Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Microsoft

MS Hotmail Offline For Hours 443

chalker writes "According to CNN, and others, the Hotmail online e-mail service, operated by Microsoft, was down for most of the working day on Friday, affecting 'a significant portion of MS customers.' People are also having trouble accessing products such as the MSN Messenger instant messaging program. The company said it was an internal problem rather than an attack on its system and that it hoped to have service restored by 5:30 p.m. PST. As of 8:15 PM EST, Hotmail appears to be online again."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

MS Hotmail Offline For Hours

Comments Filter:
  • Date in the story? (Score:5, Informative)

    by Klerck ( 213193 ) on Sunday March 14, 2004 @04:47AM (#8560131) Homepage
    Perhaps a date in the story would have been more useful, since "As of 8:15 PM EST" is now just highly misleading. That 8:15PM EST was on Friday, March 12. This story is making it sound like it's been down for days, but in reality it was just a few short hours.

    This story isn't even relevant at this point.
  • Re:News for nerds? (Score:5, Informative)

    by cioxx ( 456323 ) on Sunday March 14, 2004 @05:05AM (#8560189) Homepage
    For those things there is Mailinator [mailinator.com].

    Throwaway accounts should never be, out of all places, registered on Hotmail.com. They suspend your account if you don't login for 30 days. At least Yahoo!Mail or other free alternatives let you forget the account for few months and not get penalized for it.
  • by Grant_Watson ( 312705 ) on Sunday March 14, 2004 @05:19AM (#8560239)
    OT: what does (nt) mean??

    No text, i.e., the subject _is_ the whole message.
  • by sl956 ( 200477 ) on Sunday March 14, 2004 @05:23AM (#8560246)
    Bingo!

    Here is today error message for my hotmail account:
    The .NET Passport service is currently unavailable at this Web site for one of these reasons:
    • The site may contain an error or be experiencing a problem that affects the .NET Passport service.
    • The site may not be an official .NET Passport-participating site.
    It was worst on Friday though: there was not even an error message as loginnet.passport.com was either dead or unreachable.
  • by DARKFORCE123 ( 525408 ) on Sunday March 14, 2004 @05:27AM (#8560258)
    Uhhh no. You can also purchase a paid Hotmail account which gives you more storage room. If I pay for something , I don't expect downtime and I would expect MS to refund me for the portion of the day I couldn't access my email.

    The same goes for any service. Not just MS.

  • by jamesh ( 87723 ) on Sunday March 14, 2004 @05:36AM (#8560266)
    It's free, but you can pay for it and get extra features, like a bigger mailbox.

    I'm jharper@hotmail.com (I'm not afraid of posting the address publicly, i think i'm on every mailing list I could be on anyway :). I run the account in 'whitelist' mode, so everything goes to the 'junk' folder. The only thing I get in my actual inbox is messages from hotmail telling me my mailbox is full :)

    So if I used the account seriously, rather than just as an address I can hand out if I need to hand one out, i'd need the extra space to hold all the spam that built up overnight.
  • Re:Stop the presses! (Score:4, Informative)

    by prockcore ( 543967 ) on Sunday March 14, 2004 @05:52AM (#8560296)
    Seriously slashdot, your Linux loving policy is blinding you as to what is relevant and what isn't.

    And your ignorance of news is blinding you to the fact that all the other major news sites reported hotmail and msns outages as well.

    Even CNN had it as a top story in the technology section.
  • by IamTheRealMike ( 537420 ) * on Sunday March 14, 2004 @06:17AM (#8560359)
    Probably Passport - it's gone down before and when Passport dies it takes Hotmail, MSN Messenger, .NET alerts and most of Microsofts assorted web properties with it.
  • Yeah, I'll say... (Score:3, Informative)

    by i1984 ( 530580 ) on Sunday March 14, 2004 @06:45AM (#8560427)
    ...those people should stick with their American Online CD disks for downloading on the interweb!

    Fortunately I escaped from supporting the end-user general public several years ago, but it was many years earlier that Hotmail stopped working for me. As I recall, it was shortly after Hotmail was purchased by MS that my entire mail quota could be filled with spam in mere days, and it was then that the system got so sluggish and unreliable that it was never a surprise when I couldn't use it. (Microsoft is really good at some things, not least among them making people feel like pawns in billion dollar chess games.)

    There really was a time when I both used and liked Hotmail. I think that time was 1997.

