Google Considering IPO Auction Online 271
HackerStickers writes "An article in the Financial Times states that Google could be considering doing their IPO online via an auction versus the standard methods of raising funds early next year. The article points out that auctioning it could bring in a larger chunk of cash for the company. Would you bid on a piece of Google?"
Interesting, But Not Innovative (Score:5, Informative)
Original Financial Times Story (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Interesting, But Not Innovative (Score:3, Informative)
350% on the first day...
Ahh, those were the days.
Re:IPO=Death (Score:3, Informative)
Re:IPO=Death (Score:3, Informative)
Re:IPO=Death (Score:3, Informative)
Re:IPO=Death (Score:3, Informative)
How so? Just because the shares are not publicly traded does not mean that the company does not have shareholders. Why couldn't Google give employees shares in the company and give the bonuses through dividends for example? Company does not have to be publicly owned for that.
Re:Microsoft (Score:2, Informative)
Google search for 'linux' [google.com]
MSN search for 'linux' [msn.com]
Re:Uhm, yes, I would, but not immediately (Score:4, Informative)
Good point overall, but remember for every person that sold a share of stock at $100 (got the ride up from $10) there's someone who bought a share of stock at $100. Presumably, these buyers either expected the value to continue going up in the short term or they expected it to go up over time. For every person who bought low and sold high there's someone who bought high. These people typically lose money --- historically IPOs have tended to be bad investments unless you flip fast.
This only makes sense for Google, and only the owners.
Basically, what they are doing is replacing the IPO round of trading with a mechanism that more closely resembles the stock market and creates equal access for buyers. (It's still a monopoly on the supply side of course.)
The way that traditional IPOs create a windfall for people with investment bank connections (where stocks are typically priced low enough to ensure that they all shares are sold quickly, and then rise in value when they hit the market) has always struck me as a massive scam. It benefits the banks and their clients at the expense of the company and smaller investors without connections.
The whole point of an IPO is to raise money for the company --- it's supposed to benefit Google, not well connected investors.
As for the auction, the poster is absolutely correct: it's likely to suffer from the 'winner's curse.' The shares will be sold to the bidders with the very highest expectations for the stock value, making it unlikely that there will be a pool of even more bullish investors around to push the value of the the stock higher in the future.