Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
It's funny.  Laugh.

City Officials Almost Ban Foam Cups 1055

localhost00 writes "The city of Aliso Viejo, CA nearly banned foam cups when they learned they are produced from a substance known as 'dihydrogen monoxide.' A paralegal working for the city apparantly found a professionally designed web site put up to describe the dangerous properties of this chemical. Apparantly, the report about Dihydrogen Monoxide was written by a then 14-year-old Nathan Zohner who was researching the gullibility of fifty ninth graders."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

City Officials Almost Ban Foam Cups

Comments Filter:
  • by eljasbo ( 671696 ) * on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @10:42AM (#8577859)
    Come on people. This is the state that wanted to make oreo cookies an age restrictred item, and the state that required electronic equipment not to use the master/slave nomenclature because it offended only one person. Obviously they did zero research on this before they had their knee-jerk reaction. I bet we will soon see warnings on bottled water like we do some other items... "This product is known to the state of California to cause an unknown disease.." Remind me never to live there.
  • by MadWicKdWire ( 734140 ) * on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @10:44AM (#8577882) Homepage
    Maybe I'll put up a site about the disadvantages of outsourcing, then maybe the US Gov will try to ban it?!

    Just a wild idea!
  • by Brahmastra ( 685988 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @10:48AM (#8577916)
    Actually, there really is something called water overdose [bbc.co.uk] and apparently it can kill you.
  • by fantastic max ( 690355 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @10:54AM (#8577987)
    The DHMO site is at least 6 years old. I used to have it linked on my science education web site. I was smart enough to put it under the category of "weird science" or "science humor". Can't remember which as it is no longer active. Thought it was funny and didn't think anyone would ever buy into it... well anyone who actually graduated the 7th grade, at least.
  • Ban (Score:3, Interesting)

    by 0x41 ( 682557 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @10:55AM (#8578003)
    I think the first thing they should ban is that paralegal, from ever having access to politicians enough to convince them of crap like that.

    But, Seriouslly, they really should ban styrofoam cups, those things take forever to degrade, and are nasty pollutants. USe paper cups instead!

  • by frankie ( 91710 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @10:58AM (#8578026) Journal
    Yeah, Intentionally Disposable + Non-biodegradeable = A Bad Thing.

    But on the bright side, you can dissolve styrofoam in gasoline (or other hydrocarbons). When you add enough, the solution becomes viscous and sticky (just like honey). If you love the smell of napalm in the morning, styrofoam is your friend. :)

  • by thbigr ( 514105 ) <thebigr314.gmail@com> on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @10:59AM (#8578037) Journal
    This was the first web page I ever read and fell off my chair. The "pro" web site is just as funny.

  • by NMerriam ( 15122 ) <NMerriam@artboy.org> on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @11:11AM (#8578140) Homepage
    I should note (as an artist) that different kinds of water behave differently in paint. I would have just assumed it was distilled water had I seen the bottles. Not that you would need particularly pure water for latex paint, but some people like to buy the Rolls Royce of everything.
  • by justanyone ( 308934 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @11:11AM (#8578145) Homepage Journal
    These sites are very funny!

    Of course they're scams / humor sites, but they look really real!

    I'm somewhat surprised by these, too. I believe they're encouraging people to commit a felony (identity theft), as well as fraud (not paying debts). I believe this may mean they are engaging in a criminal conspiracy, even if they don't know the other parties to the conspiracy. IANAL, someone please review and respond?

    Here's some links:


  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @11:13AM (#8578163)
    Penn and Teller, on thier Showtime show 'Bullshit' did a similair trick to expose the ridiculous ignorance of the liberals at this earth-day type event. They went around and got a tons of signatures from people for thier support in the ban of 'dihydrogen-monoxide'. it was pretty damn funny and it did well in exposing the lack of credibility on the part of these groups.
  • Re:Come on CA (Score:5, Interesting)

    by aborchers ( 471342 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @11:14AM (#8578173) Homepage Journal
    It was an unelected paralegal doing the research who fell for the DHMO joke. Did you consider that along the way, someone (quite possibly an elected official) spotted the bad research and stopped the monkey business?

  • by sybert ( 192766 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @11:15AM (#8578185) Journal
    Even more embarrassing, this is Orange County, not the Bay Area where I would expect this to happen. And I looked at the city council web-site and one of the city council members has a PhD, from Stanford, in Educational Psychology. It only shows how useless a PhD has become.
  • Re:Come on CA (Score:5, Interesting)

    by GMC-jimmy ( 243376 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @11:16AM (#8578194) Homepage
    I submit that expecting perfect decision-making 100% of the time from leaders is akin to expecting coders to write non-trivial code that works perfectly on first execution.