    But as you point out in your post, the innocence of those simpler days is still alive, like a proverbial chest-burster from Alien, in the hearts of many Internet users.
  • by prandal ( 87280 ) on Sunday March 14, 2004 @06:54AM (#8560446)
    You think "white van man" (it's the van that's white, not the man) could do this?

    Now Novell's our friend, why not use MyRealBox [myrealbox.com] instead of Hotmail?
  • Junk accounts (Score:2, Informative)

    by dsolley ( 684081 ) on Sunday March 14, 2004 @06:55AM (#8560450) Homepage
    Um, you haven't heard about spamgourmet [spamgourmet.org] yet, have you?
  • Re:Dammit (Score:5, Informative)

    by DrSkwid ( 118965 ) on Sunday March 14, 2004 @06:55AM (#8560453) Journal
    Why do people despise the Mac platform so much?

    perceived levels of freedom

    Back in the day, both IBM PCs and Apple Macs were closed systems, their internel workings were undocumented to the outside world. There was, however, one crucial difference. PCs set up the hardware with the BIOS and then went to disk for the OS whereas MACs booted from an internal ROM. Compaq succeeded in cloning the IBM BIOS which meant you could put an IBM floppy in a Compaq machine and it would boot. Some companies tried to clone the Mac but were slapped with lawsuits because you couldn't copy the Apple ROM. The company that supplied IBM with the stuff on their floppies was a Washington startup called Microsoft who had cunningly retained the right to ship MS-DOS seperate from a computer.

    Consequently the PC Clone market flourished and IBM lost their control over the PC Platform driving down price while driving up incompatibility. Meanwhile Apple continued to develop their platform. It was a technically superior platform with a unified graphical user interface, used Postscript for printing and SCSI for devices. This made MACs expensive when you did CPU Cycles / $. You could walk into an Apple dealer, choose the bits, go home, plug it all together and it worked whereas you would go to a PC dealer tell him what you want and he's spend a few days building it and battling to get the bits talking to each other but when you got it home it worked.

    Because it was difficult to build and maintain PCs, their builders and maintainers looked down on the MAC, it wasn't as fast for the same $, was too easy to use, you didn't have to take the case to pieces to add a peripheral and the only people you knew who had them were too rich to deserve them.

    As the builders and maintainers of the PCs of everyone in their social circle, the non-techies trusted the techies opinion, parroting the same lame arguments in PCs vs MACs arguments the world over.

  • by thirdofnine ( 702646 ) on Sunday March 14, 2004 @07:38AM (#8560539)
    Actually, MS use UNIX servers for Hotmail, therefore, it is not MS Exchange causing the problems.

    Third of Nine

  • by NanoGator ( 522640 ) on Sunday March 14, 2004 @07:42AM (#8560548) Homepage Journal
    "Why is slashdot determined to report every single trivial detail when it comes to Microsoft?"

    They're trying to prove to the world that Microsoft is incompetent and evil. Those of us that use Windows must all be real morons who don't know shit, so they're hoping that by pointing out that Steve Ballmer double-parked we'll finally "see the light!" It wouldn't bother me except that it is generally assumed that my choice to use Windows 2000 wasn't voluntary. Slashbots think that Microsoft's monopoly put a Windows box on my desk at both home and at work. Yeah, there might be some truth to it. But seriously, if Windows was the big lump of shit that the people stuck in the past imagine it to be, I wouldn't be able to do 3D rendering on it.

    I agree with you that the petty "anything that can be spun against Microsoft" campaign is childish and obnoxious, but in this case, it was nice to find out why Hotmail was down. It's also nice to know when the next big worm breaks. Slashdot's helped me stay protected for years now.
    I just hope one day Slashdot will take Microsoft a little more seriously instead of the righetous BS that I need to be running Linux even though my work software isn't running on it.

    *sigh* This post isn't going to be visible for very long. Pity. At least it felt good to let it out.
  • Re:Dammit (Score:0, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 14, 2004 @08:05AM (#8560599)
    Look, I don't care when people misspell things--most of the time I don't even notice. Nor am I a stickler for punctuation, or even screwups of the their/there/they're sort. But all that aside, for the love of God, there's one thing that annoys me, just this one thing...

    For fuck's sake. It's "Mac," not "MAC."
  • Let's do both! (Score:2, Informative)

    by AndroidCat ( 229562 ) on Sunday March 14, 2004 @08:18AM (#8560625) Homepage
    I wasn't getting to www.hotmail.com, and traceroute was dying somewhere on the west coast. I forget if the last hop was into Microsoft space or not. My first thought was: Did they fsck up the domain registration again? :^)

    Routing to Slashdot occasionally has problems passing through Clueless & Witless space, but that's normal.

