Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
United States Security

Senator Blacklisted by No-Fly List 1396

sig writes "Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA) was turned down for a flight from Washington, D. C. to Boston because his name turned up on the TSA No-Fly list. He eventually got on a flight, but was again denied on his way back to D.C. It took 3 weeks of calls to Tom Ridge and the Department of Homeland Security for the ordeal to get straightened out. But what are ordinary citizens supposed to do if the Secretary of Homeland Security won't take their calls?" There's also a New York Times story.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Senator Blacklisted by No-Fly List

Comments Filter:
  • by Jim_Maryland ( 718224 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @09:03AM (#10021664)
    Don't recall the radio program but late in the day the word was that he wasn't on a No-Fly list but rather a Screen list. What the exact difference is between the list was not discussed, but I'd have to imagine that the first prohibits flight while the second is more of a harassment.
  • Re:Funny... (Score:5, Informative)

    by dekemoose ( 699264 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @09:11AM (#10021762)
    For a lot of good reading on truly effective security practices, read Bruce Schneier's stuff, http://www.schneier.com/, his crypto-gram newsletters have lots of interesting reading.
  • by SCOX_Free ( 806174 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @09:11AM (#10021769)
    Get the facts straight. Nixon TRIED to use the IRS to pester his foes.

    Clinton is the one who succeeded in using the IRS.
  • T. Kennedy (Score:5, Informative)

    by EnglishTim ( 9662 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @09:18AM (#10021853)
    Riiiight. So basically anybody called 'T Kennedy' isn't allowed to fly.

    According to the 1990 census information [census.gov], 0.067% of Americans have the surname 'Kennedy' - given a rough poulation of 300million, that makes around 200,000 American Kennedys.

    Now, also from the above information, 4.25% of the male population and 3.35% of the female population have names beginning with T.

    This means that just from that single name on the no-fly list, roughly 7600 Americans could be excluded from flying.

    It's utter, utter madness.
  • by XavierItzmann ( 687234 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @09:27AM (#10021940)
    What happens today to people who scream on airplanes, run down the aisle, and assault other passengers with pillows, like Kennedy has done?
    Ted could drink about as much as any man and still appear relatively sober. That was the most dangerous of gifts. But something was different now, and this trip brought him back to thoughts of death and dying. "They're going to shoot my ass off the way they shot Bobby's," he said as the reporters listened and took their private notes. Wanting only to pop a few more drinks, he did not eat at the airport in Fairbanks on the way home. He got on the plane and asked the flight attendant for a drink, and then another. He swaggered up and down the aisle, bouncing a pillow on the head of one of his aides, shouting for him to wake up, and then weaving along shouting, "Eskimo power! Eskimo power!" The journalists listened and noted Ted's sad state, but none of them wrote about it in their publications when they got home.

    Sons Of Camelot: The Fate Of An American Dynasty, by Laurence Leamer

    Chanting political slogans and assaulting passengers? Okay, it was 1972, but we pay TSA to stay vigilant against anyone with a history of unstable political activity, don't we?
    http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/00 2283.php [captainsquartersblog.com]

  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 20, 2004 @09:32AM (#10022003)
    Nixon had an enemies list, and he succeeded in using several departments of his executive branch to harass them. Of course, Tricky Dick is the only person forced to resign from the presidency, and you can be assured that it isn't because he merely TRIED to do illegal things.

    Kenneth Star spent upwards to $50 Million dollars investigating Clinton and all he could show at the end of it was that Billy lied about getting a blow job. Of course, Newt couldn't find ANYONE in congress to initiate proceedings against Billy because all Newt's people were guilty of similar offenses.


    So, excuse me, but get YOUR facts straight. Billy was impeached (f*cking unbelievable) because he decided to lie about his blow job. You can be assured that if Kenny had any suspicion that Billy was guilty of a REAL crime that he would have spent another $20 Million chasing it down.

  • identity crisis (Score:3, Informative)

    by recharged95 ( 782975 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @09:33AM (#10022021) Journal
    It's "Edward M. Kennedy"

    Ted's a nickname...

    Washington Post states [washingtonpost.com] the actual [bad] entry in the system was "T. Kennedy" that trigger this whole event.

