Tim Berners-Lee Attains Knighthood 539
sandalwood writes "Tim Berners-Lee has been promoted to Knight Commander of the Order of the British Empire for coming up with that 'intarweb' thing we all use. Characteristically modest, he said that he was an ordinary person who created something that 'just happened to work out.' He will join luminaries like Isaac Newton, Francis Drake, and... Mick Jagger."
Don't you have to be English to be knighted? (Score:0, Insightful)
Re:Fuck Tim Berners-Lee (Score:3, Insightful)
Comment removed (Score:2, Insightful)
Real credit for www goes to (Score:0, Insightful)
What if... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Fuck Tim Berners-Lee (Score:4, Insightful)
Reform is coming, but the present style of system won't go away until the monarchy finally keels over. I'll celebrate as much as anyone on that day, but until then the honours system is the only way to formally recognise people's acheivements. Inventing Hypertext certainly deserves some recognition IMHO.
The key to his success: he made it free (Score:5, Insightful)
The key to his success is that he made it simple and free (as in beer)! Others, like Nelson's Xanadu, were too ambitious. Others, like Hypercards, Hypernotes, Hyperdisco, etc were never free.
The BBC article highlights that in one of the side boxes: "Offered free on the Net".
Good (Score:5, Insightful)
Serious Question (Score:3, Insightful)
Could someone please explain to me the British fetish for its Monarchy ? The government is now a constitutional democracy, so why is there so much homage paid to the archaic traditions and figureheads of the past?
A great example of this is the insane media land-grab over Princess Diana's death. Hundreds of thousands of people die in traffic accidents each year - why was hers so deserving of three whole months of media coverage, weeping, wailing, and moaning?
Re:Fuck Tim Berners-Lee (Score:5, Insightful)
There is no need for everything in the world to be cold and logical. If a country wants to hold onto a 'silly' institution as a symbol of their nation, so be it.
Re:Serious Question (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Fuck Tim Berners-Lee (Score:1, Insightful)
too bad (Score:1, Insightful)
It amazes me... (Score:3, Insightful)
Unless I'm mistaken, the revolutions that these folks spurred were arguably as important to the state of modern society as was the lightbulb, telephone, or rail transit.
Re:Fuck Tim Berners-Lee (Score:3, Insightful)
Sir TBL (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Fuck Tim Berners-Lee (Score:3, Insightful)
>>>>>>>>>>>
Huh? You declare that the Monarchy is very much political, and then immediatelyl admit that it has a very limited role in politics. Which is it?
The "most stable" is a matter of opinion but I'll let that stand.
>>>>>>>>>>
FI said "one of" the most stable. The British government has been remarkably stable for hundreds of years. Unlike France, the democratization of Britain came not through a bloody revolution, but a gradual transition.
Have you ever heard of the Roman Republic? England wasn't a member of that.
>>>>>>>>>
I didn't say first, I said oldest. Generally, when we talk about the oldest of some thing, we do not consider things that no longer exist, like the Roman Republic.
Locke and Hobbes provided many ideas for the American Government. But so did Plato, Aristotle and numerous philosophers in France during the Enlightenment.
>>>>>>>>>>>
Yes other philosophers did influence the Founding Fathers. Some directly and others indirectly. But the primary philosophical basis for the American government was British philosophy.
England does not have a monopoly on those ideas
>>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;
Did I claim it did?
and at the time, did not practice them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;
While Great Britain did not practice the precise philosophy espoused by Lock and others, many of those philosophers' ideas were derived from British practice. Great Britain has been a free society for hundreds of years, even under the monarchy, and much existing pratice was codified by its philosophers.
If I recall correctly you still have a good deal of the Parthenon in the British Museum and the Greek have been asking for those pieces back for years.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
What's your point? I am not claiming that Britain is faultless. Indeed, as someone of Indian descent, I have an innate dislike of Britain and its colonial period. However, I do recognize a good thing when I see it. Great Britain has a very proud and rich history, and a tradition of freedom. The monarchy is a part of that, and is a cultural institution that should remain in place as a reminder of the nation's glory.