    I'm not worried about honest mistakes, but unhonest exploitation of the gullible does worry me. Legal professionals (the wealthy ones) understand all too well how to exaggerate the truth and worse, how to sugar-coat a lie.

    Honest mistakes are forgivable. But, exaggeration on the other hand, well I'm not so sure about that.
  • by Doctor_D ( 6980 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @11:23AM (#8578264) Homepage Journal
    It doesn't surprise me much. I mean honestly most people who were good at science and math went into fields like engineering, computer science, or research. I can't even think of an example where someone with that background would involve themselves in politics.

    On a sidenote, my little sister is nearly finished with her MBA, and she hates math, science and computers. There have been times I wanted to give her an Etch-A-Sketch as a laptop...especially when she calls me on my vacation all upset because she caught the latest windows virus. What could I do? Nothing... Why? 1) I'm a UNIX engineer 2) I was driving into the Rockies in Colorado for a nice quiet peaceful weekend in a mountain cabin, and of course she's in Ohio. Anyway to the point... My little sis would go out of her way to make sure she didn't have to take science or math courses in college. She wanted to be a marketing major for her undergraduate degree, but chose public relations instead since it didn't have a requirement for Calc I.
  • by ajs318 ( 655362 ) <sd_resp2@earthsh ... .co.uk minus bsd> on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @11:25AM (#8578284)
    Leah Betts [google.co.uk] died of drinking too much water. She took an Ecstasy tablet while her {rabidly anti-some-drugs} dad was out -- then heard he was due back before she would wear off. Fearful of a bollocking on his early return, she drank several litres of water in a misguided attempt to counteract the effects of the drug. This caused an electrolyte imbalance, leading to multiple organ failure -- including the brain -- and eventual death.

    Legal ecstasy tablets probably would include an information sheet detailing safe usage practicesm and this would never have happened. However, the government, breweries and the tobacco companies all would prefer for you to believe that she was killed by a tab of ecstasy.
  • by jedidiah ( 1196 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @11:26AM (#8578293) Homepage
    Those old styrofoam containers were also much easier to recycle than the corrogated paper that they use now. A good example of the destructive power of clueless tree huggers and the PR obsessed corps that listen to them.

    Paper Good! Plastic Bad!...
  • Re:Come on CA (Score:4, Interesting)

    by robertjw ( 728654 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @11:30AM (#8578341) Homepage
    Yeah, and my first thought is that they were going to vote something a paralegal brought to them into law without checking it out???? I think that's an even worse reflection on these public officials.
  • by WolfWithoutAClause ( 162946 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @11:32AM (#8578367) Homepage
    I heard a story from the guys at Experimental Rocket Propulsion Society [erps.org] who were playing with high purity hydrogen peroxide (85% compared to the 3% you typically get in chemists).

    Anyway the inspectors came around to check them out; and insisted on knowing what their cleanup method would be if they spilled the stuff.

    "We don't need one."

    At this point the inspector went into rant mode, threatening extensive punitive penalties if a cleanup methodology wasn't produced immediately.

    ... which was terminated only when the team pointed out that hydrogen peroxide, of this strength, when spilled on the local desert, immediately "pssssssssh" decomposed into a) steam b) oxygen... and they merely asked if they needed to worry about either contaminating the local groundwater. Upon careful consideration, the official waived this requirement, and elected not to penalise them.

    (Indeed so effective was the desert at catalysing the peroxide, the team were jokingly considering abandoning their expensive silver catalysts, and using desert instead... but I digress.)

  • by Phurd Phlegm ( 241627 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @11:33AM (#8578374)
    Reminds me of an oxygen canister I saw at home depot a little bit ago. [...] This label was about as big as the one letting you know that it was flammable.

    Of course, oxygen isn't flammable. Was that supposed to be part of the humorous part, too, or did it really say that?

  • Re:Come on CA (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Entropius ( 188861 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @11:37AM (#8578421)
    You can fatally overdose on marijuana, too.

