GFS, OCFS, and GPFS - Which Filesystem for Oracle? 36
amani asks: "My company has a Oracle 9i RAC database running on a Sun cluster. In 6 months we are looking to replace the cluster with either a Linux or an AIX solution that will involve SAN storage. I see that their are a variety of filesystems for Oracle and Linux. Sistina (Red Hat) has the GFS, Oracle has the OCFS, and IBM has GPFS. Does anyone know the pros and cons of each of these filesystems ,and which one would be better for a continuously growing database?"
Re:choose AIX/JFS/SSA (Score:1, Interesting)
Simple SW raid with 3X 300GB IDE drives for growth
ext3, metadata journaling only,
and I'd toss oracle and use postgresql.
3TB is more interesting.
(more realistically, yes, I have a 100G postgresql, ext3 database that works fine. I also have a 5GB oracle database on some veritas file system. What does the size of 100 Gig matter?)
Parting with Sentiment (Score:4, Interesting)
Despite all the wisecracks about the name, our sentimental favorite should be GPFS [ibm.com] because of a certain well known geek [samba.org] who works for the filesystem group at IBM Almaden.
Re:General Protection FaultS? (Score:1, Interesting)
Last I heard, they had a short time to fix it before the lawyers got involved, but I think IBM had pretty much given up and were looking to pay for a NetApp replacement just to keep them happy.
I will say, however, that I don't know how it works with Oracle.
Posted anonymously to protect the inno^H^H^H^Hguilty.