  • by shadowmas ( 697397 ) on Sunday March 14, 2004 @08:37AM (#8560672)
    well microsoft used to use unix/linux for it but then ppl started pointing it out so now they use windows servers i think. and b4 this transition to windows i dont seem to remember any downtime on hotmail.
    >telnet hotmail.com 80
    GET / HTTP/1.1

    HTTP/1.1 302 Redirected
    Server: Microsoft-IIS/5.0
    Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 12:36:25 GMT
    Location: http://lc1.law5.hotmail.passport.com/cgi-bin/login

    Connection to host lost.
  • Re:Yeah, I'll say... (Score:2, Informative)

    by AndroidCat ( 229562 ) on Sunday March 14, 2004 @09:01AM (#8560715) Homepage
    you can only use outlook or the website to read your emails (unless you use hotwayd from hotwayd.sf.net)

    There was a two part article in Delphi Informant (Jan-Feb) on creating a proxy server using SMTP/POP and WebDAV to talk to Hotmail from any email program. (Their WebDAV interface is undocumented, but they can't change it too much without breaking Outlook.)

  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 14, 2004 @09:18AM (#8560750)
    It was a .NET Passport outage. Even if you have no clue what this is, you almost certainly have one if you have a hotmail email address, or use MSN, or MS Money, MSN messenger, or a million other services. It's even used for RADIUS authentication of MSN dialup users.

    Unlike Hotmail, which still runs primarily on UNIX, Passport is entirely based on Windows servers.

    Passport is the authentication / single sign-on system for all these MSN services. If it's down, everything's down. And sadly it has proven a little unreliable recently, for reasons never disclosed.
  • by xanadu-xtroot.com ( 450073 ) <xanaduNO@SPAMinorbit.com> on Sunday March 14, 2004 @10:30AM (#8560959) Homepage Journal
    Actually, MS use UNIX servers for Hotmail

    Ummm... no. You have no idea what you're talking about. If you had said "used" (as in past tense), then you'd at least be close. Still wrong, but close. They used one of the BSD's until people called them on it. Hell, for all we know, they still are and just changed the headers that the server hands out to look like a MS box like the other post in this thread shows.

    Anyway, you're wrong on all accounts.
  • by 5lash ( 589953 ) <{andy} {at} {fuckhotmail.com}> on Sunday March 14, 2004 @11:08AM (#8561130) Homepage Journal
    because it says "Because of the testing nature of this site, service outages are to be expected from time to time as problems are discovered and diagnosed". fairly ironic that you would recommend that service since this news story is about the unreliability of hotmail!
  • Re:Dammit (Score:5, Informative)

    by HeghmoH ( 13204 ) on Sunday March 14, 2004 @11:38AM (#8561301) Homepage Journal
    Jeez.

    Building a computer from parts might be easy for you, but that does not make it "easy". Most people can't handle it. They want to buy a computer and take it out of the box and plug it in and turn it on. This goes for PCs or Macs.

    Have you used a Mac that was manufactured in the past half decade? You can use any USB mouse with them, including your seven-buttons-with-scroll-wheel optical mouse. They use PCI, AGP, ATA, and USB for expansion. They have a "taskbar", it's called the Dock.

    Windows's popularity is entirely attributable to Worse is Better [jwz.org].
  • Not only Hotmail... (Score:3, Informative)

    by claes ( 25551 ) on Sunday March 14, 2004 @01:04PM (#8561791)
    .. about a week or two ago all of java.sun.com , www.javasoft.com etc was down for more than a day. Not only did this affect people trying to surf on java-related pages. It also affected some java tools that tried to validate EJB deployment descriptors as the default DTD was located at this server. Certain default ant tasks hung since they tried to do lookup of http://java.sun.com/j2ee/dtds/ejb-jar_1_1.dtd, and this was not available. I wonder how many application servers were affected by this downtime? It was briefly mentioned on TheServerSide.com [theserverside.com].
  • Re:Dammit (Score:5, Informative)

    by MojoRilla ( 591502 ) on Sunday March 14, 2004 @02:51PM (#8562510)
    One irony is that the original Apple II came with a schematic of all the circuits.

    Apple was very innovative, but made a number of large mistakes that really hurt them in the market. While software for the IBM PC focused on business applications (DBASE and Lotus), the Mac focused on paint programs. It is no surprise that today artists still like Macs.