    Don't believe me? Well, I've got this wheelbarrow of plants for you to eat...
  • by Chemisor ( 97276 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @11:38AM (#8578439)
    > I think our approach to designing products aimed at the lowest common denominator

    This is a consequence, not the cause. The problem is our education system and the way it encourages stupidity. Read about that and the solution to it in th
    Montessori Method. It's old and, sadly, is the sort of stuff nobody teaches children any more.
  • Re:hyponatremia (Score:4, Interesting)

    by drinkypoo ( 153816 ) <drink@hyperlogos.org> on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @11:42AM (#8578475) Homepage Journal
    A friend of mine with a sweating problem drank enough water to do that to himself once. He didn't die though, he just had a seizure, and a free trip to the hospital. When I used to work for Roaring Camp narrow gauge railroad at the tender age of 15 (at which time I was about 6'4") I was the trackwalker, meaning I followed the narrow gauge steam train up the hill to make sure it didn't toss anything out of the firebox or the stack that was going to catch the forest on fire. I drank a lot of water, and I took salt tablets on the hottest days. I don't know if it was necessary, but I'm not dead, and it got well over 100 several times, and I was hauling my chubby ass up hill five times a day on hot, busy days. My only compensation was minimum wage and being in umpteen zillion japanese tourist videos.
  • by Politburo ( 640618 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @11:48AM (#8578516)
    Chain fast food (McDs, Burger King, etc.) is not served in styrofoam anymore. However, many, many small delis and shops use styrofoam packaging, like the deli in my office building. The take out at my alma mater's dining halls uses styrofoam packaging. That alone is thousands of meals a day with a styrofoam box and cup.
  • by Frans Faase ( 648933 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @11:48AM (#8578520) Homepage
    We live in a society where the lack of social skills has a much greater impact than the lack of technical skills. When we all were still farmers we had to plan, count, learn how to do things in order to survive. But now it are the managers, the advisors, the marketeers and the sales people who earn more than people with technical skills. Furthermore, we live in a highly individualized society where an individual without the proper social skills is easily going to lose from those that do have these.
  • by b1t r0t ( 216468 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @11:51AM (#8578549)
    I particularly enjoy the Google Ads on the Carbon Free Diamonds page. Ain't it wonderful how Google Ads can give a joke site more credibility by throwing random related ads on the page? (Buy Dehydrated Water has them too, but they're not a spiffy.)
  • by zymurgy_cat ( 627260 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @11:54AM (#8578582) Homepage
    But on the bright side, you can dissolve styrofoam in gasoline (or other hydrocarbons). When you add enough, the solution becomes viscous and sticky (just like honey). If you love the smell of napalm in the morning, styrofoam is your friend. :)

    We used to do this in the boy scouts. We'd then pour/mold the mixture onto a newspaper, twist the newspaper around the stuff, and make a "starter log" for camping. Make 'em two or three inches thick, throw a couple into your fire pit, and you've got a great way to start a fire. Very good for drying out damp wood and getting a blaze going.
  • by c13v3rm0nk3y ( 189767 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @11:55AM (#8578589) Homepage

    I'm not sure one can blame education or general intelligence for this -- at least not directly.

    What we may have lost is the ability to detect bullshit. The tendency seems to be for adults to accept official looking information presented in an expected manner, or to believe statements from someone holding a microphone in front of a video camera.

    I say "adults" only because I've seen a few "man on the street" spoofs where adults are caught up while their children look on in disbelief just before calling bullshit on the so-called interviewer. Some of Rick Mercer's [www.cbc.ca] "Talking to Americans" segments are particularly memorable examples.

    Of course, this is completely anecdotal on my part. Not to mention some of the folks who got caught on this particular hoax were young adults. Adult enough, perhaps, to start believing what "experts" suggest to them without thinking critically about what is being presented to them.

    The problem is a lack of critical thinking, I suggest, and not some arbitary level of intelligence (which is impossible to measure and compare, anyway).

    Examples about making change or spelling may be a bit misleading. I've never been strong with arithmetic (not mathematics) even though I worked for years in the service industry. I never learned the tricks and shortcuts people use to quickly calculate change or percentages. I'm not sure there is much my schooling could have provided to help this. After 35 years I just know I should use a calculator, and check my figures twice.

    Many people find spelling problematic. Especially English spelling, which is hardly a normalized language; being a good English speller requires a fair amount of sheer memorization. In fact, new research suggests that some so-called learning disabilities have almost nothing to do with intelligence or ability to learn. Dyslexics have different brains that may actually be better at some tasks than non-dyslexic brains. Dyslexics can read and comprehend letters and words the same as everyone else, but the part of the brain the recognizes words shapes and establishes a lexicon "buffer" is the problem.

  • Re:Come on CA (Score:4, Interesting)

    by GMC-jimmy ( 243376 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @11:56AM (#8578604) Homepage
    It was an unelected paralegal doing the research who fell for the DHMO joke. Did you consider that along the way, someone (quite possibly an elected official) spotted the bad research and stopped the monkey business?

