Amazon Sells IPAQs for $10 326
TomHoward writes "In a pretty huge blunder, amazon.co.uk have put the HP IPAQ H1910 (RRP about £300) for sale for just over £7.32 (plus postage and packing). It's very hard to get through to their site right now, but if you're quick you can have a look at their blunder here." Don't bother clicking through, Amazon has taken the items down.
In other words.... (Score:3, Interesting)
I would have preferred the CLIE anyway. Did anyone actually make it to one of these bargain bloopers before it went down?
I would have ordered one... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:I would have ordered one... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:I would have ordered one... (Score:2)
Re:I could have saved you postage! (Score:2, Insightful)
Either 1) you are lying and you are not an American or 2) you are an idiot that doesn't understand how democracy works in America.
A president can not be "ousted" period. There are no recall procedures for federal offices. A president can be impeached and then forced from office, but considering everythin
Hmm (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Hmm (Score:4, Informative)
I tried and failed as the site was just too busy to complete the transaction ;(
A couple of friends of friends who tipped us off reported that they where able to place orders and even got confirmation emails.
Won't even be honored (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Won't even be honored; like $99 TV (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Won't even be honored; like $99 TV (Score:2, Insightful)
Though I still doubt it'll be honoured.
Re:Won't even be honored; like $99 TV (Score:3, Insightful)
I remember that because I also placed an order for a $99 RCA 36" TV from Amazon and received a letter back from them stating that they are under no obligation to honor "price mistakes".
Could someone explain why Amazon and other on-line retailers are not held to the same standards as their brick-n-mortar counterparts with respect to this? It still sounds like "bait-n-switch"
Re:Won't even be honored; like $99 TV (Score:3, Interesting)
like, if they were advertising that in papers, web, tv and at all places for 99$, then it would be questinable if it wa
Re:Won't even be honored; like $99 TV (Score:2)
Back when I was architecting eMarkets, I seem to recall that credit card processors (visa, mastercard, etc.) wouldn't allow online merchants to actually charge a buyer's card until the item was actually shipped. So the merchant would first do a pre-authorization for the purchase amount and then do an actual charge when it left their warehouses.
It coul
Re:Won't even be honored; like $99 TV (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Won't even be honored; like $99 TV (Score:2, Interesting)
There's also the consideration that the price was not quite obviously wrong. Very very cheap, perhaps, but this was at a time when digital camera prices were dropping like crazy. Nobody would consider a PDA to cost £7. They'd be sceptical if it was a used gameboy at that price.
well (Score:3, Insightful)
Perhaps it's only recently they've changed their price policy? Ff you've got a receipt with the "faulty" price and money drawn from your account they should also deliver it. Their mistake.
Ciryon
In related news (Score:5, Funny)
Re:In related news (Score:3, Insightful)
Mistakes like these are out there - you just have to find it and hope the vendor will go along with it. I have a friend who got a flat panel LCD monitor from Amazon that usually goes for about $700, for $150. Amazon actually honored the transaction!
The differences with this story are probably (1) the price markdown to 2% is way too drastic for a vendor to honor (that would bring the term "bargain hunter" to a whole new level
Re:In related news (Score:3, Funny)
Steve Boiler explained the rationale: Frequently, we are criticised for long delays in fixing bugs in our code. As part of our Secure Computing Initiative, we now write Service Packs first, before writing the code. This helps us to solve problems faster than the Open Source Co
Re:In related news (Score:2)
Why someone would want to do that is beyond me, unless they had Amazon stock or something like that.
Re:In related news (Score:2)
Re:Jealous are we? (uhh, of what?) (Score:2)
Pssst. Nobody is getting them for $10.
I would only expect this story to be posted if it were indeed true, and it wasn't. They were not selling them for $10. They had a pricing error listed, they weren't actually selling them that cheaply. There are deal sites out there for things like this. People on them bitch all the time about how compa
Advertisement (Score:4, Funny)
It's worse than that (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:It's worse than that (Score:3, Informative)
Re:It's worse than that (Score:2)
In your particular case, I think that what you are probably seeing is not "next day" sales, but "same day" sales. As stated at the US website [amazon.com]:
You may earn a referral fee for any qu
Argos (Score:2)
Re:Argos (Score:2)
However, there was a similar case where Kodak were selling cameras for "a very special price", I think a £360 camera went for £180. In this case, it was much harder to claim that the price was an "obvious mistake".
