Weblog System Features Compared 269
prostoalex writes "The question of the best weblogging system out there arises quite often, especially after the new licensing scheme introduced by MovableType. Here's a rather detailed breakdown of currently popular blogging and content management systems. Out of 11 software packages, 10 run on any server with variations of Perl/PHP and MySQL/PostgresSQL, and one requires Windows and .NET Framework. 4 are licensed under GPL, 3 are under BSD. Mark Pilgrim explains why licensing is suddenly important."
CityDesk (Score:5, Interesting)
Whatever your opinion of him, he makes good software.
my own? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:my own? (Score:3, Interesting)
Yes, I did. A si [4k1r4.ath.cx]mple gallery script I took from somewhere on the net and modified it to fit my needs. There is a cron job launching a perl script that downloads mails from a mailbox and puts the attachments on the gallery and the body of the mail under the image on the web page.
Very simple, but allows me to blog from my mobile phone.
CMS Specifically for Writers? (Score:3, Interesting)
Specifically what I am in the process of coding (poorly) is a system that will allow me to manage and elegantly present information about the various writing I've done. This information would be metadata such as Date Written, Themes, Similar Pieces, Inspiration, etc...
What I have now on my personal site is pretty rudimentary. (example [fallinggrace.com])
I just have the texts themselves as individual HTML files in a separate directory, while the metadata is in a MySQL database that is queried through PHP.
Thoughts, links, direction, or experiences to share?
- Neil Wehneman
The best one I had (Score:2, Interesting)
Two PHP scripts, plus an additional,
Drupal (Score:1, Interesting)
The CMSes that I looked at are Slash, PHPSlash, Mambo (which BTW, is very good but not for community weblogs like slashdot), PHPNuke, and PostNuke.
I have found Drupal to be technically superior to all of them. But what makes it even more attractive to me is the fact that the community developing it is very open, active, and polite. There is a lot of communication from Dries (the guy who started the project) as well as the rest of the developers. New versions come out frequently.
Drupal is so much better than PostNuke, which is what I had been using to run my site for months. The postnuke community has no central disscussion board it seems, as well as no direction. It almost seemed dead when I abondoned it.
Re:Why just blog? (Score:2, Interesting)
The biggest thing I found lacking in UseMod was the ability to have a little "front page" blurb about recent changes, so I hacked one up. This allows the front page to contain links to my journal entries and keep visitors up to speed on the important stuff that's new since last visit. I have some other plans for additional hacks... and one that just occurred to me that would be really handy is a way to build photo galleries just using the Wiki.
how about a blog software that doesn't require sql (Score:2, Interesting)
Any suggestions for this case? And please don't say "change hosting providers" because I'm doing this for a University program and it needs to be hosted in University webspace. Hence no SQL server.
Re:LiveJournal (Score:4, Interesting)
Use the LiveJournal servers, but syndicate the RSS feed into your own blog.
This way, you can get the best of both worlds, allowing you to intergrate the blog into your own site while using all of LJ's kickass features such as the huge array of WYSIWIG clients availible. It cannot be beaten.
Re:Great site & Favs (Score:4, Interesting)
Disclaimer: I'm not sure how MANY people it actually takes to bring down a page, but this was a huge number of visitors for my site. Anyone know how many people are on Slashdot at any given time?
--
New deal processing engine online: http://www.dealsites.net/livedeals.html [dealsites.net]
Client Side Weblog Editor (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:LiveJournal (Score:2, Interesting)
Another one not mentioned (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:LiveJournal (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Great site & Favs (Score:2, Interesting)
What I want in a CMS is both the ability to use without touching any code, and the ability to extend it. But if extending means having to touch php then I don't want to go near it.
Plone (a Python / Zope based CMS) is nearly perfect, but it's really......really......slllooow. I've been trying to find something else like it preferably Java based, but just about any language other than php would do, but I haven't had much luck.
Re:Why WordPress Is Poised To Take Over (Score:4, Interesting)
I don't really want to run MySQL. I don't really want to maintain it. It is just not something I want to deal with. MT lets me use a little local database.
I really really don't want dynamic pages. I just don't need it. I have had zdnet link to my blog which caused a trillion avantgo clients to hit it. I just don't need queries to MySQL and PHP being run all the time. Actually PHP by itself wouldn't be so bad if it cached everything in a local file the first time the page required it as long as it supported if-modified-since and ranges correctly.
I actually kind of like the idea of TypeKey. Of course nothing prevents you from implementing TypeKey support in WordPress.
I simply don't care about silly licensing issues. I mean, for a single non-commercial blog, nothing has changed.
I have an upgrade path. Sooner or later WordPress will probably integrate a local databse and real caching. When that happens if it is better than MT, I'll migrate. I just don't see the point in migrating right now.