    Scenario: When you goto the airport, they look at your drivers license and it says "Richard Bruce Cheney" (or Richard B. Cheney). I'm sure you will not be flagged against "D. Cheney" if it shows up in the database, otherwise all we need is a J. Smith to be entered in the database and viola, system overload... Anyway that's where profiling comes in to place I guess to prevent that ;)

    Sounds like human error or poor judgement (or good judgement, depending on political party preference) but obviously blamed on a computer/database.

  • For the non-US (Score:5, Informative)

    by Professeur Shadoko ( 230027 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @09:36AM (#10022050)
    I didn't get the joke, so I googled a bit:

    here [washingtonpost.com]

    On the evening of July 19, 1969, Sen. Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts drove his Oldsmobile off a wooden bridge on Chappaquiddick Island, drowning his passenger, a young campaign worker named Mary Jo Kopechne. The senator left the scene of the accident, did not report it to the police for many hours, and according to some accounts considered concocting an alibi for himself in the interim.

    At the time, Kennedy managed to escape severe legal and political consequences for his actions thanks to his family's connections (which helped to contain the inquest and grand jury) and to a nationally televised "Checkers"-like speech broadcast a week after the accident. But virtually no journalist who has closely examined the evidence fully believes Kennedy's story, and almost 30 years later, the tragedy still trails the senator, with aggressive press investigations revived in five-year anniversary intervals.

    Probably more than any other single factor, Chappaquiddick - a frenzy without end - has ensured that Ted Kennedy would not follow his brother John to the White House.
  • NOT TURNED DOWN (Score:5, Informative)

    by magarity ( 164372 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @09:37AM (#10022062)
    It's bad enough when comment posters don't RTFA, but the submitter?!?!

    From the article:
    A Kennedy aide said the senator nearly missed a couple of flights because of the delays

    This is NOT "turned down for a flight". Sheesh!
  • Re:Wrong again! (Score:3, Informative)

    by sherpajohn ( 113531 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @09:49AM (#10022206) Homepage
    And there, at the end of your post, is the reason the American INS is so thorough with people coming from Canada.

    Um, being a Canadian, the only time they "check" me is on the way back into Canada. I take it you are implying the INS is wary of all people entering the US from Canada due to Canadian Customs being "lax" in checking folks out? I mean you do understand that Canadian Customs does not even talk to you when you are leaving Canada? Actually that's a good thing, had INS checked us on the way out, we may have never gotten home with that single-barrell bourbon.
  • Not that I support Clinton...
    But my understanding is that Clinton asked the Judge to define Sexual relations.
    And the Judge said Sexual relations = intercourse.
    And Clinton correctly (according to his story) stated that he did not have sexual relations with ML.
    By the Judge's definition oral sex was not considered sexual relations.
  • Re:Our gov't at work (Score:2, Informative)

    by black mariah ( 654971 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @09:52AM (#10022247)
    More like your total fucking inability to comprehend obvious humor. Watch more Monty Python until you learn.
  • Re:Answer. (Score:3, Informative)

    by Rahga ( 13479 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @09:54AM (#10022284) Journal
    After a party on Chappaquiddick Island in 1969, Kennedy drove his car off a bridge, resulting in the death of one of his aides. This event has haunted his entire career, is the reason you'll see far-right activits show up to his events wearing life preservers, and is recognized as the single most important reason he has not nor ever will run for President of the United States. Check out Wikipedia's entry on Ted Kennedy [wikipedia.org], as it contains far more about the situation than it does on his career.

    This is not Karma farming... I don't need it anymore, and I realize that the vast majority of summer /. readers probably don't know this, and the joke went way over their heads.
  • by cHiphead ( 17854 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @09:54AM (#10022286)
    you are not fucking kidding, my WIFE gets stopped EVERY TIME she boards an airplane, especially when she has our son with her. *I* on the other hand, was only stopped once, when I was next to her in line and said I was her husband. From now on, we enter the lines seperately when our son is with us. The only remotely logical explanation is that she took trips with her parents to Hungary and around Europe before she was 10 years old and thus is on some sort of watch list.

    Fuck 9/11 and fuck homeland security. If someone is determined and smart, they can blow up any goddamn thing they want, no amount of flag waving bullshit security is going to save us. Its reality and people don't want to face it. The only way we catch these people (the ones REALLY determined to hit us) is a LOT of hard work by LAW ENFORCEMENT (NOT MILITARY!) with an extra hefty scoop of LucK. Terrorism is a law enforcement issue, not an issue of war.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 20, 2004 @09:59AM (#10022348)
    They went through a metal detector.

