Why VoIP Makes Telecom Regulations Irrelevant 341
An anonymous reader writes "BusinessWeek Online analyzes why state and federal regulators' attempts to label VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) a "telecommunications service" is wrong - and threatens to undermine the technology. It quotes Vint Cerf as saying: 'To single out VoIP as a telephone service is a terrible misunderstanding of the Internet industry. I would submit that, someday, the phrase Internet telephony will sound as archaic as 'horseless carriage' sounds today.'" We've also recently discussed Vonage's attempts to fight telecom regulation in Minnesota.
Poetic justice... please (Score:5, Funny)
Sprint disputes AT&T's account, saying the dropped calls were a "translation error" due in part to AT&T's desire to hide what it was doing. Either way, Sprint maintains that the calls should be subject to traditional access fees.
As someone on the other side against AT&T in the 80's over a law called "Avoidance of Toll Charges", I find this incredibly ironic. It seems arguable that AT&T is now a phone phreak.
Hey, AT&T... can I have my Commodore SX-64 portable back now?
voip is the future (Score:3, Funny)
phrase origin (Score:5, Funny)
Well, we used to call it just "net phony", but people kept confusing it with dating services.
Re:Kapitalizm Rulez (Score:2, Funny)
No wonder I hate all of mankind.
Re:Different technology /= not a telephone (Score:4, Funny)
You don't have a girlfriend, do you?
Re:Different technology /= not a telephone (Score:5, Funny)
Wouldn't that tend to piss off my wife?
KFG