Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Communications The Internet

George Gilder on Telecommunications Policy 60

Codeine writes "The Testimony of Mr. George Gilder to the Telecommunications Policy: A Look Ahead hearing held by the US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation strongly supports the idea [of] mandated 'open access' to the logical layers of the network, and it is embodied in a new legislative proposal by MCI, A Horizontal Leap Forward: Formulating a New Public Policy Framework Based on the Network Layers Model. The success of the layered model in the LAN environment, migrated to the WAN."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

George Gilder on Telecommunications Policy

Comments Filter:
  • by deutschemonte ( 764566 ) <lane.montgomery@nOspAM.gmail.com> on Saturday May 15, 2004 @02:29PM (#9162342) Homepage
    But I have always believed that the people should own the infrastructure that companies do business on.

    Other than toll roads, we don't allow companies to own our public streets and then mandate to us who gets to use them to conduct business.

    If the people (i.e. the government) owned the data infrastructure that telecoms do business on, it would allow for more competition because smaller companies could compete over the same lines without biased interferance from the owners of the lines.

    In fact it would drive down the cost of the lines because the governmental authority over them would charge each company a fee to have access plus a usage charge. Total usage fees would remain the same no matter how many carriers compete for the same population, but the access charge income would rise with each carrier that entered the market.

    [/soap box speach]
  • by wintermute42 ( 710554 ) on Saturday May 15, 2004 @03:16PM (#9162560) Homepage

    George Gilder seems to have succeeded solely on the basis of his belief in his own power as a prophet of the future. As those who subscribed to his stock market newsletter found, he was a legend in his own mind, not in reality.

    George Gilder was a largely unknown hack author of little read books that many would regard as sexist before he wrote Wealth and Poverty which caught on with the Reagan administration believers in "supply side" economics (we know this today as the economics of tax cuts and massive federal budget deficts). Although "supply side" economics has returned, it was largely out of favor with the administration of Bush Sr. and the balanced budget faction of the Clinton administration. So Gilder reinvented himself as a technology guru. The fact that he has no background what-so-ever in science or technology did not stop him. He interviewed those who did and wrote up his impressions in breathless terms.

    The peak of Gilder's trajectory was his stock market newsletter which had thousands of subscribers who were willing to pay thousands of dollars for the privilege of reading the thoughts of the master. This and the opportunity to get early access to Gilder's hype which was moving the market in many cases.

    Then there was the fall. As the 2000 stock market crash erased the value of many of the stocks that Gilder touted, his subscribers deserted him in droves, much poorer for the experience. Gilder had invested in the stocks that he hyped and his investments were largely wiped out. Gilder was also making money holding conferences and was left with conference committements and no attendees. In the end he was heavily in debt, his bubble wealth wiped out.

    But true ego maniacs and pundits never die. They just continue the process of reinvention, whether as Governor of California or as an expert in telecommunications. So here we see Gilder again blowing hot air on topics that he has a shallow understanding of. And, as always, coloring his presentation with the usual Republican freemarket ideology (regulation bad, taxes bad, poor people weak and shiftless, unrestained free market good, rich people good).

  • by Animats ( 122034 ) on Saturday May 15, 2004 @03:29PM (#9162621) Homepage
    First, despite all the whining for Federal subsidies, broadband Internet access is at 45.9% this month. It just passed 56Kb/s modem access. (There are still a reasonable number of users at lower speeds. Amusingly, the fraction of 14.4 Kb/s users has been relatively constant for years.) High speed home Internet access is growing at about 8% per year. Korea is at about 70%, and Canada is at about 64%. Korea saturated at around 70%, and Canada seems to be levelling off around 70%. The US should hit 70% broadband in about three years.

    That's higher than cable TV ever reached. Cable TV has been stuck at roughly 65% for many years. And it's way above book and newspaper penetration. Far more people have Internet access than buy books. Newspaper penetration is down to 55% or so, and has dropped about 10% per decade since 1950.

    Remember, the US has flat rate local phone service, but many other countries don't. So dialup access was and is cheap to buy.

    So this isn't a problem.

    As for the "layering" business, we've had that ever since telephone deregulation. You can buy bulk bandwidth cheaply if you can get it to your site, or go to where it terminates. Look how little bandwidth costs for a colo server. Bulk long-haul bandwidth is incredibly cheap.

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (5) All right, who's the wiseguy who stuck this trigraph stuff in here?

Working...