    When I take my bicycle with me on the plane (in Europe), I am wearing:

    • Glasses with a metal frame;
    • One home key and one cycle key hidden under my clothes;
    • One metal watch with a metal strap;
    • Two pieces of steel sized 6x15x20 mm, one under each shoe, that fit into the pedals of my bike.
    Guess what? All this does not set off the metal detection ports. In my hand luggage, there are often a number of things that must look funny on the X-ray screen: a metal cooking vessel, the pedals (full of springs and oddly-shaped pieces of steel), wires (for recharging batteries from the dynamo), lumps of cheese and chocolate (must look like lumps of semtex), a spoon, fork, and (blunt) knive that I forgot to put into the check-in luggage, and other small things that you need in outdoor life. I've never been asked to show what's inside of that bag. I'm actually considering to cut a few layers of tinfoil into the shape of a gun or knive, just to see what happens.

    The laser service engineer that visits our lab every now and then carries a big case with screwdrivers and other tools as well as cleaning chemicals and a gas-operated soldering iron, and he claims that he managed to carry those as hand luggage on occasions where he was in a hurry. (He is of course a very good airline customer with a pass for unlimited domestic travel).

  • by dave420 ( 699308 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @10:03AM (#10022385)
    He didn't say everyone in the line was non-white, but that most non-whites go through the list. I have to agree with him. I'm white and I've been through the extra-security rubbish (at LAX a few times), and it sucks. There definitely is racial profiling going on, which is just freakin' stupid, and illegal in the US. But then it's part of the war on terror, so most people forgive it.
  • by cyber0ne ( 640846 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @10:05AM (#10022416) Homepage
    The added security does nothing but placate the sheeple.

    Amen. Also, no matter what the government mandates to try to make people feel safe, it all comes down to Mr. John Q. Agent working at the airport to actually make it work. And he often fails.

    I can give several examples of (post-9/11) experiences in an airport where I used to live (Missoula, Montana). I once boarded a plane with nobody at the gate to check passes (I still have the complete, unchecked boarding pass). I've walked right into almost every "restricted" area, including the machine room in the basement, the offices behind the airline counters, and even right out the back door to where the planes are.

    My only comfort was knowing the strategic choices of planes on 9/11 was related to their high fuel content and proximity to specific targets. By the time any plane from Montana gets to a terrorist target, it's time to re-fuel.
  • by MooseByte ( 751829 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @10:16AM (#10022566)

    "Ok...here's a proposal. [ ... ] How about, instead of mindlessly bashing what they are trying, coming up with something better. Something that won't take decades to bring to fruition [ ... ] Let's try to fix the process, instead of jumping up and down, screaming."

    I fully agree. Another critical angle is to contact your representatives [house.gov] and be heard. Your phone call is actually more powerful than your vote in many ways. Your vote gets the person into/out of office, your phone calls/email/letters gives them direct feedback on specific issues.

    Followup ideas on How To Do It Better to follow shortly, but I've got to knock out a conference call first. Yeah, work. The nerve of them. ;-)

  • by maxume ( 22995 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @10:16AM (#10022570)

    You should check out what snopes [snopes.com] has to say about the dry run. Seriously. The air marshals were at least as concerned about the behavior of the woman who wrote that article as they were about the musicians, maybe more. If you don't want to put faith in the snopes article, read thier sources. If you don't want to put faith in their sources, I can't help you.

    For people nervous about links: http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/skyterror.asp

  • by Rescate ( 688702 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @10:24AM (#10022686)
    From the U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 6 [cornell.edu]:

    [...] They shall in all cases, except treason, felony and breach of the peace, be privileged from arrest during their attendance at the session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same [...]

    This clause is sometimes put forward by congressmen to try to avoid tickets, since they are "going to and returning from" their sessions. See Sen. Robert Byrd: Invoking an ancient rule to avoid a modern law [capitolhillblue.com] to find out more.
  • by SpaceLifeForm ( 228190 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @10:29AM (#10022752)
    Really. Now the FBI is tailing people just to harass them because of their political views. Lots of recent reports here [google.com].

    And this kind of crap is not going to be buried by the media!

