Fiber to the People: Lessig, IEEE & AFNs 90
Codeine writes "Larry Lessig articulates some infrastructure observations based on work by the IEEE & Cornell AFN Institute regarding 'end-user-as owner' (EUO) advanced fibre networks."
"Money is the root of all money." -- the moving finger
Google Cache (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Still dangerous to work with fiber? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Still dangerous to work with fiber? (Score:1, Informative)
Splicing cable can be harmful, but with proper training & equipment it's very safe. When I worked at JDS Uniphase, (when they had 12,000 people in Ottawa) fiber injuries were very rare. And stabbing yourself in the finger with a fiber isn't a very serious injury.
Unless you're dealing with very high power fiber lasers, the optical risk is very small. The human eye is extremely resistant to light at 1.5 microns, the most common wavelength. Anyway, safety goggles are very cheap.
It does cost a lot more to splice fiber than copper though. Almost anyone can work with cat 5e cable (i.e. I can) that will meet the specs. Fiber takes more time & training, therefore it's more expensive.
Faster local loop != faster Internet (Score:2, Informative)
The speed of most consumer broadband services is limited by the cost of the backhaul, not the performance of the local loop. If my area, 6Mbps DSL is available for those who can afford it. It's the same wire and the same hardware at both ends. Most people stick with 1.5Mbps becuase that is all they can afford.
Re:gigabit ethernet on fiber? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:It can be done (Score:3, Informative)
That actually makes it MORE expensive. In the heart of an old, dense, poorly-planned city, the effort required to install any new cable is orders of magnitude bigger than just ripping through an empty field in a backhoe. And being in the financial district meant that all the other people inconvenienced by the work are high-wage broker-types whose time is expensive to waste. (Meaning the city will soak you on all the permits and police overtime)
Maybe, Boston is actually the worst US city for additional expense to infrastructure projects- big or small. The extreme example is how they just built $400,000,000 worth of tunnel [about.com] for $10,800,000,000 (a 27x multiplier) because of all the uninterruptable activity above the dig site.
If you want cheap fiber to your building, try someplace more amenable, like Chicago.
Right now, I live out in the burbs near boston. 30 minutes away. I have ONE choice in internet access save dialup.
I've got relatives living in such areas (128 region), and they've got two cable companies selling ISP service. The effective speeds to in-state resources are an impressive 300Kb/s.