I would provide links for these above cases, but I'm la
No badwill here (Score:2)
Of course I also realize that I am in the minority on this and that the unwashed masses w
Yawn (Score:5, Funny)
It would be really funny if they called your bluff (Score:2)
Now, if they offered the product at $0.00 with "Free Super Saver Shipping", the joke would be on them...
Don't bother.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Then why even bother posting the story? If you actually bothered to look and see that the link was invalid, then you should already know how pointless it is.
They made a pricing mistake and caught it, woopy doo. Why don't you report on a pricing mistake which meant something? Like the Best Buy pricing scandal, http://hypothermia.gamershardware.com/articles/be
Yeah, this is a bit of a rant.
Re:Don't bother.. (Score:2, Informative)
It is on the BBC front page too (Score:2)
The Amazon UK website was temporarily closed after a pricing error on its website saw pocket personal computers being sold for just £7.
Re:Don't bother.. (Score:2)
In this case, based on the various posts, it seems that many of us were uncertain about the legality of refusing to sell items in brick-and-mortar stores at the listed price. By posting this story,
Bargain of the Century (Score:3, Interesting)
Needless to say, I've ordered both.
I don't really expect them to fulfil the order - as far as I know, they should email me notifying me of the change of price (back to what it should've been), and holding the order until I confirm it at the new price. It's not legally binding until they email you to say they've dispatched it, according to their conditions of use.
Will be interesting to see what they do next.
An interesting sales strategy.... (Score:5, Interesting)
2. Get noticed.
3. (optional) Process about 10 orders at absurd price, to gain goodwill from market.
4. After a threshold number of 'absurd' orders, take down product.
5. Send link to Slashdot.
6. Enjoy.
Wonder what Amazon's charging HPaq for all the 'free' attention.
Re:An interesting sales strategy.... (Score:2)
Worthy of /.? (Score:5, Insightful)
Bill
Slashdot Posts Useless Story for $0 (Score:5, Funny)
Delayed articles (Score:2)
The BBC have picked up on this (Score:5, Informative)
Blah (Score:2, Funny)
LATEST: Shop puts wrong price on item. Corrects mistake.
LATEST: Person does something. Another person reacts.
LATEST: Dog barks at passer-by, cat sleeps on sofa.
Seriously, what the hell is this?
I ordered one! (Score:4, Interesting)
Not mentioned anywhere else I've found was that the HP iPAQ H5450 was priced at about GB£23 also!
Needless to say that I ordered me one of those, too.
Remains to be seen whether Amazon will honour the price, but I doubt it.
refunds (Score:3, Interesting)
If you read the small print it says they won't charge your credit card until the order is ready for shipping (i.e not right away, so they haven't actually taken your money & hence accepted the contract to supply the goods).
They also reserve the right to refuse your order in the event of mispricing.
We ordered a couple & got the acceptance, but we're not expecting to actually get them. Still, you've got to be in to win...
Somethings not right... (Score:2)
Re:Somethings not right... (Score:3, Insightful)
I.E. Can't they just refuse to sell the item at *ANY* price...
Re:Somethings not right... (Score:3, Interesting)
I used this today in Dixons - they had a sign up saying "All Gamecube accessories 20% off marked price" - so I
Actually, no. Brick-n-mortar stores *don't* (Score:3, Informative)
Also, if they mislabel the item, and sell it at price to whites, but not to blacks (or Catholics but not protestants, etc), they can get in trouble that way.
And if you *call* the store, and ask "Do you have a Black-n-Decker Stove-top drill with automatic surprise reverse
Re:Somethings not right... (Score:3, Insightful)
This isn't news... (Score:2)
I bought the movie The Insider on DVD from Amazon when it was first released for $0.99 because of a pricing error.
Sometimes they will honor the pricing error on small ticket items. Usually, however, they will just send you an email announcing that they are unable to fill your order because of a pricing error and that your order is cancelled.
You're not getting it (Score:5, Informative)
Re:You're not getting it (Score:3)
Exactly. This is not the same as the time they bill you. The price quoted on the web site is an invitation to treat (invitation to enter into a contract); the actual contract is formed when you get the confirmation message.
So if there are some lucky people who ordered the item and got a confirmatio
Re:You're not getting it (Score:2, Informative)
They had $800 printers for $8, I ordered 100 or so. Turned out they caught the mistake and canceled the transactions, but not before they gave everyone who ordered one $50 certificates.