  • by ajs ( 35943 ) <ajs.ajs@com> on Friday August 20, 2004 @10:38AM (#10022882) Homepage Journal
    Ah, another bastardization of the original. Here's an interesting comment from a page about the person that made the original "when they came for..." comment [liv-coll.ac.uk]:
    Everbody loves to quote Martin Niemöller's lines about moral failure in the face of the Holocaust: '
    First they came for the Communists, but I was not a Communist, so I said nothing. Then they came for the Social Democrats, but I was not a Social Democrat, so I did nothing. Then came the trade unionists, but I was not a trade unionist. And then they came for the Jews, but I was not a Jew, so I did little. Then when they came for me, there was no one left to stand up for me.'

    But interestingly, people use the quotation to imply different meanings - even altering it to suit their purpose. When Time magazine used the quotation, they moved the Jews to the first place and dropped both the communists and the social democrats. American Vice-President Al Gore likes the to quote the lines, but drops the trade unionists for good measure. Gore and Time also added Roman Catholics, who weren't on Niemöller's list at all. In the heavily Catholic city of Boston, Catholics were added to the quotation inscribed on its Holocaust memorial. The US Holocaust Museum drops the Communists but not the Social Democrats; other versions have added homosexuals.

  • Re:Answer. (Score:3, Informative)

    by The Conductor ( 758639 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @10:47AM (#10022991)
    He did run for prez in 1980, but lost party nomination fight to Carter.
  • Re:My Story (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 20, 2004 @10:48AM (#10023011)
    If you're flying SWA, you can tell if you're going to get the special treatment by looking for the checkerboard pattern at the bottom of your ticket. The TSA greeter will then mark the ticket with a red 'X', and you'll have to go through the stand-here-sit-here-legs-out-stand-up routine.
  • Re:T. Kennedy (Score:5, Informative)

    by EnglishTim ( 9662 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @10:49AM (#10023023)
    > What in the heck does someone named 'T. Kennedy' have to do with this story? That isn't his name.
    > Again, what does that have to do with this story? His name doesn't start with a 'T.'


    FROM THE ARTICLE:
    "Sen. Edward "Ted" Kennedy said Thursday that he was stopped and questioned at airports on the East Coast five times in March because his name appeared on the government's secret "no-fly" list."...

    "A senior administration official, who spoke on condition he not be identified, said Kennedy was stopped because the name "T. Kennedy" has been used as an alias by someone on the list of terrorist suspects."

    > Hey moderators, how about actually reading the posts before hitting the buttons.

    Hey, poster! how about actually reading the article before posting?
  • Re:Foreigners... (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 20, 2004 @11:19AM (#10023403)
    Enemy combatant or not, if you're being held by the United States you have the right to an attorney and your day in court.

    No, they don't

    Non-citizens abroad lack any constitutional rights, even when they confront the U.S. government there. However, they continue to enjoy constitutional rights within U.S. borders, even when here illegally. This has been decided by the supreme court already. Do a google search on "Odah decision"
  • by volgers ( 545215 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @11:45AM (#10023727) Homepage
    I'm terrible sorry to inform you about this from the other side of the Atlantic, but they did do it on purpose. This was big news 4 years ago, discovered by the BBC. By an American journalist btw.

    See: www.gregpalast.com [gregpalast.com]

  • Re:Our gov't at work (Score:3, Informative)

    by tsm_sf ( 545316 ) * on Friday August 20, 2004 @11:48AM (#10023766) Journal
    The 'felon list' is handled by the state. Since both Google and personal memory appear to not work on your end (or just in case you don't get it):

    http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/01/florida. elections/ [cnn.com]

    http://www.sptimes.com/2004/07/11/State/Florida_sc raps_felon_.shtml [sptimes.com]

    http://www.wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,64182,00.ht ml [wired.com]
  • Re:Our gov't at work (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 20, 2004 @11:53AM (#10023826)
    Fit supertall buildings with anti-aircraft weapons (specially designed for short range so they don't get hijacked). That's one of the stupidest ideas I've ever heard. You're going to shoot something flying directly towards you at 600mph with a short range weapon? Better hope you don't miss with that one shot! And where are most "supertall" buildings located? In the middle of large cities! So shooting an airplane down from the building itself will only result in scattering flaming debris over dozens of other densly populated buildings - what a great solution!
  • Re:Our gov't at work (Score:3, Informative)

    by illtud ( 115152 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @11:55AM (#10023847)
    That's a pretty awesome trick the Republicans pulled, getting Democrat precinct officials to deliberately remove potential Democrat voters from the rolls. Those Republican operatives definitely need a raise and a promotion.