    Did you consider that the paralegal could've been the patsy [reference.com] to save face for the elected official ?
  • by ThogScully ( 589935 ) <neilsd@neilschelly.com> on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @12:00PM (#8578656) Homepage
    I don't believe you, but in order to prove you wrong, I have to fall for it. Tough decisions...
    -N
  • Re:Come on CA (Score:3, Interesting)

    by The Only Druid ( 587299 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @12:34PM (#8579029)
    But here's the question: were they categorizing this as an overdose or simply over-ingestion? I dont have PDR, so I'm honestly asking, but this is what I mean: an overdose would mean that the chemical involved (i.e. THC and the other carbinoids that cause the 'high') caused one or more organ failures (possibly including the brain), resulting in death. Overingestion, on the other hand, would cause organ failure (again, possibly including the brain) for reasons unrelated to the chemical properties of marijuana (think of how drinking enough water can literally make your hyperhydrocephalic, i.e. swell your brain until death, or how drinking enough milk can cause an allergic reaction to the lactose inducing seizures then death).
  • Re:Come on CA (Score:4, Interesting)

    by dbc001 ( 541033 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @12:47PM (#8579202)
    Hmmm... Maybe it would help if a few extra eyes checked over that legislation before it gets released? Any chance of getting pre-release legislation published on sourceforge? I have to admit that I like the idea of open-source legislation. Not sure how it would work though...
  • Re:Come on CA (Score:4, Interesting)

    by STrinity ( 723872 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @01:04PM (#8579425) Homepage
    It's not just politicians. On their series Bullshit [sho.com], Penn and Teller sent a petition to ban DHMO to a Greenpeace rally. The only thing more disturbing than the people who were willing to sign after hearing selected facts about water, was the number of people who signed without even hearing the pitch.
  • Re:Come on CA (Score:4, Interesting)

    by pz ( 113803 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @01:11PM (#8579525) Journal
    ... well before you're able to consume enough THC ...

    You're assuming consumption is by inhalation; by ingestion, especially in concentrated form (hashish or THC tablets), it is surely possible.

    Just as it is difficult to achieve alcohol poisoning when drinking normally because of the same self-limiting effects (although it is possible), it is also possible to chug a litre of pure ethanol and likely induce death.
  • Re:Come on CA (Score:2, Interesting)

    by fnkleroi ( 742383 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @01:15PM (#8579563)
    Exageration, unforgivable?! Where is your appreciation for stories?

    Great exagerators:
    Mark Twain
    Hunter S. Thompson
    Homer

    To name 3 without thinking too hard. If you don't appreciate exageration you can throw away all of your library for that matter. What is fiction but an exageration?

    Why without Exageration and Lying there would be no Sci Fi! No Sci Fi! Good God /.ers! This person is an infidel obviously.
  • Re:Come on CA (Score:3, Interesting)

    by henrygb ( 668225 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @01:33PM (#8579814)
    More than one slick website. Looking up dihydrogen monoxide [google.com] suggests that it widely recognized as a danger. Only Urban Legends and the Recreation > Humor > Science > Chemistry directory spoils the effect.
  • by DunbarTheInept ( 764 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @02:01PM (#8580157) Homepage
    I drink tapwater *because* it's impure. For one thing it tastes better that way (bottled water tastes like...nothing.) And for another, the human immune system works better when it gets to practice on something - that's the premise behind innoculations.

    I do make an exception for the tapwater at work, however. It's an old building with terrible pipes because it's had biochemistry experiments being conducted in it for over a century - with all manner of corrosive compounds being used. I insist that my tapwater at least *look* clear before I drink it. The tapwater at work often comes out yellowish, with chunks of stuff in it.
    No, I'm not kidding. You can also see brown stains on all the drinking fountains' porcelin where the water regularly runs, and all the pipes I can see when the ceiling tiles are pulled aside are covered in crusty green stuff.
  • Re:Come on CA (Score:3, Interesting)

    by iminplaya ( 723125 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @02:13PM (#8580292) Journal
    In other words, if they don't like being called stupid, they should stop doing stupid things!

    Yes, while they're distracting us with that "stupid thing", they're also expanded the death penalty to include people who put Linux on their X-Box.
  • Re:Come on CA (Score:3, Interesting)

    by jayayeem ( 247877 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @02:53PM (#8580725)
    I think this is the key question... who asked for the research. Notice (in the MSNBC article) the line

    "The measure has been pulled from the agenda, although Norman said the city may still eventually ban foam cups."

    So someone decided styrofoam cups were bad, went out looking for supporting evidence, and was unable analyze the data he found. Since this got as far as it did, it is clearly someone with the ear of a councilman.

