Microsoft Office Faces British Invasion 298
jdkane writes "CNet reports that a small British software maker, Ability, plans to challenge one of Microsoft's most profitable markets by selling its low-cost package of productivity applications in North America.
Ability Office faces competition from Corel's Word Perfect, Sun Microsystems' StarOffice package and OpenOffice, it's free, open-source sibling. None of these products have captured a significant share of the market from Microsoft's Office.
Does anybody have any hands-on experience with the Ability Office suite, or are there any general speculations as to why this move will make a difference in the office software market (if not just for the bottom line of the software company)?"
DRM (Score:2, Insightful)
Doubtful (Score:5, Insightful)
Then, you have the educational dimension as well. Schools don't want to have classes for both. These days, community colleges are filled with people seeking Office certification (MOS/MOUS certification). Some companies and employees value these certifications. Schools play to that market and won't offer 2 totally different word processing courses. Too expensive. They cater to the market.
These factors are complex and difficult to overcome. Don't just scream "Stupid CEO! Office is too expensive!" before you understand all of the factors.
Doubt it'll make much difference (Score:5, Insightful)
Ehhh ... (Score:5, Insightful)
I wish them luck, but I have to wonder when people are going to realize that the way to challenge Microsoft is not to try to be Microsoft. Any product (yes, this includes a lot of Linux software) that slavishly imitates Microsoft is going to be written off, with some justification, as an inferior knock-off. IMO the M$ Office interface is a lousy one; how 'bout trying to write something better, guys, and see how that does? And while you're at it, make Linux and OS X versions -- in fact, try starting in those markets first. Yes, the pool of potential customers may be smaller, but there's no 900-lb. gorilla to compete with. I can almost guarantee that a fast, cheap, reliable, feature-rich office suite with a good non-M$ interface on those platforms would rapidly build up a dedicated customer base, and provide the company with a solid US revenue stream and name recognition while they get ready to tackle the Windows monolith.
It's not about cost, but controll (Score:4, Insightful)
IMHO we are looking at these packages in the wrong way. Instead of looking at them as a competitive alternative to Microsoft, we should be looking to them as a transitional tool to get people over to free (not as in beer) standards and software.
Re:OO is still missing a good database. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Ehhh ... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I'm a die-hard OpenOffice user (Score:5, Insightful)
I use OpenOffice at home. I won't use it (or recommend it) at work. MS Office exposes components that are used in many of our applications. Click a button in these apps, and your data is in an Excel spreadsheet open on your screen, or your customer list has just been pushed into Word, ready for your mail merge. Sure, I know how to do all of these things without the whiz-bang one click, but most of the users don't. Even if they did, why should I reduce their productivity by making them configure an export, run it, then import the text file into StarCalc?
One of the benefits that Microsoft gets by being the market leader is that software is written for it. StarOffice/OpenOffice has a large hurdle to overcome there.
Beyond SQL Backend. (Score:4, Insightful)
Where are the forms, reports, etc in OO that a common user can get too and use as easily as they can with MSAcess? Remember they have ZERO training... they are not IT people..
Until then, its not a replacement for MSOffice ( plus we aren't even discussing the missing component of *integrated* groupware. )
Don't get me wrong i would prefer to give people an open alternative. but OO is not ready to **replace** MSO...
Nor is KOffice..
But they ARE getting closer..
Not exactally true... (Score:3, Insightful)
( true that's beyond the group of users I'm taking about, but you get the point I'm sure )
Also jet isnt really 'just using excel'.. its a bit more complex then that. ( though agreed its not as complex as a 'real' data server engine )
But my main point was the reports and data forms that Access provides *easy* access too. Something that a untrained user can work with and get something useable out of and not be stuck with just a spreadsheet of raw data...
No its not efficient, nor the best solution out there. But for a person with no training it is the best choice for them. And that is, like it or not, 99% of the business software target market.
Re:Doubtful (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Doubtful (Score:3, Insightful)
And yet, people learn 'new' programs all the time...on the Internet. Not counting that, there are still other applications that are typically propriatory to a company that the new employees won't automatically know how to use.
When people go home, they don't ask for photo editor X over photo editor Y -- they generally 'pick' the one that is bundled or buy the one they see in the store.
The learning curve is basically lazyness...if it weren't, there would be a drive across many different companies to pick one specific program for each of the other applications that are in use.
MS Office is used primarily because of cut-throat pricing a few years ago, site licences, and OEM bundling deals.
Will suit the home market... (Score:2, Insightful)
I can't see it winning many points in an business environment, but it's well-pitched for the home Windows user.
Good enough to stop people just pirating MS Office or the more tech-savvy taking OpenOffice for a spin? Possibly not. Ability need to work at getting OEMs to bundle.
There is no standard MS Office (Score:3, Insightful)
Every few years an organisation is going to have to retrain its staff, whether or not they stick to MS Office. Any school or collage who teaches or trains for a specific Word processor or spreadsheet is wasting time and resources. I have often found that MSOffice training *reduces* the flexibility of users. Untrained and novice users seem to switch easily between different types of word processors, whereas trained users expect buttons in specific places etc.
Very (Re:Doubtful) (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Aawe, too bad. (Score:1, Insightful)
Did FOX not mention the various petty trade limits and taxes in place between the U.S and pretty much everyone else? Oh what am I saying, of course they didn't.
Everything is fine, Patriot. Be happy!
Diversity (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I'm a die-hard OpenOffice user (Score:3, Insightful)
Some of these arguments will not apply to Open Office, but think about sending an Open Office doc to a customer who uses MS Office. Either they have to get Open Office to read it or you have to convert it to MS Office format which means having at least one copy of MS Office to check it looks OK. Or you could use PDF. Everybody has Acrobat reader (or equivalent).
Re:I'm a die-hard OpenOffice user (Score:2, Insightful)
Eventually I doubt there will even be an install of office, but instead an office "server" comprised of services between sql server, sharepoint, exchange, drm, and other services.
Just a thought.
Don't neglect the mac (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Beyond SQL Backend. (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Ability has been around for a LONG time (Score:3, Insightful)
the assembler-based competition in most areas,
entirely due to careful algorithm choices.
Surprisingly enough, the cool platic
case cost less than the cloth-bound manuals
of the day, as you could press it in
thousand-unit lots.
(I'm biased: I did the filesystem code)
--dave