    And just in case you don't get it: Voter registration rolls are handled by the local precinct officials.


    Yes, it was the precinct officals who received the list, prepared by Database Technologies (on a $4M contract - nice money for shoddy work) of people to be excluded from the roll. What's their political inclinations got to do with this? The felon list contract was awarded by Katherine Harris, a republican. What were the county supervisors to do, throw it away? (well, one did: - Emogene Stegall).

    Explain to me what the precinct officals (Democrat or not) should have done with the list given to them.
  • by Doc Ruby ( 173196 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @12:13PM (#10024095) Homepage Journal
    Why presume when you can RTFA? Senator Kennedy wasn't cleared by "second level checking", or even the first 2 of 3 calls to Tom Ridge, Director of Homeland Security. You've obviously decided that the system is good, and aren't interested in having your mind changed by the facts. Sounds like you work for the Department.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 20, 2004 @12:34PM (#10024376)
    Section. 6.
    Clause 1: The Senators and Representatives shall receive a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States. (See Note 6) They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, beprivileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.

  • Re:Wrong again! (Score:4, Informative)

    by genixia ( 220387 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @01:08PM (#10024756)
    - they wanted to know how much money we had on us - when I told them none, as we intended to use americna funds we would get from bank machines, they demanded to know how much money we had on our credit cards and in our bank accounts!


    The 2nd question was because of your 'wrong' answer to the first. INS (or whatever they call themselves now) are required to ensure that you have enough funds to support your visit so that you won't resort to asking for handouts or robbery. The bizarre thing is that the law that codified this requirement was written a long time ago and the amount of cash required wasn't index linked, so it wouldn't cover a meal in a decent restaurant today. I can't remember exactly what the figure is, but it's something like $20.

    When I was dating my now wife and make frequent trips into the USA without a green card, I used to keep $40 in my wallet just to avoid that hassle even though I, like you, used ATMs to support my stay.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 20, 2004 @01:21PM (#10024884)
    Don't forget who this is, Ted Kennedy, not exactly the most honest guy in politics. So expect a lot of self-promoting distortion and Bush-bashing.

    And Edward Kennedy does have terrorist connections. If memory served me right, he has used his political muscle to aid IRA terrorist leaders, getting them into the US to raise money. That probably got him (legitimately) on at least one terrorist watch list and that data was fed into the current one. So, it is phony for him to whine and claim innocence. When it comes to terrorism, he has blood on his hands.

    Don't forget too that Ed Kennedy is very left and it is the left, particularly in Europe, that's providing political cover for so-called "fundamentalist" terrorists. You can read about how how Carlos the Jackal, former Marxist, has converted to Islam and how London's Sunday Telegraph is idolizing him like Marxist revolutionaries were once idolized at:

    Carlos the Jackal [inklingbooks.com]

    And recall that when his father, Joseph Kennedy, was UK ambassador after war broke out in Europe, he tilted his remarks so heavily in favor of Hitler that some historians call him "pro-Nazi." FDR had to do some clever manuvering to get him to leave the job quietly. Papa Joe hoped he could build on American isolationism and get himself in the White House. If he'd been successful in his schemes, Europe would still be Nazi. (There was, in fact, a rather badly done docu-drama that built on that theme.)

    Then there is the Kennedy family's close friendship with Senator Joe Macarthy of the repressive Macarthy Era fame. Ed's brother Robert Kennedy served as Macarthy's legal aide and John Kennedy was the only member of the Senate not to vote to censure Macarthy for his demagogery. Ed was a bit too young to get involved in the family's efforts to suppress free speech, but his heart was no doubt with his kin. Witness all the slandering he has done over the years of rather ordinary Americans.

    In short, Ed Kennedy, grossly obese and often drunk, is the last member of a rather vile political dynasty. There's probably no one more deserving of having his flights disrupted by a terrorism watch list. Edward and his kin have thrown their weight around and hurt a lot of innocent people over the years. There's no reason to feel sympathy for him now.

    --Mike Perry, Inkling blog [inklingbooks.com], Seattle

  • Re:Our gov't at work (Score:2, Informative)

    by guyjr ( 180613 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @01:26PM (#10024952)
    Uhm, they _had_ ID, and it _was_ checked. The ID checking requirement went into effect after TWA 800 went down in 1996, 5 years before 9-11.