Even in the case that you don't get what they made a mistake on, you can still get something out of it, so its always worth trying. I'd love to have had a few nice printers and a boatload of money form the EBay sale of the rest, but I'll gladly accecpt the $50 of hush money.
Never! (Score:5, Interesting)
The Register [theregister.co.uk].
ZdNet [zdnet.co.uk].
People who I know must have orders 250+ between them. There is no way they would honour this - and every person who ordered realised it was a mistake, so they have nothing to whine about.
Seen this before (Score:3, Informative)
It circulated pretty fast. I ordered 6 of them.
I did find their policy posted, tho - which stated that the could at any time increase the price of an ordered item and then notify you for your approval.. Or, if the price posted was too high and you ordered, they'd drop the price - and this wouldn't take your approval to push it through.
Needless to say, about 3 days later a bunch of us got emails stating that there was an error, and if we'd like to order them at $999, then we could re-confirm our order.. Hah
Amazon's Policy - Tough luck (Score:2)
* If an item's correct price is lower than our stated price, we charge the lower amount and ship y
Early Buyers (Score:5, Interesting)
There was a similar case a few years back with Kodak where the mispriced a camera and finally ended up honouring the deal. Details on the inquirer [theinquirer.net].
Could be a hacker... (Score:2)
buy.com class action suit re hitachi monitors (Score:2)
Low prices - BRILLIANT IDEA! (Score:2)
Patent claim: A method of increasing sales comprising the distribution of items to a plurarity of customers, in exchange for financial reward (the "sale price"), wherein the sale price is of lesser quantity than the sale price offered by competing merchants.
Is this news? (Score:2)
Parady (Score:2)
Rus
This just in.. (Score:3, Informative)
Unfortuantly, no web link yet, and the radio was somewhat lacking on detail, but they implied that no-one was going to get one at that price.
This wouldn't be the first time that a retailer has renaged on an online deal, offereed in error. A couple of years ago (Sept 1999), Argos offered a £300 TV for £3. They refused to honour it, and I'm not aware of any legal rammifications for Argos.
So, looks like this will be just another one of those curiosity stories.
IRAQs? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:IRAQs? (Score:2)
Too bad this aint Quebec (Score:3, Insightful)
In Quebec, we have a policy on displayed price. It's rather easy.
If the misspriced item is of a 10$ or less value, the dealer MUST give you the item at no charge.
If the misspriced item is of a 10$ or more value, he MUST give you a 10$ rebate on the price of the article.
There is no question of selling it to you or not. They fucked up, they own up. And it has worked surprisingly well to date, with misspricing going down radically, or misspriced item being corrected after one or two articles sold.
For those who dig Molière's language, here's a link [gouv.qc.ca] to the law.
Price blunders on the Internet (Score:2)
Already anounced they won't honor the sales (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Someone Goofed (Score:2, Interesting)
I hate when the programmer gets blamed because the client doesn't know how to use the system, or they make an entry mistake.
"Why didn't the system tell me the price was wrong?"
Re:Someone Goofed (Score:2)
A mistake such as this could happen anywhere along the line.
Re:Someone Goofed (Score:2)
You mean data entry clerk.
Re:Honor (Score:3, Informative)
SO - why should they honor any mistake like this again?
Re:Honor (Score:2, Funny)
>been found in some US case? If anything that's
>likely to encourage a court towards the opposite
>opinion; we've seen your legal system.
And anyway, they would have to honour the price, not honor it.
Re:Honor (Score:5, Informative)
The legislation is designed to protect both the purchaser and the vendor. If you went into a store and saw a widescreen 32in. TV priced at £900 instead of £1,000, then the store would be bound into selling it to you at that price or not at all. They couldn't turn around and say, "sorry, the price is £100 more, pay the full £1,000 if you wan't it", but they could refuse to sell it to you.
In most cases, where the difference is still within their profit margin and practical, stores tend to honour the lower price. However, where there's been an honest mistake, such as that £1,000 TV being mispriced at £100, they almost invariably take the option of refusing to sell the item.
The courts (where civil action has been taken) have taken a "common sense" approach. Getting a £1,000 TV for only £900 is a reasonable expectation (in a sale, promotion, etc) but getting it for £100 is highly unreasonable. Basically, where the pricing might be deceiving they tend to favour the purchaser and where the pricing is obviously a genuine mistake they tend to favour the vendor.