    Apple made some very questionable hardware decisions. They made the original Mac non expandable (no slots, you even needed a special tool to open the case, didn't change until the Mac II), even though expansion was a key to the Apple II's success (they totally ignored their hacker roots). They did thing like use a self ejecting floppy drive, which was patented by Sony and drove up the price. They had a one button mouse and a keyboard where a lot of keys were unsupported (including the forward delete key). They made their own networking hardware (localtalk) which although cheaper was slow, and had connectors which were non-locking (causing endless technical support problems).

    Sure, you could go into a store and by Mac bits, and they would all work, but that is because they had a lock on the hardware and the software. The Mac has had its share of low level problems and incompatibilities. Some of the famous ones include a bad virtual memory implementation (which was so bad most users turned it off) and 28 bit vs. 32 bit addressing (it broke a lot of badly written software so there was a switch to turn it off). Imagine using a machine where you had no virutal memory, and running out of memory becuase you opened and closed programs in a certain order.

    In the beginning (pre 1995), Apple had a better operating system than Windows. They innovated the GUI, and they had technical advantages, such as things like a flat address space. But Windows caught up and overtook the Macintosh, both in terms of user interface and developer tools. Before OS 10, the mac was still mostly 68k assembly, and was very difficult to program and debug on. Also, until OS 10 there was no protected memory, meaning it was easy for one badley behaved program to take down the system.

    When Apple moved to the Power PC in about 1995, instead of porting their operating system, they ran most of it in emulation. Which ment slower speeds and more difficult debugging for developers.

    While Apple patched and limped along, Microsoft built Windows NT from the ground up, written mostly in C (so it was portable). While previous Microsoft operating systems were more like the Mac, NT had protected memory and preemptive multitasking, two features that are critical to a modern, stable operating system.

    So while Apple had the early lead, they had a wealth of technical problems and poor hardware choices which hurt their platform.
  • by Nathan Johansen ( 762156 ) <nathan@npj.com> on Sunday March 14, 2004 @03:34PM (#8562726)

    A recent cumulative update patch for Internet Explorer browsers removes support for the user:pass@www.site.com basic authentication method for HTTP and HTTPS URL's - a response to widespread misuse of the functionality to spoof web addresses to trick unsuspecting users into revealing personal information to a dubious third-party. However, a side effect of this patch includes intermittent clobbering of hidden form fields used to maintain state or session on sites that do not implement cookies. This will render most script driven web sites useless.. Also, installing this patch clears out and resets any internal IE cache of username and password combinations used on frequently visited sites, causing people to have to enter these details anew.

    It is likely that this issue may be responsible for the recently reported Hotmail and MSN related outages (CNN [cnn.com]) and a variety of increasing problems on many other web sites as users continue to install the update patch into their IE browser over time. A MS TechNet [microsoft.com] article describes this problem and proposes workarounds - one is to uninstall the patch, or install a new patch to fix the previous patch for users of IE 6.0 and higher. Web site operators are also encouraged to increase the server KeepAlive connection timeout, although a specific numeric suggestion isn't proposed. There is an informative thread on this topic available in the Google Groups [google.com] UseNet archives. Apparently this issue has been growing more problematic over the past five weeks, and will continue to effect sites and users unless steps are taken to address it.

    IMHO: An illustrative analogy to this problem would be like your automobile manufacturer determining that accidents are caused by vehicles in motion. As a solution, all tires will be removed, thereby preventing accidents. What a great cure.

  • Re:Dammit (Score:2, Informative)

    by Hal9000_sn3 ( 707590 ) on Sunday March 14, 2004 @05:21PM (#8563408)
    Back in the day, both IBM PCs and Apple Macs were closed systems, their internel workings were undocumented to the outside world


    No, actually the IBM Technical Reference Manuals for available, and not only documented all the circuitry, but also the BIOS. It was all copyrighted, but not 'undocumented'.


    The actual difference had more to do with that IBM chose to use a documented bus, the ISA, and encouraged others to manufacture add-on hardware. While Apple strongly discouraged add-on hardware.

  • by rcgraves ( 10702 ) on Sunday March 14, 2004 @06:09PM (#8563700)
    In other news not reported on slashdot, RedHat Network, the only way to get critical updates for RedHat Enterprise Linux, has been down ALL WEEKEND. Their web site says this is a planned outage, but it most certainly was not announced to paying customers who had scheduled and announced outages requiring access to RHN this weekend.

Our business in life is not to succeed but to continue to fail in high spirits. -- Robert Louis Stevenson

Working...