep up with such an array. I'm not sure what kind of architecture you'd need, but I am convinced it would involve multiple I/O buses and some kind of crossbar arrangement for shared access between DMA controllers. Memory would have to be interleaved carefu
Re:Achieving equivalent Disk I/O (Score:4, Informative)
Give me mass storage of that throughput... (Score:5, Insightful)
For us, average nerds, if we ever got connection that fast, it would still feel slow because of our storage speed.
Wheelchair (Score:5, Funny)
This reminds me of another article this week where a guy strapped jet engines to a wheel chair....
Benefits? (Score:3, Insightful)
Use *NIX and it would be (Score:3, Funny)
I guess they wanted to leave themselves some room for improvement and therefore started off with Win2003...
Even faster....Again?! (Score:2)
bits or bytes? (Score:2)
6.63 Gbps X 4 s = 25,898,437.5 bytes 25MB ?
That's not right is it?
If it were bytes per second then that's way too big...26GB ?
Am I not doing this right?
I can beat that! (Score:5, Funny)
Beats their record.
Oh? It needs to go over wire. Fine.
Be amazed at my 80GB Harddrive over Cat 5 FLYING FOX!!
Bwahahaha.
It's fast, but... (Score:3, Informative)
There's nothing quite like having a 2.5Gbps net connection coming straight into your department at uni
Internet2 Speed Cop Pulls Them Over (Score:3, Funny)
I'm afraid I'm goin' t'have t'write y'all up for speedin'.
Scalability? (Score:3, Insightful)
Or does Internet2 use some exotic de-centralized transfer method that renders the paradigm of servers laughably obsolete?
Re:Does this mean (Score:2)
Re:Windoze?? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Windoze?? (Score:2, Informative)
PCWorld [pcworld.com]
Looks like they were using next-generation Internet Protocol version 6 protocols, but I am not sure if that encapsulates some next generation of TCP/IP as well
Re:Conversion? (Score:2)
Re:What about LOC/s? (Score:3, Funny)