Generally, it's a very good system. However, I do remember reading about an old lady somewhere in the US (Texas perhaps?) who went into her local car dealership with a bunch of oversized bananas and bought a brand new car with them. The dealership had advertised their new models on radio as being available for "only xx big bananas", ("big bananas" being local slang for $1,000), and having to honour the sale after a court decision found in favour of the old woman.
Re:Honor (Score:2, Interesting)
But that's before the sale is agreed. My commitment to make payment via credit card should be
Re:Honor (Score:2)
I reckon every successful purchaser (like me) should get together and start a website.
Why? You *surely* knew it was a mistake on their behalf. You weren't "tricked" in anyway.
Re:Honor (Score:2)
Re:Honor (Score:5, Funny)
*sigh*
Bananas urban legend (Score:2, Informative)
Might be true about buying a stereo, but probably not about buying a new car.
Why? I doubt you'd do the same (Score:5, Insightful)
Would you sell it for $1200? Doubtful. I love hypocrites who say a business should do what they wouldn't do themselves.
What if it were a company you owned stock in and you were going to lose part of your dividend? Bet you'd change your mind then too.
A company has no reason to "honor" mistakes, that's why they print those little disclaimers about erronious listings.
Re:Why? I doubt you'd do the same (Score:3, Interesting)
Would you sell it for $1200? Doubtful. I love hypocrites who say a business should do what they wouldn't do themselves.
An ad in a newspaper is just an invitation to treat, you could still change your mind and never agree to sell the car to anyone.
A web site is intially the same, but once someone clicks to buy though there must be at least an offer, a message on screen saying that the order has been placed
Re:Why? I doubt you'd do the same (Score:3, Interesting)
When I walk up to the counter at wallmart to buy an item I pay for it, they hand it to me, and I take it home. It's mine now. The price can not be contested. I take it out of the store and take it home.
Any questions
Re:Why? I doubt you'd do the same (Score:2)
No, but if this were a frequent occurrence, I'd probably get rid of this stock.
Fairness in advertising (Score:2)
If you advertise something for sale at a given price, you must sell it at that price until you can change the erroneous add, sticker, sign, web page, what have you. Typos are no exception, it's your sign, you are responsible for what it says. The only exception is where a third party (eg: a newspaper) mistakely quotes a wrong price.
In this case, Amazon mistakenly listed iPods at a ridiculously low price - on their website. It's their mistake, their responsibility, and so they
Re:Fairness in advertising (Score:2)
That had iPods as well? LINK ME!
j/k.
Re:Why? I doubt you'd do the same (Score:2)
Yes, but here in Canada a big department company took advantage of this. Through out a period of weeks, they were accused to purposely lowering the price on their goods to attract customers who were told at time of purchase, 'flier had a mistake'. Then later on they will bring out 'correction' notices.
I don't know if the accusation lead to charges or a lawsuit being laid, but it is a some
Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Truth in Advertising vs. Truth in Reporting? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Exactly (Score:2)
Re:Why even read the Register anymore... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Why even read the Register anymore... (Score:3, Informative)
Why even read the Register anymore...
amen, the fact that articles are posted multiple times is icing on the cake ! u just gotta love
Re:This might be worth mentioning if ... (Score:2)
Just wait. They soon will be.
Re:The same people that don't "get" this... (Score:2)
Never forget the shop keepers perfectly legal right to tell you to "F*** Off".
This has nothing to do with legal tender, but with the distinction between 'invitation to treat' and 'offer'
Re:The same people that don't "get" this... (Score:2)
They overlook the shopkeepers right to refuse sale.
Re:The same people that don't "get" this... (Score:2)
Re:The same people that don't "get" this... (Score:2)
I know that 500 * 1p pieces has nothing to do with leagal tender.
What i'm saying is that there are huge number of people who _don't_ - and they're normally the same people that think a shop keeper _has_ to sell something that has been priced incorrectly.
Re:The same people that don't "get" this... (Score:2)
There is a popular belief in the UK, promoted by bloke-down-the-pub legal experts, in 'legal tender', being a certain upper limit to the amount of small change a shopkeeper is obliged to accept for a purchase.
Your use of the term 'legal tender' and example of somebody paying a shopkeeper with 500 1p pieces suggested that you shared this misconception. I now stand corrected.
Re:The same people that don't "get" this... (Score:2)
If anyone is interested in the horses' mouths, here are a few references:
This statute means that you have made a valid and legal offer of payment of your debt when you tender United States currency to your creditor. However, there is no Federal statute which mandates that private busine
Re:Why post this? (Score:2)