Re:Serious Question (Score:3, Insightful)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
Jefferson said that everyone is created equal, not that everyone is equally interesting. It's foolish to pretend otherwise. Everyone is more affected when something happens to someone they know, either personally or publically. The majority of the public is enjoys watching sports, movies, and TV, or listening to music. They know the personalities involved with these. Ergo, when something happens to one of them, they care about it.
Personally, I don't watch sports or TV all that much. I couldn't really care less what happens to Kobe Bryant. But, I am a devout liberal, so I like to follow the Limbaugh story to see if he gets justice. If the media breaks a story about Ann Coulter having a major heroine addiction, I know I'd watch intently. I also am a programmer and follow the OSS movement closely, so the deaths of the Ximian employees affected me. So please realize that you're not any different from anybody else. You follow certain things, and you'd watch the media closely if a major story broke concerning the things you care about.
PS> If you think the US media spends too much time covering things *you* don't care about, try the BBC. It's pretty good in my experience.
Re:Fuck Tim Berners-Lee (Score:1, Insightful)
Sure, because they were afraid of being ridiculed by their socialist chums [telegraph.co.uk] for selling out and or kissing up to the monarchy. Not having seen TBL reading out of the little red book lately, I see no reason why this shallow and superficial ( and meaningless ) gesture should prevent him from accepting this mark of recognition from a group of UK civil servants.
Keep refusing those honors, technologists! After all, you won't have any indie cred otherwise.
o<Re:Sir TBL (Score:3, Insightful)
The "three letter prefix" is exactly what you describe -- a very public recognition of what his ideas have achieved.
Re:Geez man, get the pickle ... (Score:5, Insightful)
Al Gore made an honest claim about something that he was justly proud of. And somebody deliberately misquoted him to make it appear that he was claiming to have "invented the internet".
It wouldn't be so annoying if this deliberate campaign hadn't been so successful at painting this honest (if dull) politician as a "liar", and possibly costing him the election (which was stolen anyway).
Look, I've been on the Net since 1988 (via world.std.com, the first commercial ISP), and I can assure you that Al Gore was the first person in the Senate to take it seriously. He provided funding when the NSF was going to pull the plug, and the all the commercial internet providers were squabbling over peering agreements. Read some back issues of "Boardwatch" magazine to learn about all this, OK?
Just because you don't like to hear it doesn't mean it's not true. And something isn't funny just because it's repeated a lot.
Re:Tsu Doe Nihm (Score:5, Insightful)
Some dignity for knighthood (Score:1, Insightful)
There was a time, I assume, when knighthood meant something. Now it's a way for beleagured prime ministers to show the public how in-touch and cool they are.
(As you will know, the prime minister (President Blair as he is known to his friends) suggests the honours list.
To summarize: Congrats, TBL - for all the others (all but 2 or 3) - give me a bucket
(Arthur, England)
Re:Fuck Tim Berners-Lee (Score:2, Insightful)
Lot has been said about knighthood here (Score:3, Insightful)
But britons certainly know that there are and have been many "Knights" that they wouldn't want to be associated with. Lord Archer, for one. And a whole host of showbiz people whose only mind was to get rich at the expense of art.
Re:The key to his success: he made it free (Score:3, Insightful)
First of all, the Xanadu project, despite being a "failure", has been enormously influential. You may not know much about it, but just about every single person who's messed around with creating a hypertext system does, certainly Tim-Berners Lee did (and not incidentally, the original Netscape programming team certainly did also).
Try doing some google searches, try understanding what Xanadu was about, then pick a feature from it and see if you can figure out a way to kludge it into the web. If you pull it off, you'll have achieved something worthwhile. Off the top of my head: transclusion, back-links, micropayments, versioning, fine-grained linking...
By the way, the Xanadu code was open-sourced some years ago: xanadu source code [udanax.com]