    And as is plainly evident given 9-11, ID checking does absolutely NO good whatsoever. Facial recognition, on the other hand, or some other biometric way of postively identifying someone (maybe a DNA scanner in the not too distant future?) could perhaps be a vaild deterrant, but the system we have now punishes nobody but the innocent.
  • by mpaque ( 655244 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @02:43PM (#10025887)
    You get used to it after a while. What I do is basically:

    1) Don't carry anything valuable. They'll make you dump everything on a table, which they don't watch very well. For security staff, they're pretty slack about other people's stuff.

    2) Wear cheap, flat 'deck' shoes, like $12 pairs fron a cheap show chain. You may lose them at some point.

    3) If you wear a belt, use a cheap flat belt. You may have it torn open at some point.

    4) Wear clean underware, with no holes. You may wind up with your pants around your ankles with 20 strangers there, as you try to stand straight, with no belt, and your arms straight out from your sides. (Happened to me at San Diego, in the hole they call Gate 1.)

    Expect to be laughed at by the wanker TSA employees. Do not make any remarks or show any expression in response. Remarks about a**holes results in an extra hour or two in a small room while you wait for a cavity search 'specialist'.
  • Re:Foreigners... (Score:3, Informative)

    by 0x0d0a ( 568518 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @02:47PM (#10025944) Journal
    Despite all of this, I am pulled out of every single line in every airport I ever go through and my bags are generally searched thoroughly if not emptied entirely. Why is that? I am a short white glasses wearing female computer technician.

    There are relatively few jobs other than airport security screeners that have minimal requirements, have had to hire a ton of people extremely rapidly in a short period of time, and allow hirees to pat down [nytimes.com] choice females from a line.
  • Comment removed (Score:3, Informative)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @03:06PM (#10026168)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Re:Big Difference (Score:3, Informative)

    by sean.peters ( 568334 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @03:22PM (#10026359) Homepage
    I do seem to recall something about issuing papers to privateers for the specific purpose of harrassing the British fleet.

    These were known as "letters of marque", and although they're not considered legal under current laws of armed conflict, they were completely acceptable in those days.

    I mean, attacking the enemy on Christmas Day when they were drunk as a skunk? Is this your idea of the proper rules of engagement?

    Absolutely. War isn't a game, and if you let down your guard (by getting drunk on the battlefield), you have no right to ask the enemy to wait until you're better prepared.

    Sean

  • Re:Our gov't at work (Score:2, Informative)

    by tompaulco ( 629533 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @05:36PM (#10027850) Homepage Journal
    Another of the security features was to ground General Aviation airplanes for much longer than commercial airlines and to institute new "temporary" no-fly zones that are still in effect, but only for small planes. They have also mandated increased security for small planes. All this despite the fact that it was huge commercial jets involved in 9/11.
    Your typical General Aviation airplane has perhaps a 400 pound payload with full fuel. You could deliver much more ordinance much more precisely with a minivan, at about the same speed.
  • Re:Big Difference (Score:3, Informative)

    by ShinmaWa ( 449201 ) on Friday August 20, 2004 @05:49PM (#10027969)
    *sigh* Take off the tinfoil hat, for Pete's sake. Your brain is beginning to cook.

    I heard that bin Laden is on the board of some or many defense contractors. He supposedly has NOT been removed.

    That would have been MOHAMED bin Laden. He's the former head of the Bin Laden Group, an international construction conglomerate that has large corporate interests in many different industries. He is no longer on the board of any company, since he has passed away.

    Mohamed was Osama's father, but there was no great love between them. Mohamed disowned his son decades ago and helped pressure the Saudi royals to yank his Saudi citizenship. The etire family has turned its back on their most famous member because he's a serious embarassment to them and very, very bad for their business. Mind you, the bin Laden family is quite rich and very happy with the status quo in Saudi Arabia. The absolute last thing Mohamed's family wants is the idiology that Osama promotes.
  • Re:Japanese lesson: (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 20, 2004 @06:43PM (#10028432)
    True, but as I understand it "gaikokujin" is more commonly used now, and considered less offensive. Of course, the OP certainly intended the more offensive usage to make the point.

    These days, we're probably verging on "henna gaijin" as the predominant US view of forigners.

I tell them to turn to the study of mathematics, for it is only there that they might escape the lusts of the flesh. -- Thomas Mann, "The Magic Mountain"

Working...