    Who is pursuing this agenda, and what other causes are they pushing, possibly with equally flawed evidence
  • Re:Come on CA (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Feanturi ( 99866 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @03:02PM (#8580835)
    I dont care what any study says on that. ive smoked plenty of pot to know that i wouldn't be safe driving if i was high on it.

    hahahaha, heehehehehehe, hahaha, there's a tree, hee hee hee, CRASH!

    you get the idea.


    Yes, I get the idea that you're probably one of the ones that shouldn't be smoking pot. You know, in about 18 years of smoking the stuff and being around people who do, I have never met ONE person that would behave like your described scenario. The dumb-ass giggly shtick, I always took that to be a hollywood fabrication. "Reefer Madness" and its influence springs to mind. But I guess some people just can't handle mind-altering substances.

    I recall hearing about a study that tested (in simulators) driving abilities of straight, stoned, and drunk people. Guess what? The stoners tended to be the more careful, better drivers. Part of that I think is that when you're high, you know you're high, you know you need to compensate for attention-span etc. When your piss-drunk, you tend to forget that you're drunk, and figure being a complete idiot is just normal behavior.

    I got 150 on an IQ test right after sucking down a huge bowl of weed. I would never have been able to do that while drunk.
  • Re:Come on CA (Score:3, Interesting)

    by mattcolemanrules ( 723041 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @03:48PM (#8581300)
    I'm not sure if this is what you are referring (reefering??) to but I have only come across one documented death by marijuana consumption. And it was not caused by toxic levels of THC. I read the article over a year ago so it's a bit hazy, but basically some guy had oodles of weed and found out the cops knew about him. So he ate it all.

    Apparently it was so much that he caused his stomach to burst. Therefor the death was marijuana related, however it was really just death by eating too much. The THC probably just made the whole death thing slightly more bearable, but it's not what killed him.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @04:05PM (#8581471)
    Back in 1997 during Army Basic Training we had a group of eskimo kids (I say kids, they were 18 i was 22 at the time) from Alaska in our company. One of them had not been eating his meals and was sick. Drill Sergeants told him to drink water which he did of course. One day out on an M-16 range he collapsed.

    Unfortunately, the de facto solution to someone collapsing from a supposed heat induced injury is to stick them with an IV bag. He died shortly after.

    The week after this happened we all started getting a couple canteen cups of gatorade a day.
  • by nfabl ( 748199 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @04:09PM (#8581502)
    Oxygen (generated from simple plants or algae) is responsible for the single greatest extinction event known.

    Apparently 95% of life on earth during the early period of plants was wiped out. They were mostly anerobic bacteria.

    In fact oxygen is pretty nasty in aerobic organisms too, especially in the form of superoxides.
  • Re:Come on CA (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @04:48PM (#8581944)
    The article on snopes says one of the ninth-graders recognized it as water. Apparently, none of the officials did

    I actually saw something like this a few months ago on TV. A group went to a "Green Rally" (Hug the trees, save the snails, ...) and 80%+ signed a petition on banning the dangerous "Bihydrogen-oxide" causing several deatchs a year, a cause of obesity, and a major contributor to several natural disaster in recent years.

    After they signed they would say "Thank you for your help in banning water" and poeple then tried to leave as soon as possible!
  • by saskboy ( 600063 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @06:08PM (#8582934) Homepage Journal
    The scary thing about that site, is at first, and even 2nd glance, it is possible to think that the people writing it, actually believe what they are saying. The things are so crazy though, as to go beyond into satire.

    eg: "2nd Place: "Women Were Designed For Homemaking"
    Jonathan Goode (grade 7) applied findings from many fields of science to support his conclusion that God designed women for homemaking: physics shows that women have a lower center of gravity than men, making them more suited to carrying groceries and laundry baskets; biology shows that women were designed to carry un-born babies in their wombs and to feed born babies milk, making them the natural choice for child rearing; social sciences show that the wages for women workers are lower than for normal workers, meaning that they are unable to work as well and thus earn equal pay; and exegetics shows that God created Eve as a companion for Adam, not as a co-worker."
  • Re:Come on CA (Score:3, Interesting)

    by pyrrhonist ( 701154 ) on Tuesday March 16, 2004 @07:38PM (#8583903)
    nowadays a lot of the Styrofoam-like material used for package peanuts is made from starch. it dissolves in water pretty quickly.

    They're also edible obviously, though they don't have much taste. It's fun to open a package that just arrived by UPS in front of your co-workers and start snacking on the "styrofoam" peanuts. All you have to do is keep a straight face while doing it, and when they look back at you in pure horror, just innocently say, "What? Oh, sorry. Want some?"

To do nothing is to